Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K5143025:Design"
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
===Design Notes=== | ===Design Notes=== | ||
− | We worked on the yeast S. cerevisiae that does recombination with small homologous sequences. So, in our case, we modified some sequences in alphafactor and in CBD sequence to avoid recombination between these parts. | + | We worked on the yeast <i> S. cerevisiae </i> that does recombination with small homologous sequences. So, in our case, we modified some sequences in alphafactor and in CBD sequence to avoid recombination between these parts. |
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
===References=== | ===References=== | ||
+ | (1) Ye L, Liu X, Li K, Li X, Zhu J, Yang S, Xu L, Yang M, Yan Y, Yan J. A bioinspired synthetic fused protein adhesive from barnacle cement and spider dragline for potential biomedical materials. Int J Biol Macromol. 2023 Dec 31;253(Pt 5):127125. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.127125. Epub 2023 Sep 28. PMID: 37776922. <br> | ||
+ | (2) Gilbert, C. et al. Living materials with programmable functionalities grown from engineered microbial co-cultures. Nat Mater 20, 691–700 (2021). A Yeast Modular Cloning (MoClo) Toolkit Expansion for Optimization of Heterologous Protein Secretion and Surface Display in Saccharomyces cerevisiae | ACS Synthetic Biology. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acssynbio.3c00743. <br> | ||
+ | (3) Liljeruhm, J. et al. Engineering a palette of eukaryotic chromoproteins for bacterial synthetic biology. Journal of Biological Engineering 12, 8 (2018) <br> | ||
+ | (4) Liu, Z. et al. Systematic comparison of 2A peptides for cloning multi-genes in a polycistronic vector. Sci Rep 7, 2193 (2017). Mukherjee, M. & Wang, Z. Q. A well-characterized polycistronic-like gene expression system in yeast. Biotechnology and Bioengineering 120, 260–271 (2023). Müntjes, K. et al. Establishing Polycistronic Expression in the Model Microorganism Ustilago maydis. Front Microbiol 11, 1384 (2020). |
Latest revision as of 17:38, 21 September 2024
Plasmid D
- 10INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[10]Illegal suffix found in sequence at 3567
Illegal EcoRI site found at 1361
Illegal EcoRI site found at 7006
Illegal EcoRI site found at 7533
Illegal PstI site found at 2789
Illegal PstI site found at 3092
Illegal PstI site found at 3185
Illegal PstI site found at 3191 - 12INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[12]Illegal EcoRI site found at 1361
Illegal EcoRI site found at 7006
Illegal EcoRI site found at 7533
Illegal SpeI site found at 3568
Illegal PstI site found at 2789
Illegal PstI site found at 3092
Illegal PstI site found at 3185
Illegal PstI site found at 3191
Illegal PstI site found at 3582
Illegal NotI site found at 3575
Illegal NotI site found at 7539 - 21INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[21]Illegal EcoRI site found at 1361
Illegal EcoRI site found at 7006
Illegal EcoRI site found at 7533
Illegal BamHI site found at 1906
Illegal BamHI site found at 2620
Illegal XhoI site found at 5171
Illegal XhoI site found at 7012 - 23INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[23]Illegal suffix found in sequence at 3568
Illegal EcoRI site found at 1361
Illegal EcoRI site found at 7006
Illegal EcoRI site found at 7533
Illegal PstI site found at 2789
Illegal PstI site found at 3092
Illegal PstI site found at 3185
Illegal PstI site found at 3191 - 25INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[25]Illegal prefix found in sequence at 7533
Illegal EcoRI site found at 1361
Illegal EcoRI site found at 7006
Illegal SpeI site found at 3568
Illegal PstI site found at 2789
Illegal PstI site found at 3092
Illegal PstI site found at 3185
Illegal PstI site found at 3191
Illegal PstI site found at 3582
Illegal NgoMIV site found at 1876
Illegal AgeI site found at 1915 - 1000INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[1000]Illegal SapI.rc site found at 4280
Design Notes
We worked on the yeast S. cerevisiae that does recombination with small homologous sequences. So, in our case, we modified some sequences in alphafactor and in CBD sequence to avoid recombination between these parts.
Source
The Cp19k is a barnacle gene, MaSp1 is a spider gene, while fwYellow is synthetic.
References
(1) Ye L, Liu X, Li K, Li X, Zhu J, Yang S, Xu L, Yang M, Yan Y, Yan J. A bioinspired synthetic fused protein adhesive from barnacle cement and spider dragline for potential biomedical materials. Int J Biol Macromol. 2023 Dec 31;253(Pt 5):127125. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.127125. Epub 2023 Sep 28. PMID: 37776922.
(2) Gilbert, C. et al. Living materials with programmable functionalities grown from engineered microbial co-cultures. Nat Mater 20, 691–700 (2021). A Yeast Modular Cloning (MoClo) Toolkit Expansion for Optimization of Heterologous Protein Secretion and Surface Display in Saccharomyces cerevisiae | ACS Synthetic Biology. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acssynbio.3c00743.
(3) Liljeruhm, J. et al. Engineering a palette of eukaryotic chromoproteins for bacterial synthetic biology. Journal of Biological Engineering 12, 8 (2018)
(4) Liu, Z. et al. Systematic comparison of 2A peptides for cloning multi-genes in a polycistronic vector. Sci Rep 7, 2193 (2017). Mukherjee, M. & Wang, Z. Q. A well-characterized polycistronic-like gene expression system in yeast. Biotechnology and Bioengineering 120, 260–271 (2023). Müntjes, K. et al. Establishing Polycistronic Expression in the Model Microorganism Ustilago maydis. Front Microbiol 11, 1384 (2020).