Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K5133004"

 
(13 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 58: Line 58:
  
  
<center><b>Figure 2. Detailed constitute of this composite part, including four basic parts: T7 promoter (<bbpart>BBa_K5133000</bbpart>), RBS (<bbpart>BBa_K5133001</bbpart>), sfGFP (<bbpart>BBa_K5133002</bbpart>), and T7 terminator (<bbpart>BBa_K5133003</bbpart>).</b></center>
+
<center><b>Figure 2. Detailed assembly pattern of this composite part, including four basic parts: T7 promoter (<bbpart>BBa_K5133000</bbpart>), RBS (<bbpart>BBa_K5133001</bbpart>), sfGFP (<bbpart>BBa_K5133002</bbpart>), and T7 terminator (<bbpart>BBa_K5133003</bbpart>).</b></center>
  
  
Line 94: Line 94:
 
<font size=4><b>Step 1: molecular cloning</b></font>
 
<font size=4><b>Step 1: molecular cloning</b></font>
  
To construct this part, we first need to aquire the linearized DNA fragments of both vector and inserted fragments. Thus, we amplified vector pSB1C3 and inseted fragment (from plasmid pJL1) using PCR. Results of agarose gel electrophoresis showing the desired DNA bands (<b>Figure 4</b>) as pSB1C3 (2070 bp) and inserted fragment (988 bp).
+
To construct this part, we first need to acquire the linearized DNA fragments of both vector and inserted fragments. Thus, we amplified vector pSB1C3 and inserted fragments by using PCR. Results of agarose gel electrophoresis showing the desired DNA bands (<b>Figure 4</b>) as pSB1C3 (2070 bp) and inserted fragment (988 bp) used in this construction.
  
  
Line 117: Line 117:
  
  
<center><b>Figure 4. Agarose gel electrophoresis analysis of PCR products. The bands indicate one vector pSB1C3 and three inserted frangents. The first inserted fragment band of BBa_K5133004 (988 bp) is used for the construction of this composite part, while the other two inserted fragment bands are used for <bbpart>BBa_K5133006</bbpart> and <bbpart>BBa_K5133008</bbpart>, respectively</b></center>
+
<center><b>Figure 4. Agarose gel electrophoresis analysis of PCR products for molecular cloning. The DNA bands indicate one vector pSB1C3 and three inserted fragments. The first inserted fragment of BBa_K5133004 (988 bp) is used for the construction of this composite part, while the other two inserted fragments are used for <bbpart>BBa_K5133006</bbpart> and <bbpart>BBa_K5133008</bbpart>, respectively.</b></center>
  
  
  
  
 +
When we got the purified DNA products, then we assembled these fragments by using Gibson Assembly strategy<sup>[3]</sup>. Next, we transformed the reaction to competent <i>E. coli</i> Mach1-T1 cells and spread the transformants onto LB-agar plates containing 34 µg/mL chloramphenicol. As shown in <b>Figure 5</b>, the <i>E. coli</i> transformants could normally grow on LB-agar plates and be used for the following experiments.
  
  
==<b>Usages</b>==
+
<center>
 +
<html lang="en">
 +
<head>
 +
    <meta charset="UTF-8">
 +
    <meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1.0">
 +
    <title>Resizable Image</title>
 +
    <style>
 +
        .resizable-img5 {
 +
            max-width: 50%;
 +
            height: auto;
 +
        }
 +
    </style>
 +
</head>
 +
<body>
 +
    <img src="https://static.igem.wiki/teams/5133/bba-k5133004-44.jpg"  class="resizable-img5">
 +
</body>
 +
</html>
 +
</center>
  
This part is used for the construction of composite part <bbpart>BBa_K5133004</bbpart> (sfGFP generator) to demonstrate the feasibility of CFPS in our project. <font color="blue"><font size=4><b>Please see the detailed experimental results in <bbpart>BBa_K5133004</bbpart>.</b></font></font>
+
 
 +
<center><b>Figure 5. <i>E. coli</i> Mach1-T1 transformants on LB-agar plates, showing the expected phenotype refer to the construction of this part.</b></center>
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
<font size=4><b>Step 2: colony PCR</b></font>
 +
 
 +
To verify the constructions, we next performed colony PCR by using the reported protocol<sup>[4]</sup>. For each construction (not only this part, but also <bbpart>BBa_K5133006</bbpart> and <bbpart>BBa_K5133008</bbpart>), we selected four independent colonies from LB-agar plates and used primer pair VF2/VR to amplify the inserted DNA sequences. After that, we analyzed the DNA products by agarose gel electrophoresis. Results show that four PCR products match the desired DNA sizes of this construction (<b>Figure 6</b>).
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
<center>
 +
<html lang="en">
 +
<head>
 +
    <meta charset="UTF-8">
 +
    <meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1.0">
 +
    <title>Resizable Image</title>
 +
    <style>
 +
        .resizable-img6 {
 +
            max-width: 70%;
 +
            height: auto;
 +
        }
 +
    </style>
 +
</head>
 +
<body>
 +
    <img src="https://static.igem.wiki/teams/5133/bba-k5133004-5.jpg"  class="resizable-img6">
 +
</body>
 +
</html>
 +
</center>
 +
 
 +
 
 +
<center><b>Figure 6. Agarose gel electrophoresis analysis of PCR products for colony PCR. The four DNA products of this construction (BBa_K5133004) match the desired DNA size 1259 bp, annotated by green √.</b></center>
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
<font size=4><b>Step 3: sequencing</b></font>
 +
 
 +
Consequently, we picked the desired PCR products for sequencing. Results of Sanger sequencing show the successful construction of this part (<b>Figure 7</b>), which means that the plasmid could be used for the following experiments.
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
<center>
 +
<html lang="en">
 +
<head>
 +
    <meta charset="UTF-8">
 +
    <meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1.0">
 +
    <title>Resizable Image</title>
 +
    <style>
 +
        .resizable-img7 {
 +
            max-width: 90%;
 +
            height: auto;
 +
        }
 +
    </style>
 +
</head>
 +
<body>
 +
    <img src="https://static.igem.wiki/teams/5133/bba-k5133002-2.jpg"  class="resizable-img7">
 +
</body>
 +
</html>
 +
</center>
 +
 
 +
 
 +
<center><b>Figure 7. Validation of DNA sequence by Sanger sequencing, generated by SnapGene.</b></center>
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
<font size=4><b>Step 4: plasmid extract</b></font>
 +
 
 +
After we acquired the correct plasmids, we then tried to extract and purify the plasmids for the following CFPS reactions. By using the plasmid extract kit, we gained the purified plasmids and analyzed them by agarose gel electrophoresis. Results in <b>Figure 8</b> show that the extracted plasmids are clean, consisting of two conformations: linear and supercoiled<sup>[5]</sup>. To further evaluate the plasmid sizes, we digested the three plasmids by EcoRI (restriction enzyme). After digestion, the three plasmids show the expected linearized comformation and match the desired DNA sizes. These results indicate the successful construction and extraction of this composite part.
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
<center>
 +
<html lang="en">
 +
<head>
 +
    <meta charset="UTF-8">
 +
    <meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1.0">
 +
    <title>Resizable Image</title>
 +
    <style>
 +
        .resizable-img8 {
 +
            max-width: 70%;
 +
            height: auto;
 +
        }
 +
    </style>
 +
</head>
 +
<body>
 +
    <img src="https://static.igem.wiki/teams/5133/bba-k5133004-6.jpg"  class="resizable-img8">
 +
</body>
 +
</html>
 +
</center>
 +
 
 +
 
 +
<center><b>Figure 8. Agarose gel electrophoresis analysis of plasmid extracts for three plasmid constructions. The plasmids without EcoRI digestion show two conformations: linear (larger DNA sizes) and supercoiled (smaller DNA sizes), while after EcoRI digestion, the plasmids are linearized and show expected DNA sizes refer to DNA sequences. As for this part, the digested plasmid meet the desired DNA size 3015 bp.</b></center>
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
<font size=4><b>Step 5: CFPS reaction</b></font>
 +
 
 +
Once the plasmid was successfully constructed and extracted, we performed the CFPS reactions for demonstrating the feasibility of <i>in vitro</i> sfGFP expression (<b>Figure 9</b>).
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
<center>
 +
<html lang="en">
 +
<head>
 +
    <meta charset="UTF-8">
 +
    <meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1.0">
 +
    <title>Resizable Image</title>
 +
    <style>
 +
        .resizable-img9 {
 +
            max-width: 70%;
 +
            height: auto;
 +
        }
 +
    </style>
 +
</head>
 +
<body>
 +
    <img src="https://static.igem.wiki/teams/5133/bba-k5133004-1.jpg"  class="resizable-img9">
 +
</body>
 +
</html>
 +
</center>
 +
 
 +
 
 +
<center><b>Figure 9. Schematic diagram of <i>E. coli</i>-based CFPS reaction for sfGFP production.</b></center>
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
Before CFPS reaction, we initially established a standard curve for the conversion of "sfGFP (µg/mL)—Fluorescence (a.u.)" (<b>Figure 10</b>).
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
<center>
 +
<html lang="en">
 +
<head>
 +
    <meta charset="UTF-8">
 +
    <meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1.0">
 +
    <title>Resizable Image</title>
 +
    <style>
 +
        .resizable-img10 {
 +
            max-width: 60%;
 +
            height: auto;
 +
        }
 +
    </style>
 +
</head>
 +
<body>
 +
    <img src="https://static.igem.wiki/teams/5133/bba-k5133004-7.jpg"  class="resizable-img10">
 +
</body>
 +
</html>
 +
</center>
 +
 
 +
 
 +
<center><b>Figure 10. Standard curve of "sfGFP yield-Fluorescence" conversion for <i>in vitro</i> CFPS reactions.</b></center>
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
Subsequently, following the commonly used CFPS protocol<sup>[6]</sup>, we successfully produced sfGFP yielding 1051(±84) µg/mL, which achieved acceptable yield in this research area. Meanwhile, the green color of expressed sfGFP could be clearly observed under the bright field, also the green fluorescence could be detected and imaged by imager (<b>Figure 11</b>).
 +
 
 +
 
 +
<center>
 +
<html lang="en">
 +
<head>
 +
    <meta charset="UTF-8">
 +
    <meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1.0">
 +
    <title>Resizable Image</title>
 +
    <style>
 +
        .resizable-img11 {
 +
            max-width: 40%;
 +
            height: auto;
 +
        }
 +
    </style>
 +
</head>
 +
<body>
 +
    <img src="https://static.igem.wiki/teams/5133/bba-k5133004-8.jpg"  class="resizable-img11">
 +
</body>
 +
</html>
 +
</center>
 +
 
 +
 
 +
<center><b>Figure 11. Results of <i>E. coli</i>-based CFPS reaction for sfGFP production. The sfGFP expression could be easily visualized under the bright field, and the green fluorescence could be detected by imager. Furthermore, the yield exceeded 1000 µg/mL, which has reached the acceptable result of <i>E. coli</i>-based CFPS reactions in this research field. The plasmid (this construction) was added as 200 ng into 15 µL CFPS reactions, and the other experimental operations followed the reported protocol<sup>[6]</sup>.</b></center>
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
==<b>Conclusion</b>==
 +
 
 +
Taken together, this composite part was successfully constructed and characterized, demonstrating the feasibility of CFPS reaction for the <i>in vitro</i> production of proteins (e.g., sfGFP). Hence, this CFPS system was further utilized for the <i>in vitro</i> production of two antimicrobial peptides in our project, including Microcin H47 (<bbpart>BBa_K5133006</bbpart>) and Microcin M (<bbpart>BBa_K5133008</bbpart>).
  
  
 
==<b>DNA sequence (from 5' to 3')</b>==
 
==<b>DNA sequence (from 5' to 3')</b>==
  
 +
<font color="red">atcccgcgaaattaatacgactcactatagggagaccacaacggtttccctctagaaataattttgtttaacttt</font><font color="green">aagaaggagatatacat</font><font color="blue">
 
atgagcaaaggtgaagaactgtttaccggcgttgtgccgattctggtggaactggatggcgatgtgaacggtcacaaattcagcgtgcgtggtgaaggtgaaggcgatgccacgattggcaaactgacgctgaaattt
 
atgagcaaaggtgaagaactgtttaccggcgttgtgccgattctggtggaactggatggcgatgtgaacggtcacaaattcagcgtgcgtggtgaaggtgaaggcgatgccacgattggcaaactgacgctgaaattt
 
atctgcaccaccggcaaactgccggtgccgtggccgacgctggtgaccaccctgacctatggcgttcagtgttttagtcgctatccggatcacatgaaacgtcacgatttctttaaatctgcaatgccggaaggctat
 
atctgcaccaccggcaaactgccggtgccgtggccgacgctggtgaccaccctgacctatggcgttcagtgttttagtcgctatccggatcacatgaaacgtcacgatttctttaaatctgcaatgccggaaggctat
Line 136: Line 350:
 
cataaactggaatacaactttaatagccataatgtttatattacggcggataaacagaaaaatggcatcaaagcgaattttaccgttcgccataacgttgaagatggcagtgtgcagctggcagatcattatcagcag
 
cataaactggaatacaactttaatagccataatgtttatattacggcggataaacagaaaaatggcatcaaagcgaattttaccgttcgccataacgttgaagatggcagtgtgcagctggcagatcattatcagcag
 
aataccccgattggtgatggtccggtgctgctgccggataatcattatctgagcacgcagaccgttctgtctaaagatccgaacgaaaaaggcacgcgggaccacatggttctgcacgaatatgtgaatgcggcaggt
 
aataccccgattggtgatggtccggtgctgctgccggataatcattatctgagcacgcagaccgttctgtctaaagatccgaacgaaaaaggcacgcgggaccacatggttctgcacgaatatgtgaatgcggcaggt
attacg<font color="red">tggagccatccgcagttcgaaaaa</font>taa
+
attacgtggagccatccgcagttcgaaaaataa</font><font color="purple">gtcgaccggctgctaacaaagcccgaaaggaagctgagttggctgctgccaccgctgagcaataactagcataaccccttggggcctctaaacgggtctt
 +
gaggggttttttgctgaaagccaattctga</font>
  
<font color="red">Red font: Strep-Tag II, from pJL1<sup>[1]</sup></font>
+
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
<font color="red">Red font: T7 promoter (<bbpart>BBa_K5133000</bbpart>)</font>
 +
 
 +
<font color="green">Green font: RBS (<bbpart>BBa_K5133001</bbpart>)</font>
 +
 
 +
<font color="blue">Blue font: sfGFP (<bbpart>BBa_K5133002</bbpart>)</font>
 +
 
 +
<font color="purple">Purple font: T7 terminator (<bbpart>BBa_K5133003</bbpart>)</font>
  
  
Line 145: Line 369:
  
 
[1] https://www.addgene.org/69496/
 
[1] https://www.addgene.org/69496/
 
  
 
[2] Ba, F. et al. Expanding the toolbox of probiotic <i>Escherichia coli</i> Nissle 1917 for synthetic biology. <b>Biotechnology Journal</b> 19, 2300327 (2024). doi: 10.1002/biot.202300327
 
[2] Ba, F. et al. Expanding the toolbox of probiotic <i>Escherichia coli</i> Nissle 1917 for synthetic biology. <b>Biotechnology Journal</b> 19, 2300327 (2024). doi: 10.1002/biot.202300327
 +
 +
[3] Gibson, D.G. et al. Enzymatic assembly of DNA molecules up to several hundred kilobases. <b>Nature Methods</b> 6, 343-345 (2009). doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1318
 +
 +
[4] Ba, F. et al. Rainbow screening: Chromoproteins enable visualized molecular cloning. <b>Biotechnology Journal</b> 19, 2400114 (2024). doi: 10.1002/biot.202400114
 +
 +
[5] Lin, C.H. et al. Quantification bias caused by plasmid DNA conformation in quantitative real-time PCR assay. <b>PLoS One</b> 6, e29101 (2011). doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0029101
 +
 +
[6] Liu, W.Q. et al. Cell-free protein synthesis enables one-pot cascade biotransformation in an aqueous-organic biphasic system. <b>Biotechnology and Bioengineering</b> 117, 4001-4008 (2020). doi: 10.1002/bit.27541
  
  

Latest revision as of 14:57, 29 July 2024


sfGFP generator for CFPS (cell-free protein synthesis)

Group: GEC-China (iGEM 2024, team number: #5133)


Introduction

This composite part is derived from plasmid pJL1 (Addgene: #69496)[1], consisting of four basic parts: T7 promoter (BBa_K5133000), ribosome binding site (RBS, BBa_K5133001), coding sequence of superfolder green fluorescent protein (sfGFP, BBa_K5133002), and T7 terminator (BBa_K5133003)(Figures 1, 2). The plasmid pJL1 is commonly used for the in vitro sfGFP expression of cell-free protein synthesis (CFPS)[2], however, an iGEM-standarized CFPS construction has not yet been commonly reported and characterized yet. Hence, this part is established to demonstrate the feasibility of CFPS in our project.


Resizable Image


Figure 1. Schematic design of this part, generated by SnapGene.




Resizable Image


Figure 2. Detailed assembly pattern of this composite part, including four basic parts: T7 promoter (BBa_K5133000), RBS (BBa_K5133001), sfGFP (BBa_K5133002), and T7 terminator (BBa_K5133003).


Results

For the characterization process of this part, follow five steps showing in Figure 3: (1) molecular cloning; (2) colony PCR; (3) sequencing; (4) plasmid extraction; (5) CFPS reaction.


Resizable Image


Figure 3. Workflow for the construction and characterization of this part.



Step 1: molecular cloning

To construct this part, we first need to acquire the linearized DNA fragments of both vector and inserted fragments. Thus, we amplified vector pSB1C3 and inserted fragments by using PCR. Results of agarose gel electrophoresis showing the desired DNA bands (Figure 4) as pSB1C3 (2070 bp) and inserted fragment (988 bp) used in this construction.


Resizable Image


Figure 4. Agarose gel electrophoresis analysis of PCR products for molecular cloning. The DNA bands indicate one vector pSB1C3 and three inserted fragments. The first inserted fragment of BBa_K5133004 (988 bp) is used for the construction of this composite part, while the other two inserted fragments are used for BBa_K5133006 and BBa_K5133008, respectively.



When we got the purified DNA products, then we assembled these fragments by using Gibson Assembly strategy[3]. Next, we transformed the reaction to competent E. coli Mach1-T1 cells and spread the transformants onto LB-agar plates containing 34 µg/mL chloramphenicol. As shown in Figure 5, the E. coli transformants could normally grow on LB-agar plates and be used for the following experiments.


Resizable Image


Figure 5. E. coli Mach1-T1 transformants on LB-agar plates, showing the expected phenotype refer to the construction of this part.



Step 2: colony PCR

To verify the constructions, we next performed colony PCR by using the reported protocol[4]. For each construction (not only this part, but also BBa_K5133006 and BBa_K5133008), we selected four independent colonies from LB-agar plates and used primer pair VF2/VR to amplify the inserted DNA sequences. After that, we analyzed the DNA products by agarose gel electrophoresis. Results show that four PCR products match the desired DNA sizes of this construction (Figure 6).



Resizable Image


Figure 6. Agarose gel electrophoresis analysis of PCR products for colony PCR. The four DNA products of this construction (BBa_K5133004) match the desired DNA size 1259 bp, annotated by green √.



Step 3: sequencing

Consequently, we picked the desired PCR products for sequencing. Results of Sanger sequencing show the successful construction of this part (Figure 7), which means that the plasmid could be used for the following experiments.


Resizable Image


Figure 7. Validation of DNA sequence by Sanger sequencing, generated by SnapGene.



Step 4: plasmid extract

After we acquired the correct plasmids, we then tried to extract and purify the plasmids for the following CFPS reactions. By using the plasmid extract kit, we gained the purified plasmids and analyzed them by agarose gel electrophoresis. Results in Figure 8 show that the extracted plasmids are clean, consisting of two conformations: linear and supercoiled[5]. To further evaluate the plasmid sizes, we digested the three plasmids by EcoRI (restriction enzyme). After digestion, the three plasmids show the expected linearized comformation and match the desired DNA sizes. These results indicate the successful construction and extraction of this composite part.


Resizable Image


Figure 8. Agarose gel electrophoresis analysis of plasmid extracts for three plasmid constructions. The plasmids without EcoRI digestion show two conformations: linear (larger DNA sizes) and supercoiled (smaller DNA sizes), while after EcoRI digestion, the plasmids are linearized and show expected DNA sizes refer to DNA sequences. As for this part, the digested plasmid meet the desired DNA size 3015 bp.



Step 5: CFPS reaction

Once the plasmid was successfully constructed and extracted, we performed the CFPS reactions for demonstrating the feasibility of in vitro sfGFP expression (Figure 9).



Resizable Image


Figure 9. Schematic diagram of E. coli-based CFPS reaction for sfGFP production.



Before CFPS reaction, we initially established a standard curve for the conversion of "sfGFP (µg/mL)—Fluorescence (a.u.)" (Figure 10).


Resizable Image


Figure 10. Standard curve of "sfGFP yield-Fluorescence" conversion for in vitro CFPS reactions.



Subsequently, following the commonly used CFPS protocol[6], we successfully produced sfGFP yielding 1051(±84) µg/mL, which achieved acceptable yield in this research area. Meanwhile, the green color of expressed sfGFP could be clearly observed under the bright field, also the green fluorescence could be detected and imaged by imager (Figure 11).


Resizable Image


Figure 11. Results of E. coli-based CFPS reaction for sfGFP production. The sfGFP expression could be easily visualized under the bright field, and the green fluorescence could be detected by imager. Furthermore, the yield exceeded 1000 µg/mL, which has reached the acceptable result of E. coli-based CFPS reactions in this research field. The plasmid (this construction) was added as 200 ng into 15 µL CFPS reactions, and the other experimental operations followed the reported protocol[6].



Conclusion

Taken together, this composite part was successfully constructed and characterized, demonstrating the feasibility of CFPS reaction for the in vitro production of proteins (e.g., sfGFP). Hence, this CFPS system was further utilized for the in vitro production of two antimicrobial peptides in our project, including Microcin H47 (BBa_K5133006) and Microcin M (BBa_K5133008).


DNA sequence (from 5' to 3')

atcccgcgaaattaatacgactcactatagggagaccacaacggtttccctctagaaataattttgtttaactttaagaaggagatatacat atgagcaaaggtgaagaactgtttaccggcgttgtgccgattctggtggaactggatggcgatgtgaacggtcacaaattcagcgtgcgtggtgaaggtgaaggcgatgccacgattggcaaactgacgctgaaattt atctgcaccaccggcaaactgccggtgccgtggccgacgctggtgaccaccctgacctatggcgttcagtgttttagtcgctatccggatcacatgaaacgtcacgatttctttaaatctgcaatgccggaaggctat gtgcaggaacgtacgattagctttaaagatgatggcaaatataaaacgcgcgccgttgtgaaatttgaaggcgataccctggtgaaccgcattgaactgaaaggcacggattttaaagaagatggcaatatcctgggc cataaactggaatacaactttaatagccataatgtttatattacggcggataaacagaaaaatggcatcaaagcgaattttaccgttcgccataacgttgaagatggcagtgtgcagctggcagatcattatcagcag aataccccgattggtgatggtccggtgctgctgccggataatcattatctgagcacgcagaccgttctgtctaaagatccgaacgaaaaaggcacgcgggaccacatggttctgcacgaatatgtgaatgcggcaggt attacgtggagccatccgcagttcgaaaaataagtcgaccggctgctaacaaagcccgaaaggaagctgagttggctgctgccaccgctgagcaataactagcataaccccttggggcctctaaacgggtctt gaggggttttttgctgaaagccaattctga



Red font: T7 promoter (BBa_K5133000)

Green font: RBS (BBa_K5133001)

Blue font: sfGFP (BBa_K5133002)

Purple font: T7 terminator (BBa_K5133003)


References

[1] https://www.addgene.org/69496/

[2] Ba, F. et al. Expanding the toolbox of probiotic Escherichia coli Nissle 1917 for synthetic biology. Biotechnology Journal 19, 2300327 (2024). doi: 10.1002/biot.202300327

[3] Gibson, D.G. et al. Enzymatic assembly of DNA molecules up to several hundred kilobases. Nature Methods 6, 343-345 (2009). doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1318

[4] Ba, F. et al. Rainbow screening: Chromoproteins enable visualized molecular cloning. Biotechnology Journal 19, 2400114 (2024). doi: 10.1002/biot.202400114

[5] Lin, C.H. et al. Quantification bias caused by plasmid DNA conformation in quantitative real-time PCR assay. PLoS One 6, e29101 (2011). doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0029101

[6] Liu, W.Q. et al. Cell-free protein synthesis enables one-pot cascade biotransformation in an aqueous-organic biphasic system. Biotechnology and Bioengineering 117, 4001-4008 (2020). doi: 10.1002/bit.27541



Sequence and Features


Assembly Compatibility:
  • 10
    INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[10]
    Illegal XbaI site found at 51
  • 12
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[12]
  • 21
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[21]
  • 23
    INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[23]
    Illegal XbaI site found at 51
  • 25
    INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[25]
    Illegal XbaI site found at 51
  • 1000
    INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[1000]
    Illegal BsaI.rc site found at 32