Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K4593007"
(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
We employed a computational approach using the trained BERT language model in a dry lab setting. Through this screening of large amount of aptamer mutants, we discovered this aptamer as effective. We added biotin at the 3’ end to test the affinity of the aptamer | We employed a computational approach using the trained BERT language model in a dry lab setting. Through this screening of large amount of aptamer mutants, we discovered this aptamer as effective. We added biotin at the 3’ end to test the affinity of the aptamer | ||
− | + | <html> | |
− | + | <figure> | |
− | Figure 1. | + | <p style="text-align:center;"><img src="https://static.igem.wiki/teams/4593/wiki/pcr/design-ap-1.jpg" width="700" height="auto"/> |
+ | </figcaption> | ||
+ | </figure> | ||
+ | </html> | ||
+ | Figure 1. Secondary structure prediction of the aptamers using mfold program | ||
+ | (a) PA#2/8-a, (b) PA#2/8-b, (c) PA#2/8-c | ||
====Examining the binding affinity of PA#2/8-B to Protein A==== | ====Examining the binding affinity of PA#2/8-B to Protein A==== | ||
Line 27: | Line 32: | ||
We utilized ELONA to verify the binding affinity of PA#2/8 and its truncates to protein A. Table 1 lists the experimental and control groups. The aptamer-only groups were used to exclude background luminescence. The full-length aptamer was used for comparison with the three truncates to determine the optimal aptamer with the highest binding affinity. | We utilized ELONA to verify the binding affinity of PA#2/8 and its truncates to protein A. Table 1 lists the experimental and control groups. The aptamer-only groups were used to exclude background luminescence. The full-length aptamer was used for comparison with the three truncates to determine the optimal aptamer with the highest binding affinity. | ||
− | Table 1. The experimental and control groups' setting | + | Table 1. The experimental and control groups' setting |
− | + | <html> | |
− | + | <figure> | |
− | + | <p style="text-align:center;"><img src="https://static.igem.wiki/teams/4593/wiki/result/table-1.png" width="400" height="auto"/> | |
− | + | </figcaption> | |
− | + | </figure> | |
− | + | </html> | |
− | + | ||
+ | The binding affinity of each truncate was calculated by subtracting the absorbance in reaction to the absorbance in the background (Table 1). The binding affinity of each truncate was then compared in Figure 2. The relatively binding affinity of PA#2/8-B to protein A is 370.67(Figure 2.) | ||
− | Figure 2. The comparison of binding affinity between four aptamers | + | <html> |
+ | <figure> | ||
+ | <p style="text-align:center;"><img src="https://static.igem.wiki/teams/4593/wiki/result/figure-25.jpeg" width="400" height="auto"/> | ||
+ | </figcaption> | ||
+ | </figure> | ||
+ | </html> | ||
+ | Figure 2. The comparison of binding affinity between four aptamers | ||
Latest revision as of 12:02, 12 October 2023
PA#2/8-B
This part is the DNA sequence of PA#2/8-B
ATACCAGCTTATTCGGGGTGGGTTCTCTCGGCT
Usage and Biology
The aptamer is a kind of single-strand DNA that can form the secondary structure and bind with a specific protein. In our project, the Aptamer PA#2/8 is selected to target S. aureus due to its high affinity and specificity with native and recombinant Protein A. This aptamer will be used in vitro to detect the presence of S.aureus.
Team: BNDS-China 2023
Our project aims to create a suite of effective methods for both detecting and lysing S. aureus in vivo. Also, after detecting and eliminating S.aureus in our intestine, we should confirm that we successfully killed the S.aureus, so we used this specific and high-affinity single-strand DNA aptamer targeting the transport protein Protein a specific to S.aureus. This aptamer will be used in vitro to detect the presence of S.aureus.
Design of PA#2/8-B
We employed a computational approach using the trained BERT language model in a dry lab setting. Through this screening of large amount of aptamer mutants, we discovered this aptamer as effective. We added biotin at the 3’ end to test the affinity of the aptamer
Figure 1. Secondary structure prediction of the aptamers using mfold program (a) PA#2/8-a, (b) PA#2/8-b, (c) PA#2/8-c
Examining the binding affinity of PA#2/8-B to Protein A
We utilized ELONA to verify the binding affinity of PA#2/8 and its truncates to protein A. Table 1 lists the experimental and control groups. The aptamer-only groups were used to exclude background luminescence. The full-length aptamer was used for comparison with the three truncates to determine the optimal aptamer with the highest binding affinity.
Table 1. The experimental and control groups' setting
The binding affinity of each truncate was calculated by subtracting the absorbance in reaction to the absorbance in the background (Table 1). The binding affinity of each truncate was then compared in Figure 2. The relatively binding affinity of PA#2/8-B to protein A is 370.67(Figure 2.)
Figure 2. The comparison of binding affinity between four aptamers
Sequence and Features
- 10COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[10]
- 12COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[12]
- 21COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[21]
- 23COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[23]
- 25COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[25]
- 1000COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[1000]