Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K3815015"
AlexanderLiu (Talk | contribs) |
|||
(8 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
− | + | ==Result== | |
For a flexible control of protein half-life, we aimed to obtain a collection of mutant tags with various degradation efficiencies. | For a flexible control of protein half-life, we aimed to obtain a collection of mutant tags with various degradation efficiencies. | ||
− | [[File:SsrA_002_experiment.png|400px|thumb|center|mutagenesis strategy]] | + | <br> |
− | + | <br> | |
− | + | [[File:SsrA_002_experiment.png|400px|thumb|center|Fig.1 mutagenesis strategy]] | |
+ | <br> | ||
We fused the ssrA tag sequence to GFP while introducing mutations in the tag by random-base primers, and cloned the mutant library of ssrA-tagged GFP into a plasmid vector, so that mutant tags of different activity can be identified by comparing GFP intensity of <i>E.coli</i> transformants. | We fused the ssrA tag sequence to GFP while introducing mutations in the tag by random-base primers, and cloned the mutant library of ssrA-tagged GFP into a plasmid vector, so that mutant tags of different activity can be identified by comparing GFP intensity of <i>E.coli</i> transformants. | ||
− | + | <br> | |
− | + | <br> | |
− | + | The wildtype ssrA tag amino acid sequence is AANDENYALAA. It was reported that the three amino acids at the C terminus of the tag (LAA in wildtype) have a great impact on the degradation rate of tagged protein [1]. Therefore, we chose these three amino acids as the targets for mutagenesis. | |
+ | <br> | ||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | [[File:SsrA_sequence.png|400px|thumb|center|Fig.2 primer and amino acid sequences for mutagenesis]] | ||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | As a result of a transformation, colonies of various fluorescence intensities were obtained on the LB plates. 72 colonies in total were picked from plates and cultured overnight in LB media. The images of <i>E.coli</i> cultures were taken under the blue light. | ||
+ | [[File:SsrA_96-well plate.png|400px|thumb|center|Fig.3 <i>E.coli</i> cultures of various GFP intensity. A10: LB media only, B10: <i>E.coli</i> culture not expressing GFP, B7: <i>E.coli</i> culture expressing non ssrA-tagged GFP, C7: <i>E.coli</i> culture expressing WT ssrA-tagged GFP | ||
]] | ]] | ||
− | + | <br> | |
− | + | Plasmids were extracted from each bacterial culture by miniprep, and then Sanger-sequenced to identify ssrA tag sequence. Furthermore, to quantify protein degradation efficiency of each mutant, GFP Fluorescence of each bacterial overnight culture was imaged on Typhoon 9410 (GE healthcare). | |
− | <br> | + | <br> |
− | + | <br> | |
− | + | [[File:SsrA_Typhoon_image.png|600px|thumb|center|Fig.4 Left: GFP fluorescence image of each bacterial overnight culture. | |
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | [[File:SsrA_Typhoon_image.png|600px|thumb|center|Fig. | + | |
Right: sequenced three C-terminal amino acids of each culture]] | Right: sequenced three C-terminal amino acids of each culture]] | ||
− | + | <br> | |
− | + | ||
The mutant ssrA tag sequence of each clone was sequenced, and biological triplicate of each bacterial overnight culture was imaged for GFP fluorescence, including controls (LB media only, bacterial culture not expressing GFP (no GFP), and bacterial culture expressing non ssrA-tagged GFP (no ssrA tag)). | The mutant ssrA tag sequence of each clone was sequenced, and biological triplicate of each bacterial overnight culture was imaged for GFP fluorescence, including controls (LB media only, bacterial culture not expressing GFP (no GFP), and bacterial culture expressing non ssrA-tagged GFP (no ssrA tag)). | ||
− | + | <br> | |
− | + | <br> | |
− | [[File:SsrA_Relative_GFP_intensity.png| | + | [[File:SsrA_Relative_GFP_intensity.png|600px|thumb|center|Fig.5 The fluorescence of each culture was quantified by ImageJ as an inverted mean gray value. The measured value of each culture was then normalized to the level of the culture expressing non ssrA-tagged GFP (no ssrA tag), and presented as mean ± SD from three biological replicates. WT (LAA) and two mutants reported in previous research are shown in red boxes.]] |
+ | <br> | ||
+ | <h3>Conclusion</h3> | ||
+ | We mutagenized the ssrA tag by PCR with mixed primers, and successfully obtained a mutant collection of engineered ssrA tag derivatives which show various protein degradation efficiencies. | ||
− | + | ==Part collection of mutant ssrA tags== | |
In our mutagenesis experiments, we identified 17 mutant tags which show various protein degradation efficiencies (refer to Result). The other mutant tags are listed below. | In our mutagenesis experiments, we identified 17 mutant tags which show various protein degradation efficiencies (refer to Result). The other mutant tags are listed below. | ||
Line 130: | Line 133: | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
− | + | ==Improvement from an Existing Part== | |
− | This is a part improved from ''<partinfo>BBa_K1051206</Partinfo>''. In this part, three C-terminal amino acids LAA are replaced with LGA, resulting in a reduced protein degradation efficiency. Therefore, this part | + | This is a part improved from ''<partinfo>BBa_K1051206</Partinfo>''. In this part, three C-terminal amino acids LAA are replaced with LGA, resulting in a reduced protein degradation efficiency. Therefore, this part shows an increased half-life of fused proteins compared to WT. This part, together with the other mutants described in the part collection above, consists of a large repertoire of protein degradation tags of various efficiencies (refer to Result), which can be applied for fine-tuning of many kinds of synthetic systems that require precise control of proteins. |
<br> | <br> | ||
<br> | <br> |
Latest revision as of 02:28, 22 October 2021
AANDENYALGA. mutant SsrA degradation tag
Usage and Biology
This is an engineered derivative of wildtype ssrA tag from Escherichia coli, where three C-terminal amino acids LAA in WT are replaced with LGA. Refer to BBa_M0050 for the biological function of the tag.
Sequence and Features
- 10COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[10]
- 12COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[12]
- 21COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[21]
- 23COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[23]
- 25COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[25]
- 1000COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[1000]
Result
For a flexible control of protein half-life, we aimed to obtain a collection of mutant tags with various degradation efficiencies.
We fused the ssrA tag sequence to GFP while introducing mutations in the tag by random-base primers, and cloned the mutant library of ssrA-tagged GFP into a plasmid vector, so that mutant tags of different activity can be identified by comparing GFP intensity of E.coli transformants.
The wildtype ssrA tag amino acid sequence is AANDENYALAA. It was reported that the three amino acids at the C terminus of the tag (LAA in wildtype) have a great impact on the degradation rate of tagged protein [1]. Therefore, we chose these three amino acids as the targets for mutagenesis.
As a result of a transformation, colonies of various fluorescence intensities were obtained on the LB plates. 72 colonies in total were picked from plates and cultured overnight in LB media. The images of E.coli cultures were taken under the blue light.
Plasmids were extracted from each bacterial culture by miniprep, and then Sanger-sequenced to identify ssrA tag sequence. Furthermore, to quantify protein degradation efficiency of each mutant, GFP Fluorescence of each bacterial overnight culture was imaged on Typhoon 9410 (GE healthcare).
The mutant ssrA tag sequence of each clone was sequenced, and biological triplicate of each bacterial overnight culture was imaged for GFP fluorescence, including controls (LB media only, bacterial culture not expressing GFP (no GFP), and bacterial culture expressing non ssrA-tagged GFP (no ssrA tag)).
Conclusion
We mutagenized the ssrA tag by PCR with mixed primers, and successfully obtained a mutant collection of engineered ssrA tag derivatives which show various protein degradation efficiencies.
Part collection of mutant ssrA tags
In our mutagenesis experiments, we identified 17 mutant tags which show various protein degradation efficiencies (refer to Result). The other mutant tags are listed below.
Name | Type | Part Name | Designer |
---|---|---|---|
BBa_K3815015 | Tag | AANDENYALGA.mutant SsrA degradation tag | Alexander Liu |
BBa_K3815016 | Tag | AANDENYAKWA.mutant SsrA degradation tag | Alexander Liu |
BBa_K3815017 | Tag | AANDENYALAK.mutant SsrA degradation tag | Alexander Liu |
BBa_K3815018 | Tag | AANDENYAHPK.mutant SsrA degradation tag | Alexander Liu |
BBa_K3815019 | Tag | AANDENYALAL.mutant SsrA degradation tag | Alexander Liu |
BBa_K3815020 | Tag | AANDENYANDK.mutant SsrA degradation tag | Alexander Liu |
BBa_K3815021 | Tag | AANDENYANEN.mutant SsrA degradation tag | Alexander Liu |
BBa_K3815022 | Tag | AANDENYAYES.mutant SsrA degradation tag | Alexander Liu |
BBa_K3815023 | Tag | AANDENYAHAK.mutant SsrA degradation tag | Alexander Liu |
BBa_K3815024 | Tag | AANDENYALAS.mutant SsrA degradation tag | Alexander Liu |
BBa_K3815025 | Tag | AANDENYATAP.mutant SsrA degradation tag | Alexander Liu |
BBa_K3815026 | Tag | AANDENYANAA.mutant SsrA degradation tag | Alexander Liu |
BBa_K3815027 | Tag | AANDENYAKLA.mutant SsrA degradation tag | Alexander Liu |
BBa_K3815028 | Tag | AANDENYALPA.mutant SsrA degradation tag | Alexander Liu |
BBa_K3815029 | Tag | AANDENYALAM.mutant SsrA degradation tag | Alexander Liu |
BBa_K3815030 | Tag | AANDENYALAI.mutant SsrA degradation tag | Alexander Liu |
BBa_K3815031 | Tag | AANDENYAPHA.mutant SsrA degradation tag | Alexander Liu |
Improvement from an Existing Part
This is a part improved from BBa_K1051206. In this part, three C-terminal amino acids LAA are replaced with LGA, resulting in a reduced protein degradation efficiency. Therefore, this part shows an increased half-life of fused proteins compared to WT. This part, together with the other mutants described in the part collection above, consists of a large repertoire of protein degradation tags of various efficiencies (refer to Result), which can be applied for fine-tuning of many kinds of synthetic systems that require precise control of proteins.
Reference
- Flynn, J.M., Levchenko, I., Seidel, M., Wickner, S.H., Sauer, R.T., and Baker, T.A. (2001). Overlapping recognition determinants within the ssrA degradation tag allow modulation of proteolysis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 98, 10584–10589.