Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K3183103"
Calinmihaid (Talk | contribs) |
|||
(3 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<partinfo>BBa_K3183103 short</partinfo> | <partinfo>BBa_K3183103 short</partinfo> | ||
− | The role of this composite part is to allow constitutive expression of the CD27L (BBa_K3183009) endolysin in L. reuteri 100-23c, as well as its secretion into the extracellular medium. The main features of the plasmid and the erm constitutive promoter (BBa_K3183000), the slpMOD (BBa_K3183008) secretion tag, 6His (BBa_K3183016) and SpyTag (BBa_K3183013) for detection and purification, as well as the endolysin itself. | + | The role of this composite part is to allow constitutive expression of the CD27L (BBa_K3183009) endolysin in <I>L. reuteri</I> 100-23c, as well as its secretion into the extracellular medium. The main features of the plasmid and the erm constitutive promoter (BBa_K3183000), the slpMOD (BBa_K3183008) secretion tag, 6His (BBa_K3183016) and SpyTag (BBa_K3183013) for detection and purification, as well as the endolysin itself. |
. | . | ||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
<!-- --> | <!-- --> | ||
− | <span class='h3bb'>Sequence and Features</span> | + | ===<span class='h3bb'>Sequence and Features</span>=== |
<partinfo>BBa_K3183103 SequenceAndFeatures</partinfo> | <partinfo>BBa_K3183103 SequenceAndFeatures</partinfo> | ||
===Methods:=== | ===Methods:=== | ||
− | The part was built after the CD27L endolysin has been expressed in E. coli and assayed against B. subtilis, a susceptible species (see BBa_K3183200). The experiments have compared several CD27L variants (BBa_K3183200, BBa_K3183201, BBa_K895005) and determined that the full length CD27L shows maximal activity against the targeted species. At the same time, the properties of the erm promoter have been assayed in L. reuteri with the aid of a fluorescent reporter protein (see BBa_K3183100). As such, given that the most relevant simple parts have shown to work as expected, the current construct has been designed, codon optimised and synthesized by IDT. Finally, the composite part has been assembled by Gibson assembly into the pTRKH3 vector (BBa_K3183050) and transformed into L. reuteri by electroporation. Individual colonies were grown in MRS broth supplemented with 5 ug/ml erythromycin. | + | The part was built after the CD27L endolysin has been expressed in <I>E. coli</I> and assayed against <I>B. subtilis</I><sup>1</sup>, a susceptible species (see <partinfo>BBa_K3183200</partinfo>). The experiments have compared several CD27L variants (BBa_K3183200, BBa_K3183201, BBa_K895005) and determined that the full length CD27L shows maximal activity against the targeted species. At the same time, the properties of the erm promoter have been assayed in L. reuteri with the aid of a fluorescent reporter protein (see BBa_K3183100). As such, given that the most relevant simple parts have shown to work as expected, the current construct has been designed, codon optimised and synthesized by IDT. Finally, the composite part has been assembled by Gibson assembly into the pTRKH3 vector (BBa_K3183050) and transformed into L. reuteri by electroporation. Individual colonies were grown in MRS broth supplemented with 5 ug/ml erythromycin. |
− | Expression was assayed through SpyCatcher band-shift assays and through the use of a linked fluorescent reporter and fluorescence microscopy (see BBa_K3183100). The secretion efficiency assay involved harvesting transformants grown overnight by centrifugation at 12000g for 5 minutes. The supernatant was kept and labelled as “the extracellular fraction”. The pellet was resuspended in 1/10 original volume PBS buffered at pH 7.4 and supplemented with PI, 1mM PMSF protease inhibitors and 1% Triton X-100. The suspension was then sonicated using a Sonics VCX Ultrasonic Processor for Small Volume Applications twice, each for a total of 5 minute sonication time distributed in 20 second pulses at 75% amplitude followed by 20 sec rest periods. Next, the sample was centrifuged at 12000g for 10 min; the supernatant was labelled as “the cytoplasmic fraction”, while the pellet was resuspended in the same buffer and labelled as “the | + | Expression was assayed through SpyCatcher band-shift assays and through the use of a linked fluorescent reporter and fluorescence microscopy (see BBa_K3183100). The secretion efficiency assay involved harvesting transformants grown overnight by centrifugation at 12000g for 5 minutes. The supernatant was kept and labelled as “the extracellular fraction”. The pellet was resuspended in 1/10 original volume PBS buffered at pH 7.4 and supplemented with PI, 1mM PMSF protease inhibitors and 1% Triton X-100. The suspension was then sonicated using a Sonics VCX Ultrasonic Processor for Small Volume Applications twice, each for a total of 5 minute sonication time distributed in 20 second pulses at 75% amplitude followed by 20 sec rest periods. Next, the sample was centrifuged at 12000g for 10 min; the supernatant was labelled as “the cytoplasmic fraction”, while the pellet was resuspended in the same buffer and labelled as “the membrane fraction”. Each fraction was then incubated with SpyCatcher for 1 hour and run on an SDS-PAGE gel followed by imaging using a 700 nm filter. |
===Results:=== | ===Results:=== | ||
− | Unfortunately, none of our assays were able to detect any protein of interest in any of the fractions | + | Unfortunately, none of our assays were able to detect any protein of interest in any of the fractions (Fig. 1). Indeed, fluorescence microscopy confirmed that very little exogenous protein expression had occured in the strain (Fig. 2) |
[[File:T--Oxford--CD27L_SpyCatcher_Detection.png|thumb|left|430px| <b>Fig. 1 CD27L detection by SpyCatcher band shift assay</b>]] | [[File:T--Oxford--CD27L_SpyCatcher_Detection.png|thumb|left|430px| <b>Fig. 1 CD27L detection by SpyCatcher band shift assay</b>]] | ||
+ | [[File:T--Oxford--Lactobacillus_microscopy.png|thumb|right|430px| <b>Fig. 2 Fluorescence Microscopy:</b> top row: micrographs of normalised exposure show the relative levels of exogenous protein expression in 3 strains of <i>Lactobacillus reuteri</i> 100-23c: wild type, pTRKH3-erm-GFP and pTRKH3-erm-slpMod CD27L_mClover. Bottom row: the corresponding bright field imaging mode. As expected, no fluorescent protein expression is detected in the wild type strain, while significant levels are observable in the GFP transformants. However, the CD27L shows low level expression concentrated in inclusion body-like structures.]] | ||
+ | <br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> | ||
+ | ===Discussion:=== | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
The fluorescence microscopy images indicate the presence of inclusion body-like structures inside the cells transformed with this composite part. This may imply that the protein does not fold properly in the strain we used and that decreasing the strength of the promoter or choosing a strain with a more apt heat shock response may improve expression efficiency | The fluorescence microscopy images indicate the presence of inclusion body-like structures inside the cells transformed with this composite part. This may imply that the protein does not fold properly in the strain we used and that decreasing the strength of the promoter or choosing a strain with a more apt heat shock response may improve expression efficiency | ||
Line 36: | Line 34: | ||
<partinfo>BBa_K3183103 parameters</partinfo> | <partinfo>BBa_K3183103 parameters</partinfo> | ||
<!-- --> | <!-- --> | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===Reference=== | ||
+ | 1. Mayer, M. J., et al. “Structure-Based Modification of a Clostridium Difficile-Targeting Endolysin Affects Activity and Host Range.” Journal of Bacteriology, vol. 193, no. 19, Oct. 2011, pp. 5477–86. DOI.org (Crossref), doi:10.1128/JB.00439-11. |
Latest revision as of 02:30, 22 October 2019
CD27L and mClover3 Under Erythromycin Promoter Control
The role of this composite part is to allow constitutive expression of the CD27L (BBa_K3183009) endolysin in L. reuteri 100-23c, as well as its secretion into the extracellular medium. The main features of the plasmid and the erm constitutive promoter (BBa_K3183000), the slpMOD (BBa_K3183008) secretion tag, 6His (BBa_K3183016) and SpyTag (BBa_K3183013) for detection and purification, as well as the endolysin itself. .
Sequence and Features
- 10COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[10]
- 12COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[12]
- 21COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[21]
- 23COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[23]
- 25COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[25]
- 1000COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[1000]
Methods:
The part was built after the CD27L endolysin has been expressed in E. coli and assayed against B. subtilis1, a susceptible species (see BBa_K3183200). The experiments have compared several CD27L variants (BBa_K3183200, BBa_K3183201, BBa_K895005) and determined that the full length CD27L shows maximal activity against the targeted species. At the same time, the properties of the erm promoter have been assayed in L. reuteri with the aid of a fluorescent reporter protein (see BBa_K3183100). As such, given that the most relevant simple parts have shown to work as expected, the current construct has been designed, codon optimised and synthesized by IDT. Finally, the composite part has been assembled by Gibson assembly into the pTRKH3 vector (BBa_K3183050) and transformed into L. reuteri by electroporation. Individual colonies were grown in MRS broth supplemented with 5 ug/ml erythromycin. Expression was assayed through SpyCatcher band-shift assays and through the use of a linked fluorescent reporter and fluorescence microscopy (see BBa_K3183100). The secretion efficiency assay involved harvesting transformants grown overnight by centrifugation at 12000g for 5 minutes. The supernatant was kept and labelled as “the extracellular fraction”. The pellet was resuspended in 1/10 original volume PBS buffered at pH 7.4 and supplemented with PI, 1mM PMSF protease inhibitors and 1% Triton X-100. The suspension was then sonicated using a Sonics VCX Ultrasonic Processor for Small Volume Applications twice, each for a total of 5 minute sonication time distributed in 20 second pulses at 75% amplitude followed by 20 sec rest periods. Next, the sample was centrifuged at 12000g for 10 min; the supernatant was labelled as “the cytoplasmic fraction”, while the pellet was resuspended in the same buffer and labelled as “the membrane fraction”. Each fraction was then incubated with SpyCatcher for 1 hour and run on an SDS-PAGE gel followed by imaging using a 700 nm filter.
Results:
Unfortunately, none of our assays were able to detect any protein of interest in any of the fractions (Fig. 1). Indeed, fluorescence microscopy confirmed that very little exogenous protein expression had occured in the strain (Fig. 2)
Discussion:
The fluorescence microscopy images indicate the presence of inclusion body-like structures inside the cells transformed with this composite part. This may imply that the protein does not fold properly in the strain we used and that decreasing the strength of the promoter or choosing a strain with a more apt heat shock response may improve expression efficiency
Reference
1. Mayer, M. J., et al. “Structure-Based Modification of a Clostridium Difficile-Targeting Endolysin Affects Activity and Host Range.” Journal of Bacteriology, vol. 193, no. 19, Oct. 2011, pp. 5477–86. DOI.org (Crossref), doi:10.1128/JB.00439-11.