Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K2913018"
XuejieZhang (Talk | contribs) (→result) |
|||
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<partinfo>BBa_K2913018 short</partinfo> | <partinfo>BBa_K2913018 short</partinfo> | ||
− | A protein that inhibits the | + | A protein that inhibits the function of ECF20 that initiating the transcription of Pecf20. |
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
=result= | =result= | ||
− | [[File:T--NEFU_China--parts--ECF20.png|800px|thumb|left|Fig. 1(a). Green fluorescence intensity of produced GFP driven by the Pecf20 promoter. Plasmids pYBIa-ECf20 & pRB1s-Pecf20-EGFP were transformed in to <i>E. coli Nissle 1917</i>, and the bacteria were cultured at 37 °C in medium containing 0.5 mM | + | [[File:T--NEFU_China--parts--ECF20.png|800px|thumb|left|Fig. 1(a). Green fluorescence intensity of produced GFP driven by the Pecf20 promoter. Plasmids pYBIa-ECf20 & pRB1s-Pecf20-EGFP were transformed in to <i>E. coli Nissle 1917</i>, and the bacteria were cultured at 37 °C in medium containing 0.5 mM arabinose and 0.4 g/l glucose. OD600nm and green fluorescence signal were measured every 10 min using an automatic microplate reader. (b). Green fluorescence intensity of produced GFP to determine the antagonism of Anti-ECF20 to the Pecf20 promoter. Plasmids pYB1a-ECf20, pRB1s-Pecf20-EGFP and pSB1c-Plac-Anti-ECF20 were individually transformed into <i>E. coli Nissle 1917</i>, and The bacteria were cultured in LB medium containing 0.5 mM arabinose and 0.4 g/l glucose. IPTG was added to different final concentrations of 0, 1, 5, 10 and 20 mM. The bacteria were then cultured at 37℃ with the measurement of OD600nm and green fluorescence signal every 10 min using an automatic microplate reader. ]] |
<p style="margin-top:30em;">In Fig. 1(a), when pYB1a-P-BAD-EGFP (triangle), pYB1a-ECF20 & pRB1s-Pecf20-EGFP (square) was respectively transformed into <i>E. coli Nissle 1917</i>, green fluorescence intensity increased in a time dependent manner. When pRB1s-Pecf20-EGFP (circle) was transformed into the bacteria, green fluorescence intensity did not show obvious increase with time. We confirmed that ECF20 is a necessary factor for the activation of the Pecf20 promoter. In Fig. 1(b), the addition of IPTG led to dramatic difference of detected green florescence signal. Without IPTG, we detected the continuously increased green fluorescence signal with the time. On the other hand, with the IPTG addition, the fluorescence signal remained at the baseline level. The data confirmed that Anti-ECF20 could suppress the activity of Pecf20 promoter. Overall, our experiments indicated that ECF20 is necessary for the activation of the Pecf20 promoter, while Anti-ECF20 can repress the Pecf20 promoter through binding to ECF20 and suppressing its function.</p> | <p style="margin-top:30em;">In Fig. 1(a), when pYB1a-P-BAD-EGFP (triangle), pYB1a-ECF20 & pRB1s-Pecf20-EGFP (square) was respectively transformed into <i>E. coli Nissle 1917</i>, green fluorescence intensity increased in a time dependent manner. When pRB1s-Pecf20-EGFP (circle) was transformed into the bacteria, green fluorescence intensity did not show obvious increase with time. We confirmed that ECF20 is a necessary factor for the activation of the Pecf20 promoter. In Fig. 1(b), the addition of IPTG led to dramatic difference of detected green florescence signal. Without IPTG, we detected the continuously increased green fluorescence signal with the time. On the other hand, with the IPTG addition, the fluorescence signal remained at the baseline level. The data confirmed that Anti-ECF20 could suppress the activity of Pecf20 promoter. Overall, our experiments indicated that ECF20 is necessary for the activation of the Pecf20 promoter, while Anti-ECF20 can repress the Pecf20 promoter through binding to ECF20 and suppressing its function.</p> |
Latest revision as of 17:25, 21 October 2019
Anti-ECF20(optimized by E.coli)
A protein that inhibits the function of ECF20 that initiating the transcription of Pecf20.
Usage and Biology
result
In Fig. 1(a), when pYB1a-P-BAD-EGFP (triangle), pYB1a-ECF20 & pRB1s-Pecf20-EGFP (square) was respectively transformed into E. coli Nissle 1917, green fluorescence intensity increased in a time dependent manner. When pRB1s-Pecf20-EGFP (circle) was transformed into the bacteria, green fluorescence intensity did not show obvious increase with time. We confirmed that ECF20 is a necessary factor for the activation of the Pecf20 promoter. In Fig. 1(b), the addition of IPTG led to dramatic difference of detected green florescence signal. Without IPTG, we detected the continuously increased green fluorescence signal with the time. On the other hand, with the IPTG addition, the fluorescence signal remained at the baseline level. The data confirmed that Anti-ECF20 could suppress the activity of Pecf20 promoter. Overall, our experiments indicated that ECF20 is necessary for the activation of the Pecf20 promoter, while Anti-ECF20 can repress the Pecf20 promoter through binding to ECF20 and suppressing its function.
Sequence and Features
- 10COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[10]
- 12COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[12]
- 21COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[21]
- 23COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[23]
- 25INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[25]Illegal AgeI site found at 295
- 1000COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[1000]