Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K2974316:Experience"
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
__NOTOC__ | __NOTOC__ | ||
| − | <strong>Medium Promoter (BBa_J23106) C. elegans Toehold GFP</Strong> | + | <strong>Medium Promoter (BBa_J23106) <i>C. elegans</i> Toehold GFP</Strong> |
<br> | <br> | ||
| − | The results for the toehold were confirmed through a dual plasmid transformation in BL21 E. coli. The dual plasmid transformation presented greater fluorescence measured in lux values in comparison to the single switch transformation, confirming the function of the toehold. In addition, sequencing analysis results shown below also confirms the presence of the toehold in comparison to the toehold sequences in the reference paper (Green et al. 2014). The biobricked toehold's (BBa_K2974316) function has been validated through experimentation and sequencing. | + | The results for the toehold were confirmed through a dual plasmid transformation in BL21 <i>E. coli.</i> The dual plasmid transformation presented greater fluorescence measured in lux values in comparison to the single switch transformation, confirming the function of the toehold. In addition, sequencing analysis results shown below also confirms the presence of the toehold in comparison to the toehold sequences in the reference paper (Green et al. 2014). The biobricked toehold's (BBa_K2974316) function has been validated through experimentation and sequencing. |
<br> | <br> | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
</body> | </body> | ||
</html> | </html> | ||
| − | + | <br> | |
| − | <center><I>Figure 1: This graph compares the mean lux values of the C. elegans toehold switch, trigger, and the dual plasmid. The toehold switch and trigger have very similar lux values to LB and plain cells, whereas the dual plasmid has a higher lux value, indicating fluorescence.</I></center> | + | <center><I>Figure 1: This graph compares the mean lux values of the <i>C. elegans</i> toehold switch, trigger, and the dual plasmid. The toehold switch and trigger have very similar lux values to LB and plain cells, whereas the dual plasmid has a higher lux value, indicating fluorescence.</I></center> |
<strong>Sequence Analysis</strong> | <strong>Sequence Analysis</strong> | ||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
<center><img src="https://2019.igem.org/wiki/images/4/46/T--Lambert_GA--CEToeholdSequenceMegan.png" height="400px"> | <center><img src="https://2019.igem.org/wiki/images/4/46/T--Lambert_GA--CEToeholdSequenceMegan.png" height="400px"> | ||
</center> | </center> | ||
| − | <center><I>Figure 2: Lambert iGEM aligned the C. elegans toehold insert with the Eurofins Genomics sequencing results. This showed that the toehold was successfully cloned. </i></center> | + | <br> |
| + | <center><I>Figure 2: Lambert iGEM aligned the <i>C. elegans</i> toehold insert with the Eurofins Genomics sequencing results. This showed that the toehold was successfully cloned. </i></center> | ||
</body> | </body> | ||
</hmtl> | </hmtl> | ||
Latest revision as of 12:11, 21 October 2019
Medium Promoter (BBa_J23106) C. elegans Toehold GFP
The results for the toehold were confirmed through a dual plasmid transformation in BL21 E. coli. The dual plasmid transformation presented greater fluorescence measured in lux values in comparison to the single switch transformation, confirming the function of the toehold. In addition, sequencing analysis results shown below also confirms the presence of the toehold in comparison to the toehold sequences in the reference paper (Green et al. 2014). The biobricked toehold's (BBa_K2974316) function has been validated through experimentation and sequencing.
Sequence Analysis
===Applications of BBa_K2974316=== ===User Reviews===