Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K3147001"

(→‎I : parts BBa_K3147001 (Pc-sfGFP-TEVcs) function :)
(→‎II. Proof of function)
 
(16 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
−
===I : parts BBa_K3147001 (Pc-sfGFP-TEVcs) function===
 
  
 +
__NOTOC__
 +
<div align="center"><partinfo>BBa_K3147001 short</partinfo></div>
  
−
The Montpellier 2019 team made this reporter gene construct in order to compare the basal fluorescence of sfGFP-TEV cutting site with the sfGFP-TEVcs-SRRA construct (BBa_ K3147000). This construction produces a sfGFP(bs)[1] [2] [3] (BBA_K1365020) fused in C-ter to a TEV cutting site after cutting (ENLYFQ). It can be used as a reporter gene.
+
 
 +
 
 +
===I : parts BBa_K3147001 function===
 +
 
 +
 
 +
The Montpellier 2019 team made this reporter gene construct in order to obtain a positive control for TEV mediated proteolysis of the ssrA tag fused the sfGFP reporter (BBa_ K3147000). This construction produce sfGFP(bs)[1] [2] [3] (BBA_K1365020) fused in C-ter to a sequence corresponding to  a TEV cutting site after cleavage (ENLYFQ).
  
 
  <div align="center">[[File:design2K31470001.png|650px]]</div>
 
  <div align="center">[[File:design2K31470001.png|650px]]</div>
Line 10: Line 16:
 
===II. Proof of function===
 
===II. Proof of function===
  
−
The experimental approach used to test the activity of these reporters was to compare the basal fluorescence rate of this construction to the fluorescence of the sfGFP-TEVcs-ssrA (BBa_K3147000). That's why we made two constructions similar by removing the proteolysis tag from one and simulating a cut by the TEV.
+
We expressed this part in the pBbE8K backbone (https://www.addgene.org/35327) under a pBAD promoter. The cloning was made by Gibson Assembly.  
−
 
+
−
We expressed this part in the pBbE8K-RFP backbone (https://www.addgene.org/35327/) under a pBAD promoter. The cloning was made by Gibson Assembly.  
+
  
 
  <div align="center">[[File:PlasmideK3147001.png|400px]]</div>
 
  <div align="center">[[File:PlasmideK3147001.png|400px]]</div>
Line 18: Line 22:
 
  <div align="center"><b>Figure 2</b>: sfGFP-TEVcs reporter gene in its backbone pBbE8K-RFP.</div>
 
  <div align="center"><b>Figure 2</b>: sfGFP-TEVcs reporter gene in its backbone pBbE8K-RFP.</div>
  
−
We compared the basal fluorescence of strain E. coli NEB10β transformed with the construction type sfGFP-TEVcs to an E. coli NEB10β transformed with the construction sfGFP-TEVcs-ssrA. Fluorescence was quantified by measuring after induction with arabinose concentrated at 1% it with the plate reader overnight.
+
We compared the basal fluorescence of the <i>E. coli</i> strain NEB10β transformed with the sfGFP-TEVcs construction and the <i>E. coli</i> NEB10β transformed with the sfGFP-TEVcs-ssrA construction (BBa_K3147000). Fluorescence was measured on a plate reader after overnight induction with 1% arabinose.
−
Here are the fluorescences obtained from the sfGFP-TEVcs-SSRA and sfGFP-TEVcs at 30 and 37°C.
+
 
 +
Below are the fluorescence measurements of the sfGFP-TEVcs-ssrA and of the sfGFP-TEVcs at 30 and 37°C. We can see that the ssrA tag is causing a lot of degradation of the protein. Our part simulating cleavage effectively has a strong fluorescence.  We can see that the ssrA system is more efficient at 37C as described in part M0050 characterization.  
  
 
  <div align="center">[[File:resultK3147001.png|500px]]</div>
 
  <div align="center">[[File:resultK3147001.png|500px]]</div>
  
−
  <div align="center"><b>Figure 3</b>: Measurement of the fluorescence at 30°C and 37°C of bacteria expressing sfGFP-TEVcs or sfGFP-TEVcs-SSRA in RFU </div>
+
  <div align="center"><b>Figure 3</b>: Measurement of the fluorescence at 30°C and 37°C of bacteria expressing sfGFP-TEVcs or sfGFP-TEVcs-SSRA</div>
  
 
==Reference==
 
==Reference==
Line 31: Line 36:
  
 
[3] Sarah Guiziou et al. 2016. “A part toolbox to tune genetic expression in Bacillus subtilis” Nucleic Acids Research, 2016, Vol. 44, No. 15 7495–7508.
 
[3] Sarah Guiziou et al. 2016. “A part toolbox to tune genetic expression in Bacillus subtilis” Nucleic Acids Research, 2016, Vol. 44, No. 15 7495–7508.
 +
 +
<!-- Add more about the biology of this part here
 +
===Usage and Biology===
 +
 +
<!-- -->
 +
<span class='h3bb'>Sequence and Features</span>
 +
<partinfo>BBa_K3147001 SequenceAndFeatures</partinfo>
 +
 +
 +
<!-- Uncomment this to enable Functional Parameter display
 +
===Functional Parameters===
 +
<partinfo>BBa_K3147001 parameters</partinfo>
 +
<!-- -->

Latest revision as of 06:51, 20 October 2019


sfGFP fused to a TEV cleavage site cleaved


I : parts BBa_K3147001 function

The Montpellier 2019 team made this reporter gene construct in order to obtain a positive control for TEV mediated proteolysis of the ssrA tag fused the sfGFP reporter (BBa_ K3147000). This construction produce sfGFP(bs)[1] [2] [3] (BBA_K1365020) fused in C-ter to a sequence corresponding to a TEV cutting site after cleavage (ENLYFQ).

Design2K31470001.png
Figure 1 : Construct Design: sfGFP with cleaved TEV cutting site.

II. Proof of function

We expressed this part in the pBbE8K backbone (https://www.addgene.org/35327) under a pBAD promoter. The cloning was made by Gibson Assembly.

PlasmideK3147001.png
Figure 2: sfGFP-TEVcs reporter gene in its backbone pBbE8K-RFP.

We compared the basal fluorescence of the E. coli strain NEB10β transformed with the sfGFP-TEVcs construction and the E. coli NEB10β transformed with the sfGFP-TEVcs-ssrA construction (BBa_K3147000). Fluorescence was measured on a plate reader after overnight induction with 1% arabinose.

Below are the fluorescence measurements of the sfGFP-TEVcs-ssrA and of the sfGFP-TEVcs at 30 and 37°C. We can see that the ssrA tag is causing a lot of degradation of the protein. Our part simulating cleavage effectively has a strong fluorescence. We can see that the ssrA system is more efficient at 37C as described in part M0050 characterization.

ResultK3147001.png
Figure 3: Measurement of the fluorescence at 30°C and 37°C of bacteria expressing sfGFP-TEVcs or sfGFP-TEVcs-SSRA

Reference

[1] McGinness, Baker, Sauer. 2006. Mol. Cell. 22:701.

[2] Overkamp, W. et al. (2013) Benchmarking various green fluorescent protein variants in Bacillus subtilis, Streptococcus pneumoniae, and Lactococcus lactis for live cell imaging. Appl. About. Microbiol. 79: 6481-6490

[3] Sarah Guiziou et al. 2016. “A part toolbox to tune genetic expression in Bacillus subtilis” Nucleic Acids Research, 2016, Vol. 44, No. 15 7495–7508.

Sequence and Features


Assembly Compatibility:
  • 10
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[10]
  • 12
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[12]
  • 21
    INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[21]
    Illegal XhoI site found at 947
  • 23
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[23]
  • 25
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[25]
  • 1000
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[1000]