Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K2957007"

 
(10 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
  
 
__NOTOC__
 
__NOTOC__
<partinfo>BBa_K2957099 short</partinfo>
+
<partinfo>BBa_K2957007 short</partinfo>
  
Contents: hEF1a, IL-8 (CXCL-8), NeonGreen Tag, SynthpA, with Carb resistance
+
<b>Contents:</b> hEF1a, IL-8 (CXCL-8), NeonGreen Tag, SynthpA, with Carb resistance
  
What is it?: A Composite part; it is a genetic circuit with hEF1a promoter and IL-8 gene allowing for constitutive IL-8 expression  
+
<b>What is it?:</b> A Composite part; it is a genetic circuit with hEF1a promoter and IL-8 gene allowing for constitutive IL-8 expression  
  
What does it do?: It's responsible for the expression of the chemokine, IL-8 (CXCL8) with Flag tag. It was important for our project in particular because of its involvement in the immune system and is known to create neutrophil swarming.  
+
<b>What does it do?:</b> It's responsible for the expression of the chemokine, IL-8 (CXCL8) with Flag tag. It was important for our project in particular because of its involvement in the immune system and is known to create neutrophil swarming.  
  
How to use it?: This part was used for Type IIS Cloning and transfected into HEKs. It also has a NeonGreen tag attached to the IL8 so this allows us to visualize it and determine transfection efficiency. See more on the Parts Overview Page or MIT iGEM 2019 wiki: <a href=https://2019.igem.org/Team:MIT/Parts>.
+
<b>How to use it?:</b> This part was used for Type IIS Cloning and transfected into HEKs. It also has a NeonGreen tag attached to the IL8 so this allows us to visualize it and determine transfection efficiency. See more on the Parts Overview Page or MIT iGEM 2019 wiki: <a href=https://2019.igem.org/Team:MIT/Parts>."
 +
 
 +
==Characterization==
 +
Our team’s best composite part is the hEF1a IL8-NeonGreen construct as we were able to prove it’s functionality in engineering our leader cells, HEK-293T, to secrete a major chemokine of interest to us, IL8, which is involved in inflammatory response and has been shown to lead to neutrophil swarming (secretion test results below). IL8 induces mast cells to produce histamines, which causes openings in the endothelium, which allows neutrophils to move through.
 +
We were also able to test the version of this plasmid (BBa_K2957003) with our follower cells, HL60s, in an ibidi chamber (see video on Results page of MIT iGEM 2019 wiki).
 +
This part was checked through sequencing and we have glycerol stocks of each of these.
 +
 
 +
https://2019.igem.org/wiki/images/f/f6/T--MIT--BBa_K2957007plasmid.png
 +
 
 +
==Secretion Test Results==
 +
https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/parts/5/50/T--MIT----SecretionTest.png
 +
 
 +
The above graph shows our secretion test results, the main characterization of our parts (BBa_K2957018: hEF1a CCL5-NeonGreen and BBa_K2957007: hEF1a IL8-NeonGreen). To test whether our chemokine was successfully expressed and secreted, the culture team transfected HEK cells with IL8 and CCL5, both with NeonGreen fused to it as a fluorescent indicator. After performing a complete secretion test, we found a significant difference in fluorescent intensity for the CCL5 and the IL8 supernatant when compared to untransfected cells and cells transfected with just NeonGreen. This data suggests that our fusion proteins were translated and secreted properly as the fluorescent indicator was detected in the media outside of the cell. In addition, the transfected cells also had a large amount of protein production still inside of the cell as shown by the lysate. The fluorescence of the NeonGreen lysate is not completely accurate due to the intensity being too high for the reader to fully measure. Despite this, its high reading indicates that it was a proper positive control as it had significant fluorescence compared to the untransfected cells. The next challenges were then evaluating whether the chemokine protein was actually functional, which we detail our attempts to test so in the Results pages.
 +
 
 +
How are secretion test was performed is detailed below (as well as in our Results pages):
 +
https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/parts/3/38/T--MIT--FilteringProcess.png
  
 
<!-- Add more about the biology of this part here
 
<!-- Add more about the biology of this part here
Line 16: Line 31:
 
<!-- -->
 
<!-- -->
 
<span class='h3bb'>Sequence and Features</span>
 
<span class='h3bb'>Sequence and Features</span>
<partinfo>BBa_K2957099 SequenceAndFeatures</partinfo>
+
<partinfo>BBa_K2957007 SequenceAndFeatures</partinfo>
  
  
 
<!-- Uncomment this to enable Functional Parameter display  
 
<!-- Uncomment this to enable Functional Parameter display  
 
===Functional Parameters===
 
===Functional Parameters===
<partinfo>BBa_K2957099 parameters</partinfo>
+
<partinfo>BBa_K2957007 parameters</partinfo>
 
<!-- -->
 
<!-- -->

Latest revision as of 03:59, 22 October 2019


hEF1a, IL-8 (CXCL-8), NeonGreen Tag

Contents: hEF1a, IL-8 (CXCL-8), NeonGreen Tag, SynthpA, with Carb resistance

What is it?: A Composite part; it is a genetic circuit with hEF1a promoter and IL-8 gene allowing for constitutive IL-8 expression

What does it do?: It's responsible for the expression of the chemokine, IL-8 (CXCL8) with Flag tag. It was important for our project in particular because of its involvement in the immune system and is known to create neutrophil swarming.

How to use it?: This part was used for Type IIS Cloning and transfected into HEKs. It also has a NeonGreen tag attached to the IL8 so this allows us to visualize it and determine transfection efficiency. See more on the Parts Overview Page or MIT iGEM 2019 wiki: <a href=https://2019.igem.org/Team:MIT/Parts>."

Characterization

Our team’s best composite part is the hEF1a IL8-NeonGreen construct as we were able to prove it’s functionality in engineering our leader cells, HEK-293T, to secrete a major chemokine of interest to us, IL8, which is involved in inflammatory response and has been shown to lead to neutrophil swarming (secretion test results below). IL8 induces mast cells to produce histamines, which causes openings in the endothelium, which allows neutrophils to move through. We were also able to test the version of this plasmid (BBa_K2957003) with our follower cells, HL60s, in an ibidi chamber (see video on Results page of MIT iGEM 2019 wiki). This part was checked through sequencing and we have glycerol stocks of each of these.

T--MIT--BBa_K2957007plasmid.png

Secretion Test Results

T--MIT----SecretionTest.png

The above graph shows our secretion test results, the main characterization of our parts (BBa_K2957018: hEF1a CCL5-NeonGreen and BBa_K2957007: hEF1a IL8-NeonGreen). To test whether our chemokine was successfully expressed and secreted, the culture team transfected HEK cells with IL8 and CCL5, both with NeonGreen fused to it as a fluorescent indicator. After performing a complete secretion test, we found a significant difference in fluorescent intensity for the CCL5 and the IL8 supernatant when compared to untransfected cells and cells transfected with just NeonGreen. This data suggests that our fusion proteins were translated and secreted properly as the fluorescent indicator was detected in the media outside of the cell. In addition, the transfected cells also had a large amount of protein production still inside of the cell as shown by the lysate. The fluorescence of the NeonGreen lysate is not completely accurate due to the intensity being too high for the reader to fully measure. Despite this, its high reading indicates that it was a proper positive control as it had significant fluorescence compared to the untransfected cells. The next challenges were then evaluating whether the chemokine protein was actually functional, which we detail our attempts to test so in the Results pages.

How are secretion test was performed is detailed below (as well as in our Results pages): T--MIT--FilteringProcess.png

Sequence and Features


Assembly Compatibility:
  • 10
    INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[10]
    Illegal XbaI site found at 1256
    Illegal PstI site found at 699
  • 12
    INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[12]
    Illegal PstI site found at 699
  • 21
    INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[21]
    Illegal BamHI site found at 473
    Illegal BamHI site found at 715
  • 23
    INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[23]
    Illegal XbaI site found at 1256
    Illegal PstI site found at 699
  • 25
    INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[25]
    Illegal XbaI site found at 1256
    Illegal PstI site found at 699
    Illegal AgeI site found at 81
    Illegal AgeI site found at 1262
  • 1000
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[1000]