Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K2834005"
(65 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
<partinfo>BBa_K2834005 short</partinfo> | <partinfo>BBa_K2834005 short</partinfo> | ||
− | |||
<p align="justify"> | <p align="justify"> | ||
− | + | This BioBrick™ counts with a T7 promoter + RBS, a pelB leader sequence, defensin 1 honey bee antimicrobial peptide, a 6x His-tag, and a T1 terminator from <i>E. coli</i>. This composite enables the expression of defensin 1 in <i>E. coli</i> BL21 (DE3). The IPTG-inducible promoter controls the expression of the T7 polymerase gene in <i>E. coli</i> BL21 (DE3), later T7 polymerase can synthesize large quantities of RNA from a DNA sequence cloned downstream of the T7 promoter due to its high processivity and transcription frequency. The pelB leader sequence directs the protein to the periplasmic membrane of <i>E. coli</i> promoting the correct folding of proteins and reducing the formation of inclusion bodies. The His-tag consists of six histidine residues that are used to purify the recombinant protein, and finally, the T1 terminator is employed to provide efficient transcription termination. | |
− | This BioBrick™ counts with a T7 promoter + RBS, a pelB leader sequence, defensin 1 honey bee antimicrobial peptide, a 6x His-tag, and a T1 terminator from E. coli. This composite enables the expression of defensin 1 in E. coli BL21 (DE3). The IPTG-inducible promoter controls the expression of the T7 polymerase gene in E. coli BL21 (DE3), later T7 polymerase can synthesize large quantities of RNA from a DNA sequence cloned downstream of the T7 promoter due to its high processivity and transcription frequency. The pelB leader sequence directs the protein to the periplasmic membrane of E. coli promoting the correct folding of proteins and reducing the formation of inclusion bodies. The His-tag consists of six histidine residues that are used to purify the recombinant protein, and finally, the T1 terminator is employed to provide efficient transcription termination. | + | |
− | + | ||
</p> | </p> | ||
− | |||
<br> | <br> | ||
<p align="justify"> | <p align="justify"> | ||
As this composite includes coding regions for fusion peptides, scars are not part of the sequence between pelB, defensin 1 and the His-tag. The exact synthesized sequence is:<br> | As this composite includes coding regions for fusion peptides, scars are not part of the sequence between pelB, defensin 1 and the His-tag. The exact synthesized sequence is:<br> | ||
− | + | TAATACGACTCACTATAGGGAAAGAGGAGAAATACTAGATGAAATACCTGCTGCCGACCGCTGCTGCTGGTCTGCTGCTCCTCGCTGCCCAGCCGGCGATGG CCATGGTAACTTGTGACCTTCTCTCATTCAAAGGACAAGTTAATGACAGTGCTTGCGCTGCTAACTGTCTCAGTTTGGGTAAAGCTGGAGGTCATTGCGAGA AAGGAGTTTGTATTTGTCGAAAAACCAGTTTCAAAGATCTCTGGGACAAACGTTTCGGTCATCACCATCACCATCACTGATACTAGAGCCAGGCATCAAATA | |
− | + | AAACGAAAGGCTCAGTCGAAAGACTGGGCCTTTCGTTTTATCTGTTGTTTGTCGGTGAACGCTCTC | |
− | + | ||
</p> | </p> | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
===Usage and Biology=== | ===Usage and Biology=== | ||
+ | <p align="justify"> | ||
+ | Defensin 1 is an antimicrobial peptide of the honeybee. It's a component of their innate immune response, which contains 51 amino acids and 6 cysteine residues forming three disulfide bonds<sup>2</sup>. It is synthesized in salivary glands and characterizes the social immunity. Sometimes is able to protect honeybees even in early stages and act as part of individual immunity<sup>4</sup>. This AMP is expressed in the head and thorax of honey bees by the hypopharyngeal, mandibular and thoracic salivary glands<sup>3</sup>. It is present in the royal jelly, honey and hemolymph. Originally, it was isolated from royal jelly, and therefore named royalisin<sup>2</sup>. | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
+ | This peptide is effective against Gram-positive bacteria and some species of Gram-negative bacteria like <i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</i> and <i>Salmonella choleraesuis</i><sup>1</sup>. The mechanism of the defensin effect is reduced to disturbance of integrity and permeability of the cytoplasmic membrane. Defensin 1 is used in our project against <i>Paenibllus larvae</i> and <i>Melissococcus plutonius</i>, this would control the immunity level of a honey bee colony and reduce the using of antibiotics. | ||
+ | </p> | ||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | ==<b>Characterization of defensin 1 antimicrobial peptide</b>== | ||
<p align="justify"> | <p align="justify"> | ||
− | + | This composite will be characterized with the intention of expressing defensin 1 in <i>E. coli</i> BL21 (DE3) by IPTG induction. Subsequently, its antimicrobial activity will be evaluated against Gram-positive bacteria with antibiotic susceptibility testing by measuring OD<sub>600</sub> in broth.</p> | |
− | < | + | <br> |
− | + | ===BioBrick assembly=== | |
− | <br><br> | + | <p align="justify">To achieve this goal, firstly, the composite was synthesized by IDT® with the prefix and suffix flanking the region of interest. The final part resulted in a sequence of 415 base pairs. Once the synthesis arrived, double digestion with EcoRI-HF and PstI restriction enzymes was made to the composite, and the chloramphenicol linearized plasmid backbone (pSB1C3) for following ligation of both fragments. This resulted in a complete expression plasmid of 2442 base pairs. Afterward, <i>Escherichia coli</i> BL21(DE3) was transformed by heat shock for following the antibiotic selection of clones. Next step consisted of plasmid extraction and electrophoresis gel of the uncut plasmid, the linearized plasmid with one enzyme, and the linearized plasmid with two enzymes. This agarose gel allowed the confirmation of the correct plasmid construction.</p> |
− | + | <br> | |
− | < | + | <center>[[File:Def1.png|900px]]</center> |
+ | <div class="row"> | ||
+ | <div class="col-md-12"> | ||
+ | <center><b>Figure 1. </b>(On the left) SnapGene® map of BBa__K2834005. (On the right) Agarose gel electrophoresis of BBa__K2834005 compared with NEB Quick-Load® Purple 1Kb Plus DNA Ladder, where the highlighted band corresponds to approximately 2442 bp. | ||
+ | </center> | ||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | ===IPTG protein induction and extraction=== | ||
+ | <p align="justify"> | ||
+ | Following the construction of the BioBrick, it was necessary to induce protein production. Since the T7 promoter regulates transcription of the construct, isopropyl β-D-1 thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) is used as an inducer for T7 RNA polymerase production. The concentration of IPTG used was 0.5 mM. After induction, the cultures were incubated for six hours at 37 °C and 225 rpm. After that, protein extraction by lysis solution was made in order to obtain the soluble peptides. For insoluble peptides, the sample was treated with lysis solution + 6 M urea. | ||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | ===Antimicrobial susceptibility testing=== | ||
+ | In order to prove the antibacterial activity of defensin 1, antimicrobial susceptibility tests were performed for two different bacteria: <i>Bacillus subtilis</i> and <i>Streptococcus pyogenes</i>. <i>B. subtilis</i> was chosen because it is one of the best known Gram-positive microorganisms and <i>S. pyogenes</i> was chosen because it is one of the most important bacterial pathogens to humans. They both are widely known, commonly used, and thus allowed to better analyze the activity that the peptide has. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Being unable to isolate our peptides by affinity tag purification due to lack of equipment, crude protein extract was used in the experiment. In order to validate the experiment, different concentrations of the peptide and several controls were used; 12 ml of LB broth, with a bactericide agent or a control, were inoculated with 100μl of the overnight culture of each bacteria. Afterward, OD<sub>600</sub> was measured at 3, 6, 9, and 21 hours after inoculation. | ||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | ===Antimicrobial susceptibility test results=== | ||
+ | <i>B. subtilis</i> (figure 2a) was treated with 30.6 μg/mL (LC) and 153 μg/mL (HC) of total proteins of transformed <i>E. coli</i> BL21 (DE3) with defensin 1. Also, it was treated with 29.565 μg/mL (LC) and 147.825 μg/mL (HC) of untransformed <i>E. coli</i> BL21 (DE3) for negative control. A culture of <i>B. subtilis</i> was used as a negative control as well. At 21 h, both concentrations of defensin 1 produced a decrease in OD<sub>600</sub> compared to the untransformed <i>E. coli</i> BL21 (DE3) control. With the lowest concentration of total proteins with defensin 1 OD<sub>600</sub> decreases in 14.23% and with the highest one it decreases in 16.28%. | ||
+ | |||
+ | <i>S. pyogenes</i> (figure 2b) was treated with the same concentrations as <i>B. subtilis</i>. At 21 h, both concentrations of defensin 1 produced a decrease in OD<sub>600</sub> compared to the untransformed <i>E. coli</i> BL21 (DE3) control. With the lowest concentration of total proteins with defensin 1 OD<sub>600</sub> decreases in 8.26% and with the highest one it decreases in 12.99%. | ||
</p> | </p> | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
+ | <center>[[File:bacteria vs defensin.png|650px]]</center> | ||
+ | <div class="row"> | ||
+ | <center><b>Figure 2.</b> Antimicrobial susceptibility testing results for defensin 1. a) <i>B. subtilis</i> challenged with low (LC) and high (HC) concentrations of total proteins of transformed <i>E. coli</i> BL21 (DE3) with defensin 1 and total proteins of untransformed <i>E. coli</i> BL21 (DE3). b) <i>S. pyogenes</i> challenged with low (LC) and high (HC) concentrations of total proteins of transformed <i>E. coli</i> BL21 (DE3) with defensin 1 and total proteins of untransformed <i>E. coli</i> BL21 (DE3). | ||
+ | <br></center> | ||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <p align="justify">With the development of the antimicrobial susceptibility testing, it was observed that there was partial inhibition by both total protein extracts. It is probable that some proteins of <i>E. coli</i> BL21 (DE3) are toxic for <i>B. subtilis</i> and <i>S. pyogenes</i>, which allowed their inhibition. However, the protein extracts of the bacteria transformed with the composite for the expression of defensin 1 showed greater inhibition, supporting the premise that the peptide is present and its activity is as expected. <i>B. subtilis</i> was found to be more susceptible to total protein extract with defensin 1 than <i>S. pyogenes</i> at the end of 21 h. However, both bacteria were inhibited in a certain percentage by this extract compared to the negative control of the total protein extract of the non-transformed bacteria.</p> | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | <!-- --> | ||
===Sequence and Features=== | ===Sequence and Features=== | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
<partinfo>BBa_K2834005 SequenceAndFeatures</partinfo> | <partinfo>BBa_K2834005 SequenceAndFeatures</partinfo> | ||
− | |||
<b> | <b> | ||
− | ==References== | + | ===References=== |
</b> | </b> | ||
<p align="justify"> | <p align="justify"> |
Latest revision as of 01:57, 18 October 2018
Expressible defensin 1 antimicrobial peptide from Apis mellifera
This BioBrick™ counts with a T7 promoter + RBS, a pelB leader sequence, defensin 1 honey bee antimicrobial peptide, a 6x His-tag, and a T1 terminator from E. coli. This composite enables the expression of defensin 1 in E. coli BL21 (DE3). The IPTG-inducible promoter controls the expression of the T7 polymerase gene in E. coli BL21 (DE3), later T7 polymerase can synthesize large quantities of RNA from a DNA sequence cloned downstream of the T7 promoter due to its high processivity and transcription frequency. The pelB leader sequence directs the protein to the periplasmic membrane of E. coli promoting the correct folding of proteins and reducing the formation of inclusion bodies. The His-tag consists of six histidine residues that are used to purify the recombinant protein, and finally, the T1 terminator is employed to provide efficient transcription termination.
As this composite includes coding regions for fusion peptides, scars are not part of the sequence between pelB, defensin 1 and the His-tag. The exact synthesized sequence is:
TAATACGACTCACTATAGGGAAAGAGGAGAAATACTAGATGAAATACCTGCTGCCGACCGCTGCTGCTGGTCTGCTGCTCCTCGCTGCCCAGCCGGCGATGG CCATGGTAACTTGTGACCTTCTCTCATTCAAAGGACAAGTTAATGACAGTGCTTGCGCTGCTAACTGTCTCAGTTTGGGTAAAGCTGGAGGTCATTGCGAGA AAGGAGTTTGTATTTGTCGAAAAACCAGTTTCAAAGATCTCTGGGACAAACGTTTCGGTCATCACCATCACCATCACTGATACTAGAGCCAGGCATCAAATA
AAACGAAAGGCTCAGTCGAAAGACTGGGCCTTTCGTTTTATCTGTTGTTTGTCGGTGAACGCTCTC
Usage and Biology
Defensin 1 is an antimicrobial peptide of the honeybee. It's a component of their innate immune response, which contains 51 amino acids and 6 cysteine residues forming three disulfide bonds2. It is synthesized in salivary glands and characterizes the social immunity. Sometimes is able to protect honeybees even in early stages and act as part of individual immunity4. This AMP is expressed in the head and thorax of honey bees by the hypopharyngeal, mandibular and thoracic salivary glands3. It is present in the royal jelly, honey and hemolymph. Originally, it was isolated from royal jelly, and therefore named royalisin2.
This peptide is effective against Gram-positive bacteria and some species of Gram-negative bacteria like Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Salmonella choleraesuis1. The mechanism of the defensin effect is reduced to disturbance of integrity and permeability of the cytoplasmic membrane. Defensin 1 is used in our project against Paenibllus larvae and Melissococcus plutonius, this would control the immunity level of a honey bee colony and reduce the using of antibiotics.
Characterization of defensin 1 antimicrobial peptide
This composite will be characterized with the intention of expressing defensin 1 in E. coli BL21 (DE3) by IPTG induction. Subsequently, its antimicrobial activity will be evaluated against Gram-positive bacteria with antibiotic susceptibility testing by measuring OD600 in broth.
BioBrick assembly
To achieve this goal, firstly, the composite was synthesized by IDT® with the prefix and suffix flanking the region of interest. The final part resulted in a sequence of 415 base pairs. Once the synthesis arrived, double digestion with EcoRI-HF and PstI restriction enzymes was made to the composite, and the chloramphenicol linearized plasmid backbone (pSB1C3) for following ligation of both fragments. This resulted in a complete expression plasmid of 2442 base pairs. Afterward, Escherichia coli BL21(DE3) was transformed by heat shock for following the antibiotic selection of clones. Next step consisted of plasmid extraction and electrophoresis gel of the uncut plasmid, the linearized plasmid with one enzyme, and the linearized plasmid with two enzymes. This agarose gel allowed the confirmation of the correct plasmid construction.
IPTG protein induction and extraction
Following the construction of the BioBrick, it was necessary to induce protein production. Since the T7 promoter regulates transcription of the construct, isopropyl β-D-1 thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) is used as an inducer for T7 RNA polymerase production. The concentration of IPTG used was 0.5 mM. After induction, the cultures were incubated for six hours at 37 °C and 225 rpm. After that, protein extraction by lysis solution was made in order to obtain the soluble peptides. For insoluble peptides, the sample was treated with lysis solution + 6 M urea.
Antimicrobial susceptibility testing
In order to prove the antibacterial activity of defensin 1, antimicrobial susceptibility tests were performed for two different bacteria: Bacillus subtilis and Streptococcus pyogenes. B. subtilis was chosen because it is one of the best known Gram-positive microorganisms and S. pyogenes was chosen because it is one of the most important bacterial pathogens to humans. They both are widely known, commonly used, and thus allowed to better analyze the activity that the peptide has.
Being unable to isolate our peptides by affinity tag purification due to lack of equipment, crude protein extract was used in the experiment. In order to validate the experiment, different concentrations of the peptide and several controls were used; 12 ml of LB broth, with a bactericide agent or a control, were inoculated with 100μl of the overnight culture of each bacteria. Afterward, OD600 was measured at 3, 6, 9, and 21 hours after inoculation.
Antimicrobial susceptibility test results
B. subtilis (figure 2a) was treated with 30.6 μg/mL (LC) and 153 μg/mL (HC) of total proteins of transformed E. coli BL21 (DE3) with defensin 1. Also, it was treated with 29.565 μg/mL (LC) and 147.825 μg/mL (HC) of untransformed E. coli BL21 (DE3) for negative control. A culture of B. subtilis was used as a negative control as well. At 21 h, both concentrations of defensin 1 produced a decrease in OD600 compared to the untransformed E. coli BL21 (DE3) control. With the lowest concentration of total proteins with defensin 1 OD600 decreases in 14.23% and with the highest one it decreases in 16.28%.
S. pyogenes (figure 2b) was treated with the same concentrations as B. subtilis. At 21 h, both concentrations of defensin 1 produced a decrease in OD600 compared to the untransformed E. coli BL21 (DE3) control. With the lowest concentration of total proteins with defensin 1 OD600 decreases in 8.26% and with the highest one it decreases in 12.99%.
With the development of the antimicrobial susceptibility testing, it was observed that there was partial inhibition by both total protein extracts. It is probable that some proteins of E. coli BL21 (DE3) are toxic for B. subtilis and S. pyogenes, which allowed their inhibition. However, the protein extracts of the bacteria transformed with the composite for the expression of defensin 1 showed greater inhibition, supporting the premise that the peptide is present and its activity is as expected. B. subtilis was found to be more susceptible to total protein extract with defensin 1 than S. pyogenes at the end of 21 h. However, both bacteria were inhibited in a certain percentage by this extract compared to the negative control of the total protein extract of the non-transformed bacteria.
Sequence and Features
- 10COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[10]
- 12COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[12]
- 21INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[21]Illegal BglII site found at 233
- 23COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[23]
- 25INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[25]Illegal NgoMIV site found at 86
- 1000COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[1000]
References
1. Bucekova, M., Sojka, M., Valachova, I., Martinotti, S., Ranzato, E., Szep, Z., Majtan, V., Klaudiny, J., & Majtan, J. (2017). Bee-derived antibacterial peptide, defensin-1, promotes wound re-epithelialisation in vitro and in vivo. Scientific reports, 7(1), 7340.
2. Danihlík, J., Aronstein, K., & Petřivalský, M. (2015). Antimicrobial peptides: a key component of honey bee innate immunity. Journal of Apicultural Research, 54(2), 123–136. doi:10.1080/00218839.2015.1109919
3. Ilyasov, R., Gaifullina, L., Saltykova, E., Poskryakov, A., & Nikolenko, A. (2012). Review of the Expression of Antimicrobial Peptide Defensin in Honey Bees Apis Mellifera L., Journal of Apicultural Science, 56(1), 115-124. doi.org/10.2478/v10289-012-0013-y
4. Tesovnik, T., Cizelj, I., Zorc, M., Čitar, M., Božič, J., Glavan, G., & Narat, M. (2017). Immune related gene expression in worker honey bee (Apis mellifera carnica) pupae exposed to neonicotinoid thiamethoxam and Varroa mites (Varroa destructor). PloS one, 12(10), e0187079.