Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K2669000:Experience"

m
 
(23 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 6: Line 6:
 
===Applications of BBa_K2669000===
 
===Applications of BBa_K2669000===
 
<html>
 
<html>
−
After transforming our cells with a low copy amplicilin plasmid containing this composite part, cell lysis and affinity chromotography were used to extract UnaG from our cells.  <b>Please note:</b> The exact procedure can be found at the end of  <a href="http://2018.igem.org/wiki/index.php?title=Team:Uppsala/UnaG"><b>our UnaG wiki page</b></a>.  Conducting "bilirubin tests" (the addition of a small amount of bilirubin dissolved in chloroform to samples) allowed us to see if UnaG was present in our samples, since as mentioned earlier UnaG fluoresces in the presence of bilirubin.  </p>
 
  
−
<img class="content-card-img" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/2/20/T--Uppsala--UnaG_Comparison.png" alt="UnaG Comparison">
+
<h1>iGEM Uppsala 2018 Experience</h1>
 +
After transforming our cells with a low copy amplicilin plasmid containing this composite part, cell lysis and affinity chromotography were used to extract UnaG from our cells.  <b>Please note:</b> The exact procedure can be found at the end of  <a href="http://2018.igem.org/wiki/index.php?title=Team:Uppsala/UnaG"><b>our UnaG wiki page</b></a> or on the main page. Conducting "bilirubin tests" (the addition of a small amount of bilirubin dissolved in chloroform to samples) allowed us to see if UnaG was present in our samples, since as mentioned earlier UnaG fluoresces in the presence of bilirubin.  </p>
  
−
<p><b>Figure 1:</b> Bilirubin test before/after affinity chromatography.  Going from right to left the samples are:</p>
+
<p>The part seems to work as intended.  It has a histidine tag, expresses UnaG, and fluoresces when cloned into cells that are subsequently exposed to bilirubin </p>
−
                            <ul>
+
−
                                <li> Lysed sample of the “bad” part before AC</li>
+
−
                                <li> Lysed sample of the “good” part before AC</li>
+
−
                                <li> "Bad" part after AC</li>
+
−
                                <li> "Good" part after AC</li>
+
−
                            </ul>
+
  
−
<img class="content-card-img" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/f/fc/T--Uppsala--UnaG_Blank_Comparison.png" >
 
  
−
<p><b>Figure 2: Comparison of blank tube to successful extraction/previous iGEM part. The tubes reading from left to right are as followed:</b></p>
 
−
                              <ul>
 
−
                                <li> Blank tube with AC elution buffer/bilirubin</li>
 
−
                                <li> Tube with bilirubin + original iGEM UnaG part</li>
 
−
                                <li> Our extracted modified UnaG with a moved start codon, as can be seen in <b>Figure 1</b></li>
 
−
                            </ul>
 
  
−
<p>A good degree of fluorescence can be seen in the last tube compared to the other two, which clearly contain none of our protein of interest. </p>
 
−
 
−
<img class="content-card-img" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/2/25/T--Uppsala--UnaGGelPictureUpdated.png" > <!-- Placeholder image -->
 
−
                            <p><b>Figure 4:</b> SDS-PAGE gel after affinity chromatography</p>
 
−
                            <p>UnaG is approximately 15.6 kDa, showing that it is indeed in the extracted sample.  Other proteins are shown, and this is likely because we used no imidazole in the initial running buffer, leading to unspecific binding.  We did this to ensure that we obtained as much UnaG as possible in our sample so that we could conduct fluorescence tests visible by the naked eye. </p>
 
−
 
−
<h2>Conclusion</h2>
 
−
 
−
<p> The histidine tag, in addition to the amount of UnaG produced seem to be sufficient to both extract the protein of interest and to observe its florescence both when cells are lysed and when they are intact.  </p>
 
−
</html>
 
 
===User Reviews===
 
===User Reviews===
 
<!-- DON'T DELETE --><partinfo>BBa_K2669000 StartReviews</partinfo>
 
<!-- DON'T DELETE --><partinfo>BBa_K2669000 StartReviews</partinfo>
Line 46: Line 23:
 
<I>Username</I>
 
<I>Username</I>
 
|width='60%' valign='top'|
 
|width='60%' valign='top'|
−
Enter the review inofrmation here.
+
Enter the review information here.
 
|};
 
|};
 
<!-- End of the user review template -->
 
<!-- End of the user review template -->
 
<!-- DON'T DELETE --><partinfo>BBa_K2669000 EndReviews</partinfo>
 
<!-- DON'T DELETE --><partinfo>BBa_K2669000 EndReviews</partinfo>

Latest revision as of 02:23, 18 October 2018

This experience page is provided so that any user may enter their experience using this part.
Please enter how you used this part and how it worked out.


Applications of BBa_K2669000

iGEM Uppsala 2018 Experience

After transforming our cells with a low copy amplicilin plasmid containing this composite part, cell lysis and affinity chromotography were used to extract UnaG from our cells. Please note: The exact procedure can be found at the end of our UnaG wiki page or on the main page. Conducting "bilirubin tests" (the addition of a small amount of bilirubin dissolved in chloroform to samples) allowed us to see if UnaG was present in our samples, since as mentioned earlier UnaG fluoresces in the presence of bilirubin.

The part seems to work as intended. It has a histidine tag, expresses UnaG, and fluoresces when cloned into cells that are subsequently exposed to bilirubin

===User Reviews=== BBa_K2669000 StartReviews BBa_K2669000 EndReviews