Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K2442210"

 
 
Line 2: Line 2:
 
__NOTOC__
 
__NOTOC__
 
<partinfo>BBa_K2442210 short</partinfo>
 
<partinfo>BBa_K2442210 short</partinfo>
 +
The wild type RBS taken from the intergenic region mtlR and the mtlE coding region in <i>Pseudomonas Flourescens</i>
 +
  
.
 
  
<!-- Add more about the biology of this part here
 
 
===Usage and Biology===
 
===Usage and Biology===
 +
The RBS was tested within the [https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2442206 reporter plasmid] assay. The reporter plasmid contained the wild type mtlE promoter upstream of the RBS which was upstream of [https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_E0040 GFP]. In order to test the working of our reporter constructs, these were ligated into <i>E.coli</i>, DH5a cells. We studied the indiction of the wild type reporter plasmid with a number of different sugars, mannitol, sorbitol, sucrose, xylose, ribose, and fructose. The reporter plasmid was tested alone with these sugars as well as being tested alongside the regulatory plasmid.
 +
 +
[[Image:T-Glasgow-pleaseworkgraph.png|450px|thumb|left|'''Figure 1:''' GFP response to the sugar induction of regulatory and or reporter plasmid]]
 +
 +
Our results show a GFP response for both the wild type reporter plasmid alone and the wild type reporter plasmid with regulatory plasmid. This gives indication that the wild type RBS works, as there is expression of the GFP protein.
 +
 +
This part was not submitted indivdually, it is part of our composite part, [https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2442206 wild type plasmid]
  
 
<!-- -->
 
<!-- -->

Latest revision as of 23:21, 1 November 2017


Wild Type RBS from P.fluorescens The wild type RBS taken from the intergenic region mtlR and the mtlE coding region in Pseudomonas Flourescens


Usage and Biology

The RBS was tested within the reporter plasmid assay. The reporter plasmid contained the wild type mtlE promoter upstream of the RBS which was upstream of GFP. In order to test the working of our reporter constructs, these were ligated into E.coli, DH5a cells. We studied the indiction of the wild type reporter plasmid with a number of different sugars, mannitol, sorbitol, sucrose, xylose, ribose, and fructose. The reporter plasmid was tested alone with these sugars as well as being tested alongside the regulatory plasmid.

Figure 1: GFP response to the sugar induction of regulatory and or reporter plasmid

Our results show a GFP response for both the wild type reporter plasmid alone and the wild type reporter plasmid with regulatory plasmid. This gives indication that the wild type RBS works, as there is expression of the GFP protein.

This part was not submitted indivdually, it is part of our composite part, wild type plasmid

Sequence and Features


Assembly Compatibility:
  • 10
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[10]
  • 12
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[12]
  • 21
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[21]
  • 23
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[23]
  • 25
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[25]
  • 1000
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[1000]