Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K2368029"

 
(3 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
__NOTOC__
 
__NOTOC__
 
<h1>Introduction</h1>
 
<h1>Introduction</h1>
<partinfo>BBa_K2368029 short</partinfo>
+
<p style="text-align: center"><partinfo>BBa_K2368029 short</partinfo></p>
 
<h3>General</h3>
 
<h3>General</h3>
<p>The original <i>P<sub>fus</sub></i>  (BBa_K1154001) is 201bp long with three Ste12 binding sites, and the Ste12 is <i>P<sub>fus</sub></i>of the transcriptional activator in the endogenous GPCR pathways of yeast.</p>
+
<p>The original <i>P<sub>fus</sub></i>  (BBa_K1154001) is 201bp long with three Ste12 binding sites, and the Ste12 is the transcriptional activator of <i>P<sub>fus</sub></i> in the endogenous GPCR pathways of yeast.</p>
 
<div><br /><br /></div>
 
<div><br /><br /></div>
 
[[File:T_BIT-China_2017part_K2368026.png|center|500px|默认文字]]
 
[[File:T_BIT-China_2017part_K2368026.png|center|500px|默认文字]]
Line 22: Line 22:
 
<br />
 
<br />
 
<br />
 
<br />
<p>The intensity of modified promoter was about 35% of the wild type, which did match with our expectation. We got the new Pfus with different transcription initiation activity. With different promoters, we can apply them in the regulation subsystem according to various situations or wide-ranging needs. </p>
+
<p>The intensity of modified promoter was about 35% of the wild type, which did match with our expectation. We got the new <i>P<sub>fus</sub></i> with different transcription initiation activity. With different promoters, we can apply them in the regulation subsystem according to various situations or wide-ranging needs. </p>
 
<br />
 
<br />
 
<p>But from another point of view, still, we got the new <i>P<sub>fus</sub></i> with different transcription initiation activity. With different promoters, we can apply them in the regulation subsystem according to various situations or wide-ranging needs.</p>
 
<p>But from another point of view, still, we got the new <i>P<sub>fus</sub></i> with different transcription initiation activity. With different promoters, we can apply them in the regulation subsystem according to various situations or wide-ranging needs.</p>
Line 42: Line 42:
 
<h2>Sequence and Features</h2>
 
<h2>Sequence and Features</h2>
  
<partinfo>BBa_K2368027 SequenceAndFeatures</partinfo>
+
<partinfo>BBa_K2368029 SequenceAndFeatures</partinfo>
  
 
<!-- Uncomment this to enable Functional Parameter display  
 
<!-- Uncomment this to enable Functional Parameter display  
 
===Functional Parameters===
 
===Functional Parameters===
  
<partinfo>BBa_K2368027
+
<partinfo>BBa_K2368029

Latest revision as of 19:29, 26 October 2017

Introduction

Pfus(2 Ste12 binding sites)

General

The original Pfus (BBa_K1154001) is 201bp long with three Ste12 binding sites, and the Ste12 is the transcriptional activator of Pfus in the endogenous GPCR pathways of yeast.



默认文字

Fig.1 The sequence of original Pfus



In order to decrease the transcription initiation activity of the promoter, we used the method of one-step mutation to remove a binding sites. (from tgaaaca to ggacac)



默认文字

Fig.2 Sequencing result of original Pfus and mutant Pfus

After the modified promoter assembling into the [http://2017.igem.org/Team:BIT-China/Project/#Detection detection circuit], we added 5umol/L α pheromone to detect it, and the result is shown in Fig.3.

默认文字

Fig.3 The mRFP intensity of two kinds of promoters




The intensity of modified promoter was about 35% of the wild type, which did match with our expectation. We got the new Pfus with different transcription initiation activity. With different promoters, we can apply them in the regulation subsystem according to various situations or wide-ranging needs.


But from another point of view, still, we got the new Pfus with different transcription initiation activity. With different promoters, we can apply them in the regulation subsystem according to various situations or wide-ranging needs.



This part is an improvement of BBa_K1154001 of 2013 RHIT team.






[1] Su, T.-C., Tamarkina, E. and Sadowski, I. (2010), Organizational constraints on Ste12 cis-elements for a pheromone response in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEBS Journal, 277: 3235–3248. doi:10.1111/j.1742-4658.2010.07728.x


Sequence and Features


Assembly Compatibility:
  • 10
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[10]
  • 12
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[12]
  • 21
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[21]
  • 23
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[23]
  • 25
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[25]
  • 1000
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[1000]