Difference between revisions of "Part:pSB6A1:Experience"

 
 
(24 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
 
__NOTOC__
 
__NOTOC__
 
This experience page is provided so that any user may enter their experience using this part.<BR>Please enter
 
This experience page is provided so that any user may enter their experience using this part.<BR>Please enter
Line 8: Line 7:
 
===User Reviews===
 
===User Reviews===
 
<!-- DON'T DELETE --><partinfo>pSB6A1 StartReviews</partinfo>
 
<!-- DON'T DELETE --><partinfo>pSB6A1 StartReviews</partinfo>
<!-- Template for a user review
 
 
{|width='80%' style='border:1px solid gray'
 
{|width='80%' style='border:1px solid gray'
 
|-
 
|-
 
|width='10%'|
 
|width='10%'|
<partinfo>pSB6A1 AddReview number</partinfo>
+
<partinfo>pSB6A1 AddReview 5</partinfo>
 +
<I>iGEM2016 Tokyo_tech</I>
 +
|width='60%' valign='top'|
 +
It was found that the registered sequence of pSB6A1 was wrong; our sequencing of the plasmid showed that 272 bases was lost and the lost sequence was located at the downstream of the <i>Pst</i>Ⅰ recognition site.<br><br> When the <i>lasR</i> (<partinfo>BBa_C0179</partinfo>) gene fragment was inserted into pSB6A1, we tried to know whether the ligation was correctly performed by cutting with <i>Sal</i>Ⅰ. We expected generation of a fragment of 800 bp, but unexpectedly, a fragment of approximately 500 to 600 bp was observed(Fig.5-1) in electrophoresis. The result of sequencing showed that the recognition sequence of <i>Pst</i>Ⅰ and <i>Sal</i>Ⅰ were adjacent.
 +
[[Image: PSB6A1(tokyo tech).png|thumb|center|400px|Fig. 5-1. Agarose gel electrophoresis of <i>lasR</i> (pSB6A1) cut with <i>Sal</i>I. Lane 1 shows that approximately 300 bases are missing in <i>lasR</i> or pSB6A1]]
 +
|}
 +
 
 +
{|width='80%' style='border:1px solid gray'
 +
|-
 +
|width='10%'|
 +
<partinfo>pSB6A1 AddReview 4</partinfo>
 +
<I>iGEM2012 WHU-CHINA</I>
 +
|width='60%' valign='top'|
 +
This plasmid backbone works very well. When we tested the function of our promoter PfadR <partinfo>BBa_K861061</partinfo> in high copy number plasmid pSB1A2, almost all the clones went light red. The result from plate reader also indicted that in high copy number plasmid pSB1A2, the promoter is quite leaky. However, when we transferred the part into pSB6A1, the device becomes less leaky. We therefore highly recommend iGEM teams to use this backbone to test the function of factor-relugated promoter.
 +
|}
 +
 
 +
{|width='80%' style='border:1px solid gray'
 +
|-
 +
|width='10%'|
 +
<partinfo>pSB6A1 AddReview 3</partinfo>
 
<I>Username</I>
 
<I>Username</I>
 
|width='60%' valign='top'|
 
|width='60%' valign='top'|
Enter the review inofrmation here.
+
This plasmid has been adapted to the version 5 of BioBrick vector backbones by the ETHZ 2011 iGEM team, resulting in [https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K625005 pSB6A5]. This means, that the cassettes for the ORI and antibiotic resistance have been minimized (reduction of the size and transcriptional terminators flanking the prefix and the suffix have been added, to trancriptionally insulate the inserted parts from the vector backbone machinery and vice versa.
 +
This minimization yielded a reduction in size from 4022 bp to 2743 bp.
 +
 
 +
For comparison of the copy number of the plasmids, triplicates of OD normalized bacterial cultures containing the respective plasmids were miniprepped. The DNA concentration was then determined by an agarose DNA gel electrophoresis of EcoRI digests of the purified plasmids (Figure 1). This experiment showed a clear reduction in copy number of the minimized version of the original plasmid (Figure 2).
 +
 
 +
 
 +
[[Image:Veeeeeeery final copy number test gel.png|500px|left|thumb|'''Figure 1: Agarose gel''' with 2-log-ladder loaded in in lane one, digests of triplicates of the EcoRI digests of pSB6A1 (lane 2-4) and pSB6A5 (lane5-7).]]
 +
[[Image:Veeeeeeery final copy number test.png|300px|right|thumb|'''Figure 2: Agarose gel''' with 2-log-ladder loaded in in lane one, digests of triplicates of the EcoRI digests of pSB6A1 (lane 2-4) and pSB6A5 (lane5-7).]]
 +
 
 +
 
 
|};
 
|};
<!-- End of the user review template -->
+
 
 
<!-- DON'T DELETE --><partinfo>pSB6A1 EndReviews</partinfo>
 
<!-- DON'T DELETE --><partinfo>pSB6A1 EndReviews</partinfo>

Latest revision as of 06:42, 13 October 2016

This experience page is provided so that any user may enter their experience using this part.
Please enter how you used this part and how it worked out.

Applications of pSB6A1

User Reviews

UNIQa093a47ed2bd1fd8-partinfo-00000000-QINU

•••••

iGEM2016 Tokyo_tech

It was found that the registered sequence of pSB6A1 was wrong; our sequencing of the plasmid showed that 272 bases was lost and the lost sequence was located at the downstream of the PstⅠ recognition site.

When the lasR (BBa_C0179) gene fragment was inserted into pSB6A1, we tried to know whether the ligation was correctly performed by cutting with SalⅠ. We expected generation of a fragment of 800 bp, but unexpectedly, a fragment of approximately 500 to 600 bp was observed(Fig.5-1) in electrophoresis. The result of sequencing showed that the recognition sequence of PstⅠ and SalⅠ were adjacent.

Fig. 5-1. Agarose gel electrophoresis of lasR (pSB6A1) cut with SalI. Lane 1 shows that approximately 300 bases are missing in lasR or pSB6A1
••••

iGEM2012 WHU-CHINA

This plasmid backbone works very well. When we tested the function of our promoter PfadR BBa_K861061 in high copy number plasmid pSB1A2, almost all the clones went light red. The result from plate reader also indicted that in high copy number plasmid pSB1A2, the promoter is quite leaky. However, when we transferred the part into pSB6A1, the device becomes less leaky. We therefore highly recommend iGEM teams to use this backbone to test the function of factor-relugated promoter.

•••

Username

This plasmid has been adapted to the version 5 of BioBrick vector backbones by the ETHZ 2011 iGEM team, resulting in pSB6A5. This means, that the cassettes for the ORI and antibiotic resistance have been minimized (reduction of the size and transcriptional terminators flanking the prefix and the suffix have been added, to trancriptionally insulate the inserted parts from the vector backbone machinery and vice versa. This minimization yielded a reduction in size from 4022 bp to 2743 bp.

For comparison of the copy number of the plasmids, triplicates of OD normalized bacterial cultures containing the respective plasmids were miniprepped. The DNA concentration was then determined by an agarose DNA gel electrophoresis of EcoRI digests of the purified plasmids (Figure 1). This experiment showed a clear reduction in copy number of the minimized version of the original plasmid (Figure 2).


Figure 1: Agarose gel with 2-log-ladder loaded in in lane one, digests of triplicates of the EcoRI digests of pSB6A1 (lane 2-4) and pSB6A5 (lane5-7).
Figure 2: Agarose gel with 2-log-ladder loaded in in lane one, digests of triplicates of the EcoRI digests of pSB6A1 (lane 2-4) and pSB6A5 (lane5-7).


;

UNIQa093a47ed2bd1fd8-partinfo-00000006-QINU