Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K1645998"

 
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 10: Line 10:
 
==Characterization==
 
==Characterization==
  
[[File: T--Waterloo--2016_Round1_374vs418.png|300px|thumb|right|Figure 1: Preliminary Exploratory Comparison of RFP Expression with (a) and without (b) a Complete sgRNA-dCas9 pair.]]
+
[[File:T--Waterloo--2016_Round1_374vs418.png|300px|thumb|right|Figure 1: Preliminary Exploratory Comparison of RFP Expression with (a) and without (b) a Complete sgRNA-dCas9 pair.]]
  
[[File: T--Waterloo--2016_Round_374vs418(IPTG-BOTH.png|300px|thumb|right|Figure 1: A Comparison of GFP and RFP expression from the Dual Colour Plasmid]]
+
[[File:T--Waterloo--2016_Round_374vs418(IPTG-BOTH.png|300px|thumb|right|Figure 2: Comparison of (a) RFP with an sgRNA-dCas9 pair and (b) RFP with only dCas9 and no sgRNA]]
 +
 
 +
[[File: T--Waterloo--2016_Round_374(NOIPTG)vs374(IPTG).png|300px|thumb|right|Figure 3: Comparison between (a) iptg-induced and (b) no iptg-induction CRISPRi]]
  
 
We performed a series of experiments to demonstrate that this sgRNA when used with a dCas9 protein is able to repress RFP fluorescence when compared to controls.  
 
We performed a series of experiments to demonstrate that this sgRNA when used with a dCas9 protein is able to repress RFP fluorescence when compared to controls.  
Line 18: Line 20:
 
===Methods and Materials===
 
===Methods and Materials===
 
To produce the data, we inoculated the appropriate E. coli strains into LB and grew it for 4hr to an OD600 of 0.4, followed by induction with IPTG at a final concentration of 1mM for 6hr. For negative controls, we did not add IPTG. Next, we diluted the culture four-fold into chilled formalin (1X PBS, 4% formaldehyde, 1.5% methanol). We used flow cytometry (Aminis ImageStream MKII) to run a sample and detected fluorescence using an excitation laser wavelength of 488nm at 200mW, as well as SSC at 1.5mW. After acquiring data from 20'000 cells in all channels, we performed analysis on the IDEAS Application v.6 software.   
 
To produce the data, we inoculated the appropriate E. coli strains into LB and grew it for 4hr to an OD600 of 0.4, followed by induction with IPTG at a final concentration of 1mM for 6hr. For negative controls, we did not add IPTG. Next, we diluted the culture four-fold into chilled formalin (1X PBS, 4% formaldehyde, 1.5% methanol). We used flow cytometry (Aminis ImageStream MKII) to run a sample and detected fluorescence using an excitation laser wavelength of 488nm at 200mW, as well as SSC at 1.5mW. After acquiring data from 20'000 cells in all channels, we performed analysis on the IDEAS Application v.6 software.   
 +
 +
For Figure 1 and 2, the protocol above was modified such that the cultures after induction were incubated for 9hr instead of 6hr.
  
 
This protocol is based off in-house protocols created by previous Waterloo iGEM members and revised over the years by advisors and experienced users.  
 
This protocol is based off in-house protocols created by previous Waterloo iGEM members and revised over the years by advisors and experienced users.  
  
 
===Results and Discussion===
 
===Results and Discussion===
Figure 1. shows that both RFP and GFP are fluorescing, though at different intensities. Overall, GFP's intensity data averages at 502 intensity units and RFP's intensity data averages at 139 intensity units. This means that GFP fluoresces approximately 3.5x more intensely than RFP. Figure 2 shows the frequency at which cells fluoresce at a particular intensity for GFP on the right and RFP on the left.  
+
We began our experiments by first checking if our strains from last year were still viable. In Figure 1 (a) we show that the strain with an RFP and a dCas9 leads to expression of RFP, but in Figure 1 (b) we show that the strain with RFP and the complete dCas9-sgRNA pair resulted in repression of RFP fluorescence based on the spike in frequency of cells that have almost zero RFP fluorescence.
  
In all, further experiments can provide more precise measurements of GFP and RFP fluorescence, but we present here adequate fluorescence data for other teams to understand the behavior of the Dual Colour Plasmid in  
+
With this raw data, we were confident moving on with the part characterization and decided to extend the induction time by 3hr in an attempt to get better expression and thus more robust data. Figure 2 provides similar information to Figure 1 where we see the complete sgRNA-dCas9 pair repressing RFP fluorescence. In Figure 2 (b), we see intensities up to 2000 intensity units, but in Figure (a) we see that virtually all cells show less than 500 intensity units - an approximately four-fold repression ability.
  
 +
Finally in Figure 3, we see that for (b) there is very little RFP fluorescence, but in (a) there is essentially no RFP fluorescence as well. This is indicative of IPTG having strong control over the expression of RFP in the E. coli cells.
  
 +
In summary, we demonstrate this part's ability to give dCas9 the specificity to target the promoter of BBa_I20260 and effectively repress RFP fluorescence, thus characterizing this part for the first time.
  
 
<!-- -->
 
<!-- -->
 
<span class='h3bb'>Sequence and Features</span>
 
<span class='h3bb'>Sequence and Features</span>
<partinfo>BBa_K1645999 SequenceAndFeatures</partinfo>
+
<partinfo>BBa_K1645998 SequenceAndFeatures</partinfo>
  
  
 
<!-- Uncomment this to enable Functional Parameter display  
 
<!-- Uncomment this to enable Functional Parameter display  
 
===Functional Parameters===
 
===Functional Parameters===
<partinfo>BBa_K1645999 parameters</partinfo>
+
<partinfo>BBa_K1645998 parameters</partinfo>
 
<!-- -->
 
<!-- -->

Latest revision as of 01:41, 24 October 2016

SgRNA targeting LacI promoter

This part is an sgRNA from the CRISPRi system and is designed to provide (d)Cas9 the specificity to target the promoter of BBa_I20260.

It can be used with Streptococcus pyogenes Cas9 and related variants. Here, we use it in conjunction with flow cytometry to demonstrate its ability to repress RFP expression.

It has been characterized through numerous experiments presented in the next section.

Characterization

Figure 1: Preliminary Exploratory Comparison of RFP Expression with (a) and without (b) a Complete sgRNA-dCas9 pair.
Figure 2: Comparison of (a) RFP with an sgRNA-dCas9 pair and (b) RFP with only dCas9 and no sgRNA
Figure 3: Comparison between (a) iptg-induced and (b) no iptg-induction CRISPRi

We performed a series of experiments to demonstrate that this sgRNA when used with a dCas9 protein is able to repress RFP fluorescence when compared to controls.

Methods and Materials

To produce the data, we inoculated the appropriate E. coli strains into LB and grew it for 4hr to an OD600 of 0.4, followed by induction with IPTG at a final concentration of 1mM for 6hr. For negative controls, we did not add IPTG. Next, we diluted the culture four-fold into chilled formalin (1X PBS, 4% formaldehyde, 1.5% methanol). We used flow cytometry (Aminis ImageStream MKII) to run a sample and detected fluorescence using an excitation laser wavelength of 488nm at 200mW, as well as SSC at 1.5mW. After acquiring data from 20'000 cells in all channels, we performed analysis on the IDEAS Application v.6 software.

For Figure 1 and 2, the protocol above was modified such that the cultures after induction were incubated for 9hr instead of 6hr.

This protocol is based off in-house protocols created by previous Waterloo iGEM members and revised over the years by advisors and experienced users.

Results and Discussion

We began our experiments by first checking if our strains from last year were still viable. In Figure 1 (a) we show that the strain with an RFP and a dCas9 leads to expression of RFP, but in Figure 1 (b) we show that the strain with RFP and the complete dCas9-sgRNA pair resulted in repression of RFP fluorescence based on the spike in frequency of cells that have almost zero RFP fluorescence.

With this raw data, we were confident moving on with the part characterization and decided to extend the induction time by 3hr in an attempt to get better expression and thus more robust data. Figure 2 provides similar information to Figure 1 where we see the complete sgRNA-dCas9 pair repressing RFP fluorescence. In Figure 2 (b), we see intensities up to 2000 intensity units, but in Figure (a) we see that virtually all cells show less than 500 intensity units - an approximately four-fold repression ability.

Finally in Figure 3, we see that for (b) there is very little RFP fluorescence, but in (a) there is essentially no RFP fluorescence as well. This is indicative of IPTG having strong control over the expression of RFP in the E. coli cells.

In summary, we demonstrate this part's ability to give dCas9 the specificity to target the promoter of BBa_I20260 and effectively repress RFP fluorescence, thus characterizing this part for the first time.

Sequence and Features


Assembly Compatibility:
  • 10
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[10]
  • 12
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[12]
  • 21
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[21]
  • 23
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[23]
  • 25
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[25]
  • 1000
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[1000]