Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K2114017"
(→Characterization) |
|||
(18 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<partinfo>BBa_K2114017 short</partinfo> | <partinfo>BBa_K2114017 short</partinfo> | ||
− | N-terminal fusion of anti-GFP nanobody to spore crust gene | + | N-terminal fusion of anti-GFP nanobody to spore crust gene CgeA by an alpha helical linker. |
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
[[File:iG16_schematic_BBa_K2114017.png|350px|thumb|left|Figure 1: Schematic representation of the fusion protein.]] | [[File:iG16_schematic_BBa_K2114017.png|350px|thumb|left|Figure 1: Schematic representation of the fusion protein.]] | ||
− | This part includes the anti-GFP nanobody | + | This part includes the anti-GFP nanobody <sup>1</sup> fused by an alpha helical linker <sup>2</sup> to the <i>B. subtilis</i> spore crust gene CgeA in order to be displayed on the spore surface. The hemagglutinin epitope tag was included in the fusion construct for convenient detection by specific anti-HA antibodies. The CgeA gene was amplified from the genome of <i>B. subtilis</i> and the anti-GFP nanobody was amplified from an expression plasmid. The HA tag and the alpha helical linker were introduced by primer extensions. Both PCR fragments were assembled by Gibson cloning into pSB1C3. The fusion construct can released by XbaI and PstI and cloned alongside with an appropriate promoter into an integration vector for <i>B. subtilis</i> by 3A assembly <sup>3</sup>. |
<br><br><br> | <br><br><br> | ||
===Characterization=== | ===Characterization=== | ||
+ | This part was used and characterized by [http://2016.igem.org/Team:Freiburg Team Freiburg 2016]. <br> | ||
− | <h4>I) | + | <h4>I) Verification of surface localization by immunostaining</h4> |
− | + | [[File:iG16_Freiburg_BBa_K2114017_Alexa.png|350px|thumb|left|Figure 2: Flow cytometry analysis of the surface-displayed fusion construct. Staining of wild type (not transformed) and engineered (expressed by BBa_K2114017) spores with anti-HA antibodies conjugated to Alexa Fluor 647.]] | |
− | [[File: | + | |
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
+ | The spores of <i>B. subtilis</i> expressing the part BBa_K2114017 were purified by lysozyme treatment to lyse remaining vegetative cells and stained with anti-HA antibodies conjugated to Alexa Fluor® 647 (Cell Signaling Technology®). The antibody could only access surface-localized HA epitopes of the expressed fusion genes and could confirm the successful display of the heterologous protein on the surface of the modified spores resulting in a slight increase of the fluorescence compared to the stained wild type spores. The low amount of fluorescent spores might be attributable to a low display efficiency using the CgeA protein as an anchor. | ||
<br><br><br> | <br><br><br> | ||
<br><br><br> | <br><br><br> | ||
<br><br><br> | <br><br><br> | ||
<br><br><br> | <br><br><br> | ||
+ | <br><br><br> | ||
+ | |||
<h4>II) Verification of functionality by binding to GFP</h4> | <h4>II) Verification of functionality by binding to GFP</h4> | ||
− | [[File:iG16_Freiburg_BBa_K2114017 GFP | + | [[File:iG16_Freiburg_BBa_K2114017 GFP stainingv2.png|350px|thumb|left|Figure 3: Flow cytometry analysis of the surface-displayed fusion construct. Staining of wild type (not transformed) and engineered (transformed with BBa_K2114017) spores with anti-HA antibodies conjugated to Alexa Fluor 647.]] |
− | To verify the functionality of the expressed fusion construct containing the anti-GFP nanobody the spores were incubated with purified GFP and analyzed by flow cytometry in order to detect the fluorescence. Spores expressing the part | + | To verify the functionality of the expressed fusion construct containing the anti-GFP nanobody the spores were incubated with purified GFP and analyzed by flow cytometry in order to detect the fluorescence. Spores expressing the part BBa_K2114017 exhibited increased fluorescence in comparison to the unmodified wild type spores (Figure 3). |
<br><br><br> | <br><br><br> | ||
Line 39: | Line 39: | ||
<br><br><br> | <br><br><br> | ||
<br><br><br> | <br><br><br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===Rerences=== | ||
+ | 1. Kubala, M. H., Kovtun, O., Alexandrov, K. & Collins, B. M. Structural and thermodynamic analysis of the GFP:GFP-nanobody complex. Protein Sci. 19, 2389–2401 (2010).<br> | ||
+ | 2. Hinc, K., Iwanicki, A. & Obuchowski, M. New stable anchor protein and peptide linker suitable for successful spore surface display in B. subtilis. Microb. Cell Fact. 12, 22 (2013).<br> | ||
+ | 3. Radeck, J. et al. The Bacillus BioBrick Box: generation and evaluation of essential genetic building blocks for standardized work with Bacillus subtilis. J. Biol. Eng. 7, 29 (2013).<br> | ||
+ | |||
<!-- --> | <!-- --> |
Latest revision as of 07:22, 20 October 2016
aGFPnano_HA_aHelix_cgeA
N-terminal fusion of anti-GFP nanobody to spore crust gene CgeA by an alpha helical linker.
Usage and Biology
This part includes the anti-GFP nanobody 1 fused by an alpha helical linker 2 to the B. subtilis spore crust gene CgeA in order to be displayed on the spore surface. The hemagglutinin epitope tag was included in the fusion construct for convenient detection by specific anti-HA antibodies. The CgeA gene was amplified from the genome of B. subtilis and the anti-GFP nanobody was amplified from an expression plasmid. The HA tag and the alpha helical linker were introduced by primer extensions. Both PCR fragments were assembled by Gibson cloning into pSB1C3. The fusion construct can released by XbaI and PstI and cloned alongside with an appropriate promoter into an integration vector for B. subtilis by 3A assembly 3.
Characterization
This part was used and characterized by [http://2016.igem.org/Team:Freiburg Team Freiburg 2016].
I) Verification of surface localization by immunostaining
The spores of B. subtilis expressing the part BBa_K2114017 were purified by lysozyme treatment to lyse remaining vegetative cells and stained with anti-HA antibodies conjugated to Alexa Fluor® 647 (Cell Signaling Technology®). The antibody could only access surface-localized HA epitopes of the expressed fusion genes and could confirm the successful display of the heterologous protein on the surface of the modified spores resulting in a slight increase of the fluorescence compared to the stained wild type spores. The low amount of fluorescent spores might be attributable to a low display efficiency using the CgeA protein as an anchor.
II) Verification of functionality by binding to GFP
To verify the functionality of the expressed fusion construct containing the anti-GFP nanobody the spores were incubated with purified GFP and analyzed by flow cytometry in order to detect the fluorescence. Spores expressing the part BBa_K2114017 exhibited increased fluorescence in comparison to the unmodified wild type spores (Figure 3).
Rerences
1. Kubala, M. H., Kovtun, O., Alexandrov, K. & Collins, B. M. Structural and thermodynamic analysis of the GFP:GFP-nanobody complex. Protein Sci. 19, 2389–2401 (2010).
2. Hinc, K., Iwanicki, A. & Obuchowski, M. New stable anchor protein and peptide linker suitable for successful spore surface display in B. subtilis. Microb. Cell Fact. 12, 22 (2013).
3. Radeck, J. et al. The Bacillus BioBrick Box: generation and evaluation of essential genetic building blocks for standardized work with Bacillus subtilis. J. Biol. Eng. 7, 29 (2013).
Sequence and Features
- 10COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[10]
- 12COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[12]
- 21COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[21]
- 23COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[23]
- 25INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[25]Illegal AgeI site found at 681
- 1000COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[1000]