Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K2036013"
GuoZhengyi (Talk | contribs) |
|||
(3 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
<p> | <p> | ||
− | CII (BBa_K2036000) functions as a transcriptional activator to direct promoter RE, so we constructed CII-TT-pRE-RBS-GFP-LVAssrAtag as test group and pRE-RBS- | + | CII ([https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2036000 BBa_K2036000] ) functions as a transcriptional activator to direct promoter RE, so we constructed CII-TT-pRE-RBS-GFP-LVAssrAtag as test group and pRE-RBS-GFP-LVAssrAtag as CK to see if CII efficiently activate pRE. |
</p> | </p> | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
<p> | <p> | ||
− | We had submitted and documented RBS-CIII-RBS-CIII-RBS-CII-TT-pRE-RBS-GFP-LVAssrAtag (BBa_K2036014) and RBS-CII-RBS-CII-RBS-CII-TT-pRE-RBS-GFP-LVAssrAtag (BBa_K2036015). These two parts were to test whether CIII can protect CII from being degraded by Ftsh by competitive inhibition. | + | We had submitted and documented RBS-CIII-RBS-CIII-RBS-CII-TT-pRE-RBS-GFP-LVAssrAtag ([https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2036014 BBa_K2036014] ) and RBS-CII-RBS-CII-RBS-CII-TT-pRE-RBS-GFP-LVAssrAtag ([https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2036015 BBa_K2036015] ). These two parts were to test whether CIII can protect CII from being degraded by Ftsh by competitive inhibition. |
</p> | </p> | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
− | [[File:T--HUST-China--CIII%26Ftsh.png|800px|thumb|center|Fig4: According to the Flourescence measurement curve above, we can see clearly that GFP level of CIII test circuit increased over time and it showed significant difference from two control groups. It indicates that | + | [[File:T--HUST-China--CIII%26Ftsh.png|800px|thumb|center|Fig4: According to the Flourescence measurement curve above, we can see clearly that GFP level of CIII test circuit increased over time and it showed significant difference from two control groups. It indicates that tandemly expressed CIII can efficiently protect CII from being degraded by Ftsh. ]] |
<h2>Preliminary experiments of LVAssrA-tag</h2> | <h2>Preliminary experiments of LVAssrA-tag</h2> | ||
<p> | <p> | ||
− | In order to prove that our toolkit is efficient to switch two interest genes’ expression from GFP to RFP and to eliminate the accumulation of expressed protein to interfere our measurement. We fused a degradation tag at the amino terminal of our reporter. And we used plac from the Rgistery (BBa_J04500) to characterize the degradation tag LVAssrA. | + | In order to prove that our toolkit is efficient to switch two interest genes’ expression from GFP to RFP and to eliminate the accumulation of expressed protein to interfere our measurement. We fused a degradation tag at the amino terminal of our reporter. And we used plac from the Rgistery ([https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_J04500 BBa_J04500] ) to characterize the degradation tag LVAssrA. |
We use IPTG with final concentration of 1mM to induce the GFP-LVAssrAtag and measure the relative fluorescence through plate reader with Excitation light 495nm. | We use IPTG with final concentration of 1mM to induce the GFP-LVAssrAtag and measure the relative fluorescence through plate reader with Excitation light 495nm. | ||
</p> | </p> | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
[[File:T--HUST-China--Experiments-LVAssrA.png|800px|thumb|center|Fig5: From the figure above, we are sorry to find that plac can not be prohibited from leakage, as there are nearly no difference between the test and control group. But we are confident to prove the high degradation efficiency of the tag as more than two thirds of the GFP degraded within 90 minutes which also offered an interesting and useful tool for rapidly down regulating certain target protein.]] | [[File:T--HUST-China--Experiments-LVAssrA.png|800px|thumb|center|Fig5: From the figure above, we are sorry to find that plac can not be prohibited from leakage, as there are nearly no difference between the test and control group. But we are confident to prove the high degradation efficiency of the tag as more than two thirds of the GFP degraded within 90 minutes which also offered an interesting and useful tool for rapidly down regulating certain target protein.]] |
Latest revision as of 06:59, 25 October 2016
RBS-CII-TT-pRE-RBS-GFP-LVAssrAtag
It is a GFP regulationary circuits. When CII is expressed it can further activate GFP and forming a Switching Lag-times. HUST-China 2016 build this part to characterize CII and pRE interaction with a control group:pRE-GFP-LVAssrAtag ( BBa_K2036011). And we also construct a tandem expression of CII (BBa_K2036015)to figure out if the flouresence level will come up with CII.
Sequence and Features
- 10COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[10]
- 12COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[12]
- 21COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[21]
- 23COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[23]
- 25COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[25]
- 1000INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[1000]Illegal BsaI.rc site found at 1168
Protein&promoter
--CII and pRE
CII (BBa_K2036000 ) functions as a transcriptional activator to direct promoter RE, so we constructed CII-TT-pRE-RBS-GFP-LVAssrAtag as test group and pRE-RBS-GFP-LVAssrAtag as CK to see if CII efficiently activate pRE.
Protein&protein reaction
We had submitted and documented RBS-CIII-RBS-CIII-RBS-CII-TT-pRE-RBS-GFP-LVAssrAtag (BBa_K2036014 ) and RBS-CII-RBS-CII-RBS-CII-TT-pRE-RBS-GFP-LVAssrAtag (BBa_K2036015 ). These two parts were to test whether CIII can protect CII from being degraded by Ftsh by competitive inhibition.
Preliminary experiments of LVAssrA-tag
In order to prove that our toolkit is efficient to switch two interest genes’ expression from GFP to RFP and to eliminate the accumulation of expressed protein to interfere our measurement. We fused a degradation tag at the amino terminal of our reporter. And we used plac from the Rgistery (BBa_J04500 ) to characterize the degradation tag LVAssrA. We use IPTG with final concentration of 1mM to induce the GFP-LVAssrAtag and measure the relative fluorescence through plate reader with Excitation light 495nm.