Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K2120002"

(User Reviews)
 
(12 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
 
<partinfo>BBa_K2120002 short</partinfo>
 
<partinfo>BBa_K2120002 short</partinfo>
  
 +
''arac''-pBAD is an arabinose induced promoter, ''mazF'' is a toxin gene from ''E.coli. MG1655''. This part is functioned as a controlable killer device.
  
'''Test the toxin gene can be translated and play a role in situations'''
+
====This part has been improved. The improved version is <partinfo>BBa_K2570021</partinfo>. ====
 +
<span style="font-weight:bold;">From 2018 FJNU-China</span>
 +
We explored the effect of toxin protein expression under the control of a temperature promoter. We set different temperature as experimental variables, and we added green fluorescent protein for characterization.
  
The 2016 BIT-China iGEM Team equipped the bacteria with a plasmid-sensing logically adjustable cell killer(P-SLACKiller). To kill the slacker bacteria in time, we chose to construct circuits with toxin genes mazF and hokD. And here we designed two circuits to verify the function, one was araC+PBAD+B0032+mazF, another was araC+PBAD+B0032+hokD[https://parts.igem.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K2120003 BBa_K2120003]. The araC+PBAD promoter can be controlled tightly by using arabinose.
+
===User Reviews===
Then we constructed two plasmids containing these two circuits, and transformed the two plasmids into top10 respectively. After transformation, we measured the OD600 to draw the growth curve and observed the function of toxin protein. Besides the above two bacteria contained toxin genes, the control was the empty pSB1C3 vector. Add arabinose or not, there was another comparison. We add 10% arabinose 50 uL into 50 mL LB culture medium when the OD600 is 0.6 (the log phase). We measured the OD600 every hour until the bacteria reached the stationary phase.
+
[[File:BIT-CHINA-PARTS-KILLER-1.jpg|800px|thumb|center|Fig.1 Compared with the negative control (the empty pSB1C3 vector), OD600 of the two circuits containing toxin proteins are obviously lower, and the difference is evident as time going on. No obvious difference observed among the three groups with no induction. It showed that toxin proteins didn’t leak out.]]
+
  
 +
We explored the effect of toxin protein expression under the control of a temperature promoter. We set different temperature as experimental variables, and we added green fluorescent protein for characterization.
  
Through growth curves, we concluded that toxin protein MazF and HokD have different lethal efficiency. Depending on different situations, they can be used.
+
Then,we use the GFP BBa_E0040 to characterize the intensity of the temperature-controlled promoter.
  
'''Regulate the lethal efficiency of the toxin gene in an advanced way'''
+
[[File:FileT--FJNU-China--Fluorescence levels per OD_dsrA+GFP_1.png|600px|thumb|center|Figure.(B) Fluorescence levels per OD at different salt concentrations. ]]
+
[[File:FileT--FJNU-China--Fluorescence images_dsrA+GFP_1.png|600px|thumb|center|Figure.(C) Fluorescence images at different culture temperature.]]
To verify the toxin gene in an advanced way, we tested whether the toxin gene could be a well-regulated one. So we adjusted the translation efficiency of toxin proteins through replace ribosome binding site(RBS), thus to regulate the toxin gene.
+
We set the temperature concentration 25℃, 30℃, 35℃, 40℃. In Fig. 2, at the same OD value, the measured GFP fluorescence value increased with increasing culture temperature. In addition, the green fluorescence at different culture temperature can be visually observed, and it is concluded that an increase in culture temperature enhances the expression of a temperature controlled promoter, an increase in the expression of green fluorescent protein, and an increase in GFP fluorescence value. At the culture temperature of 40 degrees, the fluorescence intensity of the unit OD value was significantly weakened. We speculated that the higher culture temperature has an adverse effect on cell growth and temperature-controlled promoter expression.
Through one-step mutation, we have separately replaced the B0032 (33.96%)in above circuits with B0031 (12.64%) and B0034 (100%). So we got: araC+PBAD+B0031+mazF [https://parts.igem.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K2120004 BBa_K2120004], araC+PBAD+B0031+hokD[https://parts.igem.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K2120005 BBa_K2120005], araC+PBAD+B0034+mazF[https://parts.igem.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K2120006 BBa_K2120006], araC+PBAD+B0034+hokD,and here were the sequencing results.
+
[[File:BIT-CHINA-PARTS-KILLER-2.jpg|BIT-CHINA-PARTS-KILLER-3.jpg|800px|thumb|center|Fig.1 Compared with the negative control (the empty pSB1C3 vector), OD600 of the two circuits containing toxin proteins are obviously lower, and the difference is evident as time going on. No obvious difference observed among the three groups with no induction. It showed that toxin proteins didn’t leak out.]]
+
 
+
 
+
+
+
Fig.2 The successful sequencing results of 4 mutations: B0031+mazF; B0034+mazF; B0031+hokD; B0034+hokD
+
By using the above methods that we used to verify the function of the toxin gene, we also tested OD600 to get the growth curve to show the lethal efficiency of MazF and HokD under different RBS. Compare with the negative control (pSB1C3 empty vector) and the positive control (B0032 circuits, the above two circuits), the experimental groups showed obvious difference. For MazF, the strong RBS B0034 was proved to have highest lethal efficiency. For HokD, the weak RBS B0031 was proved to have the lowest lethal efficiency.
+
+
Fig.3 For the toxin protein MazF, we concluded that the influence of strong RBS is more evident.
+
 
+
+
Fig.4 For the toxin protein HokD, the replacement of RBS will influence the expression of HokD. The weaker RBS B0031 leads to lower expression of toxin protein HokD.
+
All results showed both the toxin genes can be well-regulated by different RBS, thus the toxin proteins can be widely used in various situations according to different requirements. Meanwhile, arabinose can be the sensible killer switch to induce araC+PBAD promoter.
+
  
 +
<span style="font-weight:bold;">Precise comparison </span>
  
 +
In addition, we transformed the araC+pBAD+B0032+mazF ([https://parts.igem.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K2120002 BBa_K2120002]) plasmid and set different concentrations of arabinose for induction expression. The araC+pBAD promoter can be controlled tightly by using arabinose.
 +
[[File:FileT--FJNU-China--Point_araC+mazF+GFP_1.png|600px|thumb|center|Figure.Point board data map. Reflects the lethal state of the toxin protein.]]
 +
On the other hand, by measuring the OD value, the lethal efficiency of the toxin protein can only be roughly obtained. We obtain experimental data through more accurate experimental means for the control experiment design.
  
 
<!-- Add more about the biology of this part here
 
<!-- Add more about the biology of this part here
Line 44: Line 36:
 
<partinfo>BBa_K2120002 parameters</partinfo>
 
<partinfo>BBa_K2120002 parameters</partinfo>
 
<!-- -->
 
<!-- -->
 +
 +
===Functional Parameters===
 +
 +
'''Test the toxin gene can be translated and play a role in situations'''
 +
 +
The 2016 BIT-China iGEM Team equipped the bacteria with a '''plasmid-sensing logically adjustable cell killer(P-SLACKiller)'''. To kill the slacker bacteria in time, we chose to construct circuits with toxin genes ''mazF'' and ''hokD''. And here we designed two circuits to verify the function, one was ''araC''+pBAD+B0032+''mazF'', another was ''araC''+pBAD+B0032+''hokD''([https://parts.igem.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K2120003 BBa_K2120003]). The ''araC''+pBAD promoter can be controlled tightly by using arabinose.
 +
Then we constructed two plasmids containing these two circuits, and transformed the two plasmids into ''E.coli BMTop10'' respectively. After transformation, we measured the OD600 to draw the growth curve and observed the function of toxin protein. Besides the above two bacteria contained toxin genes, the control was the empty pSB1C3 vector. Add arabinose or not, there was another comparison. We add 10% arabinose 50 uL into 50 mL LB culture medium when the OD600 is 0.6 (the log phase). We measured the OD600 every hour until the bacteria reached the stationary phase.
 +
[[File:BIT-CHINA-PARTS-KILLER-1.jpg|600px|thumb|center|Fig.1 Compared with the negative control (the empty pSB1C3 vector), OD600 of the two circuits containing toxin proteins are obviously lower, and the difference is evident as time going on. No obvious difference observed among the three groups with no induction. It showed that toxin proteins didn’t leak out.]]
 +
 +
 +
Through growth curves, we concluded that toxin protein MazF and HokD have different lethal efficiency. Depending on different situations, they can be used.
 +
 +
'''Regulate the lethal efficiency of the toxin gene in an advanced way'''
 +
 +
To verify the toxin gene in an advanced way, we tested whether the toxin gene could be a well-regulated one. So we adjusted the translation efficiency of toxin proteins through replace ribosome binding site(RBS), thus to regulate the toxin gene.
 +
Through one-step mutation, we have separately replaced the B0032 (33.96%)in above circuits with B0031 (12.64%) and B0034 (100%). So we got: ''araC''+pBAD+B0031+''mazF'' ([https://parts.igem.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K2120004 BBa_K2120004]), ''araC''+pBAD+B0031+''hokD''([https://parts.igem.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K2120005 BBa_K2120005]), ''araC''+pBAD+B0034+''mazF''([https://parts.igem.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K2120006 BBa_K2120006]), ''araC''+pBAD+B0034+''hokD''([https://parts.igem.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K1602043 BBa_K1602043]),and here were the sequencing results.
 +
[[File:BIT-CHINA-PARTS-KILLER-2.jpg|600px|thumb|center]]
 +
[[File:BIT-CHINA-PARTS-KILLER-3.jpg|600px|thumb|center]]
 +
[[File:BIT-CHINA-PARTS-KILLER-4.jpg|600px|thumb|center]]
 +
[[File:BIT-CHINA-PARTS-KILLER-5.jpg|600px|thumb|center|Fig.2 The successful sequencing results of 4 mutations: B0031+''mazF''; B0034+''mazF''; B0031+''hokD''; B0034+''hokD'']]
 +
 +
 +
By using the above methods that we used to verify the function of the toxin gene, we also tested OD600 to get the growth curve to show the lethal efficiency of MazF and HokD under different RBS. Compare with the negative control (pSB1C3 empty vector) and the positive control (B0032 circuits, the above two circuits), the experimental groups showed obvious difference. For MazF, the strong RBS B0034 was proved to have highest lethal efficiency. For HokD, the weak RBS B0031 was proved to have the lowest lethal efficiency.
 +
[[File:BIT-CHINA-PARTS-KILLER-6.jpg|600px|thumb|center|Fig.3 For the toxin protein MazF, we concluded that the influence of strong RBS is more evident. ]]
 +
 +
 +
[[File:BIT-CHINA-PARTS-KILLER-7.jpg|600px|thumb|center|Fig.4 For the toxin protein HokD, the replacement of RBS will influence the expression of HokD. The weaker RBS B0031 leads to lower expression of toxin protein HokD.]]
 +
 +
 +
All results showed both the toxin genes can be well-regulated by different RBS, thus the toxin proteins can be widely used in various situations according to different requirements. Meanwhile, arabinose can be the sensible killer switch to induce ''araC''+PBAD promoter.

Latest revision as of 18:10, 17 October 2018

araC+pBAD+B0032+mazF

arac-pBAD is an arabinose induced promoter, mazF is a toxin gene from E.coli. MG1655. This part is functioned as a controlable killer device.

This part has been improved. The improved version is BBa_K2570021.

From 2018 FJNU-China We explored the effect of toxin protein expression under the control of a temperature promoter. We set different temperature as experimental variables, and we added green fluorescent protein for characterization.

User Reviews

We explored the effect of toxin protein expression under the control of a temperature promoter. We set different temperature as experimental variables, and we added green fluorescent protein for characterization.

Then,we use the GFP BBa_E0040 to characterize the intensity of the temperature-controlled promoter.

Figure.(B) Fluorescence levels per OD at different salt concentrations.
Figure.(C) Fluorescence images at different culture temperature.

We set the temperature concentration 25℃, 30℃, 35℃, 40℃. In Fig. 2, at the same OD value, the measured GFP fluorescence value increased with increasing culture temperature. In addition, the green fluorescence at different culture temperature can be visually observed, and it is concluded that an increase in culture temperature enhances the expression of a temperature controlled promoter, an increase in the expression of green fluorescent protein, and an increase in GFP fluorescence value. At the culture temperature of 40 degrees, the fluorescence intensity of the unit OD value was significantly weakened. We speculated that the higher culture temperature has an adverse effect on cell growth and temperature-controlled promoter expression.

Precise comparison

In addition, we transformed the araC+pBAD+B0032+mazF (BBa_K2120002) plasmid and set different concentrations of arabinose for induction expression. The araC+pBAD promoter can be controlled tightly by using arabinose.

Figure.Point board data map. Reflects the lethal state of the toxin protein.

On the other hand, by measuring the OD value, the lethal efficiency of the toxin protein can only be roughly obtained. We obtain experimental data through more accurate experimental means for the control experiment design.

Sequence and Features


Assembly Compatibility:
  • 10
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[10]
  • 12
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[12]
  • 21
    INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[21]
    Illegal BamHI site found at 1144
  • 23
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[23]
  • 25
    INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[25]
    Illegal AgeI site found at 979
  • 1000
    INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[1000]
    Illegal SapI site found at 961


Functional Parameters

Test the toxin gene can be translated and play a role in situations

The 2016 BIT-China iGEM Team equipped the bacteria with a plasmid-sensing logically adjustable cell killer(P-SLACKiller). To kill the slacker bacteria in time, we chose to construct circuits with toxin genes mazF and hokD. And here we designed two circuits to verify the function, one was araC+pBAD+B0032+mazF, another was araC+pBAD+B0032+hokD(BBa_K2120003). The araC+pBAD promoter can be controlled tightly by using arabinose. Then we constructed two plasmids containing these two circuits, and transformed the two plasmids into E.coli BMTop10 respectively. After transformation, we measured the OD600 to draw the growth curve and observed the function of toxin protein. Besides the above two bacteria contained toxin genes, the control was the empty pSB1C3 vector. Add arabinose or not, there was another comparison. We add 10% arabinose 50 uL into 50 mL LB culture medium when the OD600 is 0.6 (the log phase). We measured the OD600 every hour until the bacteria reached the stationary phase.

Fig.1 Compared with the negative control (the empty pSB1C3 vector), OD600 of the two circuits containing toxin proteins are obviously lower, and the difference is evident as time going on. No obvious difference observed among the three groups with no induction. It showed that toxin proteins didn’t leak out.


Through growth curves, we concluded that toxin protein MazF and HokD have different lethal efficiency. Depending on different situations, they can be used.

Regulate the lethal efficiency of the toxin gene in an advanced way

To verify the toxin gene in an advanced way, we tested whether the toxin gene could be a well-regulated one. So we adjusted the translation efficiency of toxin proteins through replace ribosome binding site(RBS), thus to regulate the toxin gene. Through one-step mutation, we have separately replaced the B0032 (33.96%)in above circuits with B0031 (12.64%) and B0034 (100%). So we got: araC+pBAD+B0031+mazF (BBa_K2120004), araC+pBAD+B0031+hokD(BBa_K2120005), araC+pBAD+B0034+mazF(BBa_K2120006), araC+pBAD+B0034+hokD(BBa_K1602043),and here were the sequencing results.

BIT-CHINA-PARTS-KILLER-2.jpg
BIT-CHINA-PARTS-KILLER-3.jpg
BIT-CHINA-PARTS-KILLER-4.jpg
Fig.2 The successful sequencing results of 4 mutations: B0031+mazF; B0034+mazF; B0031+hokD; B0034+hokD


By using the above methods that we used to verify the function of the toxin gene, we also tested OD600 to get the growth curve to show the lethal efficiency of MazF and HokD under different RBS. Compare with the negative control (pSB1C3 empty vector) and the positive control (B0032 circuits, the above two circuits), the experimental groups showed obvious difference. For MazF, the strong RBS B0034 was proved to have highest lethal efficiency. For HokD, the weak RBS B0031 was proved to have the lowest lethal efficiency.

Fig.3 For the toxin protein MazF, we concluded that the influence of strong RBS is more evident.


Fig.4 For the toxin protein HokD, the replacement of RBS will influence the expression of HokD. The weaker RBS B0031 leads to lower expression of toxin protein HokD.


All results showed both the toxin genes can be well-regulated by different RBS, thus the toxin proteins can be widely used in various situations according to different requirements. Meanwhile, arabinose can be the sensible killer switch to induce araC+PBAD promoter.