Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K2030003"
(→Characterization) |
|||
(6 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | |||
__NOTOC__ | __NOTOC__ | ||
<partinfo>BBa_K2030003 short</partinfo> | <partinfo>BBa_K2030003 short</partinfo> | ||
− | The upstream regulatory sequence to the gene <i>PYK2</i>, coding for Pyruvate Kinase. | + | The upstream regulatory sequence to the gene <i>PYK2</i> from <i>Saccharomyces cerevisiae</i> CEN.PK113-5D, coding for Pyruvate Kinase. Repressed by glucose [1]. |
− | <!-- | + | ===Characterization=== |
− | === | + | A promoter study was performed to characterize this promoter. The <i>PYK2</i> promoter was cloned into the replicative plasmid p416tef by replacing the existing pTEF1 promoter and adding GFP as a reporter gene. By using a replicative plasmid instead of chromosomal integration, a higher copy number can be achieved, which will make sure that even weak promoters give a detectable signal. For the glucose conditions, the cells were grown as a preculture in SD -URA + 2 % glucose media overnight, diluted to OD<SUB>600</SUB>=0.3 in the same media and cultivated for 3 hours. The expression of GFP was measured in a 96-well plates (NUNC 96) in a BMG Labtech FLUOstar Omega plate reader with triplicate samples using the following setting: 20 flashes per well, excitation/emission wavelength at 485/520 nm and gain set to 800. |
+ | |||
+ | The cells were also grown in SD -URA + 0.5 % acetate to compare the expression levels when acetate was the only carbon source, which is connected to our coculture project. For the acetate experiment, the cells were grown as a preculture in SD -URA + 2 % glucose media overnight, washed and diluted to OD<SUB>600</SUB>=0.3 in SD -URA + 0.5 % acetate and cultivated for 24 hours before plate reader measurements. The longer cultivation time was due to slow growth with acetate as the carbon source. Furthermore, the reason for the longer cultivation time was to make sure that the GFP produced during the preculture in glucose was degraded. | ||
+ | |||
+ | The experiment was also done with the promoters [https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2030000 pAQR1], [https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2030004 pGLN1], [https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2030001 pPCK1] and [https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K319003 pTEF1] in the same way, and the results compared against each other. The raw data from the promoter study was normalized against OD<SUB>600</SUB> of that sample, and the mean value of the negative control (cells with p416tef without GFP) was subtracted. The results are shown in <b>Table 1</b>. | ||
+ | |||
+ | <br><center><b>Table 1.</b> Fluorescent levels of GFP under the control of the promoters pAQR1, pGLN1, pPCK1, <br>PYK2 and pTEF1 for cells cultivated in SD -URA media + 2 % glucose or 0.5 % acetate (n=3). | ||
+ | <html> | ||
+ | <style type="text/css"> | ||
+ | .tg {border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:0;} | ||
+ | .tg td{font-family:Arial, sans-serif;font-size:14px;padding:10px 5px;border-style:solid;border-width:1px;overflow:hidden;word-break:normal;} | ||
+ | .tg th{font-family:Arial, sans-serif;font-size:14px;font-weight:normal;padding:10px 5px;border-style:solid;border-width:1px;overflow:hidden;word-break:normal;} | ||
+ | .tg .tg-baqh{text-align:center;vertical-align:top} | ||
+ | .tg .tg-804w{font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif !important;;text-align:center;vertical-align:top} | ||
+ | .tg .tg-9hbo{font-weight:bold;vertical-align:top} | ||
+ | .tg .tg-amwm{font-weight:bold;text-align:center;vertical-align:top} | ||
+ | .tg .tg-yw4l{vertical-align:top} | ||
+ | </style> | ||
+ | <div align="center"> | ||
+ | <table class="tg"> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <th class="tg-9hbo">Promoter</th> | ||
+ | <th class="tg-amwm" colspan="2">Condition</th> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <td class="tg-9hbo"></td> | ||
+ | <td class="tg-baqh">Glucose (fluorescent unit/OD<SUB>600</SUB>)<br></td> | ||
+ | <td class="tg-baqh">Acetate (fluorescent unit/OD<SUB>600</SUB>)</td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <td class="tg-yw4l">pAQR1<br></td> | ||
+ | <td class="tg-804w">303</td> | ||
+ | <td class="tg-baqh">63</td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <td class="tg-yw4l">pGLN1<br></td> | ||
+ | <td class="tg-baqh">862</td> | ||
+ | <td class="tg-baqh">426</td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <td class="tg-yw4l">pPCK1</td> | ||
+ | <td class="tg-baqh">235</td> | ||
+ | <td class="tg-baqh">1721</td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <td class="tg-yw4l">pPYK2</td> | ||
+ | <td class="tg-baqh">125</td> | ||
+ | <td class="tg-baqh">77</td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <td class="tg-yw4l">pTEF1</td> | ||
+ | <td class="tg-baqh">1314</td> | ||
+ | <td class="tg-baqh">1399</td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | </table> | ||
+ | |||
+ | </html> | ||
+ | </center> | ||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | <p>In <b>Figure 1</b> the results are normalized against the expression level of the pTEF1 promoter.</p> | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | [[Image:T--Chalmers Gothenburg--glucose-acetate-relative.png|800px|thumb|center|Figure 1: Fluorescent levels of GFP under the control of the promoters pAQR1, pGLN1, pPCK1, PYK2 and pTEF1 in glucose and acetate conditions relative the levels of pTEF1. Each sample was loaded into three different wells in the plate reader, and error bars are shown as confidence intervals with p = 0.05, using student's t-test.]] | ||
+ | |||
+ | All promoters except pPCK1 show higher expression relative pTEF1 at glucose conditions compared with acetate conditions, which is consistent with previous reports [2]. pPCK1 even has higher expression level than pTEF1, which means that pPCK1 could be preferred for overexpression when acetate is the only carbon source. | ||
+ | |||
+ | A more detailed version of the promoter study and how it's connected to our project can be found [http://2016.igem.org/Team:Chalmers_Gothenburg/Project/Promoter_study here]. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===Uploads=== | ||
+ | <html><a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/parts/6/65/T--Chalmers_Gothenburg-promoter-study-data.pdf">Promoter study data</a> | ||
+ | </html> | ||
<!-- --> | <!-- --> | ||
<span class='h3bb'>Sequence and Features</span> | <span class='h3bb'>Sequence and Features</span> | ||
<partinfo>BBa_K2030003 SequenceAndFeatures</partinfo> | <partinfo>BBa_K2030003 SequenceAndFeatures</partinfo> | ||
− | |||
<!-- Uncomment this to enable Functional Parameter display | <!-- Uncomment this to enable Functional Parameter display | ||
Line 17: | Line 85: | ||
<partinfo>BBa_K2030003 parameters</partinfo> | <partinfo>BBa_K2030003 parameters</partinfo> | ||
<!-- --> | <!-- --> | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===References=== | ||
+ | [1] Boles E, Schulte F, Miosga T, Freidel K, Schlüter E, Zimmermann FK, et al. Characterization of a glucoserepressed pyruvate kinase (Pyk2p) in <i>Saccharomyces cerevisiae</i> that is catalytically insensitive to fructose-1,6-bisphosphate. Journal of Bacteriology. 1997;179(9):2987-93<br> | ||
+ | [2] K. Weinhandl, M. Winkler, A. Glieder, and A. Camattari, “Carbon source dependent promoters in yeasts,” <i>Microbial Cell Factories</i>, vol. 13, no. 1, 2014. |
Latest revision as of 16:56, 19 October 2016
pPYK2 S. cerevisiae promoter
The upstream regulatory sequence to the gene PYK2 from Saccharomyces cerevisiae CEN.PK113-5D, coding for Pyruvate Kinase. Repressed by glucose [1].
Characterization
A promoter study was performed to characterize this promoter. The PYK2 promoter was cloned into the replicative plasmid p416tef by replacing the existing pTEF1 promoter and adding GFP as a reporter gene. By using a replicative plasmid instead of chromosomal integration, a higher copy number can be achieved, which will make sure that even weak promoters give a detectable signal. For the glucose conditions, the cells were grown as a preculture in SD -URA + 2 % glucose media overnight, diluted to OD600=0.3 in the same media and cultivated for 3 hours. The expression of GFP was measured in a 96-well plates (NUNC 96) in a BMG Labtech FLUOstar Omega plate reader with triplicate samples using the following setting: 20 flashes per well, excitation/emission wavelength at 485/520 nm and gain set to 800.
The cells were also grown in SD -URA + 0.5 % acetate to compare the expression levels when acetate was the only carbon source, which is connected to our coculture project. For the acetate experiment, the cells were grown as a preculture in SD -URA + 2 % glucose media overnight, washed and diluted to OD600=0.3 in SD -URA + 0.5 % acetate and cultivated for 24 hours before plate reader measurements. The longer cultivation time was due to slow growth with acetate as the carbon source. Furthermore, the reason for the longer cultivation time was to make sure that the GFP produced during the preculture in glucose was degraded.
The experiment was also done with the promoters pAQR1, pGLN1, pPCK1 and pTEF1 in the same way, and the results compared against each other. The raw data from the promoter study was normalized against OD600 of that sample, and the mean value of the negative control (cells with p416tef without GFP) was subtracted. The results are shown in Table 1.
PYK2 and pTEF1 for cells cultivated in SD -URA media + 2 % glucose or 0.5 % acetate (n=3).
Promoter | Condition | |
---|---|---|
Glucose (fluorescent unit/OD600) |
Acetate (fluorescent unit/OD600) | |
pAQR1 |
303 | 63 |
pGLN1 |
862 | 426 |
pPCK1 | 235 | 1721 |
pPYK2 | 125 | 77 |
pTEF1 | 1314 | 1399 |
In Figure 1 the results are normalized against the expression level of the pTEF1 promoter.
All promoters except pPCK1 show higher expression relative pTEF1 at glucose conditions compared with acetate conditions, which is consistent with previous reports [2]. pPCK1 even has higher expression level than pTEF1, which means that pPCK1 could be preferred for overexpression when acetate is the only carbon source.
A more detailed version of the promoter study and how it's connected to our project can be found [http://2016.igem.org/Team:Chalmers_Gothenburg/Project/Promoter_study here].
Uploads
Sequence and Features
- 10COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[10]
- 12COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[12]
- 21COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[21]
- 23COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[23]
- 25COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[25]
- 1000COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[1000]
References
[1] Boles E, Schulte F, Miosga T, Freidel K, Schlüter E, Zimmermann FK, et al. Characterization of a glucoserepressed pyruvate kinase (Pyk2p) in Saccharomyces cerevisiae that is catalytically insensitive to fructose-1,6-bisphosphate. Journal of Bacteriology. 1997;179(9):2987-93
[2] K. Weinhandl, M. Winkler, A. Glieder, and A. Camattari, “Carbon source dependent promoters in yeasts,” Microbial Cell Factories, vol. 13, no. 1, 2014.