Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K652004"
(4 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
WPI-Worcester 2015 Characterization | WPI-Worcester 2015 Characterization | ||
− | As part of our antifreeze protein library, we characterized ZeAFP by measuring both its freeze survival and biofilm activity, as well as creating the BioBricks | + | As part of our antifreeze protein library, we characterized ZeAFP by measuring both its freeze survival and biofilm activity, as well as creating the BioBricks BBa_K1809021[https://parts.igem.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K1809021] and BBa_K1809022[https://parts.igem.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K1809022]. |
To test freeze survival, a liquid culture of E. coli was grown up overnight and three samples were taken. An MTS assay was performed for the first sample to determine the amount of live E. coli present, while the other two samples were placed in a slow-freeze box at -20C and -80C respectively. After 24 hours MTS assays were then performed on these two samples to determine what percentage of cells survived the freezing. | To test freeze survival, a liquid culture of E. coli was grown up overnight and three samples were taken. An MTS assay was performed for the first sample to determine the amount of live E. coli present, while the other two samples were placed in a slow-freeze box at -20C and -80C respectively. After 24 hours MTS assays were then performed on these two samples to determine what percentage of cells survived the freezing. | ||
Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
We found no conclusive evidence for ZeAFP promoting freeze survival in <i>E. coli</i>. | We found no conclusive evidence for ZeAFP promoting freeze survival in <i>E. coli</i>. | ||
− | |||
To test biofilm activity, each construct was transformed into the biofilm forming strain EMG2:Kλ E. coli and the strain was grown on a 96 well plate. Crystal violet was added to each well and washed, then acetic acid was used to break down the remaining crystal violet so that biofilm formation could be measured colorimetrically. These results were then normalized to an EMG2:Kλ without plasmid control. | To test biofilm activity, each construct was transformed into the biofilm forming strain EMG2:Kλ E. coli and the strain was grown on a 96 well plate. Crystal violet was added to each well and washed, then acetic acid was used to break down the remaining crystal violet so that biofilm formation could be measured colorimetrically. These results were then normalized to an EMG2:Kλ without plasmid control. | ||
Line 28: | Line 27: | ||
We found that ZeAFP significantly increased biofilm formation relative to our control. | We found that ZeAFP significantly increased biofilm formation relative to our control. | ||
+ | |||
+ | <Center>WPI iGEM 2018 Additions</center> | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | <center>https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/6/68/T--WPI_Worcester--COncentrationofProtein.png</center> | ||
+ | This graph shows the concentrations of purified proteins, including ZeAFP, labeled as "Ze" on the graph. | ||
+ | |||
+ | <center>https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/d/da/T--WPI_Worcester--CoatedPlates.png</center> | ||
+ | <center>https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/0/0e/T--WPI_Worcester--MixedPlate.png</center> | ||
+ | These are graphs of biofilm assays that included the protein ZeAFP. The proteins were either mixed into the bacteria or it was used to coat the plate that the biofilm was going to be grown on. | ||
+ | |||
+ | <center>https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/b/bf/T--WPI_Worcester--Bioflim_Assay_Plate.png</center> | ||
+ | This is a graph of the biofilm production with and without the expression of different antifreeze proteins.The expression of these proteins was proven on the following gel: | ||
+ | <center>https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/7/70/T--WPI_Worcester--ProteinGel1.png</center> | ||
<!-- Add more about the biology of this part here | <!-- Add more about the biology of this part here | ||
Latest revision as of 23:37, 17 October 2018
RBS-ZeAFP-Term
This part contains an RBS, the type III Zoarces elongatus antifreeze protein (ZeAFP), followed by a terminator.
Note: Becuase this protein is so small (7kDa), expression may be difficult to detect on a Tris-Glycine gel. Using a Tris-Tricine system where small proteins are easier to see (not so diffuse) is advisable.
WPI-Worcester 2015 Characterization
As part of our antifreeze protein library, we characterized ZeAFP by measuring both its freeze survival and biofilm activity, as well as creating the BioBricks BBa_K1809021[1] and BBa_K1809022[2].
To test freeze survival, a liquid culture of E. coli was grown up overnight and three samples were taken. An MTS assay was performed for the first sample to determine the amount of live E. coli present, while the other two samples were placed in a slow-freeze box at -20C and -80C respectively. After 24 hours MTS assays were then performed on these two samples to determine what percentage of cells survived the freezing.
We found no conclusive evidence for ZeAFP promoting freeze survival in E. coli.
To test biofilm activity, each construct was transformed into the biofilm forming strain EMG2:Kλ E. coli and the strain was grown on a 96 well plate. Crystal violet was added to each well and washed, then acetic acid was used to break down the remaining crystal violet so that biofilm formation could be measured colorimetrically. These results were then normalized to an EMG2:Kλ without plasmid control.
We found that ZeAFP significantly increased biofilm formation relative to our control.
This graph shows the concentrations of purified proteins, including ZeAFP, labeled as "Ze" on the graph.
These are graphs of biofilm assays that included the protein ZeAFP. The proteins were either mixed into the bacteria or it was used to coat the plate that the biofilm was going to be grown on.
This is a graph of the biofilm production with and without the expression of different antifreeze proteins.The expression of these proteins was proven on the following gel:
Sequence and Features
- 10COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[10]
- 12INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[12]Illegal NheI site found at 33
- 21INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[21]Illegal XhoI site found at 222
- 23COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[23]
- 25COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[25]
- 1000COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[1000]