Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K1189037"
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 83: | Line 83: | ||
<figure> | <figure> | ||
− | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/2/20/TecCEM_HS_RESULTS_Cromatogrtaf%C3%ADa2.png" alt="Ferritin cromatography" width=" | + | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/2/20/TecCEM_HS_RESULTS_Cromatogrtaf%C3%ADa2.png" alt="Ferritin cromatography" width="500" height=300"> |
<figcaption> | <figcaption> | ||
<p><b>Figure 7.</b> An induction of this Biobrick was made and a cromatography at hour 4 was performed (Nickel affinity chromatography). The overexpression can be seen in lane 5, were an approx. 42 kDa band can be seen, that means the cromatography was successful and the protein was actually expressing.</p> | <p><b>Figure 7.</b> An induction of this Biobrick was made and a cromatography at hour 4 was performed (Nickel affinity chromatography). The overexpression can be seen in lane 5, were an approx. 42 kDa band can be seen, that means the cromatography was successful and the protein was actually expressing.</p> |
Latest revision as of 03:34, 19 September 2015
A fusion of two ferrtin subunits
Ferritin is a protein shelled nanoparticle and is composed of a mixture of 24 light (BBa_K1189024) and heavy (BBa_K1189025) subunits. It is ubiquitous across eukaryotic and prokaryotic systems and is used to sequester intracellular iron (Chasteen et al., 1991). The 2013 iGEM Calgary used ferritin’s iron core as a reporter and its protein shell to scaffold DNA sensing TALEs as part of their project, the FerriTALE (see Figure 1).
BBa_K1189037 is a fusion of heavy and light ferritin subunits, such that ferritin nanoparticles are formed from 12 di-subunits. The rationale for this design is that it reduces the number of N-termini on ferritin to which proteins can be fused by half, which is important for lessening potential steric hindrances among fused proteins in the 3D sphere surrounding ferritin. Additionally, di-subunits mandate a 1:1 ratio of heavy and light subunits which ensures consistency in ferritin’s ability to uptake iron. Moreover, these fusions have been shown stable in engineered applications with other proteins scaffolded to ferritin (Dehal et al., 2010).
Design features
This part has an N-terminal fusion to an E coil connected to ferritin by a GS linker (Figure 2). The coil system is of utility to other iGEM teams because they can express K coils on their own proteins of interest, and bind them to the complementary E coil on ferritin. Such a coiled-coil linker system reduces potential for large protein fusions to harm ferritin formation, allowing user to build intricate nanoparticle devices with myriad proteins. See Figures 3 application examples.
This part is identical to BBa_1189018, with the exception of a his-tag for purification.
Results
Expression from pSB1C3
The 2013 iGEM Calgary successfully expressed and purified this protein in pSB1C3 and per this part sequence exactly using and FPLC and metal affinity purification of the his tag. See Figure 4 for an SDS-PAGE of this 42 kDa isolate. Please see the user reviews section for data on another expression vector which generated this protein with a higher yield.
Conversion of BBa_K1189037 into a reporter
This purified protein product was successfully converted into Prussian blue ferritin, a robust colourmetric reporter. Figure 5 shows that this part with coiled-coils performs better as a reporter than direct fusions to TALEs (BBa_K118021). It seems that large protein fusions reduce effectiveness of ferritin as a reporter. Figure 6 shows that ferritin with coiled-coils (BBa_1189037) maintains reporter functionality when TALEs are scaffolded using coiled-coil linkers.
Please see the Prussian blue ferritin Wiki page for a detailed analysis of how Prussian blue ferritin, synthesized from commercially available ferritin, performs as a reporter. This data informs how BBa_K1189037 is useful as a reporter.
TecCEM_HS and ferritin
[http://2015.igem.org/Team:TecCEM_HS TecCEM_HS team] HS wanted to see if there were any significant changes in the SDS binding to the molecule if there were any extra elements in the construction. That's why they used this biobrick to see if the SDS molecules were captured although there was an extra coil in the structure.
The team made an induction to see if the protein was expressing and here is the result.
We also made a chromatography to see the expression of the protein and to verify the open reading frame.
References
Sequence and Features
- 10COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[10]
- 12COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[12]
- 21COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[21]
- 23COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[23]
- 25COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[25]
- 1000INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[1000]Illegal BsaI.rc site found at 1307