Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K1653027"
(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
− | + | Geraniol is generated through GPP hydrolysis by geraniol synthase. A MEP pathway has been shown to synthesize IPP and DMAPP efficiently in ''E. coli''. | |
− | + | <br> | |
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
Line 39: | Line 19: | ||
<partinfo>BBa_K1653027 parameters</partinfo> | <partinfo>BBa_K1653027 parameters</partinfo> | ||
<!-- --> | <!-- --> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | ''E. coli'' engineered with geraniol production device ([https://parts.igem.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K1653027 BBa_K1653027]) showed different smell as compared with counterpart control (pSB1C3) and WT. This result derived from Questionnaire survey. And then we tried to detect that the geraniol generated by engineered "E. coli" by GC and GC-MS. However, the Geraniol were not detected. These result may indicate that ''E. coli'' with Geraniol production device produce smaller amouts of than can be detected by GC and GC-MS. | ||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | [[http://2015.igem.org/Team:Nagahama/Medal_Parts#Geraniol_.28GOH.29_production_device.28BBa_K1653027.29 here] is our result page.] | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[File:アンケートみのる.jpg|200px|center|thumb|fig8:Questionnaire survey of fragrance of geraniol | ||
+ | A:WT or recombinant(JM109/empty vector) | ||
+ | B:recombinant(JM109/GES) | ||
+ | Experimental cooperation persons:20 persons | ||
+ | Experiment smelling the smell of A and B | ||
+ | Experiment collaborators chose a stronger smell by comparing the A and B. | ||
+ | ]] | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | [[File:アンケート 完成1.png|350px|thumb|center|Fig.10 | ||
+ | Result of questionnaire survey using WT and recombinant (JM109/''GES''). Out of 20 persons, two persons (10%) answered the medium A (WT) smelled stronger than the medium B (recombinant (JM109/''GES'')) and eighteen persons (90%) answered the medium B smelled stronger than the medium A. If we assume that both media smell equally, the probability that the medium A is selected in the questionnaire must be 0.5. From this assumption, p-value of this result was calculated using binomial test. Because the p-value was much smaller than the 5% significance level (0.0004025), the smell of recombinant (JM109/''GES'') is stronger than that of WT significantly. This result indicate that the recombinant (JM109/''GES'') synthesize geraniol. | ||
+ | ]] |
Latest revision as of 13:06, 18 September 2015
Geraniol(GOH) production. dev
Geraniol is generated through GPP hydrolysis by geraniol synthase. A MEP pathway has been shown to synthesize IPP and DMAPP efficiently in E. coli.
Sequence and Features
- 10COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[10]
- 12INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[12]Illegal NheI site found at 2878
- 21INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[21]Illegal BglII site found at 6665
Illegal BamHI site found at 5993 - 23COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[23]
- 25INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[25]Illegal NgoMIV site found at 1462
Illegal AgeI site found at 2174 - 1000INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[1000]Illegal SapI.rc site found at 3867
E. coli engineered with geraniol production device (BBa_K1653027) showed different smell as compared with counterpart control (pSB1C3) and WT. This result derived from Questionnaire survey. And then we tried to detect that the geraniol generated by engineered "E. coli" by GC and GC-MS. However, the Geraniol were not detected. These result may indicate that E. coli with Geraniol production device produce smaller amouts of than can be detected by GC and GC-MS.
[[http://2015.igem.org/Team:Nagahama/Medal_Parts#Geraniol_.28GOH.29_production_device.28BBa_K1653027.29 here] is our result page.]