Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K1809021"

 
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
 
__NOTOC__
 
__NOTOC__
 
<partinfo>BBa_K1809021 short</partinfo>
 
<partinfo>BBa_K1809021 short</partinfo>
  
Antifreeze proteins (AFPs) are molecules with the unique property of binding and shaping ice crystals, preventing their growth into relatively large cell-lysing structures (Davies and Sykes 1997). They exhibit a property known as thermal hysteresis, whereby their activity decreases the freezing point of water without changing the melting point. This property allows organisms which produce AFPs to survive colder conditions. Additionally, AFPs have shown biolfilm inhibiting properties, potentially giving them uses in medical applications.
+
Antifreeze proteins (AFPs) are molecules with the unique property of binding and shaping ice crystals, preventing their growth into relatively large cell-lysing structures (Davies and Sykes 1997). They exhibit a property known as thermal hysteresis, whereby their activity decreases the freezing point of water without changing the melting point. This property allows organisms which produce AFPs to survive colder conditions. Additionally, an AFP from the deer tick Ixodes scapularis has been shown to have biofilm inhibiting properties, potentially giving these AFPs uses in both commercial and medical applications (Heisig et al. 2014).
 +
 
 +
 
 +
We tested 16 different AFPs for both freeze survival and biofilm activity in two different constructs. The first construct simply expressed the antifreeze protein strongly, while the second construct included a BclA tag that caused the antifreeze protein to bind to the cell surface. This AFP, taken from the eastern viviparous blenny <i>Zoarces elongatus</i> (ZeAFP), was incorporated into only the untagged constructs for testing. This part was originally taken from Yale 2011's part BBa_K652004[https://parts.igem.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K652004], and was made into this basic coding part for easier integration into plasmids.
 +
 
 +
 
 +
To test freeze survival, a liquid culture of E. coli was grown up overnight and three samples were taken. An MTS assay was performed for the first sample to determine the amount of live E. coli present, while the other two samples were placed in a slow-freeze box at -20C and -80C respectively. After 24 hours MTS assays were then performed on these two samples to determine what percentage of cells survived the freezing.
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
<center>https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/parts/a/ad/WPI_2015_ZeAFP_Freeze.jpg</center>
 +
 
 +
<center><b>Figure 1: Freeze survival for an empty vector control and ZeAFP at -20C and -80C.</b></center>
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
Our ZeAFP construct showed no increased freeze survival at either -20C or -80C.
 +
 
 +
 
 +
To test biofilm activity, each construct was transformed into the biofilm forming strain EMG2:Kλ E. coli and the strain was grown on a 96 well plate. Crystal violet was added to each well and washed, then acetic acid was used to break down the remaining crystal violet so that biofilm formation could be measured colorimetrically. These results were then normalized to an EMG2:Kλ without plasmid control.
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
<center>https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/parts/0/0e/WPI_2015_ZeAFP_Biofilm.jpg</center>
 +
 
 +
<center><b>Figure 2: Biofilm activity for an empty vector control and ZeAFP.</b></center>
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
ZeAFP showed a significant increase in the formation in biofilms.
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
<Center>WPI iGEM 2018 Additions</center>
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
<center>https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/6/68/T--WPI_Worcester--COncentrationofProtein.png</center>
 +
This graph shows the concentrations of purified proteins, including ZeAFP, labeled as "Ze" on the graph.
 +
 
 +
<center>https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/d/da/T--WPI_Worcester--CoatedPlates.png</center>
 +
<center>https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/0/0e/T--WPI_Worcester--MixedPlate.png</center>
 +
These are graphs of biofilm assays that included the protein ZeAFP. The proteins were either mixed into the bacteria or it was used to coat the plate that the biofilm was going to be grown on.
 +
 
 +
<center>https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/b/bf/T--WPI_Worcester--Bioflim_Assay_Plate.png</center>
 +
This is a graph of the biofilm production with and without the expression of different antifreeze proteins.The expression of these proteins was proven on the following gel:
 +
<center>https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/7/70/T--WPI_Worcester--ProteinGel1.png</center>
 +
 
 +
 
 +
References
 +
 
 +
 
 +
Davies, P. L., and B. D. Sykes. 1997. Antifreeze proteins. (0959-440X (Print)).
 +
 
 +
Heisig, M., N. M. Abraham, L. Liu, G. Neelakanta, S. Mattessich, H. Sultana, Z. Shang, J. M. Ansari, C. Killiam, W. Walker, L. Cooley, R. A. Flavell, H. Agaisse, and E. Fikrig. 2014. Antivirulence properties of an antifreeze protein. (2211-1247 (Electronic)).
 +
 
  
 
<!-- Add more about the biology of this part here
 
<!-- Add more about the biology of this part here

Latest revision as of 19:47, 17 October 2018

ZeAFP

Antifreeze proteins (AFPs) are molecules with the unique property of binding and shaping ice crystals, preventing their growth into relatively large cell-lysing structures (Davies and Sykes 1997). They exhibit a property known as thermal hysteresis, whereby their activity decreases the freezing point of water without changing the melting point. This property allows organisms which produce AFPs to survive colder conditions. Additionally, an AFP from the deer tick Ixodes scapularis has been shown to have biofilm inhibiting properties, potentially giving these AFPs uses in both commercial and medical applications (Heisig et al. 2014).


We tested 16 different AFPs for both freeze survival and biofilm activity in two different constructs. The first construct simply expressed the antifreeze protein strongly, while the second construct included a BclA tag that caused the antifreeze protein to bind to the cell surface. This AFP, taken from the eastern viviparous blenny Zoarces elongatus (ZeAFP), was incorporated into only the untagged constructs for testing. This part was originally taken from Yale 2011's part BBa_K652004[1], and was made into this basic coding part for easier integration into plasmids.


To test freeze survival, a liquid culture of E. coli was grown up overnight and three samples were taken. An MTS assay was performed for the first sample to determine the amount of live E. coli present, while the other two samples were placed in a slow-freeze box at -20C and -80C respectively. After 24 hours MTS assays were then performed on these two samples to determine what percentage of cells survived the freezing.


WPI_2015_ZeAFP_Freeze.jpg
Figure 1: Freeze survival for an empty vector control and ZeAFP at -20C and -80C.


Our ZeAFP construct showed no increased freeze survival at either -20C or -80C.


To test biofilm activity, each construct was transformed into the biofilm forming strain EMG2:Kλ E. coli and the strain was grown on a 96 well plate. Crystal violet was added to each well and washed, then acetic acid was used to break down the remaining crystal violet so that biofilm formation could be measured colorimetrically. These results were then normalized to an EMG2:Kλ without plasmid control.


WPI_2015_ZeAFP_Biofilm.jpg
Figure 2: Biofilm activity for an empty vector control and ZeAFP.


ZeAFP showed a significant increase in the formation in biofilms.


WPI iGEM 2018 Additions


T--WPI_Worcester--COncentrationofProtein.png

This graph shows the concentrations of purified proteins, including ZeAFP, labeled as "Ze" on the graph.

T--WPI_Worcester--CoatedPlates.png
T--WPI_Worcester--MixedPlate.png

These are graphs of biofilm assays that included the protein ZeAFP. The proteins were either mixed into the bacteria or it was used to coat the plate that the biofilm was going to be grown on.

T--WPI_Worcester--Bioflim_Assay_Plate.png

This is a graph of the biofilm production with and without the expression of different antifreeze proteins.The expression of these proteins was proven on the following gel:

T--WPI_Worcester--ProteinGel1.png


References


Davies, P. L., and B. D. Sykes. 1997. Antifreeze proteins. (0959-440X (Print)).

Heisig, M., N. M. Abraham, L. Liu, G. Neelakanta, S. Mattessich, H. Sultana, Z. Shang, J. M. Ansari, C. Killiam, W. Walker, L. Cooley, R. A. Flavell, H. Agaisse, and E. Fikrig. 2014. Antivirulence properties of an antifreeze protein. (2211-1247 (Electronic)).


Sequence and Features


Assembly Compatibility:
  • 10
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[10]
  • 12
    INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[12]
    Illegal NheI site found at 16
  • 21
    INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[21]
    Illegal XhoI site found at 205
  • 23
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[23]
  • 25
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[25]
  • 1000
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[1000]