Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K1585999:Design"
Tschwanemann (Talk | contribs) (→Design Notes) |
|||
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | |||
__NOTOC__ | __NOTOC__ | ||
<partinfo>BBa_K1585999 short</partinfo> | <partinfo>BBa_K1585999 short</partinfo> | ||
<partinfo>BBa_K1585999 SequenceAndFeatures</partinfo> | <partinfo>BBa_K1585999 SequenceAndFeatures</partinfo> | ||
− | |||
===Design Notes=== | ===Design Notes=== | ||
The "lacI binding site" of Part [https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_R0010 R_0010] differs from lacO from Part [https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_J33207 BBa_J33207] although they should be same. | The "lacI binding site" of Part [https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_R0010 R_0010] differs from lacO from Part [https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_J33207 BBa_J33207] although they should be same. | ||
− | We choosed part BBa_R0010 because we assumed older parts would be reliable. | + | We choosed part BBa_R0010 because we assumed older parts would be more reliable. |
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
===Source=== | ===Source=== |
Latest revision as of 12:20, 25 August 2015
lacI binding site
Assembly Compatibility:
- 10COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[10]
- 12COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[12]
- 21COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[21]
- 23COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[23]
- 25COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[25]
- 1000COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[1000]
Design Notes
The "lacI binding site" of Part R_0010 differs from lacO from Part BBa_J33207 although they should be same. We choosed part BBa_R0010 because we assumed older parts would be more reliable.
Source
lacI-binding-site of R_0010