Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K1431812:Experience"
Zhangysh1995 (Talk | contribs) (→Applications of BBa_K1431812) |
Zhangysh1995 (Talk | contribs) (→LB broth growth comparison) |
||
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
+ | =Applications of BBa_K1431812= | ||
+ | After we constructed this part, we tranformed into BL21 & DH5α to test expression effeciency. In the meantime, we did a comparison between BBa_K1431812 and BBa_K1431832 whose promoter is BBa_J23106, a relative weak promoter. | ||
− | + | ==LB agar plate growth comparison== | |
− | + | We spread the plate for BL21 at 10:00am on 15th, Oct and DH5α at 11:00am on 15th, Oct. The plate contains 34ug/ml chloramphenicol. Following pictures were taken every several hours after placing the plates into a 37℃ incubator. | |
− | + | ||
− | + | JA is J23100,JB is J23106. | |
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
At 00:30 (16th,Oct.) | At 00:30 (16th,Oct.) | ||
Line 42: | Line 38: | ||
<center>https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/parts/e/e8/SUSTC-Shenzhen_Characterization_K09_11_20.png</center> | <center>https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/parts/e/e8/SUSTC-Shenzhen_Characterization_K09_11_20.png</center> | ||
− | + | ==LB broth growth comparison== | |
− | + | We isolated single colonies from the plates and incubate in 2ml LB broth with 34ug/ml chloramphenicol. | |
At 00:50 (17th,Oct.) | At 00:50 (17th,Oct.) | ||
Line 57: | Line 53: | ||
− | At | + | At 10:40 (17th,Oct.) |
<center> https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/parts/6/69/SUSTC-Shenzhen_K09_L-4.jpg</center> | <center> https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/parts/6/69/SUSTC-Shenzhen_K09_L-4.jpg</center> | ||
− | + | ==Conclusion== | |
− | + | From the above observations, we found that expression in BL21 was stronger than that in DH5α, and the strength of promoter BBa_J23100 was unexpectedly weaker than BBa_J23106 provided by the 2014 iGEM kit plate. | |
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + |
Latest revision as of 13:05, 23 October 2014
Contents
Applications of BBa_K1431812
After we constructed this part, we tranformed into BL21 & DH5α to test expression effeciency. In the meantime, we did a comparison between BBa_K1431812 and BBa_K1431832 whose promoter is BBa_J23106, a relative weak promoter.
LB agar plate growth comparison
We spread the plate for BL21 at 10:00am on 15th, Oct and DH5α at 11:00am on 15th, Oct. The plate contains 34ug/ml chloramphenicol. Following pictures were taken every several hours after placing the plates into a 37℃ incubator.
JA is J23100,JB is J23106.
At 00:30 (16th,Oct.)
At 1:50 (16th,Oct.)
At 3:00 (16th,Oct.)
At 6:00 (16th,Oct.)
At 7:40 (16th,Oct.)
At 8:00 (16th,Oct.)
At 10:00 (16th,Oct.)
At 11:20 (16th,Oct.)
LB broth growth comparison
We isolated single colonies from the plates and incubate in 2ml LB broth with 34ug/ml chloramphenicol.
At 00:50 (17th,Oct.)
At 02:45 (17th,Oct.)
At 04:55 (17th,Oct.)
At 10:40 (17th,Oct.)
Conclusion
From the above observations, we found that expression in BL21 was stronger than that in DH5α, and the strength of promoter BBa_J23100 was unexpectedly weaker than BBa_J23106 provided by the 2014 iGEM kit plate.