Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K1431812:Experience"

 
(→‎LB broth growth comparison)
 
(10 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
=Applications of BBa_K1431812=
 +
After we constructed this part, we tranformed into BL21 & DH5α to test expression effeciency. In the meantime, we did a comparison between BBa_K1431812 and BBa_K1431832 whose promoter is BBa_J23106, a relative weak promoter.
  
−
__NOTOC__
+
==LB agar plate growth comparison==
−
This experience page is provided so that any user may enter their experience using this part.<BR>Please enter
+
We spread the plate for BL21 at 10:00am on 15th, Oct and DH5α at 11:00am on 15th, Oct. The plate contains 34ug/ml chloramphenicol. Following pictures were taken every several hours after placing the plates into a 37℃ incubator.
−
how you used this part and how it worked out.
+
  
−
===Applications of BBa_K1431812===
+
JA is J23100,JB is J23106.
  
−
===User Reviews===
+
At 00:30 (16th,Oct.)
−
<!-- DON'T DELETE --><partinfo>BBa_K1431812 StartReviews</partinfo>
+
<center>https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/parts/2/2e/SUSTC-Shenzhen_Characterization_K09_0：30.png</center>
−
<!-- Template for a user review
+
 
−
{|width='80%' style='border:1px solid gray'
+
 
−
|-
+
At 1:50  (16th,Oct.)
−
|width='10%'|
+
<center>https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/parts/1/19/SUSTC-Shenzhen_Characterization_K09_1_50.png</center>
−
<partinfo>BBa_K1431812 AddReview number</partinfo>
+
 
−
<I>Username</I>
+
 
−
|width='60%' valign='top'|
+
At 3:00  (16th,Oct.)
−
Enter the review inofrmation here.
+
<center>https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/parts/d/d7/SUSTC-Shenzhen_Characerization_K09_3.png</center>
−
|};
+
 
−
<!-- End of the user review template -->
+
 
−
<!-- DON'T DELETE --><partinfo>BBa_K1431812 EndReviews</partinfo>
+
At 6:00  (16th,Oct.)
 +
<center>https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/parts/8/83/SUSTC-Shenzhen_Characterization_K09_6.png</center>
 +
 
 +
 
 +
At 7:40  (16th,Oct.)
 +
<center>https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/parts/b/b3/SUSTC-Shenzhen_Characterization_K09_7_40.png</center>
 +
 
 +
 
 +
At 8:00  (16th,Oct.)
 +
<center>https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/parts/a/a8/SUSTC-Shenzhen_Characterization_K09_9.png</center>
 +
 
 +
 
 +
At 10:00 (16th,Oct.)
 +
<center>https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/parts/e/e5/SUSTC-Shenzhen_Characterization_K09_10.png</center>
 +
 
 +
 
 +
At 11:20 (16th,Oct.)
 +
<center>https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/parts/e/e8/SUSTC-Shenzhen_Characterization_K09_11_20.png</center>
 +
 
 +
==LB broth growth comparison==
 +
We isolated single colonies from the plates and incubate in 2ml LB broth with 34ug/ml chloramphenicol.
 +
 
 +
At 00:50 (17th,Oct.)
 +
<center>https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/parts/e/ed/SUSTC-Shenzhen_K09_L-1.jpg</center>
 +
 
 +
 
 +
At 02:45 (17th,Oct.)
 +
<center> https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/parts/4/4b/SUSTC-Shenzhen_K09_L-2.jpg</center>
 +
 
 +
 
 +
At 04:55 (17th,Oct.)
 +
<center> https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/parts/5/5c/SUSTC-Shenzhen_K09_L-3.jpg</center>
 +
 
 +
 
 +
At 10:40 (17th,Oct.)
 +
<center> https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/parts/6/69/SUSTC-Shenzhen_K09_L-4.jpg</center>
 +
 
 +
==Conclusion==
 +
From the above observations, we found that expression in BL21 was stronger than that in DH5α, and the strength of promoter BBa_J23100 was unexpectedly weaker than BBa_J23106 provided by the 2014 iGEM kit plate.

Latest revision as of 13:05, 23 October 2014

Applications of BBa_K1431812

After we constructed this part, we tranformed into BL21 & DH5α to test expression effeciency. In the meantime, we did a comparison between BBa_K1431812 and BBa_K1431832 whose promoter is BBa_J23106, a relative weak promoter.

LB agar plate growth comparison

We spread the plate for BL21 at 10:00am on 15th, Oct and DH5α at 11:00am on 15th, Oct. The plate contains 34ug/ml chloramphenicol. Following pictures were taken every several hours after placing the plates into a 37℃ incubator.

JA is J23100,JB is J23106.

At 00:30 (16th,Oct.)

https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/parts/2/2e/SUSTC-Shenzhen_Characterization_K09_0：30.png


At 1:50 (16th,Oct.)

SUSTC-Shenzhen_Characterization_K09_1_50.png


At 3:00 (16th,Oct.)

SUSTC-Shenzhen_Characerization_K09_3.png


At 6:00 (16th,Oct.)

SUSTC-Shenzhen_Characterization_K09_6.png


At 7:40 (16th,Oct.)

SUSTC-Shenzhen_Characterization_K09_7_40.png


At 8:00 (16th,Oct.)

SUSTC-Shenzhen_Characterization_K09_9.png


At 10:00 (16th,Oct.)

SUSTC-Shenzhen_Characterization_K09_10.png


At 11:20 (16th,Oct.)

SUSTC-Shenzhen_Characterization_K09_11_20.png

LB broth growth comparison

We isolated single colonies from the plates and incubate in 2ml LB broth with 34ug/ml chloramphenicol.

At 00:50 (17th,Oct.)

SUSTC-Shenzhen_K09_L-1.jpg


At 02:45 (17th,Oct.)

SUSTC-Shenzhen_K09_L-2.jpg


At 04:55 (17th,Oct.)

SUSTC-Shenzhen_K09_L-3.jpg


At 10:40 (17th,Oct.)

SUSTC-Shenzhen_K09_L-4.jpg

Conclusion

From the above observations, we found that expression in BL21 was stronger than that in DH5α, and the strength of promoter BBa_J23100 was unexpectedly weaker than BBa_J23106 provided by the 2014 iGEM kit plate.