Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K1371022:Design"

 
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
−
 
 
__NOTOC__
 
__NOTOC__
 
<partinfo>BBa_K1371022 short</partinfo>
 
<partinfo>BBa_K1371022 short</partinfo>
Line 7: Line 6:
  
 
===Design Notes===
 
===Design Notes===
−
aa
+
The design of docking domains in our experiment. At each set of docking domain, the top was connected with ACP that its upstream joined in the RFC 23 and its downstream joined in the RFC 10. The following came close to KS that the upstream joined in the RFC 10 and the downstream joined in the RFC 23. The following has no linker generally.
−
 
+
<div class="center">
−
 
+
[[File:DD-figb3 .jpg]]
−
 
+
</div>
 
===Source===
 
===Source===
  
−
aa
+
<i>Saccharopolyspora erythraea</i>
  
 
===References===
 
===References===
 +
[1]Broadhurst RW, Nietlispach D, Wheatcroft MP, Leadlay PF, Weissman KJ. The structure of docking domains in modular polyketide synthases [J]. Chem Biol, 2003, 10: 723–731.<p></p>
 +
[2] Worthington, A. S., Hur, G. H., Meier, J. L., Cheng, Q., Moore, B. S.and Burkart, M. D. . Probing the compatibility of  type II ketosynthase-carrier protein partners [J]. ChemBioChem, 2008, 9: 2096 –2103<p></p>
 +
[3]onia JB, Todd WG, Frank EB Kevin AR, Janet LS, and David HS. Structural Basis for Binding Specificity between Subclasses of Modular Polyketide Synthase Docking Domains [J]. ACS Chem Biol, 2009,  Vol.4 No.1<p></p>
 +
[4]Jonathan RW, Sarah SS, Douglas AH, William CB, William HG,David HS and Janet LS. <i>Cyanobacterial</i> Polyketide Synthase Docking Domains:A Tool for Engineering Natural Product Biosynthesis [J]. Chem Biol, 2013, 20:1340–1351.<p></p>
 +
[5]Tang, Y., Kim, C.-Y., Mathews, I. I., Cane, D. E. and  Khosla, C. . The 2.7-angstrom crystal structure of a 194-kDa homodimeric fragment of the 6-deoxyerythronolide B synthase [J]. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2006, 103, 11124 -11129.<p></p>

Latest revision as of 18:46, 24 October 2014

Docking domain 4 pre


Assembly Compatibility:
  • 10
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[10]
  • 12
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[12]
  • 21
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[21]
  • 23
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[23]
  • 25
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[25]
  • 1000
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[1000]


Design Notes

The design of docking domains in our experiment. At each set of docking domain, the top was connected with ACP that its upstream joined in the RFC 23 and its downstream joined in the RFC 10. The following came close to KS that the upstream joined in the RFC 10 and the downstream joined in the RFC 23. The following has no linker generally.

DD-figb3 .jpg

Source

Saccharopolyspora erythraea

References

[1]Broadhurst RW, Nietlispach D, Wheatcroft MP, Leadlay PF, Weissman KJ. The structure of docking domains in modular polyketide synthases [J]. Chem Biol, 2003, 10: 723–731.

[2] Worthington, A. S., Hur, G. H., Meier, J. L., Cheng, Q., Moore, B. S.and Burkart, M. D. . Probing the compatibility of type II ketosynthase-carrier protein partners [J]. ChemBioChem, 2008, 9: 2096 –2103

[3]onia JB, Todd WG, Frank EB Kevin AR, Janet LS, and David HS. Structural Basis for Binding Specificity between Subclasses of Modular Polyketide Synthase Docking Domains [J]. ACS Chem Biol, 2009, Vol.4 No.1

[4]Jonathan RW, Sarah SS, Douglas AH, William CB, William HG,David HS and Janet LS. Cyanobacterial Polyketide Synthase Docking Domains:A Tool for Engineering Natural Product Biosynthesis [J]. Chem Biol, 2013, 20:1340–1351.

[5]Tang, Y., Kim, C.-Y., Mathews, I. I., Cane, D. E. and Khosla, C. . The 2.7-angstrom crystal structure of a 194-kDa homodimeric fragment of the 6-deoxyerythronolide B synthase [J]. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2006, 103, 11124 -11129.