Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K1189037:Experience"

 
(21 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
__NOTOC__
+
<html>
This experience page is provided so that any user may enter their experience using this part.<BR>Please enter
+
how you used this part and how it worked out.
+
  
===Applications of BBa_K1189037===
+
<h1>A fusion of two ferrtin subunits</h1>
  
<p>The main purpose of this page is to display the characterization data of Prussian blue chemically modified commercial horse spleen ferritin as a catalyst. This ferritin is extremely similar to our constructed ferritin and we do not anticipate any differences in their properties. Next we show how our own constructed ferritin displays the same catalytic activity. At the end we show how the coil found in this part can bind to coils found on our other parts. </p>
+
<p>Ferritin is a protein shelled nanoparticle and is composed of a mixture of 24 <a href="https://parts.igem.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K1189024">light (BBa_K1189024)</a> and <a href="https://parts.igem.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K1189025">heavy (BBa_K1189025)</a> subunits. It is ubiquitous across eukaryotic and prokaryotic systems and is used to sequester intracellular iron (Chasteen <i>et al.</i>, 1991). The <a href="http://2013.igem.org/Team:Calgary">2013 iGEM Calgary</a> used ferritin’s iron core as a reporter and its protein shell to scaffold <a href="http://2013.igem.org/Team:Calgary/Project/OurSensor/Detector">DNA sensing TALEs</a> as part of their project, the <a href="http://2013.igem.org/Team:Calgary/Project/OurSensor">FerriTALE</a> (see Figure 1).</p>
 
+
<b>Kinetic Analysis of Prussian Blue Ferritin</b>
+
 
+
<html>
+
<p>We performed a kinetic analysis of our Prussian blue ferritin. We included a comparison of Prussian blue horse spleen ferritin to regular horse spleen ferritin for both TMB and ABTS (Figures 1, 2). For both of the substrates we can see that normal ferritin has a very low catalytic activity compared to our modified ferritin. Using this data were able to determine the Michaelis-Menten catalytic constants for Prussian blue ferritin with different substrates.</p>
+
  
 
<figure>
 
<figure>
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/3/36/UCalgary2013TRTmb6ulgraph.png" alt="Prussian Blue Ferritin and TMB" width="800" height="439">
+
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/thumb/3/34/Assembled_FerriTALE.png/463px-Assembled_FerriTALE.png" alt="BBa_K1189037 joined with DNA sensing TALEs" width="400" height="500">
 
<figcaption>
 
<figcaption>
<p><b>Figure 1.</b> Measurements of the absorbance of the 650nm light by the substrate TMB over a period of 600 seconds. 6 µL of 10 mg/mL substrate was used in a 242 µL reaction volume.Commercial Prussian blue ferritin ( 10 µL of 0.022 mg/mL sample) is represented by the blue data points. Orange data points are a negative control using standard ferritin (10 µL of 0.047 mg/mL sample). Negative controls are TMB and hydrogen peroxide, and TMB only. Standard error of the mean bars are based on a sample size where n=8. Substrate and hydrogen peroxide sample data is not clearly visible as it is in line with the substrate only data. </p>
+
<p><b>Figure 1.</b> 3D <i>in silico</i> rendering of BBa_K1189037 formed into functional nanoparticles bound to DNA sensing TALEs. The iron core is chemically modified and use to show when TALEs are bound to DNA. The TALEs are one specific, particular application of the ferritin E coil di-subunit fusion. This nanoparticle is the molecular basis of a DNA lateral flow strip biosensor pursued by the 2013 iGEM Calgary team.</p>
 
</figcaption>
 
</figcaption>
 
</figure>
 
</figure>
  
<figure>
+
<p><a href="https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1189037">BBa_K1189037</a> is a fusion of heavy and light ferritin subunits, such that ferritin nanoparticles are formed from 12 di-subunits. The rationale for this design is that it reduces the number of N-termini on ferritin to which proteins can be fused by half, which is important for lessening potential steric hindrances among fused proteins in the 3D sphere surrounding ferritin. Additionally, di-subunits mandate a 1:1 ratio of heavy and light subunits which ensures consistency in ferritin’s ability to uptake iron. Moreover, these fusions have been shown stable in engineered applications with other proteins scaffolded to ferritin (Dehal <i>et al.</i>, 2010).</p>
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/1/15/UCalgary2013TRABTS8ulgraph.png" alt="Prussian Blue Ferritin and ABTS" width="800" height="433">
+
<figcaption>
+
<p><b>Figure 2.</b> Measurements of the absorbance of the 415nm light by the substrate ABTS over a period of 600 seconds. 8 µL of 10 mg/mL substrate was used in a 242 µL reaction volume. Commercial Prussian blue ferritin ( 10 µL of 0.022 mg/mL sample) is represented by the blue data points. Orange data points are a negative control using standard ferritin (10 µL of 0.047 mg/mL sample). Negative controls are ABTS and hydrogen peroxide, and ABTS only. Standard error of the mean bars are based on a sample size where n=8.</p>
+
</figcaption>
+
</figure>
+
  
<p>In order to complete our kinetic analysis we had to determine the catalytic properties of our Prussian blue ferritin according to the Michaelis-Menten kinetic model. For these tests we varied the colourimetric substrate concentrations (ABTS and TMB) (Figures 3,4). We also varied the hydrogen peroxide concentration in association with TMB as this the first chemical compound that will react in the system (Figure 5).</p>
+
<h1>Design features</h1>
 +
 
 +
<p>This part has an N-terminal fusion to an E coil connected to ferritin by a GS linker (Figure 2). The coil system is of utility to other iGEM teams because they can express K coils on their own proteins of interest, and bind them to the complementary E coil on ferritin. Such a coiled-coil linker system reduces potential for large protein fusions to harm ferritin formation, allowing user to build intricate nanoparticle devices with myriad proteins. See Figures 3 application examples.</p>
  
 
<figure>
 
<figure>
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/2/20/UCalgary2013TRPBFABTSmichaelismentengraph.png" alt="Michaelis-Menten Plot for Prussian Blue Ferritin with ABTS" width="800" height="436">
+
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/thumb/d/de/BBa_K1189037_SBOL.png/800px-BBa_K1189037_SBOL.png" alt="BBa_K1189037 SBOL part figure" width="600" height="100">
 
<figcaption>
 
<figcaption>
<p><b>Figure 3.</b> Michaelis-Menten kinetic plot for commercial Prussian blue ferritin based on varying concentrations of ABTS. Absorbance readings were taken at 415 nm. Velocities were generated from the average slope of eight data sets. Standard error of the mean bars are not displayed but are present in the foundational data (eg. Figure 6).</p>
+
<p><b>Figure 2.</b> Ferritin di-subunit fused to an E coil and his tag. The E coil allows binding to other proteins expressing a complementary K coil.</p>
 
</figcaption>
 
</figcaption>
 
</figure>
 
</figure>
  
<figure>
+
<br></br>
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/c/c7/UCalgary2013TRPBFTMBmichaelismentengraph.png" alt="Michaelis-Menten Plot for Prussian Blue Ferritin with TMB" width="800" height="435">
+
<figcaption>
+
<p><b>Figure 4.</b> Michaelis-Menten kinetic plot for commercial Prussian blue ferritin based on varying concentrations of TMB. Absorbance readings were taken at 650 nm. Velocities were generated from the average slope of eight data sets. Standard error of the mean bars are not displayed but are present in the foundational data (eg. Figure 5).</p>
+
</figcaption>
+
</figure>
+
  
 
<figure>
 
<figure>
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/e/e5/UCalgary2013TRPBFTMBGHydrogenperoxidemichaelismentengraph.png" alt="Michaelis-Menten Plot for Prussian Blue Ferritin Based on Hydrogen Peroxide (with TMB)" width="800" height="434">
+
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/0/07/UCalgary2013TRCoilflexibility.png" alt="FerriTALE Scaffold Modularity" width="800" height="219" >
 
<figcaption>
 
<figcaption>
<p><b>Figure 5.</b> Michaelis-Menten kinetic plot for commercial Prussian blue ferritin based on varying concentrations of hydrogen peroxide. Absorbance readings were taken at 650 nm which measure the breakdown of TMB. Velocities were generated from the average slope of eight data sets. Standard error of the mean bars are not displayed but are present in the foundational data.</p>
+
<p><b>Figure 3.</b> Using the E and K coils in combination with ferritin as a scaffold system allows the creation of brand new FerriTALEs or protein scaffolds.</a></p>
 
</figcaption>
 
</figcaption>
 
</figure>
 
</figure>
  
<center><b>Table 1.</b> Catalytic constants for our Prussian blue ferritin</center>
+
<p>This part is identical to <a href="https://parts.igem.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K1189018">BBa_1189018</a>, with the exception of a his-tag for purification.</p>
  
<center><table width="800" border="1">
+
<h1>Results</h1>
  <tr>
+
    <td>Catalyst</td>
+
    <td>Enzyme Concentration (M)</td>
+
    <td>Substrate</td>
+
    <td>K<sub>m</sub> (mM)</td>
+
    <td>V<sub>max</sub> (Ms<sup>-1</sup>)</td>
+
    <td>K<sub>cat</sub> (s<sup>-1</sup>)</td>
+
    <td>K<sub>cat</sub>/K<sub>m</sub> (M<sup>-1</sup>s<sup>-1</sup>)</td>
+
  </tr>
+
  <tr>
+
    <td>Prussian Blue Ferritin</td>
+
    <td>1.31 x 10<sup>-9</sup></td>
+
    <td>ABTS</td>
+
    <td>0.448</td>
+
    <td>1.25 x 10<sup>-8</sup></td>
+
    <td>9.51</td>
+
    <td>2.12 x 10<sup>4</sup></td>
+
  </tr>
+
  <tr>
+
    <td>Prussian Blue Ferritin</td>
+
    <td>1.31 x 10<sup>-9</sup></td>
+
    <td>TMB</td>
+
    <td>0.0432</td>
+
    <td>1.12 x 10<sup>-7</sup></td>
+
    <td>85.3</td>
+
    <td>1.97 x 10<sup>6</sup></td>
+
  </tr>
+
  <tr>
+
    <td>Prussian Blue Ferritin</td>
+
    <td>1.31 x 10<sup>-9</sup></td>
+
    <td>H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2 </sub> (TMB)</td>
+
    <td>0.0176</td>
+
    <td>1.31 x 10<sup>-8</sup></td>
+
    <td>11.1</td>
+
    <td>6.28 x 10<sup>5</sup></td>
+
  </tr>
+
</table></center>
+
  
<b>pH Optimization of Prussian blue Ferritin</b>
+
<h3>Expression from pSB1C3</h3>
  
<p>We also performed a pH optimization of our Prussian blue ferritin using the substrates TMB and ABTS (Figure 6, 7).</p>
+
<p>The <a href="http://2013.igem.org/Team:Calgary">2013 iGEM Calgary</a> successfully expressed and purified this protein in pSB1C3 and per this part sequence exactly using and FPLC and metal affinity purification of the his tag. See Figure 4 for an SDS-PAGE of this 42 kDa isolate. Please see the <a href="https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1189037:Experience#User reviews">user review section</a> for data on another expression vector which generated this protein with a higher yield.</p>
 
+
figure>
+
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/c/ca/UCalgary2013TRABTSphoptimization.png" alt="ABTS pH Optimization" width="800" height="431">
+
<figcaption>
+
<p><b>Figure 6.</b> pH optimization of commercial Prussian blue ferritin with ABTS. Data is presented as a relative activity based on the highest activity seen during the experiment. Absorbance readings were taken at 415 nm to detect the colourimetric change in a 242 µL solution. Data based on a sample size of n=8. Standard error of the mean bars are not displayed due to their lack of visibility. </p>
+
</figcaption>
+
</figure>
+
  
 
<figure>
 
<figure>
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/1/1c/UCalgary2013TRTMBphoptimization.png" alt="TMB pH Optimization" width="800" height="444">
+
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/3/3a/BBa_1189037_SDSPAGE_1c3_expression.png" alt="FerriTALE Scaffold Modularity" width="400" height="400" >
 
<figcaption>
 
<figcaption>
<p><b>Figure 7.</b> pH optimization of commercial Prussian blue ferritin with TMB. Data is presented as a relative activity based on the highest activity seen during the experiment. Absorbance readings were taken at 650 nm to detect the colourimetric change in a 242 µL solution. Data based on a sample size of n=8. Standard error of the mean bars are not displayed due to their lack of visibility. </p>
+
<p><b>Figure 4.</b> FPLC purification fraction of <a href="https://parts.igem.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K1189037">BBa_K1189037</a> as express per our <a href="http://2013.igem.org/Team:Calgary/Notebook/Protocols/LargeScaleProteinExpressionAndPurification">large scale expression protocol.</a> Were were disappointed with the yield of this 42 kDa protein from the pSB1C3 cloning vector. Please see the <a href="https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1189037:Experience#User reviews">user reviews section</a> for results from a proper expression vector.</p>
 
</figcaption>
 
</figcaption>
 
</figure>
 
</figure>
  
<b>Temperature Optimization of Prussian Blue Ferritin</b>
+
<h3>Conversion of BBa_K1189037 into a reporter</h3>
  
<p>Another aspect of our analysis was determining the optimal temperature for catalytic activity of Prussian blue ferritin (Figure 8, 9).</p>
+
<p>This purified protein product was successfully converted into Prussian blue ferritin, a robust colourmetric reporter. Figure 5 shows that this part with coiled-coils performs better as a reporter than direct fusions to TALEs (<a href="https://parts.igem.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K1189021">BBa_K118021</a>). It seems that large protein fusions reduce effectiveness of ferritin as a reporter. Figure 6 shows that ferritin with coiled-coils (BBa_1189037) maintains reporter functionality when TALEs are scaffolded using coiled-coil linkers.</p>
  
 
<figure>
 
<figure>
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/5/57/UCalgary2013TRABTStemperatureoptimization.png" alt="ABTS Temperature Optimization" width="800" height="437">
+
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/8/89/UCalgary2013TRRecombinantPrussianBlueFerritin.png" alt="Creating Prussian Blue Ferritin out of our Own Ferritin" width="800" height="511">
 
<figcaption>
 
<figcaption>
<p><b>Figure 8.</b> Temperature optimization of commercial Prussian blue ferritin with ABTS. Data is presented as a relative activity based on the highest activity seen during the experiment. Absorbance readings were taken at 415 nm to detect the colourimetric change in a 242 µL solution. Data based on a sample size of n=8. Standard error of the mean bars are not displayed due to their lack of visibility. </p>
+
<p><b>Figure 5.</b> Measurements of the coloured substrate TMB (10 mg/mL) at 650 nm over a 600 second time period for our own Prussian blue ferritin and unmodified ferritin. Sample volume was 242 µL. Controls for this experiment include bovine serum albumin (1 mg/mL)and the substrate solution by itself. Due to limitations on the protein available only one replicate was performed. Zero time points do not have low absorbance as colour change was rapid and began before measurements started.</p>
 
</figcaption>
 
</figcaption>
 
</figure>
 
</figure>
  
 
<figure>
 
<figure>
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/6/63/UCalgary2013TRTMBtemperatureoptimization.png" alt="TMB Temperature Optimization" width="800" height="440">
+
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/0/0d/UCalgary2013TRPBFAssayNoColour.png" alt="Recombinant Prussian Blue FerritinMole Balanced" width="465" height="480">
 
<figcaption>
 
<figcaption>
<p><b>Figure 9.</b> Temperature optimization of commerical Prussian blue ferritin with TMB. Data is presented as a relative activity based on the highest activity seen during the experiment. Absorbance readings were taken at 650 nm to detect the colourimetric change in a 242 µL solution. Data based on a sample size of n=8. Standard error of the mean bars are not displayed due to their lack of visibility. </p>
+
<p><b>Figure 6.</b> Samples of our parts that were converted to Prussian Blue ferritin were mole balanced in order to ensure that the same number of effective ferritin cores are present in every sample. Additionally the ferritin-coil fusion was incubated with the TALE-coil fusion part in order to allow their binding for a separate trial. Negative controls include unconverted recombinant ferritin, bovine serum albumin and a substrate only control. Samples were incubated with a TMB substrate solution for 10 minutes at a pH of 5.6. Absorbance readings were taken at the 10 minute time-point at a wavelength of 650 nm. An ANOVA (analysis of variants) was performed upon the values to determine that there was statistical difference in the data gathered (based off of three replicates). A t-test was then performed which determined that the * columns are significantly different from the ** column (p=0.0012). Neither * column is significantly different from each other (p=0.67).</p>
 
</figcaption>
 
</figcaption>
 
</figure>
 
</figure>
  
<b>Prussian Blue Ferritin on Nitrocellulose</b>
+
<p>Please see the <a href="http://2013.igem.org/Team:Calgary/Project/OurSensor/Reporter/PrussianBlueFerritin">Prussian blue ferritin Wiki</a> page for a detailed analysis of how Prussian blue ferritin, synthesized from commercially available ferritin, performs as a reporter. This data informs how <a href="https://parts.igem.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K1189037">BBa_K1189037</a> is useful as a reporter.</p>
  
<p>The next aspect of our analysis was to see how Prussian blue ferritin would act in a catalytic sense on nitrocellulose (Figures 10,11). From these results we can that TMB is a better substrate on for use on nitrocellulose(Figure 11). With this substrate we saw a result from only 5 ng of Prussian blue ferritin present on the nitrocellulose.</p>  
+
<br></br>
  
<figure>
+
<h1>References</h1>
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/5/53/UCalgary2013TRABTSnitrocellulose.png" alt="Prussian Blue Ferritin and ABTS on Nitrocellulose" width="701" height="600">
+
 
<figcaption>
+
<li>Chasteen, N. D., & Harrison, P. M. (1999). Mineralization in ferritin: an efficient means of iron storage. Journal of structural biology, 126(3), 182-194.</li>
<p><b>Figure 10.</b> Blots of Prussian blue ferritin on nitrocellulose (5 µL samples) that are reacted with ABTS (10 mg/mL). Concentrations of Prussian blue ferritin used are indicated in the figure. Results indicate colour change after 6 minutes. Controls include the substrate by itself, unmodified ferritin and bovine serum albumin. Four replicates are present per sample trial.</p>
+
 
</figcaption>
+
<li>Dehal, P. K., Livingston, C. F., Dunn, C. G., Buick, R., Luxton, R., & Pritchard, D. J. (2010). Magnetizable antibody‐like proteins. Biotechnology journal, 5(6), 596-604.</li>
</figure>
+
 
 +
<br></br>
  
 +
<a name="User reviews"></a>
 +
<h1>User reviews</h1>
 +
 +
<h3>iGEM Calgary 2013 review</h3>
 +
 +
<p>We found that expression of <a href="https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1189037">BBa_K1189037</a> was minimal when expressed in <a href="https://parts.igem.org/Part:pSB1C3">pSB1C3 cloning vector</a>. To yield of protein in the soluble extract, we attempted expression in a different expression plasmid borrowed from <a href="http://www.ucalgary.ca/bprg/schryvers">Dr. Anthony Schryvers</a>, one of the <a href="http://2013.igem.org/Team:Calgary">iGEM Calgary 2013</a> advisors. The protein coding sequence was extracted from <a href="https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1189037">BBa_K1189037</a> using PCR and placed into <a href="https://benchling.com/s/rn94wY">vector</a> 4365 using isothermal assembly. This vector sequence placed maltose binding protein (MBP) as an N-terminal fusion with the di-subunit ferritin fusion. MBP is known to improve solubility of expressed proteins. Additionally, there is a TEV protease cleavage site between MBP and the di-subunit ferritin, which allowed us to remove MBP to generate functional ferritin. See Figure A for a diagram of the fusion genes with the new vector.</p>
  
 
<figure>
 
<figure>
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/c/cd/UCalgary2013TRTMBnitrocellulose.png" alt="Prussian Blue Ferritin and TMB on Nitrocellulose" width="693" height="600">
+
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/c/c5/BBa_K1189037_alternativeVector.png" alt="Alternate ferritin di-subunit expression vector" width="585" height="82">
 
<figcaption>
 
<figcaption>
<p><b>Figure 11.</b> Blots of Prussian blue ferritin on nitrocellulose (5 µL samples) that are reacted with TMB (10 mg/mL). Concentrations of Prussian blue ferritin used are indicated in the figure. Results indicate colour change after 6 minutes. Controls include the substrate by itself, unmodified ferritin and bovine serum albumin. Four replicates are present per sample trial.</p>
+
<p><b>Figure A.</b> Alternative expression vector for the coding sequence from BBa_K1189037. Proteins are fused to Maltose Binding Protein (MBP), which is useful for stabilizing expression of proteins. MBP was removed from E coil ferritin using TEV protease.</a></p>
 
</figcaption>
 
</figcaption>
 
</figure>
 
</figure>
  
<b>Making Prussian Blue out of This Part</b>
+
<p>As seen in Figure B, this alternative T7 expression system significantly improved protein yield compared to the pSB1C3 protein expression. From 1L of culture, we yield approximately 8mg of E coil ferritin. Unfortunately, the Calgary team did not have time prior to finals to convert vector 4365 to the iGEM RFC10 standard. Henceforth, we were unable to share this vector in the Parts Registry. Future teams can investigate this new construct <a href="https://benchling.com/s/rn94wY">here</a>.</p>
 
+
<p>We applied a scaled down Prussian blue synthesis experiment to our own ferritinOur own Prussian blue ferritin was then exposed to the TMB substrate (Figure 12). From the results we can see that the ferritin with the E-coil attached had excellent catalytic activity.</p>
+
  
 
<figure>
 
<figure>
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/8/89/UCalgary2013TRRecombinantPrussianBlueFerritin.png" alt="Creating Prussian Blue Ferritin out of our Own Ferritin" width="800" height="511">
+
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/8/84/BBa_1189037_Vector4365_expression.png" alt="FerriTALE Scaffold Modularity" width="500" height="500" >
 
<figcaption>
 
<figcaption>
<p><b>Figure 12.</b> Measurements of the coloured substrate TMB (10 mg/mL) at 650 nm over a 600 second time period for our own Prussian blue ferritin and unmodified ferritin. Sample volume was 242 µL. Controls for this experiment include bovine serum albumin (1 mg/mL)and the substrate solution by itself. Due to limitations on the protein available only one replicate was performed. Zero time points do not have low absorbance as colour change was rapid and began before measurements started.</p>
+
<p><b>Figure B.</b> Expression of the coding sequence from BBa_1189037 in a low copy number <i>E. coli</i> expression vector. The purified di-subunit is approximately twice the molecular weight of the single ferritin subunit Sigma horse spleen ferritin control.</a></p>
 
</figcaption>
 
</figcaption>
 
</figure>
 
</figure>
  
<b>Does the coil bind?</b>
+
<p>Additionally, protein expression/purification protocols were similar to the one on our <a href="http://2013.igem.org/Team:Calgary/Notebook/Protocols/LargeScaleProteinExpressionAndPurification">Wiki</a>. There were a few modifications including use of a glucose repression media to grow overnight cultures, use of a lactose/glucose autoinduction media, use of <i>E. coli ER2566</i> instead of <i>E. coli BL21</i>, and two runs through an FPLC separated by incubation with TEV protease to remove MBP.</p>
  
<p>In the case of the coils we were interested to see if the K-coil fused to TALE proteins (<a href="http://partsregistry.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K1189029"><span class="Green"><b>BBa_K1189029</b></span></a>, <a href="http://partsregistry.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K1189030"><span class="Green"><b>BBa_K1189030</b></span></a>) could bind to the E-coil found on one of our Prussian blue ferritin constructs (<a href="http://partsregistry.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K1189018"><span class="Green"><b>BBa_K1189018</b></span></a>). To complete this task we placed the TALE on the membrane, washed and blocked the membrane. The ferritin protein with the complimentary coil was then added to the membrane. If this coil successfully binds to the other coil then the ferritin will not be washed off during the next wash step. We can then see if Prussian blue ferritin is bound by adding a TMB substrate solution that will cause a colour change. To this extent we saw a blue ring in this trial indicating a positive result. This suggests that our coils are actually binding in an <i>in vitro</i> system.</p>
+
<br></br>
  
<p>Another interesting element of this assay is why we used two variants of the TALE K-coil negative control.  A blue ring on our TALE negative control confirmed our fear that during the  second protein application and wash step that some of the ferritin with coil proteins would drift over and bind to the TALE K-coils on the nitrocellulose. This did not occur for our separate negative control (Figure 13).</p>
+
<h1>References</h1>
  
<figure>
+
<li>Chasteen, N. D., & Harrison, P. M. (1999). Mineralization in ferritin: an efficient means of iron storage. Journal of structural biology, 126(3), 182-194.</li>
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/e/e3/UCalgary2013TRCoilbindingpreliminary.png" alt="Preliminary Coil Binding" width="757" height="751">
+
 
<figcaption>
+
<li>Dehal, P. K., Livingston, C. F., Dunn, C. G., Buick, R., Luxton, R., & Pritchard, D. J. (2010). Magnetizable antibody‐like proteins. Biotechnology journal, 5(6), 596-604.</li>
<p><b>Figure 13.</b> This basic qualitative assay was used to inform us whether certain elements of our system are able to bind to each other. Our TALE proteins were mounted to the membrane along with positive controls of three Prussian blue variants; two recombinant ferritins and one commercial protein. The membranes were then washed and blocked. Prussian blue ferritin with a coil was added to our TALE protein containing a coil. Prussian blue ferritin with a TALE that could bind to the DNA held by another TALE on the membrane was also added. A TMB substrate solution was added to cause a colourimetric change over 5 minutes. Positive results are indicated by dark rings of colour. Negative controls include a TALE with a coil on the same membrane and the same TALE and bovine serum albumin on separate membranes that were treated separately. Image contrast was altered to make the results more clear on a digital monitor; the same changes were applied to each element of the figure.</p>
+
  
 +
<br></br>
  
<br>
 
 
</html>
 
</html>
  
===User Reviews===
 
 
<!-- DON'T DELETE --><partinfo>BBa_K1189037 StartReviews</partinfo>
 
<!-- DON'T DELETE --><partinfo>BBa_K1189037 StartReviews</partinfo>
 
<!-- Template for a user review
 
<!-- Template for a user review

Latest revision as of 07:21, 2 November 2013

A fusion of two ferrtin subunits

Ferritin is a protein shelled nanoparticle and is composed of a mixture of 24 light (BBa_K1189024) and heavy (BBa_K1189025) subunits. It is ubiquitous across eukaryotic and prokaryotic systems and is used to sequester intracellular iron (Chasteen et al., 1991). The 2013 iGEM Calgary used ferritin’s iron core as a reporter and its protein shell to scaffold DNA sensing TALEs as part of their project, the FerriTALE (see Figure 1).

BBa_K1189037 joined with DNA sensing TALEs

Figure 1. 3D in silico rendering of BBa_K1189037 formed into functional nanoparticles bound to DNA sensing TALEs. The iron core is chemically modified and use to show when TALEs are bound to DNA. The TALEs are one specific, particular application of the ferritin E coil di-subunit fusion. This nanoparticle is the molecular basis of a DNA lateral flow strip biosensor pursued by the 2013 iGEM Calgary team.

BBa_K1189037 is a fusion of heavy and light ferritin subunits, such that ferritin nanoparticles are formed from 12 di-subunits. The rationale for this design is that it reduces the number of N-termini on ferritin to which proteins can be fused by half, which is important for lessening potential steric hindrances among fused proteins in the 3D sphere surrounding ferritin. Additionally, di-subunits mandate a 1:1 ratio of heavy and light subunits which ensures consistency in ferritin’s ability to uptake iron. Moreover, these fusions have been shown stable in engineered applications with other proteins scaffolded to ferritin (Dehal et al., 2010).

Design features

This part has an N-terminal fusion to an E coil connected to ferritin by a GS linker (Figure 2). The coil system is of utility to other iGEM teams because they can express K coils on their own proteins of interest, and bind them to the complementary E coil on ferritin. Such a coiled-coil linker system reduces potential for large protein fusions to harm ferritin formation, allowing user to build intricate nanoparticle devices with myriad proteins. See Figures 3 application examples.

BBa_K1189037 SBOL part figure

Figure 2. Ferritin di-subunit fused to an E coil and his tag. The E coil allows binding to other proteins expressing a complementary K coil.



FerriTALE Scaffold Modularity

Figure 3. Using the E and K coils in combination with ferritin as a scaffold system allows the creation of brand new FerriTALEs or protein scaffolds.

This part is identical to BBa_1189018, with the exception of a his-tag for purification.

Results

Expression from pSB1C3

The 2013 iGEM Calgary successfully expressed and purified this protein in pSB1C3 and per this part sequence exactly using and FPLC and metal affinity purification of the his tag. See Figure 4 for an SDS-PAGE of this 42 kDa isolate. Please see the user review section for data on another expression vector which generated this protein with a higher yield.

FerriTALE Scaffold Modularity

Figure 4. FPLC purification fraction of BBa_K1189037 as express per our large scale expression protocol. Were were disappointed with the yield of this 42 kDa protein from the pSB1C3 cloning vector. Please see the user reviews section for results from a proper expression vector.

Conversion of BBa_K1189037 into a reporter

This purified protein product was successfully converted into Prussian blue ferritin, a robust colourmetric reporter. Figure 5 shows that this part with coiled-coils performs better as a reporter than direct fusions to TALEs (BBa_K118021). It seems that large protein fusions reduce effectiveness of ferritin as a reporter. Figure 6 shows that ferritin with coiled-coils (BBa_1189037) maintains reporter functionality when TALEs are scaffolded using coiled-coil linkers.

Creating Prussian Blue Ferritin out of our Own Ferritin

Figure 5. Measurements of the coloured substrate TMB (10 mg/mL) at 650 nm over a 600 second time period for our own Prussian blue ferritin and unmodified ferritin. Sample volume was 242 µL. Controls for this experiment include bovine serum albumin (1 mg/mL)and the substrate solution by itself. Due to limitations on the protein available only one replicate was performed. Zero time points do not have low absorbance as colour change was rapid and began before measurements started.

Recombinant Prussian Blue FerritinMole Balanced

Figure 6. Samples of our parts that were converted to Prussian Blue ferritin were mole balanced in order to ensure that the same number of effective ferritin cores are present in every sample. Additionally the ferritin-coil fusion was incubated with the TALE-coil fusion part in order to allow their binding for a separate trial. Negative controls include unconverted recombinant ferritin, bovine serum albumin and a substrate only control. Samples were incubated with a TMB substrate solution for 10 minutes at a pH of 5.6. Absorbance readings were taken at the 10 minute time-point at a wavelength of 650 nm. An ANOVA (analysis of variants) was performed upon the values to determine that there was statistical difference in the data gathered (based off of three replicates). A t-test was then performed which determined that the * columns are significantly different from the ** column (p=0.0012). Neither * column is significantly different from each other (p=0.67).

Please see the Prussian blue ferritin Wiki page for a detailed analysis of how Prussian blue ferritin, synthesized from commercially available ferritin, performs as a reporter. This data informs how BBa_K1189037 is useful as a reporter.



References

  • Chasteen, N. D., & Harrison, P. M. (1999). Mineralization in ferritin: an efficient means of iron storage. Journal of structural biology, 126(3), 182-194.
  • Dehal, P. K., Livingston, C. F., Dunn, C. G., Buick, R., Luxton, R., & Pritchard, D. J. (2010). Magnetizable antibody‐like proteins. Biotechnology journal, 5(6), 596-604.


  • User reviews

    iGEM Calgary 2013 review

    We found that expression of BBa_K1189037 was minimal when expressed in pSB1C3 cloning vector. To yield of protein in the soluble extract, we attempted expression in a different expression plasmid borrowed from Dr. Anthony Schryvers, one of the iGEM Calgary 2013 advisors. The protein coding sequence was extracted from BBa_K1189037 using PCR and placed into vector 4365 using isothermal assembly. This vector sequence placed maltose binding protein (MBP) as an N-terminal fusion with the di-subunit ferritin fusion. MBP is known to improve solubility of expressed proteins. Additionally, there is a TEV protease cleavage site between MBP and the di-subunit ferritin, which allowed us to remove MBP to generate functional ferritin. See Figure A for a diagram of the fusion genes with the new vector.

    Alternate ferritin di-subunit expression vector

    Figure A. Alternative expression vector for the coding sequence from BBa_K1189037. Proteins are fused to Maltose Binding Protein (MBP), which is useful for stabilizing expression of proteins. MBP was removed from E coil ferritin using TEV protease.

    As seen in Figure B, this alternative T7 expression system significantly improved protein yield compared to the pSB1C3 protein expression. From 1L of culture, we yield approximately 8mg of E coil ferritin. Unfortunately, the Calgary team did not have time prior to finals to convert vector 4365 to the iGEM RFC10 standard. Henceforth, we were unable to share this vector in the Parts Registry. Future teams can investigate this new construct here.

    FerriTALE Scaffold Modularity

    Figure B. Expression of the coding sequence from BBa_1189037 in a low copy number E. coli expression vector. The purified di-subunit is approximately twice the molecular weight of the single ferritin subunit Sigma horse spleen ferritin control.

    Additionally, protein expression/purification protocols were similar to the one on our Wiki. There were a few modifications including use of a glucose repression media to grow overnight cultures, use of a lactose/glucose autoinduction media, use of E. coli ER2566 instead of E. coli BL21, and two runs through an FPLC separated by incubation with TEV protease to remove MBP.



    References

  • Chasteen, N. D., & Harrison, P. M. (1999). Mineralization in ferritin: an efficient means of iron storage. Journal of structural biology, 126(3), 182-194.
  • Dehal, P. K., Livingston, C. F., Dunn, C. G., Buick, R., Luxton, R., & Pritchard, D. J. (2010). Magnetizable antibody‐like proteins. Biotechnology journal, 5(6), 596-604.


  • UNIQ4496bd26eb2cce93-partinfo-00000001-QINU UNIQ4496bd26eb2cce93-partinfo-00000002-QINU