Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K1031211"
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
== '''Characterization''' == | == '''Characterization''' == | ||
− | + | Professor V.Shringler provided 2013 Peking iGEM Team with pVI401 composed of <html><i>Pr</i></html>-DmpR on vector pVI398, from which K1031211 is derived. K1031211 is composed of the natural promoter of DmpR, <html><i>Pr</i></html> and modified coding sequence with two Pst1 sites removed. To characterize DmpR, we constructed a biosensor circuit composed of <html><i>Pr</i></html>-DmpR and <html><i>Po</i></html>-sfGFP. | |
('''Fig 1''') | ('''Fig 1''') | ||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/thumb/7/73/Peking2013_part_Construction_Pr-DmpR.png/800px-Peking2013_part_Construction_Pr-DmpR.png" | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/thumb/7/73/Peking2013_part_Construction_Pr-DmpR.png/800px-Peking2013_part_Construction_Pr-DmpR.png" | ||
style="width:600px; margin-left:170px" /> | style="width:600px; margin-left:170px" /> | ||
− | <p style="text-align:center"><b>Fig 1</b> Construction of biosensor circuit <i>Po</i>/ | + | <p style="text-align:center"><b>Fig 1</b> Construction of biosensor circuit <i>Po</i>/DmpR. Orange arrowheads represent promoters. RBSs(Ribosome Binding Sites) are shown as green ovals. |
</html> | </html> | ||
Line 36: | Line 36: | ||
'''ON/OFF test''' | '''ON/OFF test''' | ||
− | We evaluated the performance of DmpR using our own protocols and almost every protocol mentioned in the previous studies. Results showed that the <html><a href="http://2013.igem.org/Team:Peking/Team/Notebook/Protocols#Content2">Test Protocol 3</a></html> works the best, with which we tested the ON | + | We evaluated the performance of DmpR using our own protocols and almost every protocol mentioned in the previous studies. Results showed that the <html><a href="http://2013.igem.org/Team:Peking/Team/Notebook/Protocols#Content2">Test Protocol 3</a></html> works the best, with which we tested the ON/OFF ratios of all the 78 aromatic compounds. 7 compounds out of the 78 showed significant induction ratios (>2),they are Phl, 2-MePhl, 2-ClPhl, 3-ClPhl, Cat, 4-NtPhl and 2-APhl ('''Fig 2''') |
<html> | <html> | ||
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/igem.org/7/7b/Peking2013_DmpR_Figure8.png" | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/igem.org/7/7b/Peking2013_DmpR_Figure8.png" | ||
− | style="width:800px; margin-left: | + | style="width:800px; margin-left:70px" /> |
− | <p style="text-align:center"><b>Fig 2</b> <b>Left</b> Horizontal axis stands for different aromatic compounds.Vertical axis represents the ON/OFF induction ratio calculated from fluorescence intensity. <b>Right</b> Radar graph shows the | + | <p style="text-align:center"><b>Fig 2</b> <b>Left</b> Horizontal axis stands for different aromatic compounds.Vertical axis represents the ON/OFF induction ratio calculated from fluorescence intensity. <b>Right</b> Radar graph shows the aromatics-sensing profile of DmpR. The efficient and typical inducers are shown as their chemical structure. |
</html> | </html> | ||
Line 48: | Line 48: | ||
'''Dose-Response curve''' | '''Dose-Response curve''' | ||
− | 7 aromatics at different concentration was induced to plot dose-response curves for detailed information concerning DmpR. | + | 7 efficient aromatics at different concentration was induced to DmpR biosensor to plot dose-response curves for detailed information concerning DmpR. |
− | + | ||
<html> | <html> | ||
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/igem.org/0/0d/Peking2013_DmpR_Figure9.png" | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/igem.org/0/0d/Peking2013_DmpR_Figure9.png" | ||
style="width:600px; margin-left:170px" /> | style="width:600px; margin-left:170px" /> | ||
− | <p style="text-align:center"><b>Fig 3</b> Dose-response curves of DmpR biosensor induced by 7 strong inducers (phenol, its homologs and derivatives). The induction ratio was calculated by dividing the fluorescence intensity of biosensor exposed to inducers by the basal fluorescence intensity of the biosensor. | + | <p style="text-align:center"><b>Fig 3</b> Dose-response curves of DmpR biosensor induced by 7 strong inducers (phenol, as well as its homologs and derivatives). The induction ratio was calculated by dividing the fluorescence intensity of biosensor exposed to inducers by the basal fluorescence intensity of the biosensor. |
</html> | </html> | ||
Latest revision as of 16:01, 28 October 2013
Pr-DmpR
For detailed information concerning DmpR, please visit 2013 Peking iGEM Biosensor DmpR
Characterization
Professor V.Shringler provided 2013 Peking iGEM Team with pVI401 composed of Pr-DmpR on vector pVI398, from which K1031211 is derived. K1031211 is composed of the natural promoter of DmpR, Pr and modified coding sequence with two Pst1 sites removed. To characterize DmpR, we constructed a biosensor circuit composed of Pr-DmpR and Po-sfGFP. (Fig 1)
Fig 1 Construction of biosensor circuit Po/DmpR. Orange arrowheads represent promoters. RBSs(Ribosome Binding Sites) are shown as green ovals.
Sequence and Features
Sequence and Features
- 10COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[10]
- 12COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[12]
- 21INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[21]Illegal BglII site found at 160
- 23COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[23]
- 25INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[25]Illegal NgoMIV site found at 638
- 1000INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[1000]Illegal BsaI.rc site found at 323
Illegal BsaI.rc site found at 864
Illegal SapI.rc site found at 1521
Data shown
ON/OFF test
We evaluated the performance of DmpR using our own protocols and almost every protocol mentioned in the previous studies. Results showed that the Test Protocol 3 works the best, with which we tested the ON/OFF ratios of all the 78 aromatic compounds. 7 compounds out of the 78 showed significant induction ratios (>2),they are Phl, 2-MePhl, 2-ClPhl, 3-ClPhl, Cat, 4-NtPhl and 2-APhl (Fig 2)
Fig 2 Left Horizontal axis stands for different aromatic compounds.Vertical axis represents the ON/OFF induction ratio calculated from fluorescence intensity. Right Radar graph shows the aromatics-sensing profile of DmpR. The efficient and typical inducers are shown as their chemical structure.
Dose-Response curve
7 efficient aromatics at different concentration was induced to DmpR biosensor to plot dose-response curves for detailed information concerning DmpR.
Fig 3 Dose-response curves of DmpR biosensor induced by 7 strong inducers (phenol, as well as its homologs and derivatives). The induction ratio was calculated by dividing the fluorescence intensity of biosensor exposed to inducers by the basal fluorescence intensity of the biosensor.