Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K1172201"

(→‎NADH-Assays)
m
 
(18 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 6: Line 6:
  
 
<p align="justify">
 
<p align="justify">
−
Mediators are essential for the use of ''Escherichia coli'' in Microbial Fuel Cells. The main goal when improving MFCs is to enhance the kinetics of the electron transfer between the bacterial cells and the fuel cell anode. Increasing the mediator concentration in the MFC is an efficient way to enhance electron transfer. In order to avoid the usage of expensive and toxic synthetic mediators, we engineered an ''E. coli'' KRX strain with an overexpressed glycerol dehydrogenase (GldA). GldA produces the endogenous mediator NADH from NAD<sup>+</sup> and glycerol, which is the main carbon source in our medium.  We were able to produce high amounts of NADH with the optimized ''E.coli'', which resulted in a more efficient electron transfer. This demonstrates that genetically introducing an appropriate oxidoreductase into ''E. coli'' via gene manipulation can greatly improve the mediator production and power generation. We could show that the increased intracellular- and extracellular NADH concentration, leads to a 20 % enhanced current production in our Microbial Fuel Cell. The overexpression of the glycerol dehydrogenase in ''Escherichia coli'' is a great genetic optimization for electron shuttle-mediated extracellular electron transfer from bacteria to electrodes.  
+
Mediators are essential for the use of ''Escherichia coli'' in Microbial Fuel Cells. The main goal when improving MFCs is to enhance the kinetics of the electron transfer between the bacterial cells and the Fuel Cell anode. Increasing the mediator concentration in the MFC is an efficient way to enhance electron transfer. In order to avoid the usage of expensive and toxic synthetic mediators, we engineered an ''E. coli'' KRX strain to overexpress the glycerol dehydrogenase (GldA). GldA produces the endogenous mediator NADH from NAD<sup>+</sup> and glycerol, which is the main carbon source in our medium.  We were able to produce high amounts of NADH with the optimized ''E.coli'', which resulted in a more efficient electron transfer. This demonstrates that genetically introducing an appropriate oxidoreductase into ''E. coli'' via gene manipulation can greatly improve the mediator production and power generation. We could show that the increased intracellular- and extracellular NADH concentration, leads to a 20 % enhanced current production in our Microbial Fuel Cell. The overexpression of the glycerol dehydrogenase in ''Escherichia coli'' is a great genetic optimization for electron shuttle-mediated extracellular electron transfer from bacteria to electrodes.
 
</p>
 
</p>
  
 
[[Image:iGEM_Bielefeld_NAD_oxidation_reduction.jpg|450px|thumb|center|<p align="justify"> '''Figure 1: Redox reaction catalyzed by the glycerol dehydrogenase: NAD<sup>+</sup> is reduced to NADH by addition of two electrons (e<sup>-</sup>) and one proton (H<sup>+</sup>). '''</p>]]
 
[[Image:iGEM_Bielefeld_NAD_oxidation_reduction.jpg|450px|thumb|center|<p align="justify"> '''Figure 1: Redox reaction catalyzed by the glycerol dehydrogenase: NAD<sup>+</sup> is reduced to NADH by addition of two electrons (e<sup>-</sup>) and one proton (H<sup>+</sup>). '''</p>]]
  
 +
*Allergen characterization of BBa_K1172201: Potential Allergen- matched to Group V allergen Phl from Phleum practense 
  
−
===Parts uses===
+
The Baltimore Biocrew 2017 team discovered that proteins generated through biobrick parts can be evaluated for allergenicity. This information is important to the people using these parts in the lab, as well as when considering using the protein for mass production, or using in the environment. The allergenicity test permits a comparison between the sequences of the biobrick parts and the identified allergen proteins enlisted in a data base.The higher the similarity between the biobricks and the proteins, the more likely the biobrick is allergenic cross-reactive. In the full-length alignments by FASTA, 30% or more amount of similarity signifies that the biobrick has a Precaution Status meaning there is a potential risk with using the part. A 50% or more amount of identity signifies that the biobrick has a Possible Allergen Status. In the sliding window of 80 amino acid segments, greater than 35% signifies similarity to allergens. The percentage of similarity implies the potential of harm biobricks’ potential negative impact to exposed populations. For more information on how to assess your own biobrick part please see the “Allergenicity  Testing Protocol” in the following page http://2017.igem.org/Team:Baltimore_Bio-Crew/Experiments
 +
 
 +
 
 +
For the biobrick Part:BBa_K117201, there was a 0% of identity match and 0% similarity match to the top allergens in the allergen database. This means that the biobrick part is not of potential allergen status. In 80 amino acid alignments by FASTA window, there was one match found that are greater than 35% for this biobrick. This means that this part has a Potential Allergen status. Matched to Group V allergen Phl from Phleum pratense at 36.29% Identity https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/protein/3309039
 +
 
 +
===Part uses===
  
  
 
<p align="justify">The ''gldA'' gene from ''Escherichia coli'' was cloned and overexpressed in ''E. coli'' KRX under the control of different promoters (Table 1).</p>
 
<p align="justify">The ''gldA'' gene from ''Escherichia coli'' was cloned and overexpressed in ''E. coli'' KRX under the control of different promoters (Table 1).</p>
−
[[Image:IGEM_Bielefeld_Table1_Overview_GldA_Devices.jpg|500px|thumb|center|<p align="justify"> '''Table 1: Overview of GldA devices. Combination of GldA coding BioBrick (<bbpart>BBa_K1172201</bbpart>) with different promoters and RBS. The characterization of this BioBrick was performed by comparing ''Escherichia coli'' KRX wild type with ''Escherichia coli'' KRX carrying <bbpart>BBa_K1172203</bbpart>, <bbpart>BBa_K1172204</bbpart> and <bbpart>BBa_K1172205</bbpart>.'''</p>]]
+
[[Image:IGEM_Bielefeld_Table1_Overview_GldA_Devices.jpg|500px|thumb|center|<p align="justify"> '''Table 1: Overview of ''gldA'' devices. Combination of ''gldA'' coding BioBrick (<bbpart>BBa_K1172201</bbpart>) with different promoters and RBS. The characterization of this BioBrick was performed by comparing ''Escherichia coli'' KRX wild type with ''Escherichia coli'' KRX carrying <bbpart>BBa_K1172203</bbpart>, <bbpart>BBa_K1172204</bbpart> and <bbpart>BBa_K1172205</bbpart>.'''</p>]]
  
  
Line 36: Line 42:
  
  
−
[[Image:IGEM_Bielefeld_GldA_SDS_PAGE2.jpg|700px|thumb|center|<p align="justify"> '''Figure 4: [http://2013.igem.org/Team:Bielefeld-Germany/Labjournal/ProtocolsPrograms SDS-PAGE] with [http://www.thermoscientific.com/ecomm/servlet/productsdetail_11152___13576050_-1 Prestained Protein Ladder from Thermo Scientific] as marker.  Comparison of protein expression between ''Escherichia coli'' KRX wild type and ''Escherichia coli'' KRX with <bbpart>BBa_K1172205</bbpart>, <bbpart>BBa_K1172204</bbpart> and <bbpart>BBa_K1172203</bbpart> after total cell disruption. The right-hand gel was loaded with a higher protein concentration. The [http://2013.igem.org/Team:Bielefeld-Germany/Labjournal/ProtocolsPrograms SDS-PAGEs] display the protein glycerol dehydrogenase at the expected size of 40 kDa and enhanced overproduction of the protein with increasing promoter strength. '''</p>]]
+
[[Image:IGEM_Bielefeld_GldA_SDS_PAGE2.jpg|700px|thumb|center|<p align="justify"> '''Figure 2: [http://2013.igem.org/Team:Bielefeld-Germany/Labjournal/ProtocolsPrograms SDS-PAGE] with [http://www.thermoscientific.com/ecomm/servlet/productsdetail_11152___13576050_-1 Prestained Protein Ladder from Thermo Scientific] as marker.  Comparison of protein expression between ''Escherichia coli'' KRX wild type and ''Escherichia coli'' KRX with <bbpart>BBa_K1172205</bbpart>, <bbpart>BBa_K1172204</bbpart> and <bbpart>BBa_K1172203</bbpart> after total cell disruption. The right-hand gel was loaded with a higher protein concentration. The [http://2013.igem.org/Team:Bielefeld-Germany/Labjournal/ProtocolsPrograms SDS-PAGEs] display the protein glycerol dehydrogenase at the expected size of 40 kDa and enhanced overproduction of the protein with increasing promoter strength. '''</p>]]
  
  
−
*<p align="justify">Furthermore we were able to identify the overexpressed glycerol dehydrogenase (Figure. 4) with [http://2013.igem.org/Team:Bielefeld-Germany/Labjournal/ProtocolsPrograms MALDI-TOF MS/MS].</p>
+
*<p align="justify">Furthermore we were able to identify the overexpressed glycerol dehydrogenase (Figure. 2) with [http://2013.igem.org/Team:Bielefeld-Germany/Labjournal/ProtocolsPrograms MALDI-TOF MS/MS].</p>
 
**<p align="justify">[http://2013.igem.org/Team:Bielefeld-Germany/Labjournal/ProtocolsPrograms Tryptic digest of the gel lane] for analysis with [http://2013.igem.org/Team:Bielefeld-Germany/Labjournal/ProtocolsPrograms MALDI-TOF] could confirm the glycerol dehydrogenase with a Mascot Score of 266 against the ''Escherichia coli'' database. </p>
 
**<p align="justify">[http://2013.igem.org/Team:Bielefeld-Germany/Labjournal/ProtocolsPrograms Tryptic digest of the gel lane] for analysis with [http://2013.igem.org/Team:Bielefeld-Germany/Labjournal/ProtocolsPrograms MALDI-TOF] could confirm the glycerol dehydrogenase with a Mascot Score of 266 against the ''Escherichia coli'' database. </p>
  
 +
 +
===Growth characteristics===
 +
 +
 +
*<p align="justify">In order to test the effect of the protein expression on the cell growth, growth curves were investigated.</p>
 +
 +
 +
[[Image:iGEM_Bielefeld_Growth_GldA.jpg|500px|thumb|center|<p align="justify"> '''Figure 3: Growth curves for ''E. coli'' KRX with [http://2013.igem.org/Team:Bielefeld-Germany/Labjournal/ProtocolsPrograms#Media.2C_buffer.2C_solutions LB medium]. Comparison between ''Escherichia coli'' KRX wild type and ''Escherichia coli'' KRX with <bbpart>BBa_K1172201</bbpart>, <bbpart>BBa_K1172203</bbpart> and <bbpart>BBa_K1172204</bbpart>. GldA gene expression was induced for inducable promoters at OD<sub>600</sub> = 1,0. All data are representing  two biological and two  technical replicates with standard deviation.'''</p>]]
 +
 +
 +
*<p align="justify">''E. coli'' KRX wild type shows the best growth characteristics with a maximal optical density OD<sub>600</sub> = 4,0. ''E. coli'' KRX with ''gldA'' coding plasmid shows a slightly lower growth due to the higher replication stress. ''E. coli'' KRX expressing ''gldA'' under control of ''lac'' promoter shows 14% decreased maximal cell density and ''E. coli'' KRX expressing ''gldA'' under control of T7 promoter shows a further decreased growth which was 45% reduced in comparison to ''E. coli'' KRX wild type. This lower growth is based on an increased expression of ''gldA'' and therefore on an increased NADH production, which was confirmed with different [http://2013.igem.org/Team:Bielefeld-Germany/Labjournal/ProtocolsPrograms#NADH-Assay NADH assays].</p>
  
 
===NADH-Assays===
 
===NADH-Assays===
  
  
−
*<p align="justify">An overproduction of the glycerol dehydrogenase results in an oversupply of products from the glycerol dehydrogenase. Glycerol dehydrogenase produces several mediators because of its broad substrate specificity. GldA is involved in several metabolic pathways, for example in the glycerol metabolism, which converts glycerol and NAD+ to glycerone, NADH and H+. NADH is a small, water-soluble redoxmolecule, which seems to be a great mediator for Microbial Fuel Cells. An overexpression of the glycerol dehydrogenase leads to an overproduction of NADH and therefore to an endogenous mediator production. Furthermore GldA seems to be very interesting in combination with our preferred MFC carbon source glycerol. Thus, it is essential to get reliable data on the NADH overproduction to see how many electron shuttles are available and how efficient the electron shuttle-mediated electron transfer (EET) will be.</p>
+
*<p align="justify">An overproduction of the glycerol dehydrogenase results in an oversupply of products from the glycerol dehydrogenase. Glycerol dehydrogenase produces several mediators because of its broad substrate specificity. GldA is involved in several metabolic pathways, for example in the glycerol metabolism, which converts glycerol and NAD<sup>+</sup> to glycerone, NADH and H<sup>+</sup>. NADH is a small, water-soluble redoxmolecule, which appears to be a great mediator for Microbial Fuel Cells. An overexpression of the glycerol dehydrogenase leads to an overproduction of NADH and therefore to an endogenous mediator production. Furthermore, GldA seems to be very interesting in combination with our preferred MFC carbon source glycerol. Thus, it is essential to get reliable data on the NADH overproduction to see how many electron shuttles are available and how efficient the electron shuttle-mediated electron transfer (EET) will be.</p>
  
  
−
*<p align="justify">We could observe an enhanced NADH production in comparison to the wild type for ''Escherichia coli'' KRX containing pSB1C3 with <bbpart>BBa_K1172203</bbpart>, <bbpart>BBa_K1172204</bbpart> and <bbpart>BBa_K1172205</bbpart> with increasing promoter strength. (Table 2 and Figure 5)</p>
+
*<p align="justify">We could observe an enhanced NADH production in comparison to the wild type for ''Escherichia coli'' KRX containing pSB1C3 with <bbpart>BBa_K1172203</bbpart>, <bbpart>BBa_K1172204</bbpart> and <bbpart>BBa_K1172205</bbpart> with increasing promoter strength. (Table 2 and Figure 4)</p>
  
  
 
[[Image:IGEM_Bielefeld_Table6_Results_NADH.jpg|400px|thumb|left|<p align="justify"> '''Table 2: Results of the [http://2013.igem.org/Team:Bielefeld-Germany/Labjournal/ProtocolsPrograms NADH-assay]. Comparison between ''Escherichia coli'' KRX wild type and ''Escherichia coli'' KRX with <bbpart>BBa_K1172205</bbpart>, <bbpart>BBa_K1172204</bbpart> and <bbpart>BBa_K1172203</bbpart>. NADH concentration with standard deviation and concentration in comparison to the wild type is shown. Two biological and at least three technical replicates were analyzed. '''</p>]]
 
[[Image:IGEM_Bielefeld_Table6_Results_NADH.jpg|400px|thumb|left|<p align="justify"> '''Table 2: Results of the [http://2013.igem.org/Team:Bielefeld-Germany/Labjournal/ProtocolsPrograms NADH-assay]. Comparison between ''Escherichia coli'' KRX wild type and ''Escherichia coli'' KRX with <bbpart>BBa_K1172205</bbpart>, <bbpart>BBa_K1172204</bbpart> and <bbpart>BBa_K1172203</bbpart>. NADH concentration with standard deviation and concentration in comparison to the wild type is shown. Two biological and at least three technical replicates were analyzed. '''</p>]]
−
[[Image:IGEM_Bielefeld_Figure9_NADH.jpg|400px|thumb|center|<p align="justify"> '''Figure 5: Column chart with results of the [http://2013.igem.org/Team:Bielefeld-Germany/Labjournal/ProtocolsPrograms NADH-assay]. Comparison between ''Escherichia coli'' KRX wild typ and ''Escherichia coli'' KRX with <bbpart>BBa_K1172205</bbpart>, <bbpart>BBa_K1172204</bbpart> and <bbpart>BBa_K1172203</bbpart>. NADH concentration with standard deviation and concentration in comparison to the wild type is shown. Two biological and at least three technical replicates were analyzed.'''</p>]]
+
[[Image:IGEM_Bielefeld_Figure9_NADH.jpg|400px|thumb|center|<p align="justify"> '''Figure 4: Column chart with results of the [http://2013.igem.org/Team:Bielefeld-Germany/Labjournal/ProtocolsPrograms NADH-assay]. Comparison between ''Escherichia coli'' KRX wild typ and ''Escherichia coli'' KRX with <bbpart>BBa_K1172205</bbpart>, <bbpart>BBa_K1172204</bbpart> and <bbpart>BBa_K1172203</bbpart>. NADH concentration with standard deviation and concentration in comparison to the wild type is shown. Two biological and at least three technical replicates were analyzed.'''</p>]]
  
  
−
*<p align="justify">Compared to the ''Escherichia coli'' KRX wild type, ''Escherichia coli'' carrying GldA and T7 promoter (<bbpart>BBa_K1172203</bbpart>) shows 1.7 μM NADH overproduction and GldA with Lac promoter (<bbpart>BBa_K1172204</bbpart>) shows 0.2 μM NADH overproduction. The GldA expression by the Anderson promoter (<bbpart>BBa_K1172205</bbpart>) is too weak for a significant NADH overproduction.</p>  
+
*<p align="justify">Compared to the ''Escherichia coli'' KRX wild type, ''Escherichia coli'' carrying ''gldA'' and T7 promoter (<bbpart>BBa_K1172203</bbpart>) shows 1.7 μM NADH overproduction and ''gldA'' with ''lac'' promoter (<bbpart>BBa_K1172204</bbpart>) shows 0.2 μM NADH overproduction. The ''gldA'' expression by the Anderson promoter (<bbpart>BBa_K1172205</bbpart>) is too weak for a significant NADH overproduction.</p>  
−
*<p align="justify">For all following tests, ''E. coli'' with GldA and T7 promoter (<bbpart>BBa_K1172203</bbpart>) was used, because this strain by far shows the highest NADH production rate.</p>
+
*<p align="justify">For all following tests, ''E. coli'' with ''gldA'' under control of the T7 promoter (<bbpart>BBa_K1172203</bbpart>) was used, because this strain by far shows the highest NADH production rate.</p>
  
  
−
*<p align="justify">Former MFC tests showed, that glycerol is the best carbon source for growth of ''Escherichia coli'' under anaerobic respiration in our Microbial Fuel Cell. Therefore it is important to see, which effect an increased glycerol concentration has on the mediator production. To test these parameters, [http://2013.igem.org/Team:Bielefeld-Germany/Labjournal/ProtocolsPrograms LB medium] was supplemented with different amounts of glycerol (Table 3).</p>
+
*<p align="justify">Prior MFC tests showed, that glycerol is the best carbon source for growth of ''Escherichia coli'' under anaerobic respiration in our Microbial Fuel Cell. Therefore it is important to see, which effect an increased glycerol concentration has on the mediator production. To test these parameters, [http://2013.igem.org/Team:Bielefeld-Germany/Labjournal/ProtocolsPrograms LB medium] was supplemented with different amounts of glycerol (Table 3).</p>
  
  
Line 66: Line 83:
  
  
−
*<p align="justify">''E.coli'' (<bbpart>BBa_K1172203</bbpart>) grown in glycerol-supplemented medium shows enhanced NADH production in contrast to the ''Escherichia coli'' KRX wild type and also in contrast to the '' Escherichia coli'' KRX with <bbpart>BBa_K1172203</bbpart> and no further glycerol supplementation (Table 4 and Figure 6).</p>
+
*<p align="justify">''E.coli'' (<bbpart>BBa_K1172203</bbpart>) grown in glycerol-supplemented medium shows enhanced NADH production in contrast to the ''Escherichia coli'' KRX wild type and also in contrast to the '' Escherichia coli'' KRX with <bbpart>BBa_K1172203</bbpart> and no further glycerol supplementation (Table 4 and Figure 5).</p>
  
  
 
[[Image:Table 8 Results2 of the NADH Assay.jpg|400px|thumb|left|<p align="justify"> '''Table 4: Results of the [http://2013.igem.org/Team:Bielefeld-Germany/Labjournal/ProtocolsPrograms NADH-assay]. Comparison between ''Escherichia coli'' KRX wild type and ''Escherichia coli'' KRX with <bbpart>BBa_K1172203</bbpart> supplemented with different amounts of glycerol to [http://2013.igem.org/Team:Bielefeld-Germany/Labjournal/ProtocolsPrograms LB medium]. NADH concentration with standard deviation and concentration in comparison to the wild type is shown. Two biological and at least three technical replicates were analyzed. '''</p>]]
 
[[Image:Table 8 Results2 of the NADH Assay.jpg|400px|thumb|left|<p align="justify"> '''Table 4: Results of the [http://2013.igem.org/Team:Bielefeld-Germany/Labjournal/ProtocolsPrograms NADH-assay]. Comparison between ''Escherichia coli'' KRX wild type and ''Escherichia coli'' KRX with <bbpart>BBa_K1172203</bbpart> supplemented with different amounts of glycerol to [http://2013.igem.org/Team:Bielefeld-Germany/Labjournal/ProtocolsPrograms LB medium]. NADH concentration with standard deviation and concentration in comparison to the wild type is shown. Two biological and at least three technical replicates were analyzed. '''</p>]]
−
[[Image:IGEM_Bielefeld_Figure10_Column_NADH.jpg|400px|thumb|center|<p align="justify"> '''Figure 6: Column chart with results of the [http://2013.igem.org/Team:Bielefeld-Germany/Labjournal/ProtocolsPrograms NADH-assay]. Comparison between'' Escherichia coli'' KRX wild type and ''Escherichia coli'' KRX with <bbpart>BBa_K1172203</bbpart> supplemented with different amounts of glycerol to [http://2013.igem.org/Team:Bielefeld-Germany/Labjournal/ProtocolsPrograms LB medium]. NADH concentration with standard deviation and concentration in comparison to the wild type is shown. Two biological and at least three technical replicates were analyzed. '''</p>]]
+
[[Image:IGEM_Bielefeld_Figure10_Column_NADH.jpg|400px|thumb|center|<p align="justify"> '''Figure 5: Column chart with results of the [http://2013.igem.org/Team:Bielefeld-Germany/Labjournal/ProtocolsPrograms NADH-assay]. Comparison between'' Escherichia coli'' KRX wild type and ''Escherichia coli'' KRX with <bbpart>BBa_K1172203</bbpart> supplemented with different amounts of glycerol to [http://2013.igem.org/Team:Bielefeld-Germany/Labjournal/ProtocolsPrograms LB medium]. NADH concentration with standard deviation and concentration in comparison to the wild type is shown. Two biological and at least three technical replicates were analyzed. '''</p>]]
  
  
Line 82: Line 99:
  
  
−
*<p align="justify">Cultivating ''Escherichia coli'' <bbpart>BBa_K1172203</bbpart> with increasing glycerol concentration in [http://2013.igem.org/Team:Bielefeld-Germany/Labjournal/ProtocolsPrograms M9 medium] shows enhanced intracellular and also enhanced extracellular NADH concentrations in contrast to the ''Escherichia coli'' KRX wild type. (Table 6 and Figure 7)</p>
+
*<p align="justify">Cultivating ''Escherichia coli'' <bbpart>BBa_K1172203</bbpart> with increasing glycerol concentration in [http://2013.igem.org/Team:Bielefeld-Germany/Labjournal/ProtocolsPrograms M9 medium] shows enhanced intracellular and also enhanced extracellular NADH concentrations in contrast to the ''Escherichia coli'' KRX wild type. (Table 6 and Figure 6)</p>
  
  
 
[[Image:Table 10 Results2 of the NADH Assay.jpg|400px|thumb|left|<p align="justify"> '''Table 6: Results of the [http://2013.igem.org/Team:Bielefeld-Germany/Labjournal/ProtocolsPrograms NADH-assay]. Comparison between ''Escherichia coli'' KRX wild type and ''Escherichia coli'' KRX with <bbpart>BBa_K1172203</bbpart> grown in [http://2013.igem.org/Team:Bielefeld-Germany/Labjournal/ProtocolsPrograms M9 medium] with different concentrations of glycerol. NADH concentration with standard deviation and concentration in comparison to the wild type is shown for cell disruption and supernatant fraction. Two biological and at least three technical replicates were analyzed. '''</p>]]
 
[[Image:Table 10 Results2 of the NADH Assay.jpg|400px|thumb|left|<p align="justify"> '''Table 6: Results of the [http://2013.igem.org/Team:Bielefeld-Germany/Labjournal/ProtocolsPrograms NADH-assay]. Comparison between ''Escherichia coli'' KRX wild type and ''Escherichia coli'' KRX with <bbpart>BBa_K1172203</bbpart> grown in [http://2013.igem.org/Team:Bielefeld-Germany/Labjournal/ProtocolsPrograms M9 medium] with different concentrations of glycerol. NADH concentration with standard deviation and concentration in comparison to the wild type is shown for cell disruption and supernatant fraction. Two biological and at least three technical replicates were analyzed. '''</p>]]
−
[[Image:IGEM_Bielefeld_Figure11_Column_NADHAssay.jpg|400px|thumb|center|<p align="justify"> '''Figure 7: Column chart with results of the [http://2013.igem.org/Team:Bielefeld-Germany/Labjournal/ProtocolsPrograms NADH-assay]. Comparison between ''Escherichia coli'' KRX wild type and ''Escherichia coli'' KRX with <bbpart>BBa_K1172203</bbpart> grown in [http://2013.igem.org/Team:Bielefeld-Germany/Labjournal/ProtocolsPrograms M9 medium] with different concentrations of glycerol. NADH concentration with standard deviation and concentration in comparison to the wild type is shown for cell disruption (Intracellular) and supernatant (Extracellular) fraction. Two biological and at least three technical replicates were analyzed. '''</p>]]
+
[[Image:IGEM_Bielefeld_Figure11_Column_NADHAssay.jpg|400px|thumb|center|<p align="justify"> '''Figure 6: Column chart with results of the [http://2013.igem.org/Team:Bielefeld-Germany/Labjournal/ProtocolsPrograms NADH-assay]. Comparison between ''Escherichia coli'' KRX wild type and ''Escherichia coli'' KRX with <bbpart>BBa_K1172203</bbpart> grown in [http://2013.igem.org/Team:Bielefeld-Germany/Labjournal/ProtocolsPrograms M9 medium] with different concentrations of glycerol. NADH concentration with standard deviation and concentration in comparison to the wild type is shown for cell disruption (Intracellular) and supernatant (Extracellular) fraction. Two biological and at least three technical replicates were analyzed. '''</p>]]
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
  
  
Line 102: Line 122:
  
 
*<p align="justify">All NADH-assays showed great enhanced NADH overproduction for the GldA strain. Therefore higher electron transport efficiency should result in an improved bioelectricity output.</p>
 
*<p align="justify">All NADH-assays showed great enhanced NADH overproduction for the GldA strain. Therefore higher electron transport efficiency should result in an improved bioelectricity output.</p>
−
*<p align="justify">For testing the genetic engineered system in the Microbial Fuel Cell, we used ''Escherichia coli'' KRX with GldA and Lac promoter (<bbpart>BBa_K1172204</bbpart>) in contrast to ''Escherichia coli'' KRX wild type. Certainly NADH-assays determined ''Escherichia coli'' KRX with GldA and T7 promoter (<bbpart>BBa_K1172203</bbpart>) as the best endogenous mediator producing strain. Unfortunately we could not use this strain due to cultivation problems. </p>
+
*<p align="justify">For testing the genetic engineered system in the Microbial Fuel Cell, we used ''Escherichia coli'' KRX with ''gldA'' and ''lac'' promoter (<bbpart>BBa_K1172204</bbpart>) in contrast to the ''Escherichia coli'' KRX wild type. Certainly NADH-assays determined ''Escherichia coli'' KRX with ''gldA'' and T7 promoter (<bbpart>BBa_K1172203</bbpart>) as the best endogenous mediator producing strain. Unfortunately we could not use this strain due to cultivation problems. </p>
−
*<p align="justify">According to our assumptions, the extracellular electron transfer mediated by NADH is improved in the GldA strain resulting in an increased bioelectricity output. (Figure 8 and 9)</p>
+
*<p align="justify">According to our assumptions, the extracellular electron transfer mediated by NADH is improved in the GldA strain resulting in an increased bioelectricity output. (Figure 7 and 8)</p>
  
  
−
[[Image:IGEM_Bielefeld_Voltage_GldA_Genetic.jpg|400px|thumb|left|<p align="justify"> '''Figure 8: Microbial Fuel Cell results from cultivation of ''Escherichia coli'' KRX with GldA (<bbpart>BBa_K1172204</bbpart>) in contrast to ''Escherichia coli'' KRX wild type. Voltage curve from ''Escherichia coli'' KRX wild type and ''Escherichia coli'' KRX with GldA (<bbpart>BBa_K1172204</bbpart>) is shown over time over a resistance of 200 Ω. M9-medium was used with no supplementation of mediators. '''</p>]]
 
−
[[Image:IGEM_Bielefeld_ElectricCharge2_GldA_Genetic.jpg|400px|thumb|center|<p align="justify"> '''Figure 9: Microbial Fuel Cell results from cultivation of ''Escherichia coli'' KRX with GldA (<bbpart>BBa_K1172204</bbpart>) in contrast to ''Escherichia coli'' KRX wild type. Electric charge curve from ''Escherichia coli'' KRX wild type and ''Escherichia coli'' KRX with GldA (<bbpart>BBa_K1172204</bbpart>) is shown over time over a resistance of 200 Ω. M9-medium was used with no supplementation of mediators. '''</p>]]
 
  
 +
[[Image:IGEM_Bielefeld_Voltage_GldA_Genetic.jpg|400px|thumb|left|<p align="justify"> '''Figure 7: Microbial Fuel Cell results from cultivation of ''Escherichia coli'' KRX with ''gldA'' (<bbpart>BBa_K1172204</bbpart>) in contrast to ''Escherichia coli'' KRX wild type. Voltage curve from ''Escherichia coli'' KRX wild type and ''Escherichia coli'' KRX with ''gldA'' (<bbpart>BBa_K1172204</bbpart>) is shown over time over a resistance of 200 Ω. M9-medium was used with no supplementation of mediators. '''</p>]]
 +
[[Image:IGEM_Bielefeld_ElectricCharge2_GldA_Genetic.jpg|400px|thumb|center|<p align="justify"> '''Figure 8: Microbial Fuel Cell results from cultivation of ''Escherichia coli'' KRX with ''gldA'' (<bbpart>BBa_K1172204</bbpart>) in contrast to ''Escherichia coli'' KRX wild type. Electric charge curve from ''Escherichia coli'' KRX wild type and ''Escherichia coli'' KRX with ''gldA'' (<bbpart>BBa_K1172204</bbpart>) is shown over time over a resistance of 200 Ω. M9-medium was used with no supplementation of mediators. '''</p>]]
  
−
*<p align="justify">''Escherichia coli'' KRX with GldA (<bbpart>BBa_K1172204</bbpart>) shows a 27 % higher maximal voltage than the ''Escherichia coli'' KRX wild type. Over the whole cultivation, voltage was improved by about 20%. The calculation of the electric charge confirms the described results. Electric charge is equivalent to the number of transported electrons and 20 % enhanced for ''Escherichia coli'' KRX with GldA (<bbpart>BBa_K1172204</bbpart>). The maximal electric charge of 135 mC shows that the overexpression of the glycerol dehydrogenase enables endogenous mediator production and a more efficient electron shuttle-mediated electron transfer. </p>
 
−
*<p align="justify">A further optimization by using ''Escherichia coli'' KRX with GldA and T7 promoter (<bbpart>BBa_K1172203</bbpart>) instead of Lac promoter (<bbpart>BBa_K1172203</bbpart>) would improve electricity output according to the NADH-assay results (Table 2 and Figure 5) of about 134 %. These results demonstrate that the redox mediator NADH from ''Escherichia coli'' facilitates the electron transfer between cell and electrode and shows a starting point for reducing costs of expensive and toxic exogenous mediators.</p>
 
  
 +
[[Image:IGEM_Bielefeld2013_GldA_AverageElectricPower.jpg|400px|thumb|center|<p align="justify"> '''Figure 9: Microbial Fuel Cell results from cultivation of ''Escherichia coli'' KRX with ''gldA'' (<bbpart>BBa_K1172204</bbpart>) in contrast to ''Escherichia coli'' KRX wild type. Average electric power bar chart from ''Escherichia coli'' KRX wild type and ''Escherichia coli'' KRX with ''gldA'' (<bbpart>BBa_K1172204</bbpart>). M9-medium was used with measurement over a resistance of 200 Ω. '''</p>]]
 +
 +
 +
 +
 +
 +
*<p align="justify">''Escherichia coli'' KRX with ''gldA'' (<bbpart>BBa_K1172204</bbpart>) shows a 27 % higher maximal voltage than the ''Escherichia coli'' KRX wild type. Over the whole cultivation, voltage was improved by about 20%. The calculation of the electric charge confirms the described results. Electric charge is equivalent to the number of transported electrons and 20 % enhanced for ''Escherichia coli'' KRX with ''gldA'' (<bbpart>BBa_K1172204</bbpart>). The maximal electric charge of 135 mC shows that the overexpression of the glycerol dehydrogenase enables endogenous mediator production and a more efficient electron shuttle-mediated electron transfer. </p>
 +
*Finally, the calculated electric power bar chart shows 40% enhanced average electric power for ''Escherichia coli'' KRX with ''gldA'' (<bbpart>BBa_K1172204</bbpart>).
 +
*<p align="justify">A further optimization by using ''Escherichia coli'' KRX with ''gldA'' and T7 promoter (<bbpart>BBa_K1172203</bbpart>) instead of ''lac'' promoter (<bbpart>BBa_K1172203</bbpart>) would improve electricity output according to the NADH-assay results (Table 2 and Figure 4) of about 134 %. These results demonstrate that the redox mediator NADH from ''Escherichia coli'' facilitates the electron transfer between cell and electrode and shows a starting point for reducing costs of expensive and toxic exogenous mediators.</p>
  
 
===Conclusion===
 
===Conclusion===
Line 144: Line 171:
 
**Concentration calculation by NADH calibration curve
 
**Concentration calculation by NADH calibration curve
  
 +
 +
==Acknowledgements==
 +
*'''MALDI-TOF MS/MS''': Vera Ortseifen gave us support dealing with protein analysis by MALDI-TOF MS. After our sample preparation and tryptic digestion she measured the samples and also provided help in the data analysis.
  
 
==References==
 
==References==

Latest revision as of 01:08, 2 November 2017

GldA - glycerol dehydrogenase from Escherichia coli

Usage and Biology

Mediators are essential for the use of Escherichia coli in Microbial Fuel Cells. The main goal when improving MFCs is to enhance the kinetics of the electron transfer between the bacterial cells and the Fuel Cell anode. Increasing the mediator concentration in the MFC is an efficient way to enhance electron transfer. In order to avoid the usage of expensive and toxic synthetic mediators, we engineered an E. coli KRX strain to overexpress the glycerol dehydrogenase (GldA). GldA produces the endogenous mediator NADH from NAD+ and glycerol, which is the main carbon source in our medium. We were able to produce high amounts of NADH with the optimized E.coli, which resulted in a more efficient electron transfer. This demonstrates that genetically introducing an appropriate oxidoreductase into E. coli via gene manipulation can greatly improve the mediator production and power generation. We could show that the increased intracellular- and extracellular NADH concentration, leads to a 20 % enhanced current production in our Microbial Fuel Cell. The overexpression of the glycerol dehydrogenase in Escherichia coli is a great genetic optimization for electron shuttle-mediated extracellular electron transfer from bacteria to electrodes.

Figure 1: Redox reaction catalyzed by the glycerol dehydrogenase: NAD+ is reduced to NADH by addition of two electrons (e-) and one proton (H+).

  • Allergen characterization of BBa_K1172201: Potential Allergen- matched to Group V allergen Phl from Phleum practense

The Baltimore Biocrew 2017 team discovered that proteins generated through biobrick parts can be evaluated for allergenicity. This information is important to the people using these parts in the lab, as well as when considering using the protein for mass production, or using in the environment. The allergenicity test permits a comparison between the sequences of the biobrick parts and the identified allergen proteins enlisted in a data base.The higher the similarity between the biobricks and the proteins, the more likely the biobrick is allergenic cross-reactive. In the full-length alignments by FASTA, 30% or more amount of similarity signifies that the biobrick has a Precaution Status meaning there is a potential risk with using the part. A 50% or more amount of identity signifies that the biobrick has a Possible Allergen Status. In the sliding window of 80 amino acid segments, greater than 35% signifies similarity to allergens. The percentage of similarity implies the potential of harm biobricks’ potential negative impact to exposed populations. For more information on how to assess your own biobrick part please see the “Allergenicity Testing Protocol” in the following page http://2017.igem.org/Team:Baltimore_Bio-Crew/Experiments


For the biobrick Part:BBa_K117201, there was a 0% of identity match and 0% similarity match to the top allergens in the allergen database. This means that the biobrick part is not of potential allergen status. In 80 amino acid alignments by FASTA window, there was one match found that are greater than 35% for this biobrick. This means that this part has a Potential Allergen status. Matched to Group V allergen Phl from Phleum pratense at 36.29% Identity https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/protein/3309039

Part uses

The gldA gene from Escherichia coli was cloned and overexpressed in E. coli KRX under the control of different promoters (Table 1).

Table 1: Overview of gldA devices. Combination of gldA coding BioBrick (BBa_K1172201) with different promoters and RBS. The characterization of this BioBrick was performed by comparing Escherichia coli KRX wild type with Escherichia coli KRX carrying BBa_K1172203, BBa_K1172204 and BBa_K1172205.


Sequence and Features


Assembly Compatibility:
  • 10
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[10]
  • 12
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[12]
  • 21
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[21]
  • 23
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[23]
  • 25
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[25]
  • 1000
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[1000]

Results

Overview

  • Upon the expression of the glycerol dehydrogenase, the endogenous mediator production of Escherichia coli was measured. [http://2013.igem.org/Team:Bielefeld-Germany/Labjournal/ProtocolsPrograms SDS-PAGE] combined with [http://2013.igem.org/Team:Bielefeld-Germany/Labjournal/ProtocolsPrograms MALDI-TOF MS/MS] and different [http://2013.igem.org/Team:Bielefeld-Germany/Labjournal/ProtocolsPrograms NADH-assays] were performed to characterize the GldA BioBrick BBa_K1172201.


SDS-PAGE and MALDI-TOF

  • [http://2013.igem.org/Team:Bielefeld-Germany/Labjournal/ProtocolsPrograms SDS-PAGE] shows the protein glycerol dehydrogenase at the expected size of 40 kDa. In contrast to the Escherichia coli KRX wild type, the GldA protein under the control of the weak constitutive Anderson promoter (BBa_K1172205) can be seen by an only slightly stronger band. When the T7 (BBa_K1172203) and Lac (BBa_K1172204) promoter are used a strong band can be seen, which is equated with a strong expression and overproduction of GldA.


Error creating thumbnail: Invalid thumbnail parameters

Figure 2: [http://2013.igem.org/Team:Bielefeld-Germany/Labjournal/ProtocolsPrograms SDS-PAGE] with [http://www.thermoscientific.com/ecomm/servlet/productsdetail_11152___13576050_-1 Prestained Protein Ladder from Thermo Scientific] as marker. Comparison of protein expression between Escherichia coli KRX wild type and Escherichia coli KRX with BBa_K1172205, BBa_K1172204 and BBa_K1172203 after total cell disruption. The right-hand gel was loaded with a higher protein concentration. The [http://2013.igem.org/Team:Bielefeld-Germany/Labjournal/ProtocolsPrograms SDS-PAGEs] display the protein glycerol dehydrogenase at the expected size of 40 kDa and enhanced overproduction of the protein with increasing promoter strength.


  • Furthermore we were able to identify the overexpressed glycerol dehydrogenase (Figure. 2) with [http://2013.igem.org/Team:Bielefeld-Germany/Labjournal/ProtocolsPrograms MALDI-TOF MS/MS].

    • [http://2013.igem.org/Team:Bielefeld-Germany/Labjournal/ProtocolsPrograms Tryptic digest of the gel lane] for analysis with [http://2013.igem.org/Team:Bielefeld-Germany/Labjournal/ProtocolsPrograms MALDI-TOF] could confirm the glycerol dehydrogenase with a Mascot Score of 266 against the Escherichia coli database.


Growth characteristics

  • In order to test the effect of the protein expression on the cell growth, growth curves were investigated.


Figure 3: Growth curves for E. coli KRX with [http://2013.igem.org/Team:Bielefeld-Germany/Labjournal/ProtocolsPrograms#Media.2C_buffer.2C_solutions LB medium]. Comparison between Escherichia coli KRX wild type and Escherichia coli KRX with BBa_K1172201, BBa_K1172203 and BBa_K1172204. GldA gene expression was induced for inducable promoters at OD600 = 1,0. All data are representing two biological and two technical replicates with standard deviation.


  • E. coli KRX wild type shows the best growth characteristics with a maximal optical density OD600 = 4,0. E. coli KRX with gldA coding plasmid shows a slightly lower growth due to the higher replication stress. E. coli KRX expressing gldA under control of lac promoter shows 14% decreased maximal cell density and E. coli KRX expressing gldA under control of T7 promoter shows a further decreased growth which was 45% reduced in comparison to E. coli KRX wild type. This lower growth is based on an increased expression of gldA and therefore on an increased NADH production, which was confirmed with different [http://2013.igem.org/Team:Bielefeld-Germany/Labjournal/ProtocolsPrograms#NADH-Assay NADH assays].

NADH-Assays

  • An overproduction of the glycerol dehydrogenase results in an oversupply of products from the glycerol dehydrogenase. Glycerol dehydrogenase produces several mediators because of its broad substrate specificity. GldA is involved in several metabolic pathways, for example in the glycerol metabolism, which converts glycerol and NAD+ to glycerone, NADH and H+. NADH is a small, water-soluble redoxmolecule, which appears to be a great mediator for Microbial Fuel Cells. An overexpression of the glycerol dehydrogenase leads to an overproduction of NADH and therefore to an endogenous mediator production. Furthermore, GldA seems to be very interesting in combination with our preferred MFC carbon source glycerol. Thus, it is essential to get reliable data on the NADH overproduction to see how many electron shuttles are available and how efficient the electron shuttle-mediated electron transfer (EET) will be.


  • We could observe an enhanced NADH production in comparison to the wild type for Escherichia coli KRX containing pSB1C3 with BBa_K1172203, BBa_K1172204 and BBa_K1172205 with increasing promoter strength. (Table 2 and Figure 4)


Table 2: Results of the [http://2013.igem.org/Team:Bielefeld-Germany/Labjournal/ProtocolsPrograms NADH-assay]. Comparison between Escherichia coli KRX wild type and Escherichia coli KRX with BBa_K1172205, BBa_K1172204 and BBa_K1172203. NADH concentration with standard deviation and concentration in comparison to the wild type is shown. Two biological and at least three technical replicates were analyzed.

Figure 4: Column chart with results of the [http://2013.igem.org/Team:Bielefeld-Germany/Labjournal/ProtocolsPrograms NADH-assay]. Comparison between Escherichia coli KRX wild typ and Escherichia coli KRX with BBa_K1172205, BBa_K1172204 and BBa_K1172203. NADH concentration with standard deviation and concentration in comparison to the wild type is shown. Two biological and at least three technical replicates were analyzed.


  • Compared to the Escherichia coli KRX wild type, Escherichia coli carrying gldA and T7 promoter (BBa_K1172203) shows 1.7 μM NADH overproduction and gldA with lac promoter (BBa_K1172204) shows 0.2 μM NADH overproduction. The gldA expression by the Anderson promoter (BBa_K1172205) is too weak for a significant NADH overproduction.

  • For all following tests, E. coli with gldA under control of the T7 promoter (BBa_K1172203) was used, because this strain by far shows the highest NADH production rate.


  • Prior MFC tests showed, that glycerol is the best carbon source for growth of Escherichia coli under anaerobic respiration in our Microbial Fuel Cell. Therefore it is important to see, which effect an increased glycerol concentration has on the mediator production. To test these parameters, [http://2013.igem.org/Team:Bielefeld-Germany/Labjournal/ProtocolsPrograms LB medium] was supplemented with different amounts of glycerol (Table 3).


Table 3: Experimental design of the glycerol dependent [http://2013.igem.org/Team:Bielefeld-Germany/Labjournal/ProtocolsPrograms NADH-assay]. Supplementation of different amounts of glycerol to [http://2013.igem.org/Team:Bielefeld-Germany/Labjournal/ProtocolsPrograms LB medium] should show the effect of glycerol on NADH overproduction.


  • E.coli (BBa_K1172203) grown in glycerol-supplemented medium shows enhanced NADH production in contrast to the Escherichia coli KRX wild type and also in contrast to the Escherichia coli KRX with BBa_K1172203 and no further glycerol supplementation (Table 4 and Figure 5).


Table 4: Results of the [http://2013.igem.org/Team:Bielefeld-Germany/Labjournal/ProtocolsPrograms NADH-assay]. Comparison between Escherichia coli KRX wild type and Escherichia coli KRX with BBa_K1172203 supplemented with different amounts of glycerol to [http://2013.igem.org/Team:Bielefeld-Germany/Labjournal/ProtocolsPrograms LB medium]. NADH concentration with standard deviation and concentration in comparison to the wild type is shown. Two biological and at least three technical replicates were analyzed.

Figure 5: Column chart with results of the [http://2013.igem.org/Team:Bielefeld-Germany/Labjournal/ProtocolsPrograms NADH-assay]. Comparison between Escherichia coli KRX wild type and Escherichia coli KRX with BBa_K1172203 supplemented with different amounts of glycerol to [http://2013.igem.org/Team:Bielefeld-Germany/Labjournal/ProtocolsPrograms LB medium]. NADH concentration with standard deviation and concentration in comparison to the wild type is shown. Two biological and at least three technical replicates were analyzed.


  • The glycerol dependent [http://2013.igem.org/Team:Bielefeld-Germany/Labjournal/ProtocolsPrograms NADH-assay] shows the expected NADH overproduction for BBa_K1172203 when supplemented with glycerol. It was possible to increase the NADH production by 270 % in comparison to the Escherichia coli KRX wild type and up to 100 % in comparison to the E. coli KRX carrying BBa_K1172203, without glycerol supplementation. However, the supplemented glycerol concentration does not have a considerable impact on the NADH production. These characteristics in production improvement are initially only valid for [http://2013.igem.org/Team:Bielefeld-Germany/Labjournal/ProtocolsPrograms LB medium] with glycerol supplementation.


  • With previous [http://2013.igem.org/Team:Bielefeld-Germany/Labjournal/ProtocolsPrograms NADH-assays] we only observed the effects of GldA on the intracellular NADH concentration of E. coli. To additionally investigate the extracellular NADH concentrations, we tested the Escherichia coli KRX wild type strain and the E. coli KRX with pSB1C3 and BBa_K1172203 by cultivation with different glycerol concentrations in [http://2013.igem.org/Team:Bielefeld-Germany/Labjournal/ProtocolsPrograms M9 medium]. (Table 5)


Table 5: Experimental design of the glycerol dependent [http://2013.igem.org/Team:Bielefeld-Germany/Labjournal/ProtocolsPrograms NADH-assay]. Different concentrations of glycerol in [http://2013.igem.org/Team:Bielefeld-Germany/Labjournal/ProtocolsPrograms M9 medium] should show the effect of glycerol on NADH overproduction.


  • Cultivating Escherichia coli BBa_K1172203 with increasing glycerol concentration in [http://2013.igem.org/Team:Bielefeld-Germany/Labjournal/ProtocolsPrograms M9 medium] shows enhanced intracellular and also enhanced extracellular NADH concentrations in contrast to the Escherichia coli KRX wild type. (Table 6 and Figure 6)


Table 6: Results of the [http://2013.igem.org/Team:Bielefeld-Germany/Labjournal/ProtocolsPrograms NADH-assay]. Comparison between Escherichia coli KRX wild type and Escherichia coli KRX with BBa_K1172203 grown in [http://2013.igem.org/Team:Bielefeld-Germany/Labjournal/ProtocolsPrograms M9 medium] with different concentrations of glycerol. NADH concentration with standard deviation and concentration in comparison to the wild type is shown for cell disruption and supernatant fraction. Two biological and at least three technical replicates were analyzed.

Figure 6: Column chart with results of the [http://2013.igem.org/Team:Bielefeld-Germany/Labjournal/ProtocolsPrograms NADH-assay]. Comparison between Escherichia coli KRX wild type and Escherichia coli KRX with BBa_K1172203 grown in [http://2013.igem.org/Team:Bielefeld-Germany/Labjournal/ProtocolsPrograms M9 medium] with different concentrations of glycerol. NADH concentration with standard deviation and concentration in comparison to the wild type is shown for cell disruption (Intracellular) and supernatant (Extracellular) fraction. Two biological and at least three technical replicates were analyzed.





  • In addition to the previously observed increase in intracellular NADH concentration, we were able to show an enhanced extracellular NADH concentration. Heterologous expression of GldA BBa_K1172203 in E. coli seems to be an appropriate way for endogenous mediator production. Furthermore glycerol could be confirmed as a suitable substrate for the NADH production.

  • Intracellular NADH concentration increases up to 223 % in comparison to Escherichia coli KRX wild type with increasing promoter strength. It is also very interesting to see that the extracellular NADH concentration is 7 times higher than the intracellular concentration for all strains. Overexpression of GldA BBa_K1172203 in E. coli causes a 2.5 times higher extracellular NADH concentration compared with Escherichia coli KRX wild type.

  • However, it is surprising that the extracellular concentration of NADH is 7 times higher than the intracellular concentration. Therefore, we cannot be sure that the complete extracellular fluorescence is only due to the endogenous mediator NADH. There might be a substance that is directly or indirectly produced with the overexpression of GldA and secreted into the medium. Thus, we will analysis the extracellular fraction with LC ESI MS/MS, in order to identify potential compounds.

  • These data show that NADH is an adequate mediator for Microbial Fuel Cells. NADH can be transported across the cell membrane, which is indicated by much higher extracellular NADH concentration and thus allow NADH-mediated electron transfer (EET).

Microbial Fuel Cell Measurement

  • All NADH-assays showed great enhanced NADH overproduction for the GldA strain. Therefore higher electron transport efficiency should result in an improved bioelectricity output.

  • For testing the genetic engineered system in the Microbial Fuel Cell, we used Escherichia coli KRX with gldA and lac promoter (BBa_K1172204) in contrast to the Escherichia coli KRX wild type. Certainly NADH-assays determined Escherichia coli KRX with gldA and T7 promoter (BBa_K1172203) as the best endogenous mediator producing strain. Unfortunately we could not use this strain due to cultivation problems.

  • According to our assumptions, the extracellular electron transfer mediated by NADH is improved in the GldA strain resulting in an increased bioelectricity output. (Figure 7 and 8)


Figure 7: Microbial Fuel Cell results from cultivation of Escherichia coli KRX with gldA (BBa_K1172204) in contrast to Escherichia coli KRX wild type. Voltage curve from Escherichia coli KRX wild type and Escherichia coli KRX with gldA (BBa_K1172204) is shown over time over a resistance of 200 Ω. M9-medium was used with no supplementation of mediators.

Figure 8: Microbial Fuel Cell results from cultivation of Escherichia coli KRX with gldA (BBa_K1172204) in contrast to Escherichia coli KRX wild type. Electric charge curve from Escherichia coli KRX wild type and Escherichia coli KRX with gldA (BBa_K1172204) is shown over time over a resistance of 200 Ω. M9-medium was used with no supplementation of mediators.


Figure 9: Microbial Fuel Cell results from cultivation of Escherichia coli KRX with gldA (BBa_K1172204) in contrast to Escherichia coli KRX wild type. Average electric power bar chart from Escherichia coli KRX wild type and Escherichia coli KRX with gldA (BBa_K1172204). M9-medium was used with measurement over a resistance of 200 Ω.



  • Escherichia coli KRX with gldA (BBa_K1172204) shows a 27 % higher maximal voltage than the Escherichia coli KRX wild type. Over the whole cultivation, voltage was improved by about 20%. The calculation of the electric charge confirms the described results. Electric charge is equivalent to the number of transported electrons and 20 % enhanced for Escherichia coli KRX with gldA (BBa_K1172204). The maximal electric charge of 135 mC shows that the overexpression of the glycerol dehydrogenase enables endogenous mediator production and a more efficient electron shuttle-mediated electron transfer.

  • Finally, the calculated electric power bar chart shows 40% enhanced average electric power for Escherichia coli KRX with gldA (BBa_K1172204).

  • A further optimization by using Escherichia coli KRX with gldA and T7 promoter (BBa_K1172203) instead of lac promoter (BBa_K1172203) would improve electricity output according to the NADH-assay results (Table 2 and Figure 4) of about 134 %. These results demonstrate that the redox mediator NADH from Escherichia coli facilitates the electron transfer between cell and electrode and shows a starting point for reducing costs of expensive and toxic exogenous mediators.

Conclusion

  • Mediators are essential for the use of Escherichia coli in Microbial Fuel Cells. The main goal of improving MFCs is to enhance kinetics of the electron transfer between the bacterial cells and the fuel cell anode. In order to decrease the usage of expensive and toxic synthetic mediators (exogenous mediators like methylene blue or neutral red), we produced the endogenous mediator NADH by overexpression of the glycerol dehydrogenase.

  • Looking at our project in its entirety, the overproduction of the glycerol dehydrogenase seems to be a great way for endogenous mediator production. The use of glycerol as our main carbon source for Escherichia coli in the MFC further enhances the efficiency of NADH production. We can show a 270 % higher intracellular NADH concentration (4 μM) for Escherichia coli KRX with GldA plasmid and a 170 % higher extracellular NADH concentration (24 μM) in contrast to the Escherichia coli KRX wild type.

  • The overexpression of GldA is a great genetic strategy to optimize mediator production as well as electricity generation in Microbial Fuel Cells. The most suitable and efficient GldA device for Escherichia coli is a combination with the rhamnose inducible T7 promoter (BBa_K1172203).


Methods

NADH-Assay

  • This method has been used for measurement of intracellular NADH concentration.
  • Protocol:
    • Inoculate an overnight culture (30 mL with 1 mL of pre-culture)
    • Centrifugate (5 min at 5000 g) of 6-10 mL overnight culture (OD 4-6), adjust volume between different samples for the approximation of the number of cells
    • Discard supernatant and wash pellet 3 times with 1 mL of PBS buffer
    • Resuspend pellet in 1 mL PBS buffer
    • Cell disruption by Ribolysation (3 x 30 sec at 6500 rpm)
    • Centrifugation for 10 min at maximum speed
    • Store supernatant at - 20 ° C or direct measurement with [http://www.tecan.com/platform/apps/product/index.asp?MenuID=1812&ID=1916&Menu=1&Item=21.2.10.1 Tecan Infinite® M200 platereader]


  • [http://www.tecan.com/platform/apps/product/index.asp?MenuID=1812&ID=1916&Menu=1&Item=21.2.10.1 Tecan Infinite® M200 platereader] parameters:
    • Sample volume = 100 μL clear supernatant
    • Excitation = 340 nm
    • Emission = 460 nm
    • Concentration calculation by NADH calibration curve


Acknowledgements

  • MALDI-TOF MS/MS: Vera Ortseifen gave us support dealing with protein analysis by MALDI-TOF MS. After our sample preparation and tryptic digestion she measured the samples and also provided help in the data analysis.

References

  • Kelley JJ, Dekker EE (1985) Identity of Escherichia coli D-1-amino-2-propanol: NAD+ oxidoreductase with E. coli glycerol dehydrogenase but not with Neisseria gonorrhoeae 1,2-propanediol:NAD+ oxidoreductase. [http://jb.asm.org/content/162/1/170.short| J. Bacteriol. 162: 170].

  • Mulichak AM (2005) Crystal structure of glycerol dehydrogenase. [http://www.rcsb.org/pdb/images/1ta9_bio_r_500.jpg| Research Collaboratory for Structural Bioinformatics (RCSB) Protein Data Band (PDB)].

  • Park DH, Kim SK, Shin IH, Jeong YJ (2000) Electricity production in biofuel cell using modified graphite electrode with Neutral Red. [http://link.springer.com/article/10.1023/A:1005674107841#page-1| Biotechnol. Lett 22: 1301].

  • Qiao Y, Li CM, Bao SJ, Lu ZS, Hong YH (2008) Electrocatalysis in microbial fuel cells - from electrode material to direct electrochemistry. [http://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlehtml/2010/ee/b923503e| Chem. Commun. 1290].

  • Ruzheinikov SN, Burke J, Sedelnikova S, Baker PJ, Taylor B, Bullough PA, Muir NM, Gore MG, Rice DW (2001) Glycerol Dehydrogenase: Structure, Specificity, and Mechanism of a Family III Polyol Dehydrogenase. [http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0969212601006451|Structure 9: 789–802].

  • Seop CI, Moon H, Bretschger O, Jang JK, Park HI, Nealson KH, Kim BH (2006) Electrochemically Active Bacteria (EAB) and Mediator-Less Microbial Fuel Cells. [http://www.microbialfuelcell.org/Publications/EBL/1-10/8_2006_Chang%20I.%20S_%20Electrochemically%20active%20bacteria%20%28EAB%29%20and%20mediator-less%20microbial%20fuel%20cells.pdf|J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 16 (2): 163–177].

  • Xiang K, Qiao Y, Ching CB, Li CM (2009) GldA overexpressing-engineered E. coli as superior electrocatalyst for microbial fuel cells. [http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1388248109002835| Electrochemistry Communications 11: 1593–1595].

  • Zhang T, Cui C, Chen S, Ai X, Yang H, Shen P, Peng Z (2006) A novel mediatorless microbial fuel cell based on direct biocatalysis of Escherichia coli. [http://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlehtml/2006/cc/b600876c| Chem Commun 11: 2257–2259].