Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa C0012:Experience"
(→User Reviews) |
|||
(15 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
<!-- DON'T DELETE --><partinfo>BBa_C0012 EndReviews</partinfo> | <!-- DON'T DELETE --><partinfo>BBa_C0012 EndReviews</partinfo> | ||
− | '''[[User:Jasonk|Jasonk]] 15:15, 26 July 2006 (EDT):'''The LVA | + | {|width='80%' style='border:1px solid gray' |
+ | |- | ||
+ | |width='10%'| | ||
+ | <partinfo>BBa_C0012 AddReview 5</partinfo> | ||
+ | <I>P.R.A</I> | ||
+ | |width='60%' valign='top'| | ||
+ | '''Proof that natural LacI ([https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1088018 BBa_K1088018]) also has improved function at low IPTG concentrations''' | ||
+ | |||
+ | https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/7/73/SDU2013_Expression_FACS3.png | ||
+ | |||
+ | FACS results and growth curves of <i>lacI(N)</i> and <i>lacI:LVA</i> carrying strains. Dublicates of MG1655 carrying either pSB1C3-Pcon-<i>lacI(N)</i>-term-Plac-<i>dxs (B. subtilis)</i>-GFP ([https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1088028 BBa_K1088028]) (<i>lacI(N)</i>) or pSB1C3-Pcon-<i>lacI:LVA</i>-term-Plac-<i>dxs (B. subtilis)</i>-GFP ([https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1088009 BBa_K1088009]) (<i>lacI(lva)</i>) were grown from OD<sub>600</sub>=0.005 to approximately OD<sub>600</sub>=0.2. At this OD, the one triplicate of each strain was induced with 0.05, 0.125, 0.25, or 0.5 mM IPTG at time 0 min. FACS measurements were done at times: -30, 0, 30, 60, 90, 120, 150 and 180 min. <b> A)</b> <i>lacI(lva)</i> and <i>lacI(N)</i> strains grew at the same pace <b> B)</b> Percentage of population above fluorescenct threshold. Upon induction of lacI(lva) with different concentrations of IPTG, the percentage of bacteria becoming fluorescent slowly increases. After approximately 180 min, 25-30 % of <i>lacI(lva)</i> induced bacteria in the range from 0.05-0.5 mM IPTG are above the fluorescenct threshold. After 180 min, there is a slightly higher percentage of bacteria above the fluorescenct threshold than for the lacI(lva) strain induced with 10-fold higher IPTG concentration. All <i>lacI(N)</i> induced with IPTG concentrations from 0.125-0.5mM become fluorescent within 180 min, and cultures with higher IPTG concentrations reach this point sooner. | ||
+ | |} | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | {|width='80%' style='border:1px solid gray' | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |width='10%'| | ||
+ | <partinfo>BBa_K1088020 AddReview 5</partinfo> | ||
+ | <I>P.R.A</I> | ||
+ | |width='60%' valign='top'| | ||
+ | |||
+ | '''Proof that natural LacI ([https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1088018 BBa_K1088018]) has improved function''' | ||
+ | |||
+ | https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/5/5d/SDU2013_Characterization_LacIPlac_2.2.png | ||
+ | |||
+ | FACS results and growth curves of ''lacI(N)'' and ''lacI:LVA'' carrying strains. Two triplicates of MG1655 strains carrying either pSB1C3-Pcon-''lacI(N'')-term-Plac-''dxs(B. subtilits)''-GFP ([https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1088026 BBa_K1088026]) (''lacI(N)'') or pSB1C3-Pcon-''lacI:LVA''-term-Plac-''dxs(B. subtilits)''-GFP ([https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1088009 BBa_K1088009]) (''lacI:LVA'') were grown from OD<sub>600</sub> 0.005 to approximately 0.2. At this OD the one triplicate of each strain were induced with 1 mM IPTG at time 0 min. FACS measurements were done at times: -30, 0, 30, 60, 90, 120, 150 and 180 min. | ||
+ | '''A)''' ''lacI(LVA)'' and ''lacI(N)'' strains grew at same pace both with and without induction. '''B)''' Per cent of population above fluorescence threshold. Both LacI(LVA) and LacI(N) represses the expression, when not induced with IPTG. LacI(LVA) reaches a maximum of merely 70-75 % after 150 min, which is both a poor response time and maximum cell per cent fluorescent compared to lacI(N). lacI(N) reaches a maximum just below 100 % at a time between 30 and 60 min. '''C)''' Mean GFP fluorescence of entire population. These results reflect what is seen in B, and clearly indicates that overexpression of natural LacI instead of LacI:LVA is the better, when a quick response and high level of expression is wanted. | ||
+ | |} | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | {|width='80%' style='border:1px solid gray' | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |width='10%'| | ||
+ | <partinfo>BBa_K1088020 AddReview 3</partinfo> | ||
+ | <I>P.R.A</I> | ||
+ | |width='60%' valign='top'| | ||
+ | |||
+ | https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/3/3c/SDU2013_Part_BBa_K1088020.png | ||
+ | |||
+ | FACS results and growth curves of +/-''lacI:LVA'' carrying strains. One triplicate of MG1655 (WT) and two triplicates of MG1655 strains carrying either [https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1088008 BBa_K1088008] (-''lacI:LVA'') or [https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1088009 BBa_K1088009] (+''lacI:LVA'') were grown from OD<sub>600</sub> 0.005 to approximately 0.2. At this OD the MG1655 triplicate and one triplicate of each strain carrying constructs were induced with 1 mM IPTG at time 0 min. FACS measurements were done at times: -30, 0, 30, 60, 90, 120, and 150 min. | ||
+ | |||
+ | '''A)''' Growth curve shows that WT grows slightly faster than strains bearing plasmids. '''B)''' Per cent of population above fluorescence threshold. None of the WT cells were fluorescent, almost all of the -''lacI:LVA'' cells were constitutively fluorescent, and only cells overexpressing LacI:LVA weren’t fluorescent when not induced. Upon induction increasingly per cent of +''lacI:LVA'' became fluorescent and reaches a maximum of 70-75 per cent after 90 min. '''C)''' Mean GFP fluorescence of entire population. The -''lacI:LVA'' cells became increasingly more fluorescent over time, both with and without induction. Though, the induced cells were slightly more fluorescent, which is probably because of the relief of repression from LacI naturally present in the cells. For the +''lacI:LVA'' cells the results from B is reflected. | ||
+ | |||
+ | '''[[User:Jasonk|Jasonk]] 15:15, 26 July 2006 (EDT):'''The LVA degradation tag leads to rapid degradation and as a result seeing significant repression with C0012 is unlikely. <bbpart>BBa_C0013</bbpart> is a lacI with no LVA tail (though at the moment it is not constructed). |
Latest revision as of 21:31, 29 October 2013
This experience page is provided so that any user may enter their experience using this part.
Please enter
how you used this part and how it worked out.
Applications of BBa_C0012
User Reviews
UNIQ0e92ea7ff26e8de5-partinfo-00000000-QINU UNIQ0e92ea7ff26e8de5-partinfo-00000001-QINU
•••••
P.R.A |
Proof that natural LacI (BBa_K1088018) also has improved function at low IPTG concentrations
FACS results and growth curves of lacI(N) and lacI:LVA carrying strains. Dublicates of MG1655 carrying either pSB1C3-Pcon-lacI(N)-term-Plac-dxs (B. subtilis)-GFP (BBa_K1088028) (lacI(N)) or pSB1C3-Pcon-lacI:LVA-term-Plac-dxs (B. subtilis)-GFP (BBa_K1088009) (lacI(lva)) were grown from OD600=0.005 to approximately OD600=0.2. At this OD, the one triplicate of each strain was induced with 0.05, 0.125, 0.25, or 0.5 mM IPTG at time 0 min. FACS measurements were done at times: -30, 0, 30, 60, 90, 120, 150 and 180 min. A) lacI(lva) and lacI(N) strains grew at the same pace B) Percentage of population above fluorescenct threshold. Upon induction of lacI(lva) with different concentrations of IPTG, the percentage of bacteria becoming fluorescent slowly increases. After approximately 180 min, 25-30 % of lacI(lva) induced bacteria in the range from 0.05-0.5 mM IPTG are above the fluorescenct threshold. After 180 min, there is a slightly higher percentage of bacteria above the fluorescenct threshold than for the lacI(lva) strain induced with 10-fold higher IPTG concentration. All lacI(N) induced with IPTG concentrations from 0.125-0.5mM become fluorescent within 180 min, and cultures with higher IPTG concentrations reach this point sooner. |
•••••
P.R.A |
Proof that natural LacI (BBa_K1088018) has improved function
FACS results and growth curves of lacI(N) and lacI:LVA carrying strains. Two triplicates of MG1655 strains carrying either pSB1C3-Pcon-lacI(N)-term-Plac-dxs(B. subtilits)-GFP (BBa_K1088026) (lacI(N)) or pSB1C3-Pcon-lacI:LVA-term-Plac-dxs(B. subtilits)-GFP (BBa_K1088009) (lacI:LVA) were grown from OD600 0.005 to approximately 0.2. At this OD the one triplicate of each strain were induced with 1 mM IPTG at time 0 min. FACS measurements were done at times: -30, 0, 30, 60, 90, 120, 150 and 180 min. A) lacI(LVA) and lacI(N) strains grew at same pace both with and without induction. B) Per cent of population above fluorescence threshold. Both LacI(LVA) and LacI(N) represses the expression, when not induced with IPTG. LacI(LVA) reaches a maximum of merely 70-75 % after 150 min, which is both a poor response time and maximum cell per cent fluorescent compared to lacI(N). lacI(N) reaches a maximum just below 100 % at a time between 30 and 60 min. C) Mean GFP fluorescence of entire population. These results reflect what is seen in B, and clearly indicates that overexpression of natural LacI instead of LacI:LVA is the better, when a quick response and high level of expression is wanted. |
•••
P.R.A |
FACS results and growth curves of +/-lacI:LVA carrying strains. One triplicate of MG1655 (WT) and two triplicates of MG1655 strains carrying either BBa_K1088008 (-lacI:LVA) or BBa_K1088009 (+lacI:LVA) were grown from OD600 0.005 to approximately 0.2. At this OD the MG1655 triplicate and one triplicate of each strain carrying constructs were induced with 1 mM IPTG at time 0 min. FACS measurements were done at times: -30, 0, 30, 60, 90, 120, and 150 min. A) Growth curve shows that WT grows slightly faster than strains bearing plasmids. B) Per cent of population above fluorescence threshold. None of the WT cells were fluorescent, almost all of the -lacI:LVA cells were constitutively fluorescent, and only cells overexpressing LacI:LVA weren’t fluorescent when not induced. Upon induction increasingly per cent of +lacI:LVA became fluorescent and reaches a maximum of 70-75 per cent after 90 min. C) Mean GFP fluorescence of entire population. The -lacI:LVA cells became increasingly more fluorescent over time, both with and without induction. Though, the induced cells were slightly more fluorescent, which is probably because of the relief of repression from LacI naturally present in the cells. For the +lacI:LVA cells the results from B is reflected. Jasonk 15:15, 26 July 2006 (EDT):The LVA degradation tag leads to rapid degradation and as a result seeing significant repression with C0012 is unlikely. BBa_C0013 is a lacI with no LVA tail (though at the moment it is not constructed). |