Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K1065001"

(EFE characterization)
 
(22 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
  
 
<html>
 
<html>
This is a composite part composed by an AraC-pBAD promoter (<a href="https://parts.igem.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K731201">BBa_K731201</a>) + 2-oxoglutarate oxygenase/decarboxylase (<a href="https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1065000">BBa_K1065000</a>) + terminators (<a href="https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_B0015">BBa_B0015</a>). We used this part to characterize the Ethylene Forming Enzyme, inducing its expression with Arabinose. </html>
+
This device is composed by an AraC-pBAD promoter (<a href="https://parts.igem.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K731201">BBa_K731201</a>) + 2-oxoglutarate oxygenase/decarboxylase (<a href="https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1065000">BBa_K1065000</a>) + terminators (<a href="https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_B0015">BBa_B0015</a>). </html>
 +
 
 +
<html>2-oxoglutarate oxygenase/decarboxylase is an Ethylene Forming Enzyme (EFE) that catalyzes Ethylene biosynthesis from 2-oxoglutarate. </html>
 +
 
 
===Safety===
 
===Safety===
 
<html>
 
<html>
This part produces ethylene, a compound that can be inflammable at a concentration between 2.7 to 36%. We characterized this part under the control of an AraC-pBAD promoter. With a air volume/culture volume ratio = 4, we detected about 200 ppm of Ethylene. This concentration is not dangerous and not inflammable. However we suggest to manage this part carefully.
+
This part produces Ethylene, a compound that is inflammable at a concentration ranging from 2.7% to 36%. We characterized this part under the control of an AraC-pBAD promoter. With an air volume/culture volume ratio of 4, about 200 ppm (0.02%) of Ethylene was detected by gas chromatography. This concentration is thus much lower than the inflammability threshold of Ethylene. However, we suggest to use this part carefully and to make all manipulations of open cultures under a chemical hood.
 
</html>
 
</html>
===EFE characterization===
+
 
 +
 
 +
===Usage and Biology===
 +
<html>This enzyme was first purified  from <I>Pseudomonas Siringae</I> pv. <I>phaseolicola</I> PK2, a 2-oxoglutarate-dependent ethylene producing bacterium <a href="#ref1" id="ret_ref1">[1]</a>. <br/>
 +
</html>
 +
 
 +
<html>
 +
The enzyme was thoroughly studied by many research groups. It was purified and characterized using an <i>in vitro</i> test <a href="#ref2" id="ret_ref2">[2]</a>. It was then transformed and ectopically expressed in <i>E.coli</i> <a href="#ref3" id="ret_ref3">[3]</a> and in <i>Synecocystis</i> sp <a href="#ref4" id="ret_ref4">[4]</a>.<br/><br>
 +
</html>
 +
 
 +
===EFE characterization in Neb10&beta; cells===
  
 
<html>
 
<html>
<center><img style="width:500px;"src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/6/6f/Tn-20130627-Efe_Toxicity_test-PLOT.png"></center>
+
<center><img style="width:800px;"src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/6/6f/Tn-20130627-Efe_Toxicity_test-PLOT.png"></center>
<center><p style="width:600px; margin-bottom:60px; text-align:justify"><b>Figure 1</b> Effect of EFE on cell growth. Cell density was measured at different time points to determine the effect of EFE expression. Cells were grown at 37 °C in LB until it was reached an OD of 0.6. The cells were then slitted in four samples of equal volume. Two samples were then induced with 5 mM Arabinose. Induced samples show a slowed growth rate,
+
<center><p style="width:600px; margin-bottom:60px; text-align:justify"><b>Figure 1</b> Effect of EFE on cell growth. Cell density was measured at different time points to determine the effect of EFE expression. Neb10&beta; cells were grown at 37 °C in LB until an OD of 0.6. The cultures were then split in four samples of equal volume, and two samples were induced with 5 mM Arabinose. Induced samples show a slowed growth rate. This was expected as 5mM arabinose is considered a strong induction that causes moderate stress on cells.  
as espected (5mM arabinose is a strong induction that causes stress on cells). However, cell growth is not completely inhibited so EFE is not highly toxic</p></center>
+
</p></center>
 
<h3>Ethylene detection through Micro Gas-Chromatography</h3><br/>
 
<h3>Ethylene detection through Micro Gas-Chromatography</h3><br/>
 
<center><img style="width:800px;"src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/c/c4/Tn-2013_ETH_detection.jpg"></center>
 
<center><img style="width:800px;"src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/c/c4/Tn-2013_ETH_detection.jpg"></center>
<center><p style="width:600px; margin-bottom:60px; text-align:justify"><b>Figure 2</b> Ethylene detection through Micro GC. Cells were grown until O.D.600 reached 0.5. The cells were then splitted in two samples of equal volume (3 ml) and putted into an ermetically closed vial with a pierceable septum. One of the two sample was induced with 5 mM Arabinose. The vials were then putted into the thermoshaker for 4 hours. After that, the vials were connected to a micro GC and a measure was taken. Looking at the chromatograms, we can easily note that induce sample showed a characteristic peak corresponding to Ethylene. On the other hand, the not induce sample didn't show that peak (panel A). Panel B: picture of the vial connected to the micro GC.</p></center>
+
<center><p style="width:600px; margin-bottom:60px; text-align:justify"><b>Figure 2</b> Ethylene detection using an Agilent 3000 Micro GC set up with a plot U column. Neb10&beta; cells were grown until an OD of 0.5. The culture was then split in two samples of equal volume (3 ml) and placed into an hermetically closed vial with a septum and a rubber cap. One of the two samples was induced with 5 mM arabinose. The vials were kept at 37&deg;C under shaking for 4 hours. The vials were then connected to the Micro GC and measurements were performed. Panel A:  induced 1.5 ml sample (green curve) and 3 ml sample (red curve) showed a characteristic peak corresponding to Ethylene. On the other hand, the 3 ml non-induced sample (blue curve) didn't show the Ethylene peak. Ethylene concentration was estimated to be 61 &plusmn; 15 ppm for the 1.5 ml culture and 101 &plusmn; 15 ppm for the 3 ml culture. Panel B: picture of the vial connected to the micro GC.</p></center>
  
 
<h3>Kinetic assay for Ethylene production</h3>
 
<h3>Kinetic assay for Ethylene production</h3>
<center><img style="width:500px" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/0/00/Tn-2013_kinetic_EFE_plot-2.png"></center>
+
<center><img style="width:800px" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/0/00/Tn-2013_kinetic_EFE_plot-2.png"></center>
<center><p style="width:600px; margin-bottom:60px; text-align:justify"><b>Figure 3</b> Kinetic assay for Ethylene production. Cells were grown as described in figure 2 whith the only difference that a stirrer was also putted into the vial. This is due to the fact that the vial had to be connected to the micro GC and stirred at 37 &deg;C for the entire duration of the experiment. A measure was taken every 45/60 mins for about 8 hours. As you can see, samples were induced at two differents O.D.600 and this had big effect on the amount of ethylene produced. However, seems that the Ethylene concentration in the air space reached saturation level after only two hours. Moreover when the blue curve was registered, a sample of the same stock culture was kept in thermoshaker. As expected an higher value of ethylene was detected (green point) since it was subjected to
+
<center><p style="width:600px; margin-bottom:60px; text-align:justify"><b>Figure 3</b> Kinetic assay for Ethylene production. Neb10&beta; cells were grown in agitation on a thermostatic block at 37 &deg;C until an OD of 0.5 - 0.8 and then connected to the Micro GC. Every 45-60 min a measure was taken for a total experiment time of about 8 hours. Samples were induced at two different OD and this had a marked effect on the amount of Ethylene produced. However, it seems that the Ethylene concentration in the air volume reached saturation after only two hours. The red dashed line indicates the amount of Ethylene detected with a culture left in the shaking incubator for the entire duration of the experiment and subjected to only one measurement. As expected, an higher concentration of Ethylene was measured due to the minimal gas loss using this approach.
only one measure (thus having no gas loss due to repeated measures).</p></center>
+
</p></center>
  
 
<h3>Acceleration of fruit ripening</h3>
 
<h3>Acceleration of fruit ripening</h3>
<center><img style="width:500px" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/6/64/Tn-2013_Application_on_fruit_for_part_wiki.jpg"></center>
+
 
<center><p style="width:600px; margin-bottom:60px; text-align:justify"><b>Figure 4</b> Acceleration of fruit ripening. Our system was exploited for the acceleration of fruit ripening. We designed an ermetically closed jam jar with a rubber hose connector. These jars contained our test-fruit and each one was connected to a flask. The flasks contained 300 ml of induced (or not) culture when his O.D.600 reached 0.8. The flasks contained also a stirrer.The cultures were maintained at 37 °C using a laboratory heating plate connected to a digital thermometer immersed in the culture. For four to six days, every morning the culture in the flasks was substituted with a new induced (or not) colture. Furthermore, canonical jam jars (i.e.: with no connector) were adopted to contain the negative control fruit samples (panel A). We tested many type of fruit, using different time of treatment. In this example (panel B) the tomatoe putted in the jar that was connected to an induced culture, shows a more advance stage of maturation after 4 days of threatment.</p></center>
+
<h4><center>This device was used for accelerating fruit ripening. Many types of fruit were tested and ripened successfully. For more information and details please visit the <a href="http://2013.igem.org/Team:UNITN-Trento/Project/Fruit_ripening">UNITN wiki page </a>.</center></h4>
 +
 
 +
<center><img style="width:600px" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/6/64/Tn-2013_Application_on_fruit_for_part_wiki.jpg"></center>
 +
<center><p style="width:600px; margin-bottom:60px; text-align:justify"><b>Figure 4</b> Acceleration of fruit ripening. Panel A: our system was applied to the acceleration of fruit ripening. We designed hermetically closed jars with a rubber hose connector. These jars contained our test-fruit and each one was connected to a flask. The flasks contained 300 ml of induced (or non-induced) culture at an OD of 0.8. The flasks contained cultures were maintained at 37&deg;C using a laboratory heating plate with a magnetic stirrer. During four to six days, cultures were substituted on a daily basis with a new induced (or non-induced) culture. Furthermore, non-modified jars (i.e. with no connector) were used for the negative control fruit samples (no cells sample). Panel B: ripening of plums. Plums exposed to Ethylene show a more advanced stage of ripening after 4 days of treatment respect to the negative controls (no cells and non- induced BBa_K1065001).</p></center>
  
 
</html>
 
</html>
Line 32: Line 48:
 
<partinfo>BBa_K1065001 SequenceAndFeatures</partinfo>
 
<partinfo>BBa_K1065001 SequenceAndFeatures</partinfo>
  
 +
===References===
 +
<html><ol>
 +
<li><a id="ref1"></a>Goto M, Shiday I, Akitaway T, Hyodoh, (1985). Ethylene production by the Kudzu strains of <I>Pseudomonas syringae</I> pv. <I>phaseolicola</I> causing halo blight in Pueraria lobata (Willd) Ohwi. Plant and Cell Physiology 26, 141-150.</li>
 +
<li><a id="ref2"></a>Nagahama K, Ogawa T, Fujii T, Tazaki M, Tanase S, et al. (1991) Purification and properties of an ethylene-forming enzyme from <I>Pseudomonas syringae </I>pv.<I> phaseolicola</I> PK2. Journal of General Microbiology 137: 2281–2286.</li>
 +
<li><a id="ref3"></a>Fukuda H, Ogawa T, Ishihara K, Fujii T, Nagahama K, et al. (1992) Molecular cloning in Escherichia coli, expression, and nucleotide sequence of the gene for the ethylene-forming enzyme of <I>Pseudomonas syringae </I>pv.<I> phaseolicola</I> PK2. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 188: 826–832.</li>
 +
<li><a id="ref4"></a>Guerrero F, Carbonell. V., Cossu M, Correddu D, Jones PR (2012) Ethylene Synthesis and Regulated Expression of Recombinant Protein in <I>Synechocystis sp.</I> PCC 6803. PLoS ONE 7(11): e50470.</li>
 +
</ol></html>
  
 
<!-- Uncomment this to enable Functional Parameter display  
 
<!-- Uncomment this to enable Functional Parameter display  
 
===Functional Parameters===
 
===Functional Parameters===
 
<partinfo>BBa_K1065001 parameters</partinfo>
 
<partinfo>BBa_K1065001 parameters</partinfo>
 +
 
<!-- -->
 
<!-- -->

Latest revision as of 14:06, 28 October 2013

AraC-pBAD + 2-oxoglutarate oxygenase/decarboxylase (EFE) + terminators

This device is composed by an AraC-pBAD promoter (BBa_K731201) + 2-oxoglutarate oxygenase/decarboxylase (BBa_K1065000) + terminators (BBa_B0015).

2-oxoglutarate oxygenase/decarboxylase is an Ethylene Forming Enzyme (EFE) that catalyzes Ethylene biosynthesis from 2-oxoglutarate.

Safety

This part produces Ethylene, a compound that is inflammable at a concentration ranging from 2.7% to 36%. We characterized this part under the control of an AraC-pBAD promoter. With an air volume/culture volume ratio of 4, about 200 ppm (0.02%) of Ethylene was detected by gas chromatography. This concentration is thus much lower than the inflammability threshold of Ethylene. However, we suggest to use this part carefully and to make all manipulations of open cultures under a chemical hood.


Usage and Biology

This enzyme was first purified from Pseudomonas Siringae pv. phaseolicola PK2, a 2-oxoglutarate-dependent ethylene producing bacterium [1].

The enzyme was thoroughly studied by many research groups. It was purified and characterized using an in vitro test [2]. It was then transformed and ectopically expressed in E.coli [3] and in Synecocystis sp [4].

EFE characterization in Neb10β cells

Figure 1 Effect of EFE on cell growth. Cell density was measured at different time points to determine the effect of EFE expression. Neb10β cells were grown at 37 °C in LB until an OD of 0.6. The cultures were then split in four samples of equal volume, and two samples were induced with 5 mM Arabinose. Induced samples show a slowed growth rate. This was expected as 5mM arabinose is considered a strong induction that causes moderate stress on cells.

Ethylene detection through Micro Gas-Chromatography


Figure 2 Ethylene detection using an Agilent 3000 Micro GC set up with a plot U column. Neb10β cells were grown until an OD of 0.5. The culture was then split in two samples of equal volume (3 ml) and placed into an hermetically closed vial with a septum and a rubber cap. One of the two samples was induced with 5 mM arabinose. The vials were kept at 37°C under shaking for 4 hours. The vials were then connected to the Micro GC and measurements were performed. Panel A: induced 1.5 ml sample (green curve) and 3 ml sample (red curve) showed a characteristic peak corresponding to Ethylene. On the other hand, the 3 ml non-induced sample (blue curve) didn't show the Ethylene peak. Ethylene concentration was estimated to be 61 ± 15 ppm for the 1.5 ml culture and 101 ± 15 ppm for the 3 ml culture. Panel B: picture of the vial connected to the micro GC.

Kinetic assay for Ethylene production

Figure 3 Kinetic assay for Ethylene production. Neb10β cells were grown in agitation on a thermostatic block at 37 °C until an OD of 0.5 - 0.8 and then connected to the Micro GC. Every 45-60 min a measure was taken for a total experiment time of about 8 hours. Samples were induced at two different OD and this had a marked effect on the amount of Ethylene produced. However, it seems that the Ethylene concentration in the air volume reached saturation after only two hours. The red dashed line indicates the amount of Ethylene detected with a culture left in the shaking incubator for the entire duration of the experiment and subjected to only one measurement. As expected, an higher concentration of Ethylene was measured due to the minimal gas loss using this approach.

Acceleration of fruit ripening

This device was used for accelerating fruit ripening. Many types of fruit were tested and ripened successfully. For more information and details please visit the UNITN wiki page .

Figure 4 Acceleration of fruit ripening. Panel A: our system was applied to the acceleration of fruit ripening. We designed hermetically closed jars with a rubber hose connector. These jars contained our test-fruit and each one was connected to a flask. The flasks contained 300 ml of induced (or non-induced) culture at an OD of 0.8. The flasks contained cultures were maintained at 37°C using a laboratory heating plate with a magnetic stirrer. During four to six days, cultures were substituted on a daily basis with a new induced (or non-induced) culture. Furthermore, non-modified jars (i.e. with no connector) were used for the negative control fruit samples (no cells sample). Panel B: ripening of plums. Plums exposed to Ethylene show a more advanced stage of ripening after 4 days of treatment respect to the negative controls (no cells and non- induced BBa_K1065001).

Sequence and Features


Assembly Compatibility:
  • 10
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[10]
  • 12
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[12]
  • 21
    INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[21]
    Illegal BglII site found at 1530
    Illegal BamHI site found at 1144
  • 23
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[23]
  • 25
    INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[25]
    Illegal NgoMIV site found at 1228
    Illegal AgeI site found at 979
    Illegal AgeI site found at 2281
  • 1000
    INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[1000]
    Illegal SapI site found at 961

References

  1. Goto M, Shiday I, Akitaway T, Hyodoh, (1985). Ethylene production by the Kudzu strains of Pseudomonas syringae pv. phaseolicola causing halo blight in Pueraria lobata (Willd) Ohwi. Plant and Cell Physiology 26, 141-150.
  2. Nagahama K, Ogawa T, Fujii T, Tazaki M, Tanase S, et al. (1991) Purification and properties of an ethylene-forming enzyme from Pseudomonas syringae pv. phaseolicola PK2. Journal of General Microbiology 137: 2281–2286.
  3. Fukuda H, Ogawa T, Ishihara K, Fujii T, Nagahama K, et al. (1992) Molecular cloning in Escherichia coli, expression, and nucleotide sequence of the gene for the ethylene-forming enzyme of Pseudomonas syringae pv. phaseolicola PK2. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 188: 826–832.
  4. Guerrero F, Carbonell. V., Cossu M, Correddu D, Jones PR (2012) Ethylene Synthesis and Regulated Expression of Recombinant Protein in Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803. PLoS ONE 7(11): e50470.