Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K802009"

(Confocal microscopy)
 
(9 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 14: Line 14:
 
The part was transformed into the <i> B. subtilis</i> 168 Δ<i>abrB</i> strain containing the mutated biofilm repressor gene (<i>abrB</i>). As a result, this strain forms biofilms. If the part is functional, the transformed strain should not form biofilms as AbrB will repress genes involved in biofilm formation. In fact, the transformed <i>B. subtilis</i>  168 Δ<i>abrB</i> strain with BBa_K802009 should be similar to the wild-type <i>B. subtilis</i> 168 strain  as far as the biofilm formation is concerned. </p>
 
The part was transformed into the <i> B. subtilis</i> 168 Δ<i>abrB</i> strain containing the mutated biofilm repressor gene (<i>abrB</i>). As a result, this strain forms biofilms. If the part is functional, the transformed strain should not form biofilms as AbrB will repress genes involved in biofilm formation. In fact, the transformed <i>B. subtilis</i>  168 Δ<i>abrB</i> strain with BBa_K802009 should be similar to the wild-type <i>B. subtilis</i> 168 strain  as far as the biofilm formation is concerned. </p>
 
<br><p>
 
<br><p>
In order to test the biofilm formation of the transformed bacteria, a qualitative test was performed in a 24-wells microplate. Saturated liquid cultures were used to inoculate 2 mL of LB medium (dilution ratio of the tested culture  compared to the saturated culture : 1/100) supplemented with 2% xylose as <i>abrB</i> gene is under the control of the P<sub>xyl</sub> promotor. The negative control was the <i>B. subtilis</i> 168 Δ<i>abrB</i> strain. The positive control was the wild-type <i>B. subtilis</i> 168 strain.
+
In order to test the biofilm formation of the transformed bacteria, a qualitative test was performed in a 24-well microplate. Saturated liquid cultures were used to inoculate 2 mL of LB medium (dilution ratio of the tested culture  compared to the saturated culture : 1/100) supplemented with 2% xylose as <i>abrB</i> gene is under the control of the P<sub><i>xyl</i></sub> promoter. The negative control was the <i>B. subtilis</i> 168 Δ<i>abrB</i> strain. The positive control was the wild-type <i>B. subtilis</i> 168 strain.
  
  
Line 34: Line 34:
  
 
<br>
 
<br>
<p>As it can be seen in the video, the transformed strain does not form a sticky pellicular biofilm as opposed to the wild-type strain</p><br>
+
<p>As it can be seen in the video, the transformed strain does not form a sticky pellicular biofilm as opposed to the wild-type strain.</p><br>
  
 
<p>
 
<p>
Line 47: Line 47:
  
 
<p>
 
<p>
In order to confirm the presence of the <i>sfp</i> gene, encoding a regulator of surfactin synthesis, a qualitative test for surfactant production was performed. 2 mL of filtered supernatant extracted from saturated cultures of transformed bacteria were mixed with 2 mL of sunflower oil in a spectrometer cuvette. Then, the cuvette was thoroughly vortexed to create an emulsion. After 20 hours the cuvette was observed, in case of surfactant production the emulsion should still be visible :  </p>
+
In order to confirm the presence of the <i>sfp</i> gene, encoding a regulator of surfactin synthesis, a qualitative test for surfactant production was performed. 2 mL of filtered supernatant extracted from saturated cultures of transformed bacteria were mixed with 2 mL of sunflower oil in a spectrometer cuvette. Then, the cuvette was thoroughly vortexed to create an emulsion. After 20 hours the cuvette was observed, in case of surfactant production the emulsion should still be visible :  </p>
 
<br>
 
<br>
  
Line 85: Line 85:
  
 
<html>
 
<html>
<p> In order to test the efficiency of the part, the effect of the transformed strain on an <i>E. coli</i> biofilm was observed. The test was performed  on  glass lamellae in a 12 well plate.  
+
<p> In order to test the efficiency of the part, the action of the transformed <i>B. subtilis</i> strain on the development of an <i>E. coli</i> biofilm was observed. The test was performed  on  glass slides in a 12-well plates.  
  
 
<li><i>abrB</i> test  
 
<li><i>abrB</i> test  
  <p>Wells containing a <i>B. sbtilis</i> 24 hour biofilm was seeded with a fluorescent adherent <i>E.coli</i> strain and incubated at 30°C for 36 hours before observation. The negative control contains no <i>B. subtilis</i> biofilm.</p>
+
  <p>Wells containing a <i>B. subtilis</i> 24-hour biofilm were seeded with a fluorescent adherent <i>E.coli</i> strain and incubated at 30°C for 36 hours before observation. The negative control contains no <i>B. subtilis</i> biofilm.</p>
</li>
+
</li></br></br>
 +
 
  
  
<p style="text-align:center"><i>Positive <i>B. subtilis</i> biofilm (in red). The adherent fluorescent <i>E.coli</i>is shown in green</i></p>
+
<p style="text-align:center"><i>Negative control: fluorescent <i>E. coli</i> strain</i></p>
 +
<div style="text-align:center">
 +
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2012/6/6f/PosBioColiseul.jpg" width="400px">
 +
</div>
 +
</br></br></br>
 +
 
 +
<p style="text-align:center"><i>Positive <i>B. subtilis</i> biofilm (in red). The adherent fluorescent <i>E.coli</i> is shown in green</i></p>
 
<div style="text-align:center">
 
<div style="text-align:center">
 
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2012/7/7d/BScoat%2Bcoli.jpg" width="400px">  
 
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2012/7/7d/BScoat%2Bcoli.jpg" width="400px">  
 
</div>
 
</div>
</br>
+
</br></br>
 
+
<b>Conclusion</b></br>
 
+
<p>As it can be seen in the image above, the <i>B. subtilis</i> biofilm sticks to the surface and covers the glass. As a result, the <i>E. coli</i> biofilm cannot develop. </p>
  
 
<li><i>sfp</i> test
 
<li><i>sfp</i> test
<p> The filtered supernatant from the transformed strain was incubated in wells containing glass lamellae for 24 hours. Then, the supernatant was replaced with LB media diluted 2 times and seeded with a saturated flourescent adherent <i>E. coli</i> strain. In order to compare the surfactin secreted by the strain containing the part and the purified molecule, the positive control wells were incubated with a solution containing surfactin at a concentration of 80 µg/mL. To make sure that the observed effect is not due to the antibiotic or to the backbone, control wells were incubated with the supernatant extracted from a saturated culture of <i>B. subtilis</i> transformed with the empty backbone.
+
<p> The filtered supernatant from the transformed strain was incubated in wells containing glass slides for 24 hours. Then, the supernatant was replaced with LB medium diluted 2 times and seeded with a saturated fluorescent adherent <i>E. coli</i> strain. In order to compare the surfactin secreted by the strain containing the part and the purified molecule, the positive control wells were incubated with a solution containing surfactin at a concentration of 80 µg/mL. To make sure that the observed effect is not due to the antibiotic or to the backbone, control wells were incubated with the supernatant extracted from a saturated culture of <i>B. subtilis</i> transformed with the empty backbone. The plate was incubated at 30°C for 36 hours.
  
  
Line 119: Line 126:
  
  
 +
 +
<p style="text-align:center"><i>The effect of the supernatant extracted from the <i>B. subtilis</i> strain transformed with BBa_K802009 on an <i>E. coli</i> biofilm.</i></p>
 +
<div style="text-align:center">
 +
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2012/6/65/Sfp.jpg" width="400px">
 +
</div>
 +
</br></br></br>
 +
 +
<b>Conclusion</b></br>
 +
<p> The surfactant properties of the supernatant containing the surfactin are effective in preventing biofilm formation. </p>
  
 
</li>
 
</li>
Line 131: Line 147:
  
 
===Usage and Biology===
 
===Usage and Biology===
This part can be used in <i>B. subtilis</i> for the control of biofilm formation and for the production of a surfactant that will prevent the growth of other bacteria
+
This part can be used in <i>B. subtilis</i> for the control of biofilm formation and for the production of a surfactant that will prevent the growth of other bacteria.
  
 
<span class='h3bb'>Sequence and Features</span>
 
<span class='h3bb'>Sequence and Features</span>

Latest revision as of 00:27, 27 October 2012

Sufactin generator and biofilm repressor for B. subtilis

This part can be used to induce surfactin production (an antimicrobial lipopeptide) and to repress the biofilm formation in B. subtilis strains.


Characterization


abrB tests

The part was transformed into the B. subtilis 168 ΔabrB strain containing the mutated biofilm repressor gene (abrB). As a result, this strain forms biofilms. If the part is functional, the transformed strain should not form biofilms as AbrB will repress genes involved in biofilm formation. In fact, the transformed B. subtilis 168 ΔabrB strain with BBa_K802009 should be similar to the wild-type B. subtilis 168 strain as far as the biofilm formation is concerned.


In order to test the biofilm formation of the transformed bacteria, a qualitative test was performed in a 24-well microplate. Saturated liquid cultures were used to inoculate 2 mL of LB medium (dilution ratio of the tested culture compared to the saturated culture : 1/100) supplemented with 2% xylose as abrB gene is under the control of the Pxyl promoter. The negative control was the B. subtilis 168 ΔabrB strain. The positive control was the wild-type B. subtilis 168 strain.

Biofilm test




Comparison of biofilm formation between the transformed strain and the wild-type strain

As it can be seen in the video, the transformed strain does not form a sticky pellicular biofilm as opposed to the wild-type strain.


The results show that the characteristics of the transformed mutated strain resemble more the B. subtilis 168 strain than the B. subtilis 168 ΔabrB strain.




sfp test

In order to confirm the presence of the sfp gene, encoding a regulator of surfactin synthesis, a qualitative test for surfactant production was performed. 2 mL of filtered supernatant extracted from saturated cultures of transformed bacteria were mixed with 2 mL of sunflower oil in a spectrometer cuvette. Then, the cuvette was thoroughly vortexed to create an emulsion. After 20 hours the cuvette was observed, in case of surfactant production the emulsion should still be visible :


Surfactin production test

Sample number details:

  • 1 is a positive control (the supernatant was replaced with a 10% SDS solution);
  • 2 is a negative control (supernatant from B. subtilis 168 strain);
  • 3 contains the supernatant from the transformed strain B. subtilis 168 ΔarbB with BBa_K802009;
  • 4 is a negative control (supernatant from B. subtilis 168 strain transformed with the same plasmid which was used for cloning the part BBa_K802009, but without the part).

Comparison between the cuvettes 3 and 4 shows that the emulsion is due to a surfactant present in the supernatant of the transformed bacteria with BBa_K802009. The absence of an emulsion in cuvette 4 confirms that the observed effect in due to the cloned sfp gene and not to the backbone vector.




Confocal microscopy

In order to test the efficiency of the part, the action of the transformed B. subtilis strain on the development of an E. coli biofilm was observed. The test was performed on glass slides in a 12-well plates.

  • abrB test

    Wells containing a B. subtilis 24-hour biofilm were seeded with a fluorescent adherent E.coli strain and incubated at 30°C for 36 hours before observation. The negative control contains no B. subtilis biofilm.



  • Negative control: fluorescent E. coli strain




    Positive B. subtilis biofilm (in red). The adherent fluorescent E.coli is shown in green



    Conclusion

    As it can be seen in the image above, the B. subtilis biofilm sticks to the surface and covers the glass. As a result, the E. coli biofilm cannot develop.

  • sfp test

    The filtered supernatant from the transformed strain was incubated in wells containing glass slides for 24 hours. Then, the supernatant was replaced with LB medium diluted 2 times and seeded with a saturated fluorescent adherent E. coli strain. In order to compare the surfactin secreted by the strain containing the part and the purified molecule, the positive control wells were incubated with a solution containing surfactin at a concentration of 80 µg/mL. To make sure that the observed effect is not due to the antibiotic or to the backbone, control wells were incubated with the supernatant extracted from a saturated culture of B. subtilis transformed with the empty backbone. The plate was incubated at 30°C for 36 hours.

    Negative control: fluorescent E. coli biofilm


    Positive control: effect of a solution containing purified surfactin on a fluorescent E. coli biofilm


    The effect of the supernatant extracted from the B. subtilis strain transformed with BBa_K802009 on an E. coli biofilm.




    Conclusion

    The surfactant properties of the supernatant containing the surfactin are effective in preventing biofilm formation.

  • CONCLUSION

    BBa_K802009 part was shown to be efficient in controlling the ON and OFF biofilm states in B. subtilis. Moreover the production of surfactin was efficient, so this part can be a source of surfactin that can be easily extracted from the supernatant of the cultures.

    Usage and Biology

    This part can be used in B. subtilis for the control of biofilm formation and for the production of a surfactant that will prevent the growth of other bacteria.

    Sequence and Features


    Assembly Compatibility:
    • 10
      COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[10]
    • 12
      COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[12]
    • 21
      COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[21]
    • 23
      COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[23]
    • 25
      COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[25]
    • 1000
      INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[1000]
      Illegal BsaI site found at 760
      Illegal SapI.rc site found at 770