Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K921000"
Enpederson (Talk | contribs) |
|||
(6 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
<br><br> | <br><br> | ||
− | <strong>Table 1: | + | <strong>Table 1: Relative transcription and translation efficiencies of three T7Lac promoters as compared to the wildtype promoter</strong><br> |
<table border="1"> | <table border="1"> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
Line 48: | Line 48: | ||
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/parts/2/25/CMU_leaky.jpg", width="465", height="594"><br> | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/parts/2/25/CMU_leaky.jpg", width="465", height="594"><br> | ||
<strong>Figure 3: Leaky RNA (top panel) and protein (bottom panel) expression levels of our T7Lac promoters in BL21(DE3) cells.</strong> Uninduced cells (without IPTG) were added to wells in a 96 well plate supplemented with either 200µM of DFHBI or 10µM of malachite green. Fluorescence intensities at the 3rd hour time point is shown for comparison between promoters.<br><br> | <strong>Figure 3: Leaky RNA (top panel) and protein (bottom panel) expression levels of our T7Lac promoters in BL21(DE3) cells.</strong> Uninduced cells (without IPTG) were added to wells in a 96 well plate supplemented with either 200µM of DFHBI or 10µM of malachite green. Fluorescence intensities at the 3rd hour time point is shown for comparison between promoters.<br><br> | ||
+ | </p><p> | ||
+ | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2012/d/de/Ts.png" height="300" width="380" align="center"/> | ||
+ | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2012/9/9b/Tl.png" height="300" width="380" ><br> | ||
+ | <strong>Figure 4: Calculated values of transcription strength and translational efficiency.</strong> | ||
+ | These values were calculated from the raw fluorescence values that were normalized by OD600 and fit into the differential equations that were developed to model our system. The units are in RFU/min due to time constraints and insufficient published information about our biosensor system. Further experiments are required to determine a conversion factor. | ||
</p> | </p> | ||
− | |||
<p> | <p> | ||
<strong>Discussion</strong><br> | <strong>Discussion</strong><br> | ||
Line 56: | Line 60: | ||
The leaky expression of this promoter is noticeably lower than the wild type promoter, which is consistent with the low RNA expression rates after induction of the promoter. | The leaky expression of this promoter is noticeably lower than the wild type promoter, which is consistent with the low RNA expression rates after induction of the promoter. | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
+ | </p> | ||
+ | |||
</html> | </html> | ||
Latest revision as of 01:09, 4 October 2012
T7 RNAP + IPTG->PoPs (Mutant I)
This is a mutant T7 promoter that includes a lacO operator site. The promoter is inhibited by the LacI protein and can be induced by IPTG. The promoter sits in the 5' region of a gene and initiates transcription when cells express T7 RNA polymerase. Please use cell strains that are compatible with T7 expression vectors. Our promoters were characterized in a high copy plasmid (pBR322 replication origin); as a result, there was a measurable amount of background fluorescence values from uninduced cells. This measurement of leaky expression offers insight into the negative regulatory behavior of our hybrid promoters.
Mutant II
Mutant III
The following parameters were calculated and compared against the "wild-type" promoter. To learn more about how we characterized this set of promoters, click here.
Table 1: Relative transcription and translation efficiencies of three T7Lac promoters as compared to the wildtype promoter
Promoter | BBa K921000 | BBa K921001 | BBa K921002 |
---|---|---|---|
Transcription Strength | 97% | 72% | 127% |
Translational Efficiency | 169% | 90% | 160% |
Figure 1: FAP fluorescence (reporter for protein levels) over time.Fluorogen-activating proteins were used as protein reporters in our characterization experiment (see details in here). 10µM malachite green was added to each well of a 96-well plate and fluorescence intensities were recorded over time. Our model was used to simulate the time lapse data using differential equations. We note that multiple dips were recorded in the readings of all three mutated promoters. This could be due to a strong metabolic burden and multiphasic growth of bacteria. Cells were grown in M9 media without casamino acids. Fluorescence intensities are normalized to optical density (absorbance @600nm). Lines are drawn as guide of eyes.
Figure 2: Spinach fluorescence (reporter for RNA levels) over time.The Spinach aptamer was used as a RNA reporter in our characterization experiment (see details in here). 200µM DFHBI was added to each well of a 96- well plate and fluorescence intensities were recorded over time. Our model was used to simulate the time lapse data using differential equations. Lines are drawn as guide of eyes.
Figure 3: Leaky RNA (top panel) and protein (bottom panel) expression levels of our T7Lac promoters in BL21(DE3) cells. Uninduced cells (without IPTG) were added to wells in a 96 well plate supplemented with either 200µM of DFHBI or 10µM of malachite green. Fluorescence intensities at the 3rd hour time point is shown for comparison between promoters.
Figure 4: Calculated values of transcription strength and translational efficiency.
These values were calculated from the raw fluorescence values that were normalized by OD600 and fit into the differential equations that were developed to model our system. The units are in RFU/min due to time constraints and insufficient published information about our biosensor system. Further experiments are required to determine a conversion factor.
Discussion
The design of Mutant I (BBa_K921000) was based on random mutations throughout the promoter region including the recognition site, initiation site, and the lac operator. This promoter was expected to have a lower affinity to the T7 RNAP and therefore have a lower amount of protein expression. The mutant I (BBa_K921000) promoter produces less RNA, but more protein than the wild type promoter (Bba_K613007). We hypothesize that the difference between the prediction and the experimental results is due to cellular adaptation to metabolic burden.
The leaky expression of this promoter is noticeably lower than the wild type promoter, which is consistent with the low RNA expression rates after induction of the promoter.
Usage and Biology
Sequence and Features
- 10COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[10]
- 12COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[12]
- 21COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[21]
- 23COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[23]
- 25COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[25]
- 1000COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[1000]
Functional Parameters
direction | Forward |
efficiency | 169% |
negative_regulators | LacI (Hypothesized LacIQ compatible) |