Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K921001"

 
(14 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
 
<html>
 
<html>
 
<br>
 
<br>
This is a mutant T7 promoter that includes a lacO operator site. The promoter is inhibited by the LacI protein and can be induced by IPTG. The promoter sits in the 5' region of a gene and initiates transcription when cells express T7 RNA polymerase. Please use cell strains that are compatible with T7 expression vectors. <br>
+
This is a mutant T7 promoter that includes a lacO operator site. The promoter is inhibited by the LacI protein and can be induced by IPTG. The promoter sits in the 5' region of a gene and initiates transcription when cells express T7 RNA polymerase. Please use cell strains that are compatible with T7 expression vectors. Our promoters were characterized in a high copy plasmid (pBR322 replication origin); as a result, there was a measurable amount of background fluorescence values from uninduced cells. This measurement of leaky expression offers insight into the negative regulatory behavior of our hybrid promoters.<br><br>
The following parameters were calculated and compared against the "wild-type" <a href="https://parts.igem.org/part:BBa_K613007">promoter</a>.
+
<a href="https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K921000">Mutant I</a><br>
 +
<a href="https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K921002">Mutant III</a>
 +
<br><br>
 +
The following parameters were calculated and compared against the "wild-type" <a href="https://parts.igem.org/part:BBa_K613007">promoter</a>. To learn more about how we characterized this set of promoters, <a href="http://2012.igem.org/Team:Carnegie_Mellon/Met-Overview">click here</a>.
 +
 
 +
<br><br>
  
 +
<strong>Table 1: Relative transcription and translation efficiencies of three T7Lac promoters as compared to the wildtype promoter</strong><br>
 
<table border="1">
 
<table border="1">
 
<tr>
 
<tr>
Line 30: Line 36:
 
</tr>
 
</tr>
 
</table>
 
</table>
<br>
 
Cells were grown in M9 media without casamino acids. Fluorescence intensities were normalized to optical density (absorbance @600nm).
 
<br>
 
  
 
<p><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/parts/d/d0/CMU_FAP-MG2.jpg", width="689", height="384"><br>
 
<p><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/parts/d/d0/CMU_FAP-MG2.jpg", width="689", height="384"><br>
Fluorogen-activating proteins were used as protein reporters in our characterization experiment (see details in <a href="http://2012.igem.org/Team:Carnegie_Mellon/Met-Overview">here</a>). 10uM malachite green was added to each well of a 96-well plate and fluorescence intensities were recorded over time. Our <a href="http://2012.igem.org/Team:Carnegie_Mellon/Mod-Overview">model</a> was used to simulate the time lapse data using differential equations.
+
<strong>Figure 1: FAP fluorescence (reporter for protein levels) over time.</strong>Fluorogen-activating proteins were used as protein reporters in our characterization experiment (see details in <a href="http://2012.igem.org/Team:Carnegie_Mellon/Met-Overview">here</a>). 10µM malachite green was added to each well of a 96-well plate and fluorescence intensities were recorded over time. Our <a href="http://2012.igem.org/Team:Carnegie_Mellon/Mod-Overview">model</a> was used to simulate the time lapse data using differential equations. We note that multiple dips were recorded in the readings of all three mutated promoters. This could be due to a strong metabolic burden and multiphasic growth of bacteria. Cells were grown in M9 media without casamino acids. Fluorescence intensities are normalized to optical density (absorbance @600nm). Lines are drawn as guide of eyes.
 
<br><br>
 
<br><br>
  
 
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/parts/5/5c/CMU_Spin-DFHBI2.jpg", width="689", height="384"><br>
 
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/parts/5/5c/CMU_Spin-DFHBI2.jpg", width="689", height="384"><br>
The Spinach aptamer was used as a RNA reporter in our characterization experiment (see details in <a href="http://2012.igem.org/Team:Carnegie_Mellon/Met-Overview">here</a>). 200uM DFHBI was added to each well of a 96- well plate and fluorescence intensities were recorded over time. Our <a href="http://2012.igem.org/Team:Carnegie_Mellon/Mod-Overview">model</a> was used to simulate the time lapse data using differential equations.
+
<strong>Figure 2: Spinach fluorescence (reporter for RNA levels) over time.</strong>The Spinach aptamer was used as a RNA reporter in our characterization experiment (see details in <a href="http://2012.igem.org/Team:Carnegie_Mellon/Met-Overview">here</a>). 200µM DFHBI was added to each well of a 96- well plate and fluorescence intensities were recorded over time. Our <a href="http://2012.igem.org/Team:Carnegie_Mellon/Mod-Overview">model</a> was used to simulate the time lapse data using differential equations. Lines are drawn as guide of eyes.
 
<br><br>
 
<br><br>
  
Note: To learn more about how we characterized this set of promoters, <a href="http://2012.igem.org/Team:Carnegie_Mellon/Met-Overview">click here</a>.
+
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/parts/2/25/CMU_leaky.jpg", width="465", height="594"><br>
</p>  
+
<strong>Figure 3: Leaky RNA (top panel) and protein (bottom panel) expression levels of our T7Lac promoters in BL21(DE3) cells.</strong> Uninduced cells (without IPTG) were added to wells in a 96 well plate supplemented with either 200µM of DFHBI or 10µM of malachite green. Fluorescence intensities at the 3rd hour time point is shown for comparison between promoters.<br><br>
 +
</p><p>
 +
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2012/d/de/Ts.png" height="300" width="380" align="center"/>
 +
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2012/9/9b/Tl.png" height="300" width="380" ><br>
 +
<strong>Figure 4: Calculated values of transcription strength and translational efficiency.</strong>
 +
These values were calculated from the raw fluorescence values that were normalized by OD600 and fit into the differential equations that were developed to model our system. The units are in RFU/min due to time constraints and insufficient published information about our biosensor system. Further experiments are required to determine a conversion factor.
 +
</p>
  
<p>Discussion:<br>
+
<p>
The design of this mutant T7Lac promoter (BBa_K921001) was based on random mutations throughout the promoter including the recognition site, melting box, initiation site, and the lac operator. This promoter is expected to have a significantly lower initiation frequency due to the T->C mutation in the melting box. RNA polymerase denatures DNA at the melting box to initiate transcription. The melting box TATA presents in all T7 promoters. Thymine and adenine have lower melting temperatures and are easily melted. Guanine and cytosine form an extra hydrogen bond and cause base stacking, which increases their melting temperature, making it more difficult for RNAP to initiate transcription. This mutation was rationally made to decrease an initiation frequency, resulting in a weaker T7Lac promoter. Indeed, mutant II (BBa_K921001) of this set of T7/lac promoters produces less protein than the wildtype T7Lac promoter (BBa_K613007).  
+
<strong>Discussion</strong><br>
 +
The design of Mutant I (BBa_K921000) was based on random mutations throughout the promoter region including the recognition site, initiation site, and the lac operator. This promoter was expected to have a lower affinity to the T7 RNAP and therefore have a lower amount of protein expression. However, mutant I (BBa_K921000) of this set of T7/lac promoters produces more protein than the wild type promoter (BBa_K613007). We hypothesize that the difference between prediction and experimental results is due to the lower affinity between T7 promoter and T7 RNAP, which allows the polymerase to initiate transcription more frequently.
 
<br><br>  
 
<br><br>  
  
We note that multiple dips were recorded in the readings of all three mutated promoters. This could be due to a strong metabolic burden and multiphasic growth of bacteria.
+
The leaky expression of this promoter is noticeably higher than the wild type promoter. Furthermore, this mutant promoter does not produce much protein after induction by IPTG. Therefore, a large percentage of the overall protein  production after IPTG induction is likely due to the leaky expression. The leaky expression is likely due to a decrease in the affinity of the LacI repressor to the LacO operator.  
 +
</p>
 +
 
 
</html>
 
</html>
  
<!-- Add more about the biology of this part here
+
 
 
===Usage and Biology===
 
===Usage and Biology===
  
 
<!-- -->
 
<!-- -->
 
<span class='h3bb'>Sequence and Features</span>
 
<span class='h3bb'>Sequence and Features</span>
<partinfo>BBa_K921001 SequenceAndFeatures</partinfo>
+
<partinfo>BBa_K921000 SequenceAndFeatures</partinfo>
 
+
  
  
 
===Functional Parameters===
 
===Functional Parameters===
 
<partinfo>BBa_K921001 parameters</partinfo>
 
<partinfo>BBa_K921001 parameters</partinfo>
<!-- -->
 

Latest revision as of 01:09, 4 October 2012

T7 RNAP + IPTG->PoPs (Mutant II)
This is a mutant T7 promoter that includes a lacO operator site. The promoter is inhibited by the LacI protein and can be induced by IPTG. The promoter sits in the 5' region of a gene and initiates transcription when cells express T7 RNA polymerase. Please use cell strains that are compatible with T7 expression vectors. Our promoters were characterized in a high copy plasmid (pBR322 replication origin); as a result, there was a measurable amount of background fluorescence values from uninduced cells. This measurement of leaky expression offers insight into the negative regulatory behavior of our hybrid promoters.

Mutant I
Mutant III

The following parameters were calculated and compared against the "wild-type" promoter. To learn more about how we characterized this set of promoters, click here.

Table 1: Relative transcription and translation efficiencies of three T7Lac promoters as compared to the wildtype promoter

Promoter BBa K921000 BBa K921001 BBa K921002
Transcription Strength 97% 72% 127%
Translational Efficiency 169% 90% 160%


Figure 1: FAP fluorescence (reporter for protein levels) over time.Fluorogen-activating proteins were used as protein reporters in our characterization experiment (see details in here). 10µM malachite green was added to each well of a 96-well plate and fluorescence intensities were recorded over time. Our model was used to simulate the time lapse data using differential equations. We note that multiple dips were recorded in the readings of all three mutated promoters. This could be due to a strong metabolic burden and multiphasic growth of bacteria. Cells were grown in M9 media without casamino acids. Fluorescence intensities are normalized to optical density (absorbance @600nm). Lines are drawn as guide of eyes.


Figure 2: Spinach fluorescence (reporter for RNA levels) over time.The Spinach aptamer was used as a RNA reporter in our characterization experiment (see details in here). 200µM DFHBI was added to each well of a 96- well plate and fluorescence intensities were recorded over time. Our model was used to simulate the time lapse data using differential equations. Lines are drawn as guide of eyes.


Figure 3: Leaky RNA (top panel) and protein (bottom panel) expression levels of our T7Lac promoters in BL21(DE3) cells. Uninduced cells (without IPTG) were added to wells in a 96 well plate supplemented with either 200µM of DFHBI or 10µM of malachite green. Fluorescence intensities at the 3rd hour time point is shown for comparison between promoters.


Figure 4: Calculated values of transcription strength and translational efficiency. These values were calculated from the raw fluorescence values that were normalized by OD600 and fit into the differential equations that were developed to model our system. The units are in RFU/min due to time constraints and insufficient published information about our biosensor system. Further experiments are required to determine a conversion factor.

Discussion
The design of Mutant I (BBa_K921000) was based on random mutations throughout the promoter region including the recognition site, initiation site, and the lac operator. This promoter was expected to have a lower affinity to the T7 RNAP and therefore have a lower amount of protein expression. However, mutant I (BBa_K921000) of this set of T7/lac promoters produces more protein than the wild type promoter (BBa_K613007). We hypothesize that the difference between prediction and experimental results is due to the lower affinity between T7 promoter and T7 RNAP, which allows the polymerase to initiate transcription more frequently.

The leaky expression of this promoter is noticeably higher than the wild type promoter. Furthermore, this mutant promoter does not produce much protein after induction by IPTG. Therefore, a large percentage of the overall protein production after IPTG induction is likely due to the leaky expression. The leaky expression is likely due to a decrease in the affinity of the LacI repressor to the LacO operator.


Usage and Biology

Sequence and Features


Assembly Compatibility:
  • 10
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[10]
  • 12
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[12]
  • 21
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[21]
  • 23
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[23]
  • 25
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[25]
  • 1000
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[1000]


Functional Parameters

directionForward
efficiency90%
negative_regulatorsLacI (Hypothesized LacIQ compatible)