Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K763001"

 
(9 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
  
  
When the bacteria suffer heat shock the protein gets expressed. Why?
+
This construction is made up of two elements:
  
Heat-shock response is mediated by the Sigma 32 factor. This alternative sigma factor lets the RNA polymerase binds to some consensus promoter sequence.
+
1. The transcription factor-binding site inside the promoter
  
groE has this sequence in the promoter. That is because this gene encodes a chaperon protein, GroE. Chaperone proteins are a group of proteins present in all cells, many of them are heat shock proteins, whose function is to assist the folding of other proteins in the newly formed protein synthesis.
+
2. the coding sequence, which contains a synthetic fluorescent (red) protein. Our construction uses the well-known high chaperon expression when the bacterium is suffering from heat shock [1]. We have taken the promoter sequence of groE, one of these proteins highly produced when heat shock [2]. When is the protein synthesized? In order to obtain the red fluorescent protein a condition has to be met. High temperatures for <i>E. coli</i> must be reached, like for example from 42ºC degrees. We focused on 44ºC because here we got the best results.
  
In the case of GroE, it processes a nonnative polypeptide in a cycle consisting of three steps. First, the polypeptide substrate is captured by GroEL. Upon binding of the co-chaperone GroES and ATP, the substrate is then discharged into a unique microenvironment inside of the chaperone, which promotes proper folding. After hydrolysis of ATP, the polypeptide is released into solution. Moreover, GroE may actively increase the folding efficiency, e.g. by unfolding of misfolded protein molecules. This chaperon has an important role in heat shock proccess too, helping other proteins not to denature.
+
[[Image:Are you hot biobricks.png|400px|right]]
  
 +
The molecular mechanism underlying this phenomenon is as follows: high temperatures are sometimes harmful for microorganisms, so they have adapted successfully for such a strong condition by synthesizing some proteins, called HSP (Heat Shock Proteins), that help in protein folding. Heat-shock response is mediated by the sigma32 factor [3]. This alternative sigma factor allows the RNA polymerase to bind to some consensus promoter sequence. groE has this sequence in its promoter [4]. That is because this gene encodes a chaperon protein, GroE. Chaperone proteins are a group of proteins present in all cells; many of them are heat shock proteins, whose function is to assist the folding of other proteins in the newly formed protein synthesis.
  
<!-- Add more about the biology of this part here
+
In the case of GroE, it processes a nonnative polypeptide in a cycle consisting of three steps. First, the polypeptide substrate is captured by GroEL. Upon binding of the co-chaperone GroES and ATP, the substrate is then discharged into a unique microenvironment inside of the chaperone, which promotes proper folding. After hydrolysis of ATP, the polypeptide is released into solution. Moreover, GroE may actively increase the folding efficiency, e.g. by unfolding of misfolded protein molecules. This chaperon has an important role in heat shock process too, helping other proteins not to denature.
===Usage and Biology===
+
 
 +
How did we deal with this construction? We were able to activate the promoter after a heat shock, like keeping the culture at 44ºC during 5 min. However, since we wanted a very good modeling for this construction, we developed a lot of experiments with different temperatures, different times of incubation, as well as gradating the temperature ranging from 37ºC to 46ºC.
 +
 
 +
 
 +
===Characterization===
 +
 
 +
<br>
 +
To test the heat-sensitive construction, an overnight culture of our <i>E.coli</i> strain carrying the AsRed2 gene under the control of groE promoter was set up at 25 ºC. After that, OD was adjusted to 0.15 and several aliquots were transferred to fluorimetry cuvettes. Heat shock was carried out at different temperatures in a water bath. Then, the cuvettes were maintained at room temperature and OD and fluorescence intensity were measured at different time points.
 +
 
 +
As shown in the graphs below, we found a correlation between the temperature at which heat shock was carried out and the level of expression of the fluorescent protein. Higher fluorescence intensity was obtained when higher temperatures (ranging from 40 to 44 ºC) were applied (check the <html><a href="http://2012.igem.org/Team:Valencia_Biocampus/Molecular#TEMPERATURE-INDUCED_PROMOTER"><b>molecular mechanism details</b></a></html>). According to our results, it seems that protein expression cannot keep increasing at temperatures higher than 44 ºC, probably due to lethality effects.
 +
 
 +
<table align="center" border="0.01" bordercolor="#9F9F9F" style="background-color:#FFFFFF">
 +
    <tr>
 +
        <td><html><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/parts/7/7a/HS_60_biobricks.png" width="550" height="300" BORDER=0</a></html></td></tr>
 +
    <tr><td><b>Figure 7.</b> Fluorescence intensity (FI) normalized by the optical density (OD) of cultures that<br> were subjected to a 10-min heat-shock at different temperatures. Measures were taken 60 min<br> after the shock.<br><br>
 +
      </td></tr>
 +
 
 +
    <tr>
 +
        <td><html><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/parts/2/20/HS_120_biobricks.png" width="550" height="300" BORDER=0</a></html></td></tr>
 +
    <tr><td><b>Figure 8.</b> Fluorescence intensity (FI) normalized by the optical density (OD) of cultures that<br> were subjected to a 10-min heat-shock at different temperatures. Measures were taken 120 min<br> after the shock.
 +
      </td></tr>
 +
</table>
 +
 
 +
 
 +
<!--2019 GDSYZX-->
 +
<br>
 +
2019 GDSYZX:
 +
 
 +
We run the enzyme digestion verification and sequence test of plasmid GroE-AsRed2, then test the fluorescence intensity under different heat-induce time. (set gradient between 0 and 30 minutes.)
 +
 
 +
We place the shaken fugus solution into 18℃,28℃,37℃, 42℃, and 55℃ pots for 10 minutes and cultivate the solution in static under room temperature. We test the OD600 value and Florence intensity 0 min, 30 min, 60 min, 90min, 120min,150min, 180min after the heat shock transformation.
 +
 
 +
(measure condition: wavelength of excited light: 576nm, wavelength of emitting light: 592nm, E.coli competent :DH5α, chloramphenicol LB culture medium , Endonuclease XbaI and SpeI: enzyme test of GroE-AsRed2 plasmid.)
 +
 
 +
<table align="center" border="0.01" bordercolor="#9F9F9F" style="background-color:#FFFFFF">
 +
    <tr>
 +
        <td><html><img src="https://2019.igem.org/wiki/images/1/10/T--GDSYZX--K763001.jpg" width="550" height="300" BORDER=0</a></html></td></tr>
 +
    <tr><td><b>Figure 1.</b> As shown, the result indicates that the fluorescence intensity is the highest under 55 ℃ and that the fluorescence intensity all tends to reach their maximum at about 125 minutes after heat shock transformation under different temperature. <br><br>
 +
      </td></tr>
 +
 
 +
   
 +
</table>
 +
 
 +
<!--2019 GDSYZX ends-->
  
 
<!-- -->
 
<!-- -->
Line 20: Line 64:
  
  
<!-- Uncomment this to enable Functional Parameter display
+
 
===Functional Parameters===
+
 
 +
 
 +
==Functional Parameters: Austin_UTexas==
 +
<html>
 +
<body>
 
<partinfo>BBa_K763001 parameters</partinfo>
 
<partinfo>BBa_K763001 parameters</partinfo>
<!-- -->
+
<h3><center>Burden Imposed by this Part:</center></h3>
 +
<figure>
 +
<div class = "center">
 +
<center><img src = "https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/parts/f/fa/T--Austin_Utexas--no_burden_icon.png" style = "width:160px;height:120px"></center>
 +
</div>
 +
<figcaption><center><b>Burden Value: 1.6 ± 6.9% </b></center></figcaption>
 +
</figure>
 +
<p> Burden is the percent reduction in the growth rate of <i>E. coli</i> cells transformed with a plasmid containing this BioBrick (± values are 95% confidence limits). This BioBrick did not exhibit a burden that was significantly greater than zero (i.e., it appears to have little to no impact on growth). Therefore, users can depend on this part to remain stable for many bacterial cell divisions and in large culture volumes. Refer to any one of the
 +
<a href="https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K3174002">BBa_K3174002</a> - <a href="https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K3174007">BBa_K3174007</a> pages for more information on the methods, an explanation of the sources of burden,  and other conclusions from a large-scale measurement project conducted by the <a href="http://2019.igem.org/Team:Austin_UTexas">2019 Austin_UTexas team</a>.</p>
 +
<p>This functional parameter was added by the <a href="https://2020.igem.org/Team:Austin_UTexas/Contribution">2020 Austin_UTexas team.</a></p>
 +
</body>
 +
</html>

Latest revision as of 20:33, 27 August 2020

pGroE + Gene encoding AsRed2


This construction is made up of two elements:

1. The transcription factor-binding site inside the promoter

2. the coding sequence, which contains a synthetic fluorescent (red) protein. Our construction uses the well-known high chaperon expression when the bacterium is suffering from heat shock [1]. We have taken the promoter sequence of groE, one of these proteins highly produced when heat shock [2]. When is the protein synthesized? In order to obtain the red fluorescent protein a condition has to be met. High temperatures for E. coli must be reached, like for example from 42ºC degrees. We focused on 44ºC because here we got the best results.

Are you hot biobricks.png

The molecular mechanism underlying this phenomenon is as follows: high temperatures are sometimes harmful for microorganisms, so they have adapted successfully for such a strong condition by synthesizing some proteins, called HSP (Heat Shock Proteins), that help in protein folding. Heat-shock response is mediated by the sigma32 factor [3]. This alternative sigma factor allows the RNA polymerase to bind to some consensus promoter sequence. groE has this sequence in its promoter [4]. That is because this gene encodes a chaperon protein, GroE. Chaperone proteins are a group of proteins present in all cells; many of them are heat shock proteins, whose function is to assist the folding of other proteins in the newly formed protein synthesis.

In the case of GroE, it processes a nonnative polypeptide in a cycle consisting of three steps. First, the polypeptide substrate is captured by GroEL. Upon binding of the co-chaperone GroES and ATP, the substrate is then discharged into a unique microenvironment inside of the chaperone, which promotes proper folding. After hydrolysis of ATP, the polypeptide is released into solution. Moreover, GroE may actively increase the folding efficiency, e.g. by unfolding of misfolded protein molecules. This chaperon has an important role in heat shock process too, helping other proteins not to denature.

How did we deal with this construction? We were able to activate the promoter after a heat shock, like keeping the culture at 44ºC during 5 min. However, since we wanted a very good modeling for this construction, we developed a lot of experiments with different temperatures, different times of incubation, as well as gradating the temperature ranging from 37ºC to 46ºC.


Characterization


To test the heat-sensitive construction, an overnight culture of our E.coli strain carrying the AsRed2 gene under the control of groE promoter was set up at 25 ºC. After that, OD was adjusted to 0.15 and several aliquots were transferred to fluorimetry cuvettes. Heat shock was carried out at different temperatures in a water bath. Then, the cuvettes were maintained at room temperature and OD and fluorescence intensity were measured at different time points.

As shown in the graphs below, we found a correlation between the temperature at which heat shock was carried out and the level of expression of the fluorescent protein. Higher fluorescence intensity was obtained when higher temperatures (ranging from 40 to 44 ºC) were applied (check the molecular mechanism details). According to our results, it seems that protein expression cannot keep increasing at temperatures higher than 44 ºC, probably due to lethality effects.

Figure 7. Fluorescence intensity (FI) normalized by the optical density (OD) of cultures that
were subjected to a 10-min heat-shock at different temperatures. Measures were taken 60 min
after the shock.

Figure 8. Fluorescence intensity (FI) normalized by the optical density (OD) of cultures that
were subjected to a 10-min heat-shock at different temperatures. Measures were taken 120 min
after the shock.



2019 GDSYZX:

We run the enzyme digestion verification and sequence test of plasmid GroE-AsRed2, then test the fluorescence intensity under different heat-induce time. (set gradient between 0 and 30 minutes.)

We place the shaken fugus solution into 18℃,28℃,37℃, 42℃, and 55℃ pots for 10 minutes and cultivate the solution in static under room temperature. We test the OD600 value and Florence intensity 0 min, 30 min, 60 min, 90min, 120min,150min, 180min after the heat shock transformation.

(measure condition: wavelength of excited light: 576nm, wavelength of emitting light: 592nm, E.coli competent :DH5α, chloramphenicol LB culture medium , Endonuclease XbaI and SpeI: enzyme test of GroE-AsRed2 plasmid.)

Figure 1. As shown, the result indicates that the fluorescence intensity is the highest under 55 ℃ and that the fluorescence intensity all tends to reach their maximum at about 125 minutes after heat shock transformation under different temperature.


Sequence and Features


Assembly Compatibility:
  • 10
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[10]
  • 12
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[12]
  • 21
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[21]
  • 23
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[23]
  • 25
    INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[25]
    Illegal NgoMIV site found at 507
  • 1000
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[1000]



Functional Parameters: Austin_UTexas

BBa_K763001 parameters

Burden Imposed by this Part:

Burden Value: 1.6 ± 6.9%

Burden is the percent reduction in the growth rate of E. coli cells transformed with a plasmid containing this BioBrick (± values are 95% confidence limits). This BioBrick did not exhibit a burden that was significantly greater than zero (i.e., it appears to have little to no impact on growth). Therefore, users can depend on this part to remain stable for many bacterial cell divisions and in large culture volumes. Refer to any one of the BBa_K3174002 - BBa_K3174007 pages for more information on the methods, an explanation of the sources of burden, and other conclusions from a large-scale measurement project conducted by the 2019 Austin_UTexas team.

This functional parameter was added by the 2020 Austin_UTexas team.