Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K575024"

 
(8 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
This construct was developed by Northwestern's 2011 iGEM team as part of a ''Pseudomonas Aeruginosa'' detector. The device is designed to fluoresce with GFP in the presence of PAI1 (3-oxo-C12-HSL), one of the ''Pseudomonas '' quorum sensing molecules. The promoter in front of GFP is activated by the combination of PAI1 from the environment and the LasR receptor (produced by this construct).  
 
This construct was developed by Northwestern's 2011 iGEM team as part of a ''Pseudomonas Aeruginosa'' detector. The device is designed to fluoresce with GFP in the presence of PAI1 (3-oxo-C12-HSL), one of the ''Pseudomonas '' quorum sensing molecules. The promoter in front of GFP is activated by the combination of PAI1 from the environment and the LasR receptor (produced by this construct).  
  
In order to evaluate the suitability of our biosensor constructs for detecting ''P. aeruginosa'', we conducted a series of dose-response studies to characterize our constructs. We also analyzed these data to determine the transfer function and dynamic range of each biosensor system.
+
[[Image:Standardized Fluorescence for S1.jpg]]__NOTOC__
 
+
 
+
<div align="center"><html><table class="image">
+
<caption align="bottom"></html>'''Figure 1: Dose response of the PAI-1 biosensor system (''LasP+RBS30+GFP and CP+RBS30+lasR'').''' Immediately before the assay, cells were diluted to ensure that they were growing at exponential phase for the experiment. Autoinducer PAI-1 was added at the concentrations indicated, and GFP fluorescence was quantified using an incubated, shaking plate reader. In this plot, fluorescence was normalized to the culture OD to control for cell growth. Samples were run in quadruplicate with standard deviation indicated (Error bars = SD; n=4).<html></caption>
+
<tr><td><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/3/38/S1_full.jpg" style="opacity:1;filter:alpha(opacity=100);" width="720px" height="564px" alt="fig1"/ border="0"></td></tr></table></html></div>
+
 
+
+
Our first observation was that this construct [lasP+RBS30+GFP, CP+RBS30+lasR] appears to be well-suited for a conducting a binary test to simply determine whether or not ''P. aeruginosa'' is present. In every case, the construct follows the same general trend except the negative control (0μM). However, there is is a significant amount of overlapping error bars in Figure 1, so in order to evaluate the statistical significance of this apparent trend, t-tests were conducted as detailed below in Table 1.
+
 
+
 
+
<div align="center"><html><table class="image">
+
<caption align="bottom"></html>'''Table 1: Statistical analysis of the PAI-1 biosensor response (lasP+RBS30+GFP, CP+RBS30+lasR).''' The null hypothesis is that there is no statistical difference between the means of the compared samples. Green cells indicate rejection of the null hypothesis (p<0.05), while blue cells indicate failure to reject (p>0.05). (A) Data from each of the initial segments of the curves was compared with the other initial segments (the region before any fluorescence is observed ~30min). (B) Data from the initial segment of the curves (before any fluorescence is observed) was compared with the final steady state fluorescence (last 10 data points). (C) Data from each of the final steady state segments of the curves was compared with the other final steady state segments (last 10 data points).<html></caption>
+
<tr><td><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/0/03/S1_ttest.jpg" style="opacity:1;filter:alpha(opacity=100);" width="700px" height="513px" alt="fig1"/ border="0"></td></tr></table></html></div>
+
 
+
 
+
In the first 30 minutes, only the sample stimulated with 100μM PAI-1 yielded a response significantly different from the other samples (Table 1A). Our data also indicated that fluorescence per OD changed in each of the samples as time progressed (Table 1B). However, the negative control actually decreased by this measure. This oddity is actually the result of relatively steady total fluorescence and a high rate of cell growth which led to a sharp decrease in fluorescence per OD, as shown in Figure 2 below. In this format, all the samples show similar fluorescence except the 0.1μM, to some extent the 0.5μM, and of course 0μM PAI-1 autoinducer concentrations.
+
 
+
 
+
<div align="center"><html><table class="image">
+
<caption align="bottom"></html>'''Figure 2: Overall response of the PAI-1 biosensor system (lasP+RBS30+GFP, CP+RBS30+lasR).''' Here, the data from Figure 1 are presented without normalization, showing total fluorescence (left) and total OD of the cultures.<html></caption>
+
<tr><td><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/b/bb/S1_flOD.jpg" style="opacity:1;filter:alpha(opacity=100);" width="750px" height="309px" alt="fig1"/ border="0"></td></tr></table></html></div>
+
 
+
 
+
In order to further characterize this biosensor, we next plotted the steady state fluorescence (per OD) vs. autoinducer concentration to determine the input-output transfer function (Figure 3). As indicated by the analysis and discussion above, in this “binary” biosensor, fluorescence per OD is constant (within about 10% of the mean fluorescence per OD) for all samples we treated with PAI-1 autoinducer, and all samples are significantly distinct from the negative control sample.
+
 
+
 
+
<div align="center"><html><table class="image">
+
<caption align="bottom"></html>'''Figure 3: Input-output transfer function for PAI-1 biosensor (''lasP+RBS30+GFP, CP+RBS30+lasR'').''' Steady-state responses were calculated from the data in Figure 1 and plotted against the input concentration of PAI-1 autoinducer. <html></caption>
+
<tr><td><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/0/07/S1_tranf1.jpg" style="opacity:1;filter:alpha(opacity=100);" width="750px" height="279px" alt="fig1"/ border="0"></td></tr></table></html></div>
+
 
<br><br>
 
<br><br>
 
<partinfo>BBa_K575024 short</partinfo>
 
<partinfo>BBa_K575024 short</partinfo>
Line 50: Line 21:
 
<partinfo>BBa_K575024 parameters</partinfo>
 
<partinfo>BBa_K575024 parameters</partinfo>
 
<!-- -->
 
<!-- -->
 +
 +
[http://2018.igem.org/Team:RMHS_Maryland Team RMHS_Maryland 2018] contributed to the characterization of this part by obtaining novel dose-dependent expression data for this construct in a different chassis, <i>E. coli</i> BL21, at realistic AI-1 concentrations (5-1000nM) that <i>E. coli</i> produce and respond to, demonstrating the construct’s suitability for use in co-culture.
 +
<br>
 +
(<small>--[[User:ishayardi|ishayardi]] 20:24, 16 October 2018 (UTC)</small>)
 +
 +
==Team RMHS_Maryland 2018: Characterization of dose-dependent activity of PAI-1 promoter in BL21  <i>Escherichia coli</i> for use in co-culture==
 +
 +
<html>
 +
 +
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/b/b4/T--RMHS_Maryland--Expressiongraph.png" width=750><br>
 +
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/d/df/T--RMHS_Maryland--percentflotable.png"><br>
 +
 +
 +
<i>NOTES ON GRAPHS AND TABLES</i><br>
 +
Percent of cells fluorescing was determined through ImageJ analysis of cell counts under Brightfield microscopy as compared to cell counts under fluorescent microscopy (cell count in fluorescent scope/cell count in brightfield microscope). Towards the end of the experiment there seemed to be a lot of cell debris in brightfield, so it is possible that the percent of cells fluorescing for time 4 was underestimated, since our method was unable to account for dead cells which could show up in brightfield but without continuing to fluoresce.<br><br>
 +
 +
Time 0 indicates when the first measurement was done. Prior to this, BL21 overnight cultures were diluted 50x into a 3 mL culture and grown for one hour at 37C before AI-1 was added. OD at time 0 was about 0.3 and measurements were taken directly after AI-1 was added. The sensitivity of the PAI-1 promoter (as based on its fluorescence even on levels of AI-1 as low as 5 nM) may therefore explain the high initial percent of cells fluorescing even at time 0.<br><br>
 +
 +
<i>RESULTS</i><br>
 +
Team RMHS_Maryland 2018 obtained novel dose-dependent expression data for this construct in a different chassis, <i>E. coli</i> BL21, at realistic AI-1 levels that <i>E. coli</i> produce and respond to, demonstrating the construct’s suitability for use in co-culture (Kaplan 1210, Rutherford 1). Because we noted that fluorescent expression was similar in nearly all of the high AI-1 concentrations tested by Northwestern, we aimed to use lower concentrations of AI-1 to determine if this promoter exhibited dose-dependent expression at realistic concentrations less than 1 uM: 0, 5, 17.5, 25 and 100 nM. We also sought to characterize how sensitive the construct’s promoter was to changes in AI-1 concentration by using a lower bound of 5 nM and relatively small increments between concentrations tested.<br><br>
 +
 +
BBa_K575024 was transformed into BL21 using heat-shock single-transformation protocol. The previously mentioned concentrations of synthetic AI-1 were added and cells were imaged using brightfield and fluorescence microscopy every 90 minutes. Percent fluorescence, the number of cells fluorescing divided by total number of cells in the same field, was determined by comparing fluorescence and brightfield images of the same fields using ImageJ analysis.<br><br>
 +
 +
At lower levels of AI-1, percent expression of fluorescence is shown to be dependent on the amount of AI-1 present. Our findings demonstrate that the PAI-1 promoter is very sensitive, exhibiting fluorescence at concentrations as low as 5 nM. Concentrations of AI-1 around 10-100 nM elicit high rates of expression, but after about 4 hours show a sharp decrease in percent and intensity of fluorescence, possibly due to degradation of the autoinducer by cells. Percent fluorescence and qualitative observations of fluorescence intensity are lower with 1 uM AI-1 than with 25 or 17.5 nM, but fluorescence persists for a lengthier time period. This finding suggests that AI-1 persists in the media for hours without being degraded, and that high AI-1 concentrations much as 1000 nM may elicit less expression as they exceed optimal ranges used for cell-to-cell communication (Kaplan 1210). Leaky expression of promoter was minimal, as illustrated by the lack of fluorescing cells in the control batch culture. Based on the results of our investigation, BBa_K575024 is extremely well-suited to facilitate two-way population-to-population communication in <i>E. coli</i> co-cultures due to its sensitivity, dose-dependent expression, and minimal leakiness. These findings were verified by our project, “Conversensations”, as BBa_K575024 was an integral part of our successful two-way quorum-sensing feedback loop.<br><br>
 +
 +
<i>PICTURES</i><br>
 +
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/6/63/T--RMHS_Maryland--Percentflopics.png"><br><br>
 +
It can be observed that although the number of cells fluorescing may be similar, intensity of fluorescence is much higher in response to 17.5-100 nM AI-1. This remained true for all three time points, suggesting that the cells themselves may be optimized to respond to certain levels of AI-1 concentrations better than others.<br><br>
 +
 +
<i>WORKS CITED</i><br>
 +
Kaplan, H. B., & Greenberg, E. P. (1985). Diffusion of autoinducer is involved in regulation of the Vibrio fischeri luminescence system. Journal of Bacteriology, 163(3), 1210–1214.<br><br>
 +
 +
Rutherford, S. T., & Bassler, B. L. (2012). Bacterial Quorum Sensing: Its Role in Virulence and Possibilities for Its Control. Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Medicine, 2(11), a012427. http://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a012427
 +
 +
 +
 +
 +
 +
</html>

Latest revision as of 01:06, 17 October 2018

This construct was developed by Northwestern's 2011 iGEM team as part of a Pseudomonas Aeruginosa detector. The device is designed to fluoresce with GFP in the presence of PAI1 (3-oxo-C12-HSL), one of the Pseudomonas quorum sensing molecules. The promoter in front of GFP is activated by the combination of PAI1 from the environment and the LasR receptor (produced by this construct).

Standardized Fluorescence for S1.jpg

LasR/PAI1 Inducible Promoter + RBS (B0030) + GFP, Constitutive Promoter + RBS (B0030) + LasR

Continuous expression of LasR (with RBS B0030), coupled with a LasR/PAI1 (3-oxo-C12-HSL) inducible promoter, RBS (Part B0030), and a GFP reporter.

Sequence and Features


Assembly Compatibility:
  • 10
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[10]
  • 12
    INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[12]
    Illegal NheI site found at 58
    Illegal NheI site found at 921
    Illegal NheI site found at 944
  • 21
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[21]
  • 23
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[23]
  • 25
    INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[25]
    Illegal NgoMIV site found at 1300
    Illegal AgeI site found at 1497
  • 1000
    INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[1000]
    Illegal BsaI.rc site found at 830


[http://2018.igem.org/Team:RMHS_Maryland Team RMHS_Maryland 2018] contributed to the characterization of this part by obtaining novel dose-dependent expression data for this construct in a different chassis, E. coli BL21, at realistic AI-1 concentrations (5-1000nM) that E. coli produce and respond to, demonstrating the construct’s suitability for use in co-culture.
(--ishayardi 20:24, 16 October 2018 (UTC))

Team RMHS_Maryland 2018: Characterization of dose-dependent activity of PAI-1 promoter in BL21 Escherichia coli for use in co-culture



NOTES ON GRAPHS AND TABLES
Percent of cells fluorescing was determined through ImageJ analysis of cell counts under Brightfield microscopy as compared to cell counts under fluorescent microscopy (cell count in fluorescent scope/cell count in brightfield microscope). Towards the end of the experiment there seemed to be a lot of cell debris in brightfield, so it is possible that the percent of cells fluorescing for time 4 was underestimated, since our method was unable to account for dead cells which could show up in brightfield but without continuing to fluoresce.

Time 0 indicates when the first measurement was done. Prior to this, BL21 overnight cultures were diluted 50x into a 3 mL culture and grown for one hour at 37C before AI-1 was added. OD at time 0 was about 0.3 and measurements were taken directly after AI-1 was added. The sensitivity of the PAI-1 promoter (as based on its fluorescence even on levels of AI-1 as low as 5 nM) may therefore explain the high initial percent of cells fluorescing even at time 0.

RESULTS
Team RMHS_Maryland 2018 obtained novel dose-dependent expression data for this construct in a different chassis, E. coli BL21, at realistic AI-1 levels that E. coli produce and respond to, demonstrating the construct’s suitability for use in co-culture (Kaplan 1210, Rutherford 1). Because we noted that fluorescent expression was similar in nearly all of the high AI-1 concentrations tested by Northwestern, we aimed to use lower concentrations of AI-1 to determine if this promoter exhibited dose-dependent expression at realistic concentrations less than 1 uM: 0, 5, 17.5, 25 and 100 nM. We also sought to characterize how sensitive the construct’s promoter was to changes in AI-1 concentration by using a lower bound of 5 nM and relatively small increments between concentrations tested.

BBa_K575024 was transformed into BL21 using heat-shock single-transformation protocol. The previously mentioned concentrations of synthetic AI-1 were added and cells were imaged using brightfield and fluorescence microscopy every 90 minutes. Percent fluorescence, the number of cells fluorescing divided by total number of cells in the same field, was determined by comparing fluorescence and brightfield images of the same fields using ImageJ analysis.

At lower levels of AI-1, percent expression of fluorescence is shown to be dependent on the amount of AI-1 present. Our findings demonstrate that the PAI-1 promoter is very sensitive, exhibiting fluorescence at concentrations as low as 5 nM. Concentrations of AI-1 around 10-100 nM elicit high rates of expression, but after about 4 hours show a sharp decrease in percent and intensity of fluorescence, possibly due to degradation of the autoinducer by cells. Percent fluorescence and qualitative observations of fluorescence intensity are lower with 1 uM AI-1 than with 25 or 17.5 nM, but fluorescence persists for a lengthier time period. This finding suggests that AI-1 persists in the media for hours without being degraded, and that high AI-1 concentrations much as 1000 nM may elicit less expression as they exceed optimal ranges used for cell-to-cell communication (Kaplan 1210). Leaky expression of promoter was minimal, as illustrated by the lack of fluorescing cells in the control batch culture. Based on the results of our investigation, BBa_K575024 is extremely well-suited to facilitate two-way population-to-population communication in E. coli co-cultures due to its sensitivity, dose-dependent expression, and minimal leakiness. These findings were verified by our project, “Conversensations”, as BBa_K575024 was an integral part of our successful two-way quorum-sensing feedback loop.

PICTURES


It can be observed that although the number of cells fluorescing may be similar, intensity of fluorescence is much higher in response to 17.5-100 nM AI-1. This remained true for all three time points, suggesting that the cells themselves may be optimized to respond to certain levels of AI-1 concentrations better than others.

WORKS CITED
Kaplan, H. B., & Greenberg, E. P. (1985). Diffusion of autoinducer is involved in regulation of the Vibrio fischeri luminescence system. Journal of Bacteriology, 163(3), 1210–1214.

Rutherford, S. T., & Bassler, B. L. (2012). Bacterial Quorum Sensing: Its Role in Virulence and Possibilities for Its Control. Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Medicine, 2(11), a012427. http://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a012427