Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K401000"
Alejovigno (Talk | contribs) (→Function) |
(→Sequence) |
||
(13 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
==Sequence== | ==Sequence== | ||
− | + | The amplification previous to the clonation into the pSB1C3, was made using the primers previously employed in Liu and Zheng (2005): | |
* Forward actagtagcggccgctgcagATGGCGTCCAAGAAAC | * Forward actagtagcggccgctgcagATGGCGTCCAAGAAAC | ||
* Reverse tctagaagcggccgcgaattcTGCGTCTATATATAC | * Reverse tctagaagcggccgcgaattcTGCGTCTATATATAC | ||
(capital letters indicate the region of the sequence that pairs with the coding sequence of PM2). | (capital letters indicate the region of the sequence that pairs with the coding sequence of PM2). | ||
+ | The sequence of the part, the PM2 gene, was first reported by Z.-Y. Chen, .Y-I.C. Hsing and T.-Y. Chow and it is available at the NCBI Nucleotide database (accession number AF532313). The complete sequence is pasted below: | ||
+ | |||
+ | 1 cacaaaagtg ttccacttga gtgaaaagta gtgtgttaag aactaaacaa tttttcaatg | ||
+ | 61 gcgtccaaga aacaagagga gcgagctgag gcagctgcga aagttgctgc caaagaactc | ||
+ | 121 gaacaagtca acagagaaag aagagaccgt gatttcggtg ttgttgctga acaacaacaa | ||
+ | 181 caacatcatc aggaagatca acaaaaacgt ggtgtaatcg ggtccatgtt taaggcggtg | ||
+ | 241 caagacacct acgagaacgc caaggaagct gtcgttggca agaaagaagc tactaataac | ||
+ | 301 gcgtacagta atacagaggt tattcacgat gttaacattc agcccgatga cgtgtcggca | ||
+ | 361 acgggggaag taagggacat atcagccaca aagactcatg atatctacga ttctgccacg | ||
+ | 421 gacaacaaca acaacaaaac cggttccaag gtcggagagt acgcagatta cgcttctcag | ||
+ | 481 aaggccaagg aaacaaaaga tgcaacgatg gaaaaagctg gagagtacac agattatgct | ||
+ | 541 tcgcagaaag cgaaggaagc gaagaagacg accatggaga agggtggaga atacaaggat | ||
+ | 601 tactctgcgg agaaagctaa ggagagaaaa gatgctactg tgaataagat gggagagtat | ||
+ | 661 aaggactatg ctgcggagaa agccaaagag gggaaagatg ctactgtgaa taaaatggga | ||
+ | 721 gagtataagg actatgctgc ggagaaaacg aaagagggga aagatgccac tgtgaataag | ||
+ | 781 atgggagagt ataaggatta cactgcggag aaggcgaaag aggggaaaga tacgacgttg | ||
+ | 841 gggaagcttg gggagctgaa ggacacggct tcggatgcgg cgaagagggc cgtgggttac | ||
+ | 901 ttgagcggca agaaagagga aactaaagag atggcttcgg agaccgccga ggcgacggcg | ||
+ | 961 aataaggcag gggagatgaa ggaggcaaca aagaaaaaga cggcggagac cgcggaggcg | ||
+ | 1021 gcgaagaata aggcggggga gatcaaggac agagccgcgg agacggcgga ggccgcgaaa | ||
+ | 1081 aacaagaccg cggagaccgc ggaagtgacg aagaataagg ctttggagat gaaggatgca | ||
+ | 1141 gcgaaggaca ggaccgctga gacaacggat gcggcgaagc agaaaactgc acaggcaaag | ||
+ | 1201 gagaacacca aggaaaatgt gagtggtgca ggtgaaactg caaggaggaa aatggaagag | ||
+ | 1261 ccaaagcttc aaggtaaaga agggtatggg ggccgtggag acaaggtggt ggtgaaagtg | ||
+ | 1321 gaagagagtc gaccaggggc aattgcggaa acgctgaaag ccgccgacca gattgcggga | ||
+ | 1381 cagaccttca acgatgtagg acgcttcgat gaagagggtg tcgtcaatgt ggagcgccgc | ||
+ | 1441 aagaaataat taaaacgtga tctatgatac aacaatatta gtatatatag acgcatgcag | ||
+ | 1501 tttatatagt atatattgtc atgttgtatg tttttacatt ttggtttgct tgtttacatt | ||
+ | 1561 ctcttcaaaa aaaaaaaaaa tgtgtagtac gtgtaaggtt ttgaagattg gttctaggct | ||
+ | 1621 ccgtgggaac catttcaaca ataaacattt tgcgcgttct tgtacacgta gtgatgagaa | ||
+ | 1681 gagatgcctt atgggcagta tcatctaaaa cttattttca tccatcatag aatttggatc | ||
+ | 1741 t | ||
== Verification of LEA protection against extreme temperature == | == Verification of LEA protection against extreme temperature == | ||
Line 30: | Line 62: | ||
===Temperatures tested=== | ===Temperatures tested=== | ||
− | In order to demonstrate that PM2 (LEA3) protein is useful to protect | + | In order to demonstrate that PM2 (LEA3) protein is useful to protect cells against extreme temperatures in a terraforming context we tried to choose representative temperatures for the treatments. |
The chart below shows the maximum and minimum temperatures on Mars along a year, depending on the latitude at 0 longitude. Treatment temperatures were selected focusing on the equator area (around latitude 0). In this area current temperatures range, during most of the year, are between -80ºC and 20ºC approximately. And, in a partially terraformed Mars, these temperatures would be warmer. | The chart below shows the maximum and minimum temperatures on Mars along a year, depending on the latitude at 0 longitude. Treatment temperatures were selected focusing on the equator area (around latitude 0). In this area current temperatures range, during most of the year, are between -80ºC and 20ºC approximately. And, in a partially terraformed Mars, these temperatures would be warmer. | ||
Line 47: | Line 79: | ||
− | These experiment temperatures are realistic for the equator area. In colder areas we can use the [ | + | These experiment temperatures are realistic for the equator area. In colder areas we can use the [http://2010.igem.org/Team:Valencia/RH Redhouse] device to reach them. Thus, if we demonstrate the cell resistance at these temperatures we might consider these cells be able to live in other areas (and also to grow) because of the temperature rise achieved with the Redhouse. |
Line 53: | Line 85: | ||
In addition, we also carried out this assays with cells in a 8% of glycerol solution, due to its protective effect against freezing temperatures. The reason why we used glycerol was because we were afraid no cells at 0% glycerol could survive on such harsh temperatures. | In addition, we also carried out this assays with cells in a 8% of glycerol solution, due to its protective effect against freezing temperatures. The reason why we used glycerol was because we were afraid no cells at 0% glycerol could survive on such harsh temperatures. | ||
+ | ===Verification protocol of resistance with LEA=== | ||
− | + | The experiments were carried out both in ''E. coli'' expressing LEA and in others transformed only with the backbone. | |
− | + | ||
− | The experiments were carried | + | |
Line 62: | Line 93: | ||
− | The figure below summarizes all the treatments carried | + | The figure below summarizes all the treatments carried out in LEA and not LEA cells. |
Line 69: | Line 100: | ||
We got, for each case, three replicates in order to obtain three independent events for our results. Later, both results were compared to demonstrate that LEA really helps ''E. coli'' to survive. Liquid medium was chosen to the treatments, and, after that, the cells were spread on plates in order to calculate their concentration. | We got, for each case, three replicates in order to obtain three independent events for our results. Later, both results were compared to demonstrate that LEA really helps ''E. coli'' to survive. Liquid medium was chosen to the treatments, and, after that, the cells were spread on plates in order to calculate their concentration. | ||
− | + | ||
+ | ====Protocol description==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | *Preculture | ||
+ | **Take two tubes of 25 ml and add 5 ml of LB in both of them. | ||
+ | **Add 5µl of kannamicine in each tube. | ||
+ | **Inoculate in each tube a colony corresponding E. coli (with LEA and without LEA). | ||
+ | **Maintain the tubes during 8 hours at 37 ºC and 250 rpm. | ||
+ | |||
+ | *Culture overnight of liquid medium | ||
+ | ** Take two flasks of 500 ml and add 50µl of kannamicine in both flasks. | ||
+ | ** Inoculate 500µl of corresponding preculture. | ||
+ | ** Maintain the flask incubator at 37ºC and 250 rpm. | ||
+ | |||
+ | *Measure of OD of culture and dilution to exponential growth zone | ||
+ | **Measure of the OD of each culture. | ||
+ | **Dilution the cultures with LB fresh to OD of 0.5. | ||
+ | **Grow the cultures to OD of 0.6. | ||
+ | |||
+ | *Induction with IPTG | ||
+ | **Add IPTG to 1mM final concentration. | ||
+ | **Incubate, both cultures, during 4 hours at 37 ºC and 250 rpm. | ||
+ | |||
+ | *Adjust of OD | ||
+ | **Measure the OD of each culture. | ||
+ | **Adjust the OD of both cultures at 0.4. | ||
+ | |||
+ | *Add glycerol | ||
+ | **Extract three aliquots, for each culture, corresponding to the different concentrations of glycerol (the volumes are calculated for glycerol to 99,5%): | ||
+ | ***0% glycerol: take 50 ml of culture and nothing of glycerol. | ||
+ | ***8% glycerol: take 4 ml of glycerol and 56 % and 46 ml of culture. | ||
+ | ***50% glycerol: take 25.3 ml of glycerol and 24.7 ml of culture. | ||
+ | **Prepare these premixes with tubes of 50 ml (only for mixing). | ||
+ | |||
+ | *Separate the cultures for the different conditions | ||
+ | **Extract twelve 1 ml aliquots from each stock of 50 ml. | ||
+ | |||
+ | *Spread to count initial colonies | ||
+ | **Take 1 ml of each 50mL stock. | ||
+ | **Prepare serial dilutions of each 1 ml of the samples: | ||
+ | ***1/1,000 | ||
+ | ***1/5,000 | ||
+ | ***1/25,000 | ||
+ | ***1/125,000 | ||
+ | **Spread (with glass beads)LB plates (without antibiotic) with 100 µl for each dilutions. | ||
+ | |||
+ | *Stress by extremely conditions | ||
+ | **Low temperatures during 2 hours and high temperatures during 45’ | ||
+ | **Take 1 ml of sample of each culture after each completed cycle. | ||
+ | **Prepare serial dilution of each sample: | ||
+ | ***1/1,000 | ||
+ | ***1/5,000 | ||
+ | ***1/25,000 | ||
+ | ***1/125,000 | ||
===Results=== | ===Results=== | ||
Line 75: | Line 159: | ||
[[Image:Valencia_lea_eq.png|center|300px||]] | [[Image:Valencia_lea_eq.png|center|300px||]] | ||
− | Bacterial concentration has been calculated from the number of colonies counted on the plates before and after the treatment (taking into account initial | + | Bacterial concentration has been calculated from the number of colonies counted on the plates before and after the treatment (taking into account initial OD, glycerol concentration and dilutions). |
− | Obtained data has been analyzed by means of a non-parametric Kruskall-Wallis analysis. This analysis compares survival ratio obtained in the different conditions: with and without LEA. The confidence value has been set at 0 | + | Obtained data has been analyzed by means of a non-parametric Kruskall-Wallis analysis. This analysis compares survival ratio obtained in the different conditions: with and without LEA. The confidence value has been set at 0.05. |
An independent analysis has been done for each combination of conditions. | An independent analysis has been done for each combination of conditions. | ||
− | The chart below represents in logarithmic | + | The chart below represents in logarithmic scale the mean of survival ratio for each of the four different conditions. This chart clearly shows that bacteria expressing LEA survive (and even sometimes grow) while non-expressing LEA cells yield a very reduced survival ratio. So, a highly protective effect of LEA is visible on this figure. LEA is having in all cases but at -80/50 combination a higher protective action than glycerol's. |
Line 87: | Line 171: | ||
− | For | + | For each of the four treatments we obtained a p-value lower than 10<sup>-4</sup>. These results point out the protective effect of LEA as statistically significant. |
Finally, it is noteworthy that the chart shows a synergic interaction between glycerol and LEA presence. When the expression of PM2 and the presence of glycerol in the growth medium are combined, the survival ratio results in a much higher protective effect. | Finally, it is noteworthy that the chart shows a synergic interaction between glycerol and LEA presence. When the expression of PM2 and the presence of glycerol in the growth medium are combined, the survival ratio results in a much higher protective effect. | ||
Line 98: | Line 182: | ||
− | |||
Latest revision as of 19:37, 6 November 2010
PM2 (Glycine max)
Function
PM2 corresponds to the LEA3 protein from soybean (Glycine max). Late Embryogenesis Abundant (LEA) proteins are known for their roles in plant embryogenesis, as important dessication-resistance factors. It has also been shown that they confer tolerance under several stress conditions in Escherichia coli. You can read more about it in our wiki and in several references, as, for example, the following: Liu et al. (2010).
PM2 can be useful as a general stress-resistance factor. It could improve survival under low or high temperatures, water stress and maybe other atypical conditions.
Original source
Our PM2 was inserted into the pET28a vector and transformed into E. coli BL21 Star cells. We sincerely thank professor Yizhi Zheng and Yun Liu (College of Life Science, Shenzhen University. Guangdong, China) for sending us the plasmid with the gene, and, in consequence, let us develop our project.
Sequence
The amplification previous to the clonation into the pSB1C3, was made using the primers previously employed in Liu and Zheng (2005):
- Forward actagtagcggccgctgcagATGGCGTCCAAGAAAC
- Reverse tctagaagcggccgcgaattcTGCGTCTATATATAC
(capital letters indicate the region of the sequence that pairs with the coding sequence of PM2).
The sequence of the part, the PM2 gene, was first reported by Z.-Y. Chen, .Y-I.C. Hsing and T.-Y. Chow and it is available at the NCBI Nucleotide database (accession number AF532313). The complete sequence is pasted below:
1 cacaaaagtg ttccacttga gtgaaaagta gtgtgttaag aactaaacaa tttttcaatg 61 gcgtccaaga aacaagagga gcgagctgag gcagctgcga aagttgctgc caaagaactc 121 gaacaagtca acagagaaag aagagaccgt gatttcggtg ttgttgctga acaacaacaa 181 caacatcatc aggaagatca acaaaaacgt ggtgtaatcg ggtccatgtt taaggcggtg 241 caagacacct acgagaacgc caaggaagct gtcgttggca agaaagaagc tactaataac 301 gcgtacagta atacagaggt tattcacgat gttaacattc agcccgatga cgtgtcggca 361 acgggggaag taagggacat atcagccaca aagactcatg atatctacga ttctgccacg 421 gacaacaaca acaacaaaac cggttccaag gtcggagagt acgcagatta cgcttctcag 481 aaggccaagg aaacaaaaga tgcaacgatg gaaaaagctg gagagtacac agattatgct 541 tcgcagaaag cgaaggaagc gaagaagacg accatggaga agggtggaga atacaaggat 601 tactctgcgg agaaagctaa ggagagaaaa gatgctactg tgaataagat gggagagtat 661 aaggactatg ctgcggagaa agccaaagag gggaaagatg ctactgtgaa taaaatggga 721 gagtataagg actatgctgc ggagaaaacg aaagagggga aagatgccac tgtgaataag 781 atgggagagt ataaggatta cactgcggag aaggcgaaag aggggaaaga tacgacgttg 841 gggaagcttg gggagctgaa ggacacggct tcggatgcgg cgaagagggc cgtgggttac 901 ttgagcggca agaaagagga aactaaagag atggcttcgg agaccgccga ggcgacggcg 961 aataaggcag gggagatgaa ggaggcaaca aagaaaaaga cggcggagac cgcggaggcg 1021 gcgaagaata aggcggggga gatcaaggac agagccgcgg agacggcgga ggccgcgaaa 1081 aacaagaccg cggagaccgc ggaagtgacg aagaataagg ctttggagat gaaggatgca 1141 gcgaaggaca ggaccgctga gacaacggat gcggcgaagc agaaaactgc acaggcaaag 1201 gagaacacca aggaaaatgt gagtggtgca ggtgaaactg caaggaggaa aatggaagag 1261 ccaaagcttc aaggtaaaga agggtatggg ggccgtggag acaaggtggt ggtgaaagtg 1321 gaagagagtc gaccaggggc aattgcggaa acgctgaaag ccgccgacca gattgcggga 1381 cagaccttca acgatgtagg acgcttcgat gaagagggtg tcgtcaatgt ggagcgccgc 1441 aagaaataat taaaacgtga tctatgatac aacaatatta gtatatatag acgcatgcag 1501 tttatatagt atatattgtc atgttgtatg tttttacatt ttggtttgct tgtttacatt 1561 ctcttcaaaa aaaaaaaaaa tgtgtagtac gtgtaaggtt ttgaagattg gttctaggct 1621 ccgtgggaac catttcaaca ataaacattt tgcgcgttct tgtacacgta gtgatgagaa 1681 gagatgcctt atgggcagta tcatctaaaa cttattttca tccatcatag aatttggatc 1741 t
Verification of LEA protection against extreme temperature
Temperatures tested
In order to demonstrate that PM2 (LEA3) protein is useful to protect cells against extreme temperatures in a terraforming context we tried to choose representative temperatures for the treatments.
The chart below shows the maximum and minimum temperatures on Mars along a year, depending on the latitude at 0 longitude. Treatment temperatures were selected focusing on the equator area (around latitude 0). In this area current temperatures range, during most of the year, are between -80ºC and 20ºC approximately. And, in a partially terraformed Mars, these temperatures would be warmer.
The considered temperatures are as follows:
- -80ºC, as the minimum temperature on the equator area,
- 20ºC, as the maximum temperature on the equator area,
- -20ºC, as the minimum temperature on the equator area in a partially terraformed Mars,
- 50ºC, as the upper limit of temperature on Mars during the terraforming process.
These experiment temperatures are realistic for the equator area. In colder areas we can use the [http://2010.igem.org/Team:Valencia/RH Redhouse] device to reach them. Thus, if we demonstrate the cell resistance at these temperatures we might consider these cells be able to live in other areas (and also to grow) because of the temperature rise achieved with the Redhouse.
Moreover, in order to mimic the cycle temperatures during a solar day on Mars (sol), the treatments for the experiments consists of varying the temperature from maximum value to a minimum. So, the result of combining these temperatures are four different treatments.
In addition, we also carried out this assays with cells in a 8% of glycerol solution, due to its protective effect against freezing temperatures. The reason why we used glycerol was because we were afraid no cells at 0% glycerol could survive on such harsh temperatures.
Verification protocol of resistance with LEA
The experiments were carried out both in E. coli expressing LEA and in others transformed only with the backbone.
The figure below summarizes all the treatments carried out in LEA and not LEA cells.
We got, for each case, three replicates in order to obtain three independent events for our results. Later, both results were compared to demonstrate that LEA really helps E. coli to survive. Liquid medium was chosen to the treatments, and, after that, the cells were spread on plates in order to calculate their concentration.
Protocol description
- Preculture
- Take two tubes of 25 ml and add 5 ml of LB in both of them.
- Add 5µl of kannamicine in each tube.
- Inoculate in each tube a colony corresponding E. coli (with LEA and without LEA).
- Maintain the tubes during 8 hours at 37 ºC and 250 rpm.
- Culture overnight of liquid medium
- Take two flasks of 500 ml and add 50µl of kannamicine in both flasks.
- Inoculate 500µl of corresponding preculture.
- Maintain the flask incubator at 37ºC and 250 rpm.
- Measure of OD of culture and dilution to exponential growth zone
- Measure of the OD of each culture.
- Dilution the cultures with LB fresh to OD of 0.5.
- Grow the cultures to OD of 0.6.
- Induction with IPTG
- Add IPTG to 1mM final concentration.
- Incubate, both cultures, during 4 hours at 37 ºC and 250 rpm.
- Adjust of OD
- Measure the OD of each culture.
- Adjust the OD of both cultures at 0.4.
- Add glycerol
- Extract three aliquots, for each culture, corresponding to the different concentrations of glycerol (the volumes are calculated for glycerol to 99,5%):
- 0% glycerol: take 50 ml of culture and nothing of glycerol.
- 8% glycerol: take 4 ml of glycerol and 56 % and 46 ml of culture.
- 50% glycerol: take 25.3 ml of glycerol and 24.7 ml of culture.
- Prepare these premixes with tubes of 50 ml (only for mixing).
- Extract three aliquots, for each culture, corresponding to the different concentrations of glycerol (the volumes are calculated for glycerol to 99,5%):
- Separate the cultures for the different conditions
- Extract twelve 1 ml aliquots from each stock of 50 ml.
- Spread to count initial colonies
- Take 1 ml of each 50mL stock.
- Prepare serial dilutions of each 1 ml of the samples:
- 1/1,000
- 1/5,000
- 1/25,000
- 1/125,000
- Spread (with glass beads)LB plates (without antibiotic) with 100 µl for each dilutions.
- Stress by extremely conditions
- Low temperatures during 2 hours and high temperatures during 45’
- Take 1 ml of sample of each culture after each completed cycle.
- Prepare serial dilution of each sample:
- 1/1,000
- 1/5,000
- 1/25,000
- 1/125,000
Results
The measured output is the survival ratio calculated as follows:
Bacterial concentration has been calculated from the number of colonies counted on the plates before and after the treatment (taking into account initial OD, glycerol concentration and dilutions).
Obtained data has been analyzed by means of a non-parametric Kruskall-Wallis analysis. This analysis compares survival ratio obtained in the different conditions: with and without LEA. The confidence value has been set at 0.05.
An independent analysis has been done for each combination of conditions.
The chart below represents in logarithmic scale the mean of survival ratio for each of the four different conditions. This chart clearly shows that bacteria expressing LEA survive (and even sometimes grow) while non-expressing LEA cells yield a very reduced survival ratio. So, a highly protective effect of LEA is visible on this figure. LEA is having in all cases but at -80/50 combination a higher protective action than glycerol's.
For each of the four treatments we obtained a p-value lower than 10-4. These results point out the protective effect of LEA as statistically significant.
Finally, it is noteworthy that the chart shows a synergic interaction between glycerol and LEA presence. When the expression of PM2 and the presence of glycerol in the growth medium are combined, the survival ratio results in a much higher protective effect.
References
- Liu, Y., Zheng, Y. (2005). PM2, a group 3 LEA protein from soybean, and its 22-mer repeating region confer salt tolerance in Escherichia coli. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Com. 331: 325-332.
- Liu, Y., Zheng, Y., Zhang, Y., Wang, W., Li, R. (2010). Soybean PM2 protein (LEA3) confers the tolerance of Escherichia coli and stabilization of enzyme activity under diverse stresses. Current Microbiology. 60: 373-378.
Sequence and Features
- 10COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[10]
- 12COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[12]
- 21COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[21]
- 23COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[23]
- 25INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[25]Illegal AgeI site found at 439
- 1000INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[1000]Illegal BsaI.rc site found at 143
Illegal BsaI.rc site found at 940
Illegal BsaI.rc site found at 1006
Illegal BsaI.rc site found at 1093
Illegal SapI.rc site found at 1255