Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K395301:Experience"
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
__NOTOC__ | __NOTOC__ | ||
− | [[Image:Tokyotech_ompc_graph.jpg|thumb|left|400px|Figure 1. | + | [[Image:Tokyotech_ompc_graph.jpg|thumb|left|400px|Figure 1. Induction of new'' OmpC'' series in high osmolarity medium ]] |
PompC(C)-GFP, PompC(CB)-GFP PompC(CS1)-GFP and PompC(WT)-GFP on pSB3K3 was introduced into E. coli strain MG1655. A strain containing pLacI<sup>q</sup>-GFP, plasmid (BBa_J54202), a constitutive GFP expressive promoter, and promoterless GFP reporter plasmid (BBa_J54103) was used as a positive control and negative control respectively. | PompC(C)-GFP, PompC(CB)-GFP PompC(CS1)-GFP and PompC(WT)-GFP on pSB3K3 was introduced into E. coli strain MG1655. A strain containing pLacI<sup>q</sup>-GFP, plasmid (BBa_J54202), a constitutive GFP expressive promoter, and promoterless GFP reporter plasmid (BBa_J54103) was used as a positive control and negative control respectively. | ||
− | Overnight cultures of reporter strains grown at 37 °C in Medium A containing appropriated antibiotics were diluted at least 1:100 in the medium and incubated at 37 °C as fresh cultures. After their OD590 reached 0.2, the fresh culture was diluted 1 : 3 into 2 ml of pre-warmed medium A. For high osmolarity conditions, the cultures were diluted with sucrose supplemented medium to the final concentration of 15% (wt/vol). After 4 hours of induction, fluorescence intensity was measured with fluorometer | + | Overnight cultures of reporter strains grown at 37 °C in Medium A containing appropriated antibiotics were diluted at least 1:100 in the medium and incubated at 37 °C as fresh cultures. After their OD590 reached 0.2, the fresh culture was diluted 1 : 3 into 2 ml of pre-warmed medium A. For high osmolarity conditions, the cultures were diluted with sucrose supplemented medium to the final concentration of 15% (wt/vol). After 4 hours of induction, fluorescence intensity was measured with fluorometer. |
− | After 4 hours of sucrose induction, transcriptional activity of PompC(CB)-GFP and PompC(CS1)-GFP increased 2.5 folds and 2.3 folds respectively. However, significant amount of leaky expression was found in PompC(CS1)-GFP without induction. In contrast, under the same conditions, we found no significant difference of GFP expression in PompC(C)-GFP and PompC(WT)-GFP. | + | After 4 hours of sucrose induction, transcriptional activity of PompC(CB)-GFP and PompC(CS1)-GFP increased 2.5 folds and 2.3 folds respectively. However, significant amount of leaky expression was found in PompC(CS1)-GFP without induction. In contrast, under the same conditions, we found no significant difference of GFP expression in PompC(C)-GFP and PompC(WT)-GFP. [http://2010.igem.org/Team:Tokyo_Tech/Project/wolf_coli/New_Series_of_PompC ...see more about P''ompC'' series] |
− | + | ||
===Applications of BBa_K395301=== | ===Applications of BBa_K395301=== |
Revision as of 11:39, 26 October 2010
PompC(C)-GFP, PompC(CB)-GFP PompC(CS1)-GFP and PompC(WT)-GFP on pSB3K3 was introduced into E. coli strain MG1655. A strain containing pLacIq-GFP, plasmid (BBa_J54202), a constitutive GFP expressive promoter, and promoterless GFP reporter plasmid (BBa_J54103) was used as a positive control and negative control respectively. Overnight cultures of reporter strains grown at 37 °C in Medium A containing appropriated antibiotics were diluted at least 1:100 in the medium and incubated at 37 °C as fresh cultures. After their OD590 reached 0.2, the fresh culture was diluted 1 : 3 into 2 ml of pre-warmed medium A. For high osmolarity conditions, the cultures were diluted with sucrose supplemented medium to the final concentration of 15% (wt/vol). After 4 hours of induction, fluorescence intensity was measured with fluorometer. After 4 hours of sucrose induction, transcriptional activity of PompC(CB)-GFP and PompC(CS1)-GFP increased 2.5 folds and 2.3 folds respectively. However, significant amount of leaky expression was found in PompC(CS1)-GFP without induction. In contrast, under the same conditions, we found no significant difference of GFP expression in PompC(C)-GFP and PompC(WT)-GFP. [http://2010.igem.org/Team:Tokyo_Tech/Project/wolf_coli/New_Series_of_PompC ...see more about PompC series]
Applications of BBa_K395301
User Reviews
UNIQa9aa6fdf28da59ca-partinfo-00000000-QINU UNIQa9aa6fdf28da59ca-partinfo-00000001-QINU