Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K5236012"

 
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 6: Line 6:
 
===Usage and Biology===
 
===Usage and Biology===
  
To insert our parts into plasmids, we’ve designed primers and performed PCRs. Then, our genes were recombined into plasmids and transformed into chassis. To test if our part codes for the mutated BhrPETase M57L we want and whether the enzyme works, we've completed two large experimental processes. The first step is plasmid construction. And the second is to test the enzymatic activity.
+
To generate mutated variants, we have trained a Transformer AI model. This model predicts the top 10 potential mutation sites, which are likely to have significant impacts on the enzyme's structure and function. Next, we analyzed the top 10 potential sites via Meta's ESM-1b model to eliminate the silent mutations, which involve changes in nucleotides that do not altering the corresponding amino acids. This ensures that the mutations result in changes in the enzyme's structure and thereby its function. For further information, please check the model page on our wiki. https://2024.igem.wiki/basis-china/model
  
By conducting colony PCR, we are able to test if our parts have been transformed into chassis successfully. The following result of electrophoresis proves that we’ve inserted genes into chassis since the sequence containing our mutated genes has a total of 891 base pairs and the results are in the right location.
+
The BhrPETase M57L sequence is expressed in E.coli BL21(DE3) using the pET28a vector. The pET-28a is a classical plasmid vector used for protein expression in E.coli. This vector contains the T7 promoter, the lac operator, a ribosome binding site, the 6xHis sequence, and the T7 terminator. The T7 promoter is a strong promoter recognizable by T7 RNA polymerase, used to regulate gene expression of recombinant proteins. The lac operator can be activated by IPTG and used to control gene expression. The 6xHis sequence encodes for a tag that facilitates protein purification. Asides from the features included in the plasmid backbone, we added a signal peptide sequence — pELB — before the BhrPETase M57L sequence, which is inserted between the promoter and terminator.
  
<center><html><img src ="https://static.igem.wiki/teams/5236/part-images/colony-pcr.png" width = "50%"><br></html></center>
+
<center><html><img src ="https://static.igem.wiki/teams/5236/part-images/plasmis-m75l.png" width = "50%"><br></html></center>
<center>Fig.1 The DNA gel electrophoresis result </center>
+
<center>Fig.1 The illustration of BhrPETase M57L genetic pathway </center>
  
<center><html><img src ="https://static.igem.wiki/teams/5236/part-images/k95f-sequnce-cycle-3.png" width = "50%"><br></html></center>
+
We tested for successful plasmid construction and transformation into E.coli through colony PCR and gel electrophoresis. The following gel result demonstrates that the plasmid transformed into E.coli are correct. The plasmid should have a total of 891 base pairs and the results match.
<center>Fig.2 The result of BhrPETase M57L DNA sequencing  </center>
+
  
After proving that our genes existed in chassis, we need to test if the bacteria can survive as usual with our genes. Thus, we’ve coated the bacteria on nutritional petri dish. And after a night, E. coli grew over the plate our plate, justifying that E. coli can survive with the gene of our part.
+
<center><html><img src ="https://static.igem.wiki/teams/5236/part-images/colony-pcr.png" width = "50%"><br></html></center>
 +
<center>Fig.2 The DNA gel electrophoresis result </center>
  
 +
There were some problems with the sequencing results and the plasmid is being reconstructed.
  
 +
<center><html><img src ="https://static.igem.wiki/teams/5236/part-images/m57l.png" width = "50%"><br></html></center>
 +
<center>Fig.3 The result of BhrPETase M57L DNA sequencing  </center>
  
We tested whether the bacteria could translate for our protein, and we examined whether our mutated enzyme is more efficient. For this section, we analyzed two results as well. First, the dynamic curve of our enzyme shows its high efficiency in degrading rate. Second, the electrophoresis result of our protein proves that our enzyme can be successfully coded by the parts we designed.
+
To test the potential PET degradation efficiency of the BhrPETase N191S synthesized in E.coli we applied the p-nitrophenyl butryte degradation assay from the iGEM19_Toronto team (for more details, please see protocols). The following graph shows the enzyme activities of BhrPETase WT and IsPETase WT compared to the mutations N191S, W229F, N205G.
  
<center><html><img src ="https://static.igem.wiki/teams/5236/part-images/bhrpetase-mutation-efficiency-line-graph-1.jpg" width = "50%"><br></html></center>
+
<center><html><img src ="https://static.igem.wiki/teams/5236/yh/bhrpet-relative-activity.jpg" width = "50%"><br></html></center>
<center>Fig.3 Mutated BhrPETase Dynamic Curve </center>
+
<center>Fig.4 Mutated BhrPETase Dynamic Curve </center>
  
 
Reference
 
Reference

Latest revision as of 13:21, 2 October 2024

BhrPETase M57L

Plastic pollution poses a serious threat to the global environment. One of the potential solutions, enzyme degradation, would be a suitable approach of dealing with plastic wastes. Among all plastic pollutions, more than 10% of them are Polyethylene terephthalate (PET). Thus, our team has been searching for possible PET hydrolases to break down PET. However, according to Nature's publishment on April 27, 2022, traditional PET hydrolases' enzymatic ability of degrading PET are easily affected by the fluctuation of temperature and pH value. Therefore, we decided to artificially mutate wild-type BhrPETase to increase the enzyme’s range of tolerance so that it can efficiently degrade PET under a wider range of environmental conditions, thereby enhance its potential application. BhrPETase was identified by the Shingo group in a metagenomic study on uncultured thermophiles and was deposited into the NCBI database by the group in 2018 and annotated as a PET hydrolase. As one of the most-confident mutants created in our lab, this basic part encodes mutated BhrPETase M57L.

Usage and Biology

To generate mutated variants, we have trained a Transformer AI model. This model predicts the top 10 potential mutation sites, which are likely to have significant impacts on the enzyme's structure and function. Next, we analyzed the top 10 potential sites via Meta's ESM-1b model to eliminate the silent mutations, which involve changes in nucleotides that do not altering the corresponding amino acids. This ensures that the mutations result in changes in the enzyme's structure and thereby its function. For further information, please check the model page on our wiki. https://2024.igem.wiki/basis-china/model

The BhrPETase M57L sequence is expressed in E.coli BL21(DE3) using the pET28a vector. The pET-28a is a classical plasmid vector used for protein expression in E.coli. This vector contains the T7 promoter, the lac operator, a ribosome binding site, the 6xHis sequence, and the T7 terminator. The T7 promoter is a strong promoter recognizable by T7 RNA polymerase, used to regulate gene expression of recombinant proteins. The lac operator can be activated by IPTG and used to control gene expression. The 6xHis sequence encodes for a tag that facilitates protein purification. Asides from the features included in the plasmid backbone, we added a signal peptide sequence — pELB — before the BhrPETase M57L sequence, which is inserted between the promoter and terminator.


Fig.1 The illustration of BhrPETase M57L genetic pathway

We tested for successful plasmid construction and transformation into E.coli through colony PCR and gel electrophoresis. The following gel result demonstrates that the plasmid transformed into E.coli are correct. The plasmid should have a total of 891 base pairs and the results match.


Fig.2 The DNA gel electrophoresis result

There were some problems with the sequencing results and the plasmid is being reconstructed.


Fig.3 The result of BhrPETase M57L DNA sequencing

To test the potential PET degradation efficiency of the BhrPETase N191S synthesized in E.coli we applied the p-nitrophenyl butryte degradation assay from the iGEM19_Toronto team (for more details, please see protocols). The following graph shows the enzyme activities of BhrPETase WT and IsPETase WT compared to the mutations N191S, W229F, N205G.


Fig.4 Mutated BhrPETase Dynamic Curve

Reference

Lu, Hongyuan, et al. “Machine Learning-Aided Engineering of Hydrolases for Pet Depolymerization.” Nature News, Nature Publishing Group, 27 Apr. 2022, www.nature.com/articles/s41586-022-04599-z. Kato, Shingo, et al. “Long-Term Cultivation and Metagenomics Reveal Ecophysiology of Previously Uncultivated Thermophiles Involved in Biogeochemical Nitrogen Cycle.” Microbes and Environments, vol. 33, no. 1, Jan. 2018, pp. 107–10. https://doi.org/10.1264/jsme2.me17165

Sequence and Features


Assembly Compatibility:
  • 10
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[10]
  • 12
    INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[12]
    Illegal NheI site found at 226
  • 21
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[21]
  • 23
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[23]
  • 25
    INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[25]
    Illegal AgeI site found at 136
  • 1000
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[1000]