Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K5127002"
(→Applying DCA biosensor for butyrate production) |
|||
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
===Usage and Biology=== | ===Usage and Biology=== | ||
− | BreR is an allosteric TetR-family transcription factor responsive to deoxycholic acid (DCA) identified in Vibrio cholorae. We choose to test this as well because it has been validated in E. coli, with an about 230-fold dynamic range to DCA (Beabout et al., 2023), so it's a promising choice for our E. coli probiotic platform. As a transcription factor, BreR plays a significant role in bile acid sensing by demonstrating a tight long-term binding to the promotor. In the BreR system, BreR is constitutively expressed and binds to its corresponding promoter pBreR which contains the operator sequence. When DCA is present, it binds to BreR, releasing it from the operator and triggering the expression of downstream genes. | + | BreR is an allosteric TetR-family transcription factor responsive to deoxycholic acid (DCA) identified in <i>Vibrio cholorae</i>. We choose to test this as well because it has been validated in <i>E. coli</i>, with an about 230-fold dynamic range to DCA (Beabout et al., 2023), so it's a promising choice for our <i>E. coli</i> probiotic platform. As a transcription factor, BreR plays a significant role in bile acid sensing by demonstrating a tight long-term binding to the promotor. In the BreR system, BreR is constitutively expressed and binds to its corresponding promoter pBreR which contains the operator sequence. When DCA is present, it binds to BreR, releasing it from the operator and triggering the expression of downstream genes. |
Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
<html><BR><BR><center><img style=" max-width: 50%;height:auto" src="https://static.igem.wiki/teams/5127/parts/brer-structure.png"></center></html> | <html><BR><BR><center><img style=" max-width: 50%;height:auto" src="https://static.igem.wiki/teams/5127/parts/brer-structure.png"></center></html> | ||
− | Figure 1. The structure predicted by alphafold 3. (A) The apo-structure of BreR homodimer (chain A: cyan; chain B: green). (B) The DNA-bound structure of BreR-BreO flanked by upstream spacer and downstream promoter DNA. (C) Structural alignment of BreR apo-structure and DNA-bound structure; a structural shift was observed at the helix-turn-helix DNA binding domain (red circled). | + | <html><center><i>Figure 1. The structure predicted by alphafold 3. (A) The apo-structure of BreR homodimer (chain A: cyan; chain B: green). (B) The DNA-bound structure of BreR-BreO flanked by upstream spacer and downstream promoter DNA. (C) Structural alignment of BreR apo-structure and DNA-bound structure; a structural shift was observed at the helix-turn-helix DNA binding domain (red circled).</i></center></html> |
===Characterization of DCA biosensor using BreR=== | ===Characterization of DCA biosensor using BreR=== | ||
− | In our design, we used constitutive promoter J23106 for BreR expression. The pBreR is designed with an optimized version of the J23101 promoter with BreO operator incorporated (Beabout et al., 2023) (Figure 2). We inserted GFP downstream pBreR as the reporter gene. | + | In our design, we used constitutive promoter J23106 for BreR expression. The pBreR is designed with an optimized version of the J23101 promoter with BreO operator incorporated (Beabout et al., 2023) (Figure 2). We inserted GFP downstream to pBreR as the reporter gene. |
<html><BR><BR><center><img style=" max-width: 50%;height:auto" src="https://static.igem.wiki/teams/5127/parts/brer-2.png"></center></html> | <html><BR><BR><center><img style=" max-width: 50%;height:auto" src="https://static.igem.wiki/teams/5127/parts/brer-2.png"></center></html> | ||
− | Figure 2. Plasmid design of BreR-pDCA. Created by biorender.com. | + | <html><center><i>Figure 2. Plasmid design of BreR-pDCA. Created by biorender.com.</i></center></html> |
Line 36: | Line 36: | ||
<html><BR><BR><center><img style=" max-width: 50%;height:auto" src="https://static.igem.wiki/teams/5127/parts/brer-3.png"></center></html> | <html><BR><BR><center><img style=" max-width: 50%;height:auto" src="https://static.igem.wiki/teams/5127/parts/brer-3.png"></center></html> | ||
− | Figure 3. The AGE result of the PCR products of materials to construct pBreR plasmid. | + | <html><center><i>Figure 3. The AGE result of the PCR products of materials to construct pBreR plasmid.</i></center></html> |
− | To evaluate the inducibility of the downstream gene, two cultures of E. coli transformed with the BreR plasmid were prepared, with DCA added to one. The DCA-treated culture exhibited strong green fluorescence, qualitatively demonstrating that our design is responsive to DCA (Figure 4). | + | To evaluate the inducibility of the downstream gene, two cultures of <i>E. coli</i> transformed with the BreR plasmid were prepared, with DCA added to one. The DCA-treated culture exhibited strong green fluorescence, qualitatively demonstrating that our design is responsive to DCA (Figure 4). |
<html><BR><BR><center><img style=" max-width: 50%;height:auto" src="https://static.igem.wiki/teams/5127/parts/brer-4.png"></center></html> | <html><BR><BR><center><img style=" max-width: 50%;height:auto" src="https://static.igem.wiki/teams/5127/parts/brer-4.png"></center></html> | ||
− | Figure 4. Observation of pBreR with DCA+ (left) or DCA- (right). The left bacteria culture with DCA treatment showed strong green fluorescence. | + | <html><center><i>Figure 4. Observation of pBreR with DCA+ (left) or DCA- (right). The left bacteria culture with DCA treatment showed strong green fluorescence.</i></center></html> |
Line 48: | Line 48: | ||
<html><BR><BR><center><img style=" max-width: 50%;height:auto" src="https://static.igem.wiki/teams/5127/parts/brer-5.png"></center></html> | <html><BR><BR><center><img style=" max-width: 50%;height:auto" src="https://static.igem.wiki/teams/5127/parts/brer-5.png"></center></html> | ||
− | Figure 5. Quantitative relationship between DCA concentration and fluorescence level. The GFP expression was quantified by measuring fluorescence / ABS600. | + | <html><center><i>Figure 5. Quantitative relationship between DCA concentration and fluorescence level. The GFP expression was quantified by measuring fluorescence / ABS600.</i></center></html> |
Line 54: | Line 54: | ||
<html><BR><BR><center><img style=" max-width: 50%;height:auto" src="https://static.igem.wiki/teams/5127/parts/brer-6.png"></center></html> | <html><BR><BR><center><img style=" max-width: 50%;height:auto" src="https://static.igem.wiki/teams/5127/parts/brer-6.png"></center></html> | ||
− | Figure 6. A kinetic assay for GFP expression was conducted over 18 hours using various DCA concentrations. GFP expression was quantified by measuring fluorescence / ABS600. | + | <html><center><i>Figure 6. A kinetic assay for GFP expression was conducted over 18 hours using various DCA concentrations. GFP expression was quantified by measuring fluorescence / ABS600.</i></center></html> |
Line 68: | Line 68: | ||
<html><BR><BR><center><img style=" max-width: 50%;height:auto" src="https://static.igem.wiki/teams/5127/parts/brer-7.png"></center></html> | <html><BR><BR><center><img style=" max-width: 50%;height:auto" src="https://static.igem.wiki/teams/5127/parts/brer-7.png"></center></html> | ||
− | <html><center>Figure 7. Plasmid design of BreR-Tes4. Created by biorender.com.</center></html> | + | <html><center><i>Figure 7. Plasmid design of BreR-Tes4. Created by biorender.com.</i></center></html> |
Line 74: | Line 74: | ||
<html><BR><BR><center><img style=" max-width: 50%;height:auto" src="https://static.igem.wiki/teams/5127/parts/brer-8.png"></center></html> | <html><BR><BR><center><img style=" max-width: 50%;height:auto" src="https://static.igem.wiki/teams/5127/parts/brer-8.png"></center></html> | ||
− | <html><center>Figure 8. The AGE results of the PCR products of BreR construction. A and B, materials to construct BreR-Tes4. C, Golden gate assembly result of BreR-Tes4 construction. The band at 4372bp in (C) indicated the success in plasmid construction.</center></html> | + | <html><center><i>Figure 8. The AGE results of the PCR products of BreR construction. A and B, materials to construct BreR-Tes4. C, Golden gate assembly result of BreR-Tes4 construction. The band at 4372bp in (C) indicated the success in plasmid construction.</i></center></html> |
Line 81: | Line 81: | ||
<html><BR><BR><center><img style=" max-width: 50%;height:auto" src="https://static.igem.wiki/teams/5127/parts/brer-9.png"></center></html> | <html><BR><BR><center><img style=" max-width: 50%;height:auto" src="https://static.igem.wiki/teams/5127/parts/brer-9.png"></center></html> | ||
− | <html><center>Figure 9. The SDS-PAGE result of successful Tes4 expression induced by DCA.</center></html> | + | <html><center><i>Figure 9. The SDS-PAGE result of successful Tes4 expression induced by DCA.</i></center></html> |
− | We are trying to further validate the production of butyrate with GC-MS assay | + | We are trying to further validate the production of butyrate with GC-MS assay. |
− | + | ===Sequence and Features=== | |
− | + | ||
<partinfo>BBa_K5127002 SequenceAndFeatures</partinfo> | <partinfo>BBa_K5127002 SequenceAndFeatures</partinfo> | ||
Latest revision as of 13:06, 2 October 2024
BreR
This part is a coding sequence for BreR.
Usage and Biology
BreR is an allosteric TetR-family transcription factor responsive to deoxycholic acid (DCA) identified in Vibrio cholorae. We choose to test this as well because it has been validated in E. coli, with an about 230-fold dynamic range to DCA (Beabout et al., 2023), so it's a promising choice for our E. coli probiotic platform. As a transcription factor, BreR plays a significant role in bile acid sensing by demonstrating a tight long-term binding to the promotor. In the BreR system, BreR is constitutively expressed and binds to its corresponding promoter pBreR which contains the operator sequence. When DCA is present, it binds to BreR, releasing it from the operator and triggering the expression of downstream genes.
Team: BNDS-China 2024
Our team aims to detect the intake of food before activating our comprehensive platform that regulates levels of gut metabolites, with DCA (a subtype of bile acid) as the indicator of food presence. Within this framework, the BreR system stands out as an effective food sensor for detecting DCA, and the response range best aligns with the fluctuations of DCA levels in human intestines.
Structural analysis of BreR repressor
As expected, BreR structure predicted by alphafold 3 (Abramson et al., 2024) suggests a homodimer oligomer (Figure 1A). Moreover, the protein-DNA interaction prediction by alphafold 3 accurately predicted the BreR binding to the BreO operator surrounded by the upstream spacer and downstream promoter DNA (Figure 1B). Structural alignment by PyMOL cealign function showed a significant structural shift upon DNA binding (Figure 1C, red circled). Taken together, the structural evidence from alphafold 3 further the DNA binding capability of BreR, and we thus adopted this allosteric TetR-family transcription factor for DCA biosensor design.
Characterization of DCA biosensor using BreR
In our design, we used constitutive promoter J23106 for BreR expression. The pBreR is designed with an optimized version of the J23101 promoter with BreO operator incorporated (Beabout et al., 2023) (Figure 2). We inserted GFP downstream to pBreR as the reporter gene.
We used Golden Gate Assembly to construct pBreR plasmid. PCR and Gel Electrophoresis were performed to verify the materials of the assembly (Figure 3).
To evaluate the inducibility of the downstream gene, two cultures of E. coli transformed with the BreR plasmid were prepared, with DCA added to one. The DCA-treated culture exhibited strong green fluorescence, qualitatively demonstrating that our design is responsive to DCA (Figure 4).
We quantified the relationship between DCA concentration and pBreR promoter activity. The dynamic range of BreR biosensor system was about 6-fold with the maximum signal achieved at 500μM DCA; above 500μM, the change in promoter activity became subtle (Figure 5).
Further, we characterized the kinetic behavior of this biosensor. A gradient of DCA concentration was added into bacterial cultures, and fluorescence / ABS600 values were measured over time using a plate-reader to assess promoter activity (Figure 6).
The results aligned with our expectations, in which bacteria cultures added with higher DCA concentration had stronger GFP expression levels. The dynamic range of BreR sensor system was about 5-fold at 1000μM DCA, much higher compared to that of pDCA_VFA0359 system (about 2-fold).
This trend was especially clear when DCA concentration was above 62.5μM. When DCA concentration was below 62.5μM, the difference in DCA concentration between groups might be too small to be reflected in significant difference in GFP expression.
Applying DCA biosensor for butyrate production
To implement our overall design, we placed Tes4 downstream to promoter pBreR to make the butyrate production responsive to the food availability. In this way, the presence of bile acid will trigger the expression of Tes4 and produce butyrate. We replaced the GFP reporter gene in the BreR-mediated DCA biosensor with the coding frame of Tes4 (Figure 7).
We used Golden Gate Assembly to construct BreR-Tes4 from BreR backbone and Tes4 fragment. PCR and Gel Electrophoresis were performed to verify the success in constructing each component and the full plasmid (Figure 8).
We performed SDS-PAGE to verify the expression of Tes4. The band representing Tes4 (19.5kDa) was thicker in the DCA-treated group, showing the successful induction of Tes4 by DCA (Figure 9).
We are trying to further validate the production of butyrate with GC-MS assay.
Sequence and Features
- 10INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[10]Illegal PstI site found at 400
- 12INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[12]Illegal PstI site found at 400
- 21COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[21]
- 23INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[23]Illegal PstI site found at 400
- 25INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[25]Illegal PstI site found at 400
- 1000COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[1000]