Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K5184043"
(→Part Collection) |
(→Essential Information) |
||
(8 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
==Essential Information== | ==Essential Information== | ||
===Abstract=== | ===Abstract=== | ||
− | + | This part presents an original, novel mite venom peptide with high potency against spider mites (Acariformes: ''Tetranychidae''). Named PpVP2S, this part was obtained from genome mining results by our own team, and has the effects assessed both ''in silico'' and ''in vivo''. Amongst the very first ever identified from the acariforme family, this part will also provide the foundation for identification of homologous venom peptides in the enormous, diverse family of acarids. <br><br> | |
− | The part collection includes: Parts expressing venom peptides that target various ion channels that leads to paralysis and death of spider mites: PpVP1S (BBa_K5184042), PpVP2S (BBa_K5184043), PpVP1F (BBa_K5184038), rCtx-4 (BBa_K5184021), HxTx-Hv1h (BBa_K5184033), Cs1A (BBa_K5184032); supplementary parts that allows extracellular secretion, facilitates venom peptide folding, and improves contact and oral toxicity (BBa_5184020, and BBa_K5184022); composite parts | + | The part collection includes: Parts expressing venom peptides that target various ion channels that leads to paralysis and death of spider mites: PpVP1S (BBa_K5184042), PpVP2S (BBa_K5184043), PpVP1F (BBa_K5184038), rCtx-4 (BBa_K5184021), HxTx-Hv1h (BBa_K5184033), Cs1A (BBa_K5184032); supplementary parts that allows extracellular secretion, facilitates venom peptide folding, and improves contact and oral toxicity (BBa_5184020, and BBa_K5184022); composite parts integrates these parts to guarantee correct folding of venom peptides with high levels of contact toxicity (BBa_K5184071-BBa_K5184076). <br><br> |
− | Our part collection provides a feasible and efficient expression of a collection of venom peptides targeting a diverse range of molecular targets in spider mites. | + | Our part collection provides a feasible and efficient expression of a collection of venom peptides targeting a diverse range of molecular targets in spider mites. Such a collection allows cooperative-combination of multiple venom peptides that together affect multiple molecular target sites, significantly reducing chance of resistance development. This can help and inspire future teams to design and perfect venom peptide-based pesticides that are capable of tackling many pests known for their rapidly developing resistance and, as template sequences for identification of other acariforme venom peptides. |
+ | |||
===Basic Characterization=== | ===Basic Characterization=== | ||
− | PpVP2S is the modified version of the venom peptide we identified in genome of the predatory mite, | + | PpVP2S is the modified version of the venom peptide we identified in genome of the predatory mite, Phytoseiulus persimilis, by genome mining. It shares a high degree of homology to venom peptides from the predatory mite species Neoseiulus barkeri, which is first identified in [1]. Via phylogenic analysis, we believe it likely achieves its paralyzing and insecticidal properties by interfering with voltage gated calcium channels whose affinity towards is then verified by computer modelling. |
===Sequences=== | ===Sequences=== | ||
<!-- --> | <!-- --> | ||
<span class='h3bb'>Sequence and Features</span> | <span class='h3bb'>Sequence and Features</span> | ||
<partinfo>BBa_K5184043 SequenceAndFeatures</partinfo> | <partinfo>BBa_K5184043 SequenceAndFeatures</partinfo> | ||
+ | |||
==Characterization== | ==Characterization== | ||
===Molecular Structure=== | ===Molecular Structure=== | ||
PpVP2S is the truncated version of the PpVP2F, composing of a total of 55 amino acids, containing 8 cysteine residues that form 4 disulfide bridges, and two antiparallel beta sheets, together contributing to the final highly compact conformation of the venom. Comparing to NbVP2[1], it has the same set of cysteine network of C1xxxC2xxxC3C4xxxC5xC6xxxC7xC8, with disulfide bridges between C(1)C(4), C(2)C(5), C(3)C(8), and C(6)C(7)[Fig.1A], and therefore shares an almost congruent geometry [Fig.1B], differing by only 5 amino acids. | PpVP2S is the truncated version of the PpVP2F, composing of a total of 55 amino acids, containing 8 cysteine residues that form 4 disulfide bridges, and two antiparallel beta sheets, together contributing to the final highly compact conformation of the venom. Comparing to NbVP2[1], it has the same set of cysteine network of C1xxxC2xxxC3C4xxxC5xC6xxxC7xC8, with disulfide bridges between C(1)C(4), C(2)C(5), C(3)C(8), and C(6)C(7)[Fig.1A], and therefore shares an almost congruent geometry [Fig.1B], differing by only 5 amino acids. | ||
− | <center><html><img src="https://static.igem.wiki/teams/5184/parts/ | + | <center><html><img src="https://static.igem.wiki/teams/5184/parts/ppvp2s-fig-3.webp" width="600"/></html></center> |
<center><b>Fig.1: A. Disulfide network of the venomous domain of PpVP2S, involving 8 cysteine residues and 4 disulfide bridges B. Comparison of structural prediction results of core venomous domains of NbVP2F (transparent light gray) and PpVP2F (solid blue) from AlphaFold Server; the cysteine residues are colored orange</b></center> | <center><b>Fig.1: A. Disulfide network of the venomous domain of PpVP2S, involving 8 cysteine residues and 4 disulfide bridges B. Comparison of structural prediction results of core venomous domains of NbVP2F (transparent light gray) and PpVP2F (solid blue) from AlphaFold Server; the cysteine residues are colored orange</b></center> | ||
===Genome Mining=== | ===Genome Mining=== | ||
− | Using identified mRNAs of the two | + | Using identified mRNAs of the two N. barkeri venom peptides as query, we identified the two orthologous venom peptide-encoding loci in the P. persimilis genome (GenBank Assembly: GCA_037576195.1) using NCBI BLASTn [Fig.2]. |
− | Sequences from the BLAST result are then aligned with the two | + | Sequences from the BLAST result are then aligned with the two N. barkeri mRNAs to filter out the introns. Thus, the protein sequence of the P. persimilis orthologous venom peptides are obtained. |
− | <center><html><img src="https://static.igem.wiki/teams/5184/parts/ | + | <center><html><img src="https://static.igem.wiki/teams/5184/parts/ppvp2s-fig-2.webp" width="600"/></html></center> |
<center><b>Fig.2: BLAST results of two ''N. barkeri'' venom peptide mRNAs against the ''P. persimilis genome''.</b></center> | <center><b>Fig.2: BLAST results of two ''N. barkeri'' venom peptide mRNAs against the ''P. persimilis genome''.</b></center> | ||
===Truncation & Optimizations=== | ===Truncation & Optimizations=== | ||
− | Looking into molecular features of the sequences of the mite venom peptides: small, cysteine-rich and involves multiple disulfide bridges, we realized the mite venom peptides to be homologous to spider venom peptides, a class of versatile, widely-studied venom peptides found in spiders—phylogenically related to the acariformes. | + | Looking into molecular features of the sequences of the mite venom peptides: small, cysteine-rich and involves multiple disulfide bridges, we realized the mite venom peptides to be homologous to spider venom peptides, a class of versatile, widely-studied venom peptides found in spiders—phylogenically related to the acariformes.<br> |
− | With some research into spider venom peptides, we realized the cysteine-rich venom peptides’ toxicity is largely determined by a core venomous domain, and that other domains are largely irrelevant to the inhibitory effects the venom has on its molecular targets ( | + | With some research into spider venom peptides, we realized the cysteine-rich venom peptides’ toxicity is largely determined by a core venomous domain, and that other domains are largely irrelevant to the inhibitory effects the venom has on its molecular targets (illlustrated dramatically by the fact that many recombinant SVPs retain only their core venmous domain, yet retains and usually achieves toxicity higher than that of their native forms).<br> |
− | Since the mite venom peptide protein sequences are obtained directly from the genome of | + | Since the mite venom peptide protein sequences are obtained directly from the genome of P. persimilis, the protein likely include various domains or structures that facilitates the protein’s expression and post-translational modifications and secretion in vivo. Since they are largely unnecessary for heterologous expression in unicellular chassis such as E. coli or P. pastoris, such regions, could be truncated to improve expression efficiency and toxicity.<br> |
− | We therefore, matching structural prediction results of the MVPs and a described, recombinant SVP (truncated down to only the central venomous domain), rCtx4 [2], identified the MVP’s core venom domain. | + | We therefore, matching structural prediction results of the MVPs and a described, recombinant SVP (truncated down to only the central venomous domain), rCtx4 [2], identified the MVP’s core venom domain.< |
− | <center><html><img src="https://static.igem.wiki/teams/5184/parts/ | + | <center><html><img src="https://static.igem.wiki/teams/5184/parts/ppvp2s-fig-1.webp" width="600"/></html></center> |
− | <center><b>Fig.3: Structural comparisons between AlphaFold Structural prediction results of PpVP2F (White and blue), and rCtx4 (transparent light grey); the identified core venomous domain of PpVP2F is colored in blue and the cysteine | + | <center><b>Fig.3: Structural comparisons between AlphaFold Structural prediction results of PpVP2F (White and blue), and rCtx4 (transparent light grey); the identified core venomous domain of PpVP2F is colored in blue and the cysteine residues colored orange</b></center> |
===''in silico'' Analysis=== | ===''in silico'' Analysis=== | ||
− | With further research into spider venom peptides’ molecular mechanisms for their paralyzing and lethal effects, we realized that they (and therefore MVPs due to high levels of homology between them) target neuronal ion channels or receptors. Their interference led to blockage of various receptors or ion channels or neurotransmitter receptors, leading to prevention of release or detection of neurotransmitters. This therefore interferes with normal conduction of neural impulses and achieves paralyzing and lethal effects. | + | With further research into spider venom peptides’ molecular mechanisms for their paralyzing and lethal effects, we realized that they (and therefore MVPs due to high levels of homology between them) target neuronal ion channels or receptors. Their interference led to blockage of various receptors or ion channels or neurotransmitter receptors, leading to prevention of release or detection of neurotransmitters. This therefore interferes with normal conduction of neural impulses and achieves paralyzing and lethal effects.<br> |
− | To analyze molecular action of venom peptides using computational approaches such as molecular docking, we constructed a phylogenic tree based on core venomous domains of various SVPs with known molecular targets [3], [4], [5], [6] along with the four MVPs, in an attempt to determine their molecular targets. The results, in [Fig4], suggests that they likely interfere with voltage-gated calcium channels. | + | To analyze molecular action of venom peptides using computational approaches such as molecular docking, we constructed a phylogenic tree based on core venomous domains of various SVPs with known molecular targets [3], [4], [5], [6] along with the four MVPs, in an attempt to determine their molecular targets. The results, in [Fig4], suggests that they likely interfere with voltage-gated calcium channels and potentially calcium-activated potassium channels.<br> |
− | We therefore tried to predict molecular effects of the venom peptides against | + | We therefore tried to predict molecular effects of the venom peptides against CaV and KCa channels, using both “conventional” docking tools such as HDock server, and “non-classical” tools such as AlphaFold (for its ability to accurately predict conformational changes in both receptor and a peptide ligand upon binding).<br> |
− | The docking results from both AlphaFold and HDock suggests that the MVPs are likely to interfere with the alpha 2 subunit of the | + | The docking results from both AlphaFold and HDock suggests that the MVPs are likely to interfere with the alpha 2 subunit of the T. urticae CaV channels, blocking flow of ions and therefore release of neurotransmitters. |
− | <center><html><img src="https://static.igem.wiki/teams/5184/parts/ | + | <center><html><img src="https://static.igem.wiki/teams/5184/parts/ppvp2s-fig0.webp" width="600"/></html></center> |
<center><b>Fig.4: A. Phylogenic tree from core venomous domains of MVPs and several SVPs with known molecular targets (all ion channels, ion type identified at the end of each name) B. Docking results of PpVP2S against T. urticae voltage-gated calcium channel using AlphaFold</b></center> | <center><b>Fig.4: A. Phylogenic tree from core venomous domains of MVPs and several SVPs with known molecular targets (all ion channels, ion type identified at the end of each name) B. Docking results of PpVP2S against T. urticae voltage-gated calcium channel using AlphaFold</b></center> | ||
+ | ===Safety=== | ||
+ | Venom peptides' ability to inhibit ion channels extremely efficiently originates from the fact that they can bind or associate closely to their receptors. Their paralyzing or even lethal activity is therefore highly dependent on conformations of the receptor (i.e. Ion channel or neurotransmitter receptor).<br> | ||
+ | Given the fact that PpVP2S originates from a predatory mite specie who feeds completely on non-mammalian preys, the structure of the peptide will be highly selected for association with the prey (i.e. Spider mites) molecular targets, and therefore, ineffectual towards similar structures in species other than spider mites.<br> | ||
+ | As suggested by [9], insect CaV channels vary greatly to mammalian calcium channels due to both a much smaller repertoire of subunits and low level of homology (<68%), and that varies to a moderate degree between insect orders. This means that PpVP2S, targetting voltage-gated-calcium channels, is highly unlikely to be poisonous towards mammals (as demonstrated by the fact that 10000 tine of some CaV-targetting venom peptides' lethal dose for insects may not display even slightest toxicity against mammals) and evolutionarily more distant beneficial insects.<br> | ||
===Toxicity Assay=== | ===Toxicity Assay=== | ||
− | The designed and optimized venom peptides are expressed using the expression system G1M5-His-SUMO-MVP-GNA, where G1M5-SUMO proved to facilitate correct folding and therefore soluble expression of the attached protein [7][Fig.5A], and GNA | + | The designed and optimized venom peptides are expressed using the expression system G1M5-His-SUMO-MVP-GNA, where the G1M5-SUMO on the N-terminus is proved to facilitate correct folding and therefore soluble expression of the attached protein [7][Fig.5A], and the C-terminus GNA significantly enhances fusion protein’s oral and contact toxicity [8].<br> |
− | Plasmids pET28a-G1M5-His-SUMO-MVP-GNA | + | Plasmids pET28a-G1M5-His-SUMO-MVP-GNA are assembled using GoldenGate cloning, and after verification by colony PCR and sequencing[Fig6A&B], is transformed into BL21(DE3) strain. After IPTG induction and overnight incubation, the culture is harvested and underwent sonication cell lysis; SDS-PAGE was then ran for supernatant and precipitate samples, verifying soluble expression of the recombined PpVP2S using our current expression strategies. |
− | <center><html><img src="https://static.igem.wiki/teams/5184/parts/ppvp2s- | + | <center><html><img src="https://static.igem.wiki/teams/5184/parts/ppvp2s-fig1.webp" width="600"/></html></center> |
<center><b>Fig5: A. G1M5 signal peptide meditates extracellular secretion of the fusion protein B. Plasmid construct pET28a-G1M5-His-SUMO-PpVP2S-GNA-His C. SDS-PAGE of SUMO-digested supernatant of PpVP2S, with supernatant of BL21(DE3) as control; S: supernatant, SUMO: SUMO protease-treated supernatant</b></center> | <center><b>Fig5: A. G1M5 signal peptide meditates extracellular secretion of the fusion protein B. Plasmid construct pET28a-G1M5-His-SUMO-PpVP2S-GNA-His C. SDS-PAGE of SUMO-digested supernatant of PpVP2S, with supernatant of BL21(DE3) as control; S: supernatant, SUMO: SUMO protease-treated supernatant</b></center> | ||
− | Supernatant | + | <center><html><img src="https://static.igem.wiki/teams/5184/parts/ppvp2s-fig2.webp" width="600"/></html></center> |
− | <center><html><img src="https://static.igem.wiki/teams/5184/parts/ppvp2s- | + | <center><b>Fig6: A. Colony PCR results of the pET28a-G1M5-His-SUMO-PpVP2S-GNA-His B. Alignment of sequencing results of colony PCR products C. SDS-PAGE for supernatant and SUMO-treated supernatant of PpVP2S, with supernatant of BL21(DE3) as control</b></center> |
+ | Supernatant after cell lysis is then treated with SUMO protease remove the SUMO tag, leaving behind only MVP-GNA fusion proteins[Fig5B]. The treated supernatant is sent to Professor Huang of SCAU for toxicity bioassay, where he tested the contact toxicity of SUMO-protease-treated supernatant on 3 groups of 20 females of ''Tetranychus urticae'', the most prominent species in spider mites [14].<br> | ||
+ | The supernatant is applied to the spider mites using a spraying method once only on day 1, and the three groups of ''T. urticae'' mites' lethality is assessed at 24, 48, and 72 hours after spraying. For control, supernatant of BL21(DE3) is used. The results reveal that PpVP2S shows very high toxicity against ''T. urticae'' [Fig7C&D], achieving a death rate of 98.25% in the first day and 100% in the next. | ||
+ | <center><html><img src="https://static.igem.wiki/teams/5184/parts/ppvp2s-fig3.webp" width="600"/></html></center> | ||
<center><b>Fig6: A. ''T. urticae'' before being sprayed with PpVP2S B. ''T. urticae'' after being sprayed with PpVP2S C. Survival plot of PpVP2S against female ''T. urticae'' using a spraying method, CK is induced liquid culture of BL21(DE3), of which acts as control D. Lethality data of PpVP2S over 24, 48, and 72 hours, CK is induced liquid culture of BL21(DE3), of which acts as control; data is the means of ± SD of three parallel replicate experiments</b></center> | <center><b>Fig6: A. ''T. urticae'' before being sprayed with PpVP2S B. ''T. urticae'' after being sprayed with PpVP2S C. Survival plot of PpVP2S against female ''T. urticae'' using a spraying method, CK is induced liquid culture of BL21(DE3), of which acts as control D. Lethality data of PpVP2S over 24, 48, and 72 hours, CK is induced liquid culture of BL21(DE3), of which acts as control; data is the means of ± SD of three parallel replicate experiments</b></center> | ||
==Part Collection== | ==Part Collection== | ||
− | Our part collection provides a comprehensive list of venom peptides with a diverse range of molecular targets, and | + | Our part collection provides a comprehensive list of venom peptides with a diverse range of molecular targets, which suppresses the development of drug resistance, and thus ensuring the efficacy of our acaricide. Through the incorporation of a G1M5-SUMO tag, all of the venom peptides are successfully expressed and digested by SUMO protease. According to the toxicity bioassay, all of the venom peptides display significant contact efficacy[Fig8A&B], especially PpVP2S, a novel MVP that we discovered by ourselves through genome mining. In future applications, we hope that our collection of venom peptides will not only be highly effective, but also solve the problem of drug resistance development that traditional pesticides always encounter. |
− | <center><html><img src="https://static.igem.wiki/teams/5184/parts/vp-lethality.webp" width="600"/></html></center> | + | <center><html><img src="https://static.igem.wiki/teams/5184/parts/vp-lethality-v.webp" width="600"/></html></center> |
− | <center><b> | + | <center><b>Fig8: A. Survival plot of 6 venom peptides against female ''T. urticae'' using a spraying method, CK is induced liquid culture of BL21(DE3), of which acts as control D. Lethality data of 6 venom peptides over 24, 48, and 72 hours, CK is induced liquid culture of BL21(DE3), of which acts as control; data is the means of ± SD of three parallel replicate experiments</b></center> |
{|class="wikitable" style="margin:auto" | {|class="wikitable" style="margin:auto" | ||
Line 59: | Line 68: | ||
|- | |- | ||
|||PpVP1S||Ca||New||BBa_K5184042||''Phytoseiulus persimilis'' | |||PpVP1S||Ca||New||BBa_K5184042||''Phytoseiulus persimilis'' | ||
+ | |- | ||
|||PpVP1F||Ca||New||BBa_K5184038||''Phytoseiulus persimilis'' | |||PpVP1F||Ca||New||BBa_K5184038||''Phytoseiulus persimilis'' | ||
+ | |- | ||
|||rCtx4||Na||||BBa_K5184021||''Phoneutria depilata'' | |||rCtx4||Na||||BBa_K5184021||''Phoneutria depilata'' | ||
+ | |- | ||
|||Cs1A||Ca||||BBa_K5184032||''Calommata signata'' | |||Cs1A||Ca||||BBa_K5184032||''Calommata signata'' | ||
+ | |- | ||
|||HxTx-Hv1h||Ca, K||||BBa_K5184033||''Hadronyche versuta'' | |||HxTx-Hv1h||Ca, K||||BBa_K5184033||''Hadronyche versuta'' | ||
|} | |} | ||
− | |||
<!-- Uncomment this to enable Functional Parameter display | <!-- Uncomment this to enable Functional Parameter display | ||
===Functional Parameters=== | ===Functional Parameters=== | ||
<partinfo>BBa_K5184043 parameters</partinfo> | <partinfo>BBa_K5184043 parameters</partinfo> | ||
<!-- --> | <!-- --> |
Latest revision as of 12:46, 2 October 2024
PpVP2-S
Essential Information
Abstract
This part presents an original, novel mite venom peptide with high potency against spider mites (Acariformes: Tetranychidae). Named PpVP2S, this part was obtained from genome mining results by our own team, and has the effects assessed both in silico and in vivo. Amongst the very first ever identified from the acariforme family, this part will also provide the foundation for identification of homologous venom peptides in the enormous, diverse family of acarids.
The part collection includes: Parts expressing venom peptides that target various ion channels that leads to paralysis and death of spider mites: PpVP1S (BBa_K5184042), PpVP2S (BBa_K5184043), PpVP1F (BBa_K5184038), rCtx-4 (BBa_K5184021), HxTx-Hv1h (BBa_K5184033), Cs1A (BBa_K5184032); supplementary parts that allows extracellular secretion, facilitates venom peptide folding, and improves contact and oral toxicity (BBa_5184020, and BBa_K5184022); composite parts integrates these parts to guarantee correct folding of venom peptides with high levels of contact toxicity (BBa_K5184071-BBa_K5184076).
Our part collection provides a feasible and efficient expression of a collection of venom peptides targeting a diverse range of molecular targets in spider mites. Such a collection allows cooperative-combination of multiple venom peptides that together affect multiple molecular target sites, significantly reducing chance of resistance development. This can help and inspire future teams to design and perfect venom peptide-based pesticides that are capable of tackling many pests known for their rapidly developing resistance and, as template sequences for identification of other acariforme venom peptides.
Basic Characterization
PpVP2S is the modified version of the venom peptide we identified in genome of the predatory mite, Phytoseiulus persimilis, by genome mining. It shares a high degree of homology to venom peptides from the predatory mite species Neoseiulus barkeri, which is first identified in [1]. Via phylogenic analysis, we believe it likely achieves its paralyzing and insecticidal properties by interfering with voltage gated calcium channels whose affinity towards is then verified by computer modelling.
Sequences
Sequence and Features
- 10COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[10]
- 12COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[12]
- 21COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[21]
- 23COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[23]
- 25COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[25]
- 1000COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[1000]
Characterization
Molecular Structure
PpVP2S is the truncated version of the PpVP2F, composing of a total of 55 amino acids, containing 8 cysteine residues that form 4 disulfide bridges, and two antiparallel beta sheets, together contributing to the final highly compact conformation of the venom. Comparing to NbVP2[1], it has the same set of cysteine network of C1xxxC2xxxC3C4xxxC5xC6xxxC7xC8, with disulfide bridges between C(1)C(4), C(2)C(5), C(3)C(8), and C(6)C(7)[Fig.1A], and therefore shares an almost congruent geometry [Fig.1B], differing by only 5 amino acids.
Genome Mining
Using identified mRNAs of the two N. barkeri venom peptides as query, we identified the two orthologous venom peptide-encoding loci in the P. persimilis genome (GenBank Assembly: GCA_037576195.1) using NCBI BLASTn [Fig.2]. Sequences from the BLAST result are then aligned with the two N. barkeri mRNAs to filter out the introns. Thus, the protein sequence of the P. persimilis orthologous venom peptides are obtained.
Truncation & Optimizations
Looking into molecular features of the sequences of the mite venom peptides: small, cysteine-rich and involves multiple disulfide bridges, we realized the mite venom peptides to be homologous to spider venom peptides, a class of versatile, widely-studied venom peptides found in spiders—phylogenically related to the acariformes.
With some research into spider venom peptides, we realized the cysteine-rich venom peptides’ toxicity is largely determined by a core venomous domain, and that other domains are largely irrelevant to the inhibitory effects the venom has on its molecular targets (illlustrated dramatically by the fact that many recombinant SVPs retain only their core venmous domain, yet retains and usually achieves toxicity higher than that of their native forms).
Since the mite venom peptide protein sequences are obtained directly from the genome of P. persimilis, the protein likely include various domains or structures that facilitates the protein’s expression and post-translational modifications and secretion in vivo. Since they are largely unnecessary for heterologous expression in unicellular chassis such as E. coli or P. pastoris, such regions, could be truncated to improve expression efficiency and toxicity.
We therefore, matching structural prediction results of the MVPs and a described, recombinant SVP (truncated down to only the central venomous domain), rCtx4 [2], identified the MVP’s core venom domain.<
in silico Analysis
With further research into spider venom peptides’ molecular mechanisms for their paralyzing and lethal effects, we realized that they (and therefore MVPs due to high levels of homology between them) target neuronal ion channels or receptors. Their interference led to blockage of various receptors or ion channels or neurotransmitter receptors, leading to prevention of release or detection of neurotransmitters. This therefore interferes with normal conduction of neural impulses and achieves paralyzing and lethal effects.
To analyze molecular action of venom peptides using computational approaches such as molecular docking, we constructed a phylogenic tree based on core venomous domains of various SVPs with known molecular targets [3], [4], [5], [6] along with the four MVPs, in an attempt to determine their molecular targets. The results, in [Fig4], suggests that they likely interfere with voltage-gated calcium channels and potentially calcium-activated potassium channels.
We therefore tried to predict molecular effects of the venom peptides against CaV and KCa channels, using both “conventional” docking tools such as HDock server, and “non-classical” tools such as AlphaFold (for its ability to accurately predict conformational changes in both receptor and a peptide ligand upon binding).
The docking results from both AlphaFold and HDock suggests that the MVPs are likely to interfere with the alpha 2 subunit of the T. urticae CaV channels, blocking flow of ions and therefore release of neurotransmitters.
Safety
Venom peptides' ability to inhibit ion channels extremely efficiently originates from the fact that they can bind or associate closely to their receptors. Their paralyzing or even lethal activity is therefore highly dependent on conformations of the receptor (i.e. Ion channel or neurotransmitter receptor).
Given the fact that PpVP2S originates from a predatory mite specie who feeds completely on non-mammalian preys, the structure of the peptide will be highly selected for association with the prey (i.e. Spider mites) molecular targets, and therefore, ineffectual towards similar structures in species other than spider mites.
As suggested by [9], insect CaV channels vary greatly to mammalian calcium channels due to both a much smaller repertoire of subunits and low level of homology (<68%), and that varies to a moderate degree between insect orders. This means that PpVP2S, targetting voltage-gated-calcium channels, is highly unlikely to be poisonous towards mammals (as demonstrated by the fact that 10000 tine of some CaV-targetting venom peptides' lethal dose for insects may not display even slightest toxicity against mammals) and evolutionarily more distant beneficial insects.
Toxicity Assay
The designed and optimized venom peptides are expressed using the expression system G1M5-His-SUMO-MVP-GNA, where the G1M5-SUMO on the N-terminus is proved to facilitate correct folding and therefore soluble expression of the attached protein [7][Fig.5A], and the C-terminus GNA significantly enhances fusion protein’s oral and contact toxicity [8].
Plasmids pET28a-G1M5-His-SUMO-MVP-GNA are assembled using GoldenGate cloning, and after verification by colony PCR and sequencing[Fig6A&B], is transformed into BL21(DE3) strain. After IPTG induction and overnight incubation, the culture is harvested and underwent sonication cell lysis; SDS-PAGE was then ran for supernatant and precipitate samples, verifying soluble expression of the recombined PpVP2S using our current expression strategies.
Supernatant after cell lysis is then treated with SUMO protease remove the SUMO tag, leaving behind only MVP-GNA fusion proteins[Fig5B]. The treated supernatant is sent to Professor Huang of SCAU for toxicity bioassay, where he tested the contact toxicity of SUMO-protease-treated supernatant on 3 groups of 20 females of Tetranychus urticae, the most prominent species in spider mites [14].
The supernatant is applied to the spider mites using a spraying method once only on day 1, and the three groups of T. urticae mites' lethality is assessed at 24, 48, and 72 hours after spraying. For control, supernatant of BL21(DE3) is used. The results reveal that PpVP2S shows very high toxicity against T. urticae [Fig7C&D], achieving a death rate of 98.25% in the first day and 100% in the next.
Part Collection
Our part collection provides a comprehensive list of venom peptides with a diverse range of molecular targets, which suppresses the development of drug resistance, and thus ensuring the efficacy of our acaricide. Through the incorporation of a G1M5-SUMO tag, all of the venom peptides are successfully expressed and digested by SUMO protease. According to the toxicity bioassay, all of the venom peptides display significant contact efficacy[Fig8A&B], especially PpVP2S, a novel MVP that we discovered by ourselves through genome mining. In future applications, we hope that our collection of venom peptides will not only be highly effective, but also solve the problem of drug resistance development that traditional pesticides always encounter.
Current VP | Venom Name | Targeted Ion Channel | New? | Part Number | Original Specie |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
✳️ | PpVP2S | Ca | New | BBa_K5184043 | Phytoseiulus persimilis |
PpVP1S | Ca | New | BBa_K5184042 | Phytoseiulus persimilis | |
PpVP1F | Ca | New | BBa_K5184038 | Phytoseiulus persimilis | |
rCtx4 | Na | BBa_K5184021 | Phoneutria depilata | ||
Cs1A | Ca | BBa_K5184032 | Calommata signata | ||
HxTx-Hv1h | Ca, K | BBa_K5184033 | Hadronyche versuta |