Staple subunit: GCN4

GCN4 is a yeast transcription factor belonging to the bZip family of DNA-binding proteins. We use GCN4 to study DNA-binding kinetics in our "Mini staples" that bring two DNA target sites into proximity by binding them simultaneously.

Figure 1: How our part collection can be used to engineer new staples

Next to the well-studied linear DNA sequence, the 3D spatial organization of DNA plays a crucial role in gene regulation, cell fate, disease development and more. However, the tools to precisely manipulate this genomic architecture remain limited, rendering it challenging to explore the full potential of the 3D genome in synthetic biology. We - iGEM Team Heidelberg 2024 - have developed PICasSO, a powerful molecular toolbox based on various DNA-binding proteins to address this issue.

The PICasSO part collection offers a comprehensive, modular platform for precise manipulation and re-programming of DNA-DNA interactions using protein staples in living cells, enabling researchers to recreate natural 3D genomic interactions, such as enhancer hijacking, or to design entirely new spatial architectures for gene regulation. Beyond its versatility, PICasSO includes robust assay systems to support the engineering, optimization, and testing of new staples, ensuring functionality in vitro and in vivo. We took special care to include parts crucial for testing every step of the cycle (design, build, test, learn) when engineering new parts.

At its heart, the PICasSO part collection consists of three categories.
(i) Our DNA-binding proteins include our finalized enhancer hijacking Cas staple as well as half staples that can be used by scientists to compose entirely new Cas staples in the future. We also include our Simple staples that serve as controls for successful stapling and can be further engineered to create alternative, simpler and more compact staples.
(ii) As functional elements, we list additional parts that enhance the functionality of our Cas and Basic staples. These consist of protease-cleavable peptide linkers and inteins that allow condition-specific, dynamic stapling in vivo. Besides staple functionality, we also include the parts to enable the efficient delivery of PICasSO's constructs with our interkingdom conjugation system.
(iii) As the final category of our collection, we provide parts that support the use of our custom readout systems. These include components of our established FRET-based proximity assay system, enabling users to confirm accurate stapling. Additionally, we offer a complementary, application-oriented testing system for functional readouts via a luciferase reporter, which allows for straightforward experimental simulation of enhancer hijacking in mammalian cells.

The following table gives a comprehensive overview of all parts in our PICasSO toolbox. The highlighted parts showed exceptional performance as described on our iGEM wiki and can serve as a reference. The other parts in the collection are versatile building blocks designed to provide future iGEMers with the flexibility to engineer their own custom Cas staples, enabling further optimization and innovation.

Our part collection includes:

1. Sequence overview

2. Usage and Biology

GCN4 is a yeast transcription factor from the bZip family of DNA-binding proteins, first discovered by McKnight and co-workers in 1988. The bZip motif features a coiled-coil leucine zipper dimerization domain paired with a highly charged basic region, which directly interacts with DNA. GCN4 binds specifically to the cyclic AMP response element (CRE) DNA sequence (5' ATGACGTCAT 3') in the promoter regions of target genes, primarily through its basic residues at the N-terminus.

In our project, GCN4 was employed to study DNA-binding kinetics and develop a minimal "Mini staple" that brings two DNA target sites into proximity by binding them simultaneously. This "Mini staple" was designed as a versatile tool for precise DNA manipulation in synthetic biology applications.

The DNA-binding properties of GCN4 were tested using an electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA) to quantify binding affinity and kinetics. EMSA is a widely adopted method to study DNA-protein interactions. It works on the principle that nucleic acids bound to proteins exhibit reduced electrophoretic mobility compared to unbound nucleic acids (Hellman & Fried, 2007). EMSA can be employed both qualitatively, to assess DNA-binding capabilities, and quantitatively, to determine critical parameters such as binding stoichiometry and the apparent dissociation constant (K_d) (Fried, 1989).

3. Assembly and part evolution

The GCN4 amino acid sequence was taken from literature (Hollenbeck et al. 2001) and codon optimized for E. coli. A FLAG-tag (DYKDDDDK) was added to the N-terminus for protein purification. The FLAG-tag can be cleaved off using an Enterokinase, if necessary. The FLAG-GCN4 sequence was cloned into a T7 expression vector and expressed using E. coli BL21 (DE3) cells.

4. Results

4.1 Protein expression and purification

The FLAG-GCN4 protein could be readily expressed in E. coli BL21 (DE3). The protein was purified using an anti-FLAG resin. Fractions taken during purification were analyzed by SDS-PAGE. Purified protein was quantified using a Lowry assay, 1.18 mg/mL were obtained, resulting in 153 µM of monomeric FLAG-GCN4.

Figure 2: SDS-PAGE analysis of FLAG-GCN4 purification Fractions analysed are the raw lysate, flow through and eluate. Depicted is GCN4 (this part), rGCN4 (BBa_K5237008), and bGCN4 (BBa_K5237009). Protein size is indicated next to construct name and purified band with protein of interest highlighted by a red box.

4.2 Electrophoretic Mobility shift assay

Figure 3: Overview Image of Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assay (EMSA)

The Electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA) is a widely adopted method used to study DNA-protein interactions. EMSA functions on the basis that nucleic acids bound to proteins have reduced electrophoretic mobility, compared to their counterpart. (Hellman & Fried, 2007). Mobility-shift assays can both be used to qualitatively assess DNA binding capabilities or quantitatively to determine binding stoichiometry and kinetics such as the apparent dissociation constant (K_d) (Fried, 1989).

GCN4 was tested for its DNA-binding capabilities using an electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA). The protein was incubated with a DNA probe containing the GCN4 binding site. The formation of a protein-DNA complex was analyzed by native PAGE. To further analyze DNA binding, quantitative shift assays were performed for GCN4 and rGCN4 (BBa_K5237008). 0.5 µM DNA were incubated with varying concentrations of protein until equilibration. After electrophoresis, bands were stained with SYBR-Safe and quantified based on pixel intensity. The obtained values were fitted to equation 1, describing formation of a 2:1 protein-DNA complex:

Θ_app = Θ_min + (Θ_max - Θ_min) × (K_a² [L]_tot²) / (1 + K_a² [L]_tot²) Equation 1

Here [L]_tot describes the total protein monomer concentration, K_a corresponds to the apparent monomeric equilibration constant. The Θ_min/max values are the experimentally determined site saturation values (For this experiment 0 and 1 were chosen for min and max respectively). GCN4 binds to its optimal DNA binding motif with an apparent dissociation constant K_k of (0.2930.033)×10^-6 M, which is almost identical to the rGCN4 binding affinity to INVii a _d of (0.2980.030)×10^-6 M.

Figure 4: Quantitative EMSAQuantitative assessment of binding affinity for GCN4 and rGCN4. Proteins of different concentrations were incubated with 0.5 µM DNA until equilibrium and fraction bound analyzed, after gel electrophoresis, by dividing pixel intensity of bound fraction with pixel intensity of bound and unbound fraction. At least three separate measurements were conducted for each data point. Values are presented as mean +/- SD.

The apparent binding kinetics calculated for GCN4 ((0.2930.033) × 10^-6 M) and rGCN4 ((0.2980.030) × 10^-6 M) are approximately a factor 10 higher then those described in literature ((96) × 10^-8 M for GCN4 and (2.90.8) × 10^-8 M for rGCN4) (Hollenbeck et al., 2001). The differences could be due to the lower sensitivity of SYBR-Safe staining compared to radio-labeled oligos. Most likely, the protein concentration was miscalculated due to the presence of additional (lower intensity) bands in the SDS-PAGE analysis, indicating the co-purification of small amounts of unspecific proteins.

The FLAG-tag fusion to the N-terminus of proteins could potentially decrease binding affinity, likely due to steric hindrance affecting the interaction with DNA. Interestingly, the differences in binding affinity between GCN4 and rGCN4 appear negligible. Since GCN4 binds to DNA via its N-terminus and rGCN4 binds C-terminally, the FLAG-tag likely does not directly influence DNA binding. However, it may influence the dimerization of the proteins, which is necessary for DNA binding. To further investigate this, the FLAG-tag can be cleaved using an enterokinase and potential changes in binding affinity analyzed

5. References

Fried, M. G. (1989). Measurement of protein-DNA interaction parameters by electrophoresis mobility shift assay. ELECTROPHORESIS, 10(5-6), 366-376. https://doi.org/10.1002/elps.1150100515

Hellman, L. M., & Fried, M. G. (2007). Electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA) for detecting protein-nucleic acid interactions. Nature Protocols, 2(8), 1849-1861. https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2007.249

Hollenbeck, J. J., Gurnon, D. G., Fazio, G. C., Carlson, J. J., & Oakley, M. G. (2001). A GCN4 Variant with a C-Terminal Basic Region Binds to DNA with Wild-Type Affinity. Biochemistry, 40(46), 13833-13839.

Hollenbeck, J. J., & Oakley, M. G. (2000). GCN4 Binds with High Affinity to DNA Sequences Containing a Single Consensus Half-Site. Biochemistry, 39(21), 6380-6389. https://doi.org/10.1021/bi992705n