Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K5133006"
(6 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
==<b>Introduction</b>== | ==<b>Introduction</b>== | ||
− | This composite part is derived from plasmid pJL1 (Addgene: #69496)<sup>[1]</sup>, consisting of four basic parts: T7 promoter (<bbpart>BBa_K5133000</bbpart>), ribosome binding site (RBS, <bbpart>BBa_K5133001</bbpart>), coding sequence of antimicrobial peptide Microcin H47 (<bbpart>BBa_K5133005</bbpart>), and T7 terminator (<bbpart>BBa_K5133003</bbpart>)(<b>Figures 1, 2</b>). The plasmid pJL1 is commonly used for the <i>in vitro</i> | + | This composite part is derived from plasmid pJL1 (Addgene: #69496)<sup>[1]</sup>, consisting of four basic parts: T7 promoter (<bbpart>BBa_K5133000</bbpart>), ribosome binding site (RBS, <bbpart>BBa_K5133001</bbpart>), coding sequence of antimicrobial peptide Microcin H47 (<bbpart>BBa_K5133005</bbpart>), and T7 terminator (<bbpart>BBa_K5133003</bbpart>)(<b>Figures 1, 2</b>). The plasmid pJL1 is commonly used for the <i>in vitro</i> protein expression of cell-free protein synthesis (CFPS)<sup>[2]</sup>, and the iGEM-standarized CFPS construction has been constructed and characterized yet in our project (<bbpart>BBa_K5133004</bbpart>). To further expand the application of CFPS systems in iGEM competition, this composite part is designed to demonstrate the feasibility of <i>in vitro</i> antimicrobial peptide (AMP) synthesis by CFPS for extended useful purposes. |
Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
</head> | </head> | ||
<body> | <body> | ||
− | <img src="https://static.igem.wiki/teams/5133/bba- | + | <img src="https://static.igem.wiki/teams/5133/bba-k5133006-5.jpg" class="resizable-img1"> |
</body> | </body> | ||
</html> | </html> | ||
Line 53: | Line 53: | ||
</head> | </head> | ||
<body> | <body> | ||
− | <img src="https://static.igem.wiki/teams/5133/bba- | + | <img src="https://static.igem.wiki/teams/5133/bba-k5133006-2.jpg" class="resizable-img2"> |
</body> | </body> | ||
</html> | </html> | ||
Line 59: | Line 59: | ||
− | <center><b>Figure 2. Detailed assembly pattern of this composite part, including four basic parts: T7 promoter (<bbpart>BBa_K5133000</bbpart>), RBS (<bbpart>BBa_K5133001</bbpart>), | + | <center><b>Figure 2. Detailed assembly pattern of this composite part, including four basic parts: T7 promoter (<bbpart>BBa_K5133000</bbpart>), RBS (<bbpart>BBa_K5133001</bbpart>), Microcin H47 (<bbpart>BBa_K5133005</bbpart>), and T7 terminator (<bbpart>BBa_K5133003</bbpart>).</b></center> |
Line 95: | Line 95: | ||
<font size=4><b>Step 1: molecular cloning</b></font> | <font size=4><b>Step 1: molecular cloning</b></font> | ||
− | To construct this part, we first need to acquire the linearized DNA fragments of both vector and inserted fragments. Thus, we amplified vector pSB1C3 and inserted fragments by using PCR. Results of agarose gel electrophoresis showing the desired DNA bands (<b>Figure 4</b>) as pSB1C3 (2070 bp) and inserted fragment ( | + | To construct this part, we first need to acquire the linearized DNA fragments of both vector and inserted fragments. Thus, we amplified vector pSB1C3 and inserted fragments by using PCR. Results of agarose gel electrophoresis showing the desired DNA bands (<b>Figure 4</b>) as pSB1C3 (2070 bp) and inserted fragment (511 bp) used in this construction. Note that the PCR template of inserted fragment was derived from the previously reported research article<sup>[2]</sup>. |
Line 118: | Line 118: | ||
− | <center><b>Figure 4. Agarose gel electrophoresis analysis of PCR products for molecular cloning. The DNA bands indicate one vector pSB1C3 and three inserted fragments. The | + | <center><b>Figure 4. Agarose gel electrophoresis analysis of PCR products for molecular cloning. The DNA bands indicate one vector pSB1C3 and three inserted fragments. The second inserted fragment of BBa_K5133006 (511 bp) is used for the construction of this composite part, while the other two inserted fragments are used for <bbpart>BBa_K5133004</bbpart> and <bbpart>BBa_K5133008</bbpart>, respectively.</b></center> |
Line 140: | Line 140: | ||
</head> | </head> | ||
<body> | <body> | ||
− | <img src="https://static.igem.wiki/teams/5133/bba- | + | <img src="https://static.igem.wiki/teams/5133/bba-k5133006-4.jpg" class="resizable-img5"> |
</body> | </body> | ||
</html> | </html> | ||
Line 154: | Line 154: | ||
<font size=4><b>Step 2: colony PCR</b></font> | <font size=4><b>Step 2: colony PCR</b></font> | ||
− | To verify the constructions, we next performed colony PCR by using the reported protocol<sup>[4]</sup>. For each construction (not only this part, but also <bbpart> | + | To verify the constructions, we next performed colony PCR by using the reported protocol<sup>[4]</sup>. For each construction (not only this part, but also <bbpart>BBa_K5133004</bbpart> and <bbpart>BBa_K5133008</bbpart>), we selected four independent colonies from LB-agar plates and used primer pair VF2/VR to amplify the inserted DNA sequences. After that, we analyzed the DNA products by agarose gel electrophoresis. Results show that three PCR products match the desired DNA sizes of this construction, and the other one was the empty vector of pSB1C3 as false positive (<b>Figure 6</b>). |
Line 179: | Line 179: | ||
− | <center><b>Figure 6. Agarose gel electrophoresis analysis of PCR products for colony PCR. The | + | <center><b>Figure 6. Agarose gel electrophoresis analysis of PCR products for colony PCR. The three DNA products of this construction (BBa_K5133006) match the desired DNA size 782 bp, annotated by green √, while the other one is the empty vector of pSB1C3 as false positive that annotated by red ×.</b></center> |
Line 205: | Line 205: | ||
</head> | </head> | ||
<body> | <body> | ||
− | <img src="https://static.igem.wiki/teams/5133/bba- | + | <img src="https://static.igem.wiki/teams/5133/bba-k5133005-22.jpg" class="resizable-img7"> |
</body> | </body> | ||
</html> | </html> | ||
Line 242: | Line 242: | ||
− | <center><b>Figure 8. Agarose gel electrophoresis analysis of plasmid extracts for three plasmid constructions. The plasmids without EcoRI digestion show two conformations: linear (larger DNA sizes) and supercoiled (smaller DNA sizes), while after EcoRI digestion, the plasmids are linearized and show expected DNA sizes refer to DNA sequences. As for this part, the digested plasmid meet the desired DNA size | + | <center><b>Figure 8. Agarose gel electrophoresis analysis of plasmid extracts for three plasmid constructions. The plasmids without EcoRI digestion show two conformations: linear (larger DNA sizes) and supercoiled (smaller DNA sizes), while after EcoRI digestion, the plasmids are linearized and show expected DNA sizes refer to DNA sequences. As for this part, the digested plasmid meet the desired DNA size 2538 bp.</b></center> |
Line 249: | Line 249: | ||
<font size=4><b>Step 5: CFPS reaction</b></font> | <font size=4><b>Step 5: CFPS reaction</b></font> | ||
− | Once the plasmid was successfully constructed and extracted, we performed the CFPS reactions for demonstrating the feasibility of <i>in vitro</i> | + | Once the plasmid was successfully constructed and extracted, we performed the CFPS reactions for demonstrating the feasibility of <i>in vitro</i> AMP Microcin H47 expression (<b>Figure 9</b>). |
Line 268: | Line 268: | ||
</head> | </head> | ||
<body> | <body> | ||
− | <img src="https://static.igem.wiki/teams/5133/bba- | + | <img src="https://static.igem.wiki/teams/5133/bba-k5133006-1.jpg" class="resizable-img9"> |
</body> | </body> | ||
</html> | </html> | ||
Line 274: | Line 274: | ||
− | <center><b>Figure 9. Schematic diagram of <i>E. coli</i>-based CFPS reaction for | + | <center><b>Figure 9. Schematic diagram of <i>E. coli</i>-based CFPS reaction for AMP Microcin H47 production.</b></center> |
− | |||
+ | Subsequently, following the commonly used CFPS protocol<sup>[6]</sup> and Western-Blot analysis protocol<sup>[2]</sup>, we successfully produced Microcin H47 (7.4 kDa) with acceptable soluble fraction (<b>Figure 10</b>). | ||
Line 291: | Line 291: | ||
<style> | <style> | ||
.resizable-img10 { | .resizable-img10 { | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
max-width: 40%; | max-width: 40%; | ||
height: auto; | height: auto; | ||
Line 326: | Line 297: | ||
</head> | </head> | ||
<body> | <body> | ||
− | <img src="https://static.igem.wiki/teams/5133/bba- | + | <img src="https://static.igem.wiki/teams/5133/bba-k5133006-3.jpg" class="resizable-img10"> |
</body> | </body> | ||
</html> | </html> | ||
Line 332: | Line 303: | ||
− | <center><b>Figure | + | <center><b>Figure 10. Western-Blot analysis of <i>E. coli</i>-based CFPS reaction for AMP Microcin H47 production. The <i>in vitro</i> expressed Microcin H47 (c-terminal 6×HisTag, 7.4 kDa) could be detected with a soluble fraction. The plasmid (this construction) was added as 200 ng into 15 µL CFPS reactions, and the other experimental operations followed the reported protocol<sup>[6]</sup>.</b></center> |
Line 340: | Line 311: | ||
==<b>Conclusion</b>== | ==<b>Conclusion</b>== | ||
− | Taken together, this composite part was successfully constructed and characterized, demonstrating the feasibility of CFPS reaction for the <i>in vitro</i> production of | + | Taken together, this composite part was successfully constructed and characterized, demonstrating the feasibility of CFPS reaction for the <i>in vitro</i> production of antimicrobial peptide Microcin H47. Hence, this CFPS system was further utilized for the <i>in vitro</i> production of another antimicrobial peptide Microcin M (<bbpart>BBa_K5133008</bbpart>) in our project. |
Line 346: | Line 317: | ||
<font color="red">atcccgcgaaattaatacgactcactatagggagaccacaacggtttccctctagaaataattttgtttaacttt</font><font color="green">aagaaggagatatacat</font><font color="blue"> | <font color="red">atcccgcgaaattaatacgactcactatagggagaccacaacggtttccctctagaaataattttgtttaacttt</font><font color="green">aagaaggagatatacat</font><font color="blue"> | ||
− | + | atgcgagaaataacagaatcacagttaagatatatttccggggcgggaggtgcgccagcgacttcagctaatgctgcaggtgctgcagctattgttggagctctcgccggaatacctggtggtccacttggggttgta | |
− | + | gttggagccgtatctgccggtttgacaacagcaattggctcgaccgtgggaagtggtagtgccagttcttctgctggtggcggtagccatcatcatcatcatcactaa</font> | |
− | + | <font color="purple">gtcgaccggctgctaacaaagcccgaaaggaagctgagttggctgctgccaccgctgagcaataactagcataaccccttggggcctctaaacgggtcttgaggggttttttgctgaaagccaattctga</font> | |
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
Line 361: | Line 328: | ||
<font color="green">Green font: RBS (<bbpart>BBa_K5133001</bbpart>)</font> | <font color="green">Green font: RBS (<bbpart>BBa_K5133001</bbpart>)</font> | ||
− | <font color="blue">Blue font: | + | <font color="blue">Blue font: Microcin H47 (<bbpart>BBa_K5133005</bbpart>)</font> |
<font color="purple">Purple font: T7 terminator (<bbpart>BBa_K5133003</bbpart>)</font> | <font color="purple">Purple font: T7 terminator (<bbpart>BBa_K5133003</bbpart>)</font> |
Latest revision as of 04:41, 30 July 2024
Microcin H47 generator for CFPS (cell-free protein synthesis)
Group: GEC-China (iGEM 2024, team number: #5133)
Introduction
This composite part is derived from plasmid pJL1 (Addgene: #69496)[1], consisting of four basic parts: T7 promoter (BBa_K5133000), ribosome binding site (RBS, BBa_K5133001), coding sequence of antimicrobial peptide Microcin H47 (BBa_K5133005), and T7 terminator (BBa_K5133003)(Figures 1, 2). The plasmid pJL1 is commonly used for the in vitro protein expression of cell-free protein synthesis (CFPS)[2], and the iGEM-standarized CFPS construction has been constructed and characterized yet in our project (BBa_K5133004). To further expand the application of CFPS systems in iGEM competition, this composite part is designed to demonstrate the feasibility of in vitro antimicrobial peptide (AMP) synthesis by CFPS for extended useful purposes.
Results
For the characterization process of this part, follow five steps showing in Figure 3: (1) molecular cloning; (2) colony PCR; (3) sequencing; (4) plasmid extraction; (5) CFPS reaction.
Step 1: molecular cloning
To construct this part, we first need to acquire the linearized DNA fragments of both vector and inserted fragments. Thus, we amplified vector pSB1C3 and inserted fragments by using PCR. Results of agarose gel electrophoresis showing the desired DNA bands (Figure 4) as pSB1C3 (2070 bp) and inserted fragment (511 bp) used in this construction. Note that the PCR template of inserted fragment was derived from the previously reported research article[2].
When we got the purified DNA products, then we assembled these fragments by using Gibson Assembly strategy[3]. Next, we transformed the reaction to competent E. coli Mach1-T1 cells and spread the transformants onto LB-agar plates containing 34 µg/mL chloramphenicol. As shown in Figure 5, the E. coli transformants could normally grow on LB-agar plates and be used for the following experiments.
Step 2: colony PCR
To verify the constructions, we next performed colony PCR by using the reported protocol[4]. For each construction (not only this part, but also BBa_K5133004 and BBa_K5133008), we selected four independent colonies from LB-agar plates and used primer pair VF2/VR to amplify the inserted DNA sequences. After that, we analyzed the DNA products by agarose gel electrophoresis. Results show that three PCR products match the desired DNA sizes of this construction, and the other one was the empty vector of pSB1C3 as false positive (Figure 6).
Step 3: sequencing
Consequently, we picked the desired PCR products for sequencing. Results of Sanger sequencing show the successful construction of this part (Figure 7), which means that the plasmid could be used for the following experiments.
Step 4: plasmid extract
After we acquired the correct plasmids, we then tried to extract and purify the plasmids for the following CFPS reactions. By using the plasmid extract kit, we gained the purified plasmids and analyzed them by agarose gel electrophoresis. Results in Figure 8 show that the extracted plasmids are clean, consisting of two conformations: linear and supercoiled[5]. To further evaluate the plasmid sizes, we digested the three plasmids by EcoRI (restriction enzyme). After digestion, the three plasmids show the expected linearized comformation and match the desired DNA sizes. These results indicate the successful construction and extraction of this composite part.
Step 5: CFPS reaction
Once the plasmid was successfully constructed and extracted, we performed the CFPS reactions for demonstrating the feasibility of in vitro AMP Microcin H47 expression (Figure 9).
Subsequently, following the commonly used CFPS protocol[6] and Western-Blot analysis protocol[2], we successfully produced Microcin H47 (7.4 kDa) with acceptable soluble fraction (Figure 10).
Conclusion
Taken together, this composite part was successfully constructed and characterized, demonstrating the feasibility of CFPS reaction for the in vitro production of antimicrobial peptide Microcin H47. Hence, this CFPS system was further utilized for the in vitro production of another antimicrobial peptide Microcin M (BBa_K5133008) in our project.
DNA sequence (from 5' to 3')
atcccgcgaaattaatacgactcactatagggagaccacaacggtttccctctagaaataattttgtttaactttaagaaggagatatacat atgcgagaaataacagaatcacagttaagatatatttccggggcgggaggtgcgccagcgacttcagctaatgctgcaggtgctgcagctattgttggagctctcgccggaatacctggtggtccacttggggttgta gttggagccgtatctgccggtttgacaacagcaattggctcgaccgtgggaagtggtagtgccagttcttctgctggtggcggtagccatcatcatcatcatcactaa gtcgaccggctgctaacaaagcccgaaaggaagctgagttggctgctgccaccgctgagcaataactagcataaccccttggggcctctaaacgggtcttgaggggttttttgctgaaagccaattctga
Red font: T7 promoter (BBa_K5133000)
Green font: RBS (BBa_K5133001)
Blue font: Microcin H47 (BBa_K5133005)
Purple font: T7 terminator (BBa_K5133003)
References
[1] https://www.addgene.org/69496/
[2] Ba, F. et al. Expanding the toolbox of probiotic Escherichia coli Nissle 1917 for synthetic biology. Biotechnology Journal 19, 2300327 (2024). doi: 10.1002/biot.202300327
[3] Gibson, D.G. et al. Enzymatic assembly of DNA molecules up to several hundred kilobases. Nature Methods 6, 343-345 (2009). doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1318
[4] Ba, F. et al. Rainbow screening: Chromoproteins enable visualized molecular cloning. Biotechnology Journal 19, 2400114 (2024). doi: 10.1002/biot.202400114
[5] Lin, C.H. et al. Quantification bias caused by plasmid DNA conformation in quantitative real-time PCR assay. PLoS One 6, e29101 (2011). doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0029101
[6] Liu, W.Q. et al. Cell-free protein synthesis enables one-pot cascade biotransformation in an aqueous-organic biphasic system. Biotechnology and Bioengineering 117, 4001-4008 (2020). doi: 10.1002/bit.27541
Sequence and Features
- 10INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[10]Illegal XbaI site found at 51
Illegal PstI site found at 166
Illegal PstI site found at 175 - 12INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[12]Illegal PstI site found at 166
Illegal PstI site found at 175 - 21COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[21]
- 23INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[23]Illegal XbaI site found at 51
Illegal PstI site found at 166
Illegal PstI site found at 175 - 25INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[25]Illegal XbaI site found at 51
Illegal PstI site found at 166
Illegal PstI site found at 175 - 1000INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[1000]Illegal BsaI.rc site found at 32