Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K4759219"
JianghuaChen (Talk | contribs) |
|||
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
===Usage and Biology=== | ===Usage and Biology=== | ||
− | Generally, the method of determining whether the redox | + | Generally, the method of determining whether the redox partners was suitable required tedious steps such as the construction of plasmids, heterologous expression, construction of catalytic systems, and detection of conversion rate after catalysis. Therefore, we wanted to find a convenient way to do a quick screening. We used the fluorescent protein sfGFP and successfully constructed a sensor to detect redox partners. |
− | We | + | We divided sfGFP into N-terminal and C-terminal, and although these two parts were cut off, there was an interaction force between them. Thus, four iron redox proteins were fused to the N-terminal of sfGFP-1-10 and Olep to the C-terminal of sfGFP-11, respectively, to obtain the recombinant plasmid pRSFDuet-BM3-GFP-1-10-GFP-11-oleP, pRSFDuet-camA-camB-GFP-1-10-GFP-11-oleP, pRSFDuet-FdR_0978-Fdx_1499-GFP-1-10-GFP-11-oleP, and pRSFDuet-petH-petF-GFP-1-10-GFP-11-oleP. |
+ | The above four recombinant plasmids were converted to BL21(DE3) to obtain recombinant strains G2 to G5. | ||
+ | |||
+ | https://static.igem.wiki/teams/4759/wiki/p7.png | ||
+ | |||
+ | Fig1: The self-assembly of Olep and Fdx based on the three-dimensional structure of sfGFP (PDB: 5BT0) | ||
+ | |||
+ | The recombinant strains G2 to G5 were subjected to shaker fermentation experiments. After the fermentation was completed, 200 ul bacteria were added to the 96-well plate with a microplate reader to determine biomass (wavelength 600 nm) and fluorescence value (excitation wavelength 488 nm, emission wavelength 520 nm). Then we calculated the fluorescence intensity (fluorescence value/biomass) of the strain. The fluorescence intensity of the recombinant strain G5 (containing recombinant plasmid pRSFDuet-petH-petF-GFP-1-10-GFP-11-olep) was the highest (1.2×106) and 6 times higher than that of the control strain G2 (containing recombinant plasmid pRSFDuet-camA-camB-GFP-1-10-GFP-11-olep). | ||
+ | |||
+ | https://static.igem.wiki/teams/4759/wiki/4-2.png | ||
+ | |||
+ | Fig2: BL21 morphology diagram seen under excitation light 488nm and emitted light 520nm, green is green fluorescence of sfGFP | ||
+ | |||
+ | We selected four conventional redox partners (BM3, CamA/CamB, SelFdR0978/SelFdx1499, PetH/PetF) in combination with the P450 enzyme. Four groups of redox partners were constructed on the high-copy plasmid pRSFDuet to obtain recombinant plasmids: pRSFDuet-BM3-olep, pRSFDuet-camA-camB-olep, pRSFDuet-FdR0978-Fdx1499-olep, and pRSFDuet-petH-petF-olep. Then they were transformed to C41 (DE3) to obtain the recombinant strain R2 to R5. The recombinant strains R2 to R5 were subjected to shaker fermentation experiments. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Four groups of redox partners are constructed on the high-copy plasmid pRSFDuet to obtain recombinant plasmids: pRSFDuet-BM3-olep, pRSFDuet-camA-camB-olep, pRSFDuet-FdR0978-Fdx1499-olep, and pRSFDuet-petH-petF-olep. and transformed to C41 (DE3) to obtain the recombinant strain R2 strain to R5 strain. The recombinant strains G2 to G5 are subjected to shaker fermentation experiments. The recombinant strain R5 (containing recombinant plasmid pRSFDuet-petH-petF-olep) has the highest conversion rate, significantly increasing from 41.4% to 85.6%. Therefore, the redox companion PetH/PetF derived from Synechocystis is successfully screened as the most suitable redox partner for the P450 enzyme Olep, and the construction of the sfGFP sensor is verified, which could efficiently and accurately screen the redox partner adapted by the P450 enzyme. | ||
+ | |||
+ | https://static.igem.wiki/teams/4759/wiki/4-3.png | ||
+ | Fig3: (A) Screening proper redox partners for Olep from different sources. The G1 strain that contains the empty pRSFDuet-1 plasmid was used as a control. The fluorescent intensities were calculated and the color of cells and fluorescent images were presented for G2-G5 strains that express different redox partners-sfGFP-1-10 and sfGFP-11-Olep, respectively. (B) The conversion rates were calculated for R2-R5 strains that express different redox partners and Olep, respectively. The R1 strain that contains the empty pRSFDuet-1 plasmid was used as a control. The blue-filled triangle represents the fluorescent intensity/OD600. The red hollow triangle represents the conversion rate (%). Values and triangles represent the means and standard deviations of biological triplicates | ||
+ | |||
+ | https://static.igem.wiki/teams/4759/wiki/4-4.png | ||
+ | Fig4: The structures and interactions between Olep and Fdxs are presented. The key interacting residues in Olep-Fdx complexes are depicted as sticks and highlighted in yellow. Heme and substrates are displayed as sticks, colored in red and wheat, respectively. The Fe2S2 cluster is visualized as spheres. The distances (Å) between the iron–sulfur cluster and heme-iron are measured and indicated by dashed red lines. The interaction areas of Olep-Fdx are calculated by NovoPro (https://www.novopro.cn/). The numbers of hydrogen bonds and salt bridges are predicted by PDBePISA (https://www.ebi.ac.uk/pdbe/) | ||
<!-- --> | <!-- --> | ||
<span class='h3bb'>Sequence and Features</span> | <span class='h3bb'>Sequence and Features</span> |
Latest revision as of 16:00, 12 October 2023
T7-RBS1-RBM3-linker-GFP1-10
Usage and Biology
Generally, the method of determining whether the redox partners was suitable required tedious steps such as the construction of plasmids, heterologous expression, construction of catalytic systems, and detection of conversion rate after catalysis. Therefore, we wanted to find a convenient way to do a quick screening. We used the fluorescent protein sfGFP and successfully constructed a sensor to detect redox partners. We divided sfGFP into N-terminal and C-terminal, and although these two parts were cut off, there was an interaction force between them. Thus, four iron redox proteins were fused to the N-terminal of sfGFP-1-10 and Olep to the C-terminal of sfGFP-11, respectively, to obtain the recombinant plasmid pRSFDuet-BM3-GFP-1-10-GFP-11-oleP, pRSFDuet-camA-camB-GFP-1-10-GFP-11-oleP, pRSFDuet-FdR_0978-Fdx_1499-GFP-1-10-GFP-11-oleP, and pRSFDuet-petH-petF-GFP-1-10-GFP-11-oleP. The above four recombinant plasmids were converted to BL21(DE3) to obtain recombinant strains G2 to G5.
Fig1: The self-assembly of Olep and Fdx based on the three-dimensional structure of sfGFP (PDB: 5BT0)
The recombinant strains G2 to G5 were subjected to shaker fermentation experiments. After the fermentation was completed, 200 ul bacteria were added to the 96-well plate with a microplate reader to determine biomass (wavelength 600 nm) and fluorescence value (excitation wavelength 488 nm, emission wavelength 520 nm). Then we calculated the fluorescence intensity (fluorescence value/biomass) of the strain. The fluorescence intensity of the recombinant strain G5 (containing recombinant plasmid pRSFDuet-petH-petF-GFP-1-10-GFP-11-olep) was the highest (1.2×106) and 6 times higher than that of the control strain G2 (containing recombinant plasmid pRSFDuet-camA-camB-GFP-1-10-GFP-11-olep).
Fig2: BL21 morphology diagram seen under excitation light 488nm and emitted light 520nm, green is green fluorescence of sfGFP
We selected four conventional redox partners (BM3, CamA/CamB, SelFdR0978/SelFdx1499, PetH/PetF) in combination with the P450 enzyme. Four groups of redox partners were constructed on the high-copy plasmid pRSFDuet to obtain recombinant plasmids: pRSFDuet-BM3-olep, pRSFDuet-camA-camB-olep, pRSFDuet-FdR0978-Fdx1499-olep, and pRSFDuet-petH-petF-olep. Then they were transformed to C41 (DE3) to obtain the recombinant strain R2 to R5. The recombinant strains R2 to R5 were subjected to shaker fermentation experiments.
Four groups of redox partners are constructed on the high-copy plasmid pRSFDuet to obtain recombinant plasmids: pRSFDuet-BM3-olep, pRSFDuet-camA-camB-olep, pRSFDuet-FdR0978-Fdx1499-olep, and pRSFDuet-petH-petF-olep. and transformed to C41 (DE3) to obtain the recombinant strain R2 strain to R5 strain. The recombinant strains G2 to G5 are subjected to shaker fermentation experiments. The recombinant strain R5 (containing recombinant plasmid pRSFDuet-petH-petF-olep) has the highest conversion rate, significantly increasing from 41.4% to 85.6%. Therefore, the redox companion PetH/PetF derived from Synechocystis is successfully screened as the most suitable redox partner for the P450 enzyme Olep, and the construction of the sfGFP sensor is verified, which could efficiently and accurately screen the redox partner adapted by the P450 enzyme.
Fig3: (A) Screening proper redox partners for Olep from different sources. The G1 strain that contains the empty pRSFDuet-1 plasmid was used as a control. The fluorescent intensities were calculated and the color of cells and fluorescent images were presented for G2-G5 strains that express different redox partners-sfGFP-1-10 and sfGFP-11-Olep, respectively. (B) The conversion rates were calculated for R2-R5 strains that express different redox partners and Olep, respectively. The R1 strain that contains the empty pRSFDuet-1 plasmid was used as a control. The blue-filled triangle represents the fluorescent intensity/OD600. The red hollow triangle represents the conversion rate (%). Values and triangles represent the means and standard deviations of biological triplicates
Fig4: The structures and interactions between Olep and Fdxs are presented. The key interacting residues in Olep-Fdx complexes are depicted as sticks and highlighted in yellow. Heme and substrates are displayed as sticks, colored in red and wheat, respectively. The Fe2S2 cluster is visualized as spheres. The distances (Å) between the iron–sulfur cluster and heme-iron are measured and indicated by dashed red lines. The interaction areas of Olep-Fdx are calculated by NovoPro (https://www.novopro.cn/). The numbers of hydrogen bonds and salt bridges are predicted by PDBePISA (https://www.ebi.ac.uk/pdbe/) Sequence and Features
- 10COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[10]
- 12COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[12]
- 21INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[21]Illegal BglII site found at 2517
- 23COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[23]
- 25INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[25]Illegal AgeI site found at 1426
- 1000INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[1000]Illegal BsaI.rc site found at 472
Illegal BsaI.rc site found at 1396
Illegal SapI.rc site found at 952
Illegal SapI.rc site found at 1552