Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K4583000"
(→Usage and Biology) |
(→Reference) |
||
| (13 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
PYU3 is the promoter of the gene orf-0464, and it comes from Escherichia coli. It will reach its maximum expression at the late stationary phase. | PYU3 is the promoter of the gene orf-0464, and it comes from Escherichia coli. It will reach its maximum expression at the late stationary phase. | ||
==Usage and Biology== | ==Usage and Biology== | ||
| − | When the bacteria enter the stationary phase, the physiological state of the bacteria changes significantly. During this phase, many genes will respond to make timely adjustments. This part | + | When the bacteria enter the stationary phase, the physiological state of the bacteria changes significantly. During this phase, many genes will respond to make timely adjustments. This part <html><a href="https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K4583000"> BBa_K4583000(PYU3)</a></html> is the promoter of the gene <em>orf-0464</em>. Its most notable feature is that it will be expressed in the late stationary phase. Moreover, it is a self-inducible promoter, which means that no additional inducers need to be added for expression. Exogenous inducers are expensive and need to be added artificially, whereas self-induced promoters are cost-effective and relatively stable. This part is also very safe because it comes from E. coli MG1655, a commonly engineered bacterium. |
| + | * <strong>Late stationary phase promoter</strong> | ||
| + | * <strong>Self-inducible promoter without additional inducers</strong> | ||
| + | * <strong>Biosafety</strong> | ||
| + | There are 3 parts that have similar features characcterized by our team: <html> <a href="https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K4583001"> BBa_K4583001(PYU7)</a> , <a href="https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K4583003"> BBa_K4583003(PYU16)</a>, and <a href="https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K4583004"> BBa_K4583004(PYU92)</a></html> | ||
<span class='h3bb'>Sequence and Features</span> | <span class='h3bb'>Sequence and Features</span> | ||
| Line 16: | Line 20: | ||
Our characterization of this part is divided into two main parts. | Our characterization of this part is divided into two main parts. | ||
* First, this promoter was placed upstream of<em> GFP </em>gene, forming a genetic circuit as shown in Fig. 1. This plasmid was transformed into a bacterium containing another plasmid for characterization. Green and red fluorescence were measured at fixed intervals to compare the expression time and intensity of the two. | * First, this promoter was placed upstream of<em> GFP </em>gene, forming a genetic circuit as shown in Fig. 1. This plasmid was transformed into a bacterium containing another plasmid for characterization. Green and red fluorescence were measured at fixed intervals to compare the expression time and intensity of the two. | ||
| − | * Second, this promoter was placed upstream of the <em> BFP </em> gene, forming a genetic circuit as shown in Fig. 3. This plasmid was then | + | * Second, this promoter was placed upstream of the <em> BFP </em> gene, forming a genetic circuit as shown in Fig. 3. This plasmid was then transformed into bacteria containing two other plasmids. Green, red and blue fluorescence were measured at fixed time intervals to compare the difference in expression time and intensity between this part and the other two parts. |
For plasmid construction methods and other experimental procedures, see the Design page. | For plasmid construction methods and other experimental procedures, see the Design page. | ||
===Protocols=== | ===Protocols=== | ||
| Line 24: | Line 28: | ||
* Plasmid Backbone: PACYC | * Plasmid Backbone: PACYC | ||
* Equipment: Multi-Detection Microplate Reader (Synergy HT, Biotek, U.S.) and Molecular Devices SpectraMax i3x. | * Equipment: Multi-Detection Microplate Reader (Synergy HT, Biotek, U.S.) and Molecular Devices SpectraMax i3x. | ||
| − | We used GFP (excitation at 485 nm and emission at 528 nm)and BFP (excitation at 400 nm and emission at 450 nm) to characterize this part. As our focus was mainly on the expression time, we processed the obtained fluorescence data by means of the following equation: x'=(x-min)/(max- | + | We used GFP (excitation at 485 nm and emission at 528 nm)and BFP (excitation at 400 nm and emission at 450 nm) to characterize this part. As our focus was mainly on the expression time, we processed the obtained fluorescence data by means of the following equation: x'=(x-min)/(max-min). This treatment makes all data fall between 0 and 1, which is easier to use for comparisons between different fluorescence data (since our focus is on expression time). |
===Characterization using GFP in 2-plasmids bacteria=== | ===Characterization using GFP in 2-plasmids bacteria=== | ||
| − | In this section we used the PACYC plasmid with PYU3 upstream of <em>GFP</em> gene(Fig. 1). We transformed it into L19 and L31 with PesaRwt, PesaRc, PesaRp plasmids respectively (6 combinations in total) and characterized them using 24-well plates. The characterization results are shown in Fig. 2 | + | In this section we used the PACYC plasmid with PYU3 upstream of <em>GFP</em> gene(Fig. 1). We transformed it into L19 and L31 with <html><a href="https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K4583009"> BBa_K4583009(PesaRwt)</a>, <a href="https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K4583010"> BBa_K4583010(PesaRc)</a>, <a href="https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K4583011"> BBa_K4583011(PesaRp)</a></html> plasmids respectively (6 combinations in total) and characterized them using 24-well plates. The characterization results are shown in Fig. 2 |
<html> | <html> | ||
| Line 42: | Line 46: | ||
<html> | <html> | ||
<figure> | <figure> | ||
| − | <img src="https://static.igem.wiki/teams/4583/wiki/ | + | <img src="https://static.igem.wiki/teams/4583/wiki/pesar-pyu3.png"width="700" height="390"> |
<figcaption><b>Fig. 2 </b>. Characterization results of PYU3 in the 2-plasmid bacteria</figcaption> | <figcaption><b>Fig. 2 </b>. Characterization results of PYU3 in the 2-plasmid bacteria</figcaption> | ||
</figure> | </figure> | ||
| Line 48: | Line 52: | ||
===Characterization using BFP in 3-plasmids bacteria=== | ===Characterization using BFP in 3-plasmids bacteria=== | ||
| − | In this section, we used the PACYC plasmid with PYU3 upstream of the <em>BFP</em> gene (Fig. 3). Based on the results of the last Characterization, we transformed it into L19 and L31 with PesaRwt, PesaRc, PesaRp | + | In this section, we used the PACYC plasmid with PYU3 upstream of the <em>BFP</em> gene (Fig. 3). Based on the results of the last Characterization, we transformed it into L19 and L31 with <html><a href="https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K4583009"> BBa_K4583009(PesaRwt)</a>, <a href="https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K4583010"> BBa_K4583010(PesaRc)</a>, <a href="https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K4583011"> BBa_K4583011(PesaRp)</a></html> and <html><a href="https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K4583012"> BBa_K4583012(PesaS)</a> plasmid respectively (4 combinations in total) and characterized them using 24-well plates. The characterization results are shown in Fig. 4. |
<html> | <html> | ||
<figure> | <figure> | ||
| Line 56: | Line 60: | ||
</html> | </html> | ||
From the characterization results, we can see that there is a significant delay in the expression of this part from the other promoters. PYU3 is expressed at the stationary phase and peaks at the late stationary phase. | From the characterization results, we can see that there is a significant delay in the expression of this part from the other promoters. PYU3 is expressed at the stationary phase and peaks at the late stationary phase. | ||
| − | + | We found roughly the same results for both characterizations, but with slightly different onset times. This may be related to the instrumentation used.For this characterization, we used a Molecular Devices SpectraMax i3x, which has a much higher precision. In addition, the difference between the 2-plasmids system and the 3-plasmids system may also account for the difference. | |
| − | + | ||
<html> | <html> | ||
<figure> | <figure> | ||
| Line 67: | Line 70: | ||
==Reference== | ==Reference== | ||
[1] Talukder, A A et al. “RpoS-dependent regulation of genes expressed at late stationary phase in Escherichia coli.” FEBS letters vol. 386,2-3 (1996): 177-80. doi:10.1016/0014-5793(96)00426-7 | [1] Talukder, A A et al. “RpoS-dependent regulation of genes expressed at late stationary phase in Escherichia coli.” FEBS letters vol. 386,2-3 (1996): 177-80. doi:10.1016/0014-5793(96)00426-7 | ||
| + | |||
| + | [2] Gu F, Jiang W, Mu Y, et al. Quorum Sensing-Based Dual-Function Switch and Its Application in Solving Two Key Metabolic Engineering Problems. ACS Synth Biol. 2020;9(2):209-217. doi:10.1021/acssynbio.9b00290 | ||
| + | |||
| + | [3] Shong J, Collins CH. Engineering the esaR promoter for tunable quorum sensing- dependent gene expression. ACS Synth Biol. 2013;2(10):568-575. doi:10.1021/sb4000433 | ||
Latest revision as of 11:30, 12 October 2023
PYU3
PYU3 is the promoter of the gene orf-0464, and it comes from Escherichia coli. It will reach its maximum expression at the late stationary phase.
Usage and Biology
When the bacteria enter the stationary phase, the physiological state of the bacteria changes significantly. During this phase, many genes will respond to make timely adjustments. This part BBa_K4583000(PYU3) is the promoter of the gene orf-0464. Its most notable feature is that it will be expressed in the late stationary phase. Moreover, it is a self-inducible promoter, which means that no additional inducers need to be added for expression. Exogenous inducers are expensive and need to be added artificially, whereas self-induced promoters are cost-effective and relatively stable. This part is also very safe because it comes from E. coli MG1655, a commonly engineered bacterium.
- Late stationary phase promoter
- Self-inducible promoter without additional inducers
- Biosafety
There are 3 parts that have similar features characcterized by our team: BBa_K4583001(PYU7) , BBa_K4583003(PYU16), and BBa_K4583004(PYU92)
Sequence and Features
- 10COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[10]
- 12COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[12]
- 21COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[21]
- 23COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[23]
- 25COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[25]
- 1000COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[1000]
Characterization
Our characterization of this part is divided into two main parts.
- First, this promoter was placed upstream of GFP gene, forming a genetic circuit as shown in Fig. 1. This plasmid was transformed into a bacterium containing another plasmid for characterization. Green and red fluorescence were measured at fixed intervals to compare the expression time and intensity of the two.
- Second, this promoter was placed upstream of the BFP gene, forming a genetic circuit as shown in Fig. 3. This plasmid was then transformed into bacteria containing two other plasmids. Green, red and blue fluorescence were measured at fixed time intervals to compare the difference in expression time and intensity between this part and the other two parts.
For plasmid construction methods and other experimental procedures, see the Design page.
Protocols
Our experimental conditions for characterizing this part were as follows:
- E. coli MG1655
- 30oC, 48h, under vigorous shaking
- Plasmid Backbone: PACYC
- Equipment: Multi-Detection Microplate Reader (Synergy HT, Biotek, U.S.) and Molecular Devices SpectraMax i3x.
We used GFP (excitation at 485 nm and emission at 528 nm)and BFP (excitation at 400 nm and emission at 450 nm) to characterize this part. As our focus was mainly on the expression time, we processed the obtained fluorescence data by means of the following equation: x'=(x-min)/(max-min). This treatment makes all data fall between 0 and 1, which is easier to use for comparisons between different fluorescence data (since our focus is on expression time).
Characterization using GFP in 2-plasmids bacteria
In this section we used the PACYC plasmid with PYU3 upstream of GFP gene(Fig. 1). We transformed it into L19 and L31 with BBa_K4583009(PesaRwt), BBa_K4583010(PesaRc), BBa_K4583011(PesaRp) plasmids respectively (6 combinations in total) and characterized them using 24-well plates. The characterization results are shown in Fig. 2
As can be seen from the characterization results, with the exception of three combinations (L19-PesaRp-PYU3, L31-PesaRc-PYU3, and L31-PesaRp-PYU3) the expression time of this element is significantly different from that of the other element in terms of time and intensity.
In the case of the combination L19-PesaRwt-PYU3, for example, the expression of the other part peaked at about 12 h, whereas the expression of this part peaked at about 38 h. The expression of the other part peaked at about 12 h, whereas the expression of this part peaked at about 38 h.
Characterization using BFP in 3-plasmids bacteria
In this section, we used the PACYC plasmid with PYU3 upstream of the BFP gene (Fig. 3). Based on the results of the last Characterization, we transformed it into L19 and L31 with BBa_K4583009(PesaRwt), BBa_K4583010(PesaRc), BBa_K4583011(PesaRp) and BBa_K4583012(PesaS) plasmid respectively (4 combinations in total) and characterized them using 24-well plates. The characterization results are shown in Fig. 4.
Reference
[1] Talukder, A A et al. “RpoS-dependent regulation of genes expressed at late stationary phase in Escherichia coli.” FEBS letters vol. 386,2-3 (1996): 177-80. doi:10.1016/0014-5793(96)00426-7
[2] Gu F, Jiang W, Mu Y, et al. Quorum Sensing-Based Dual-Function Switch and Its Application in Solving Two Key Metabolic Engineering Problems. ACS Synth Biol. 2020;9(2):209-217. doi:10.1021/acssynbio.9b00290
[3] Shong J, Collins CH. Engineering the esaR promoter for tunable quorum sensing- dependent gene expression. ACS Synth Biol. 2013;2(10):568-575. doi:10.1021/sb4000433