Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K4907139"
(→Usage and design) |
|||
(5 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
To validate the interaction between <i>ccdA</i> and <i>ccdB</i>, we constructed a composite part: BBa_K4907139. | To validate the interaction between <i>ccdA</i> and <i>ccdB</i>, we constructed a composite part: BBa_K4907139. | ||
− | <center><html><img src="https://static.igem.wiki/teams/4907/wiki/parts/yxy/parts/parts/k206001-b0034-ccdb.png" width="400px"></html></center> | + | <center><html><img src="https://static.igem.wiki/teams/4907/wiki/parts/yxy/parts/parts/k206001-b0034-ccdb-1.png" width="400px"></html></center> |
<center><b>Fig. 1 Gene Circuit of BBa_K4907139</b></center> | <center><b>Fig. 1 Gene Circuit of BBa_K4907139</b></center> | ||
+ | |||
===Characterization=== | ===Characterization=== | ||
====Colony PCR==== | ====Colony PCR==== | ||
Line 20: | Line 21: | ||
====Verification of double plasmid transformation==== | ====Verification of double plasmid transformation==== | ||
To validate the resistance of <i>ccdA</i> to <i>ccdB</i>, we performed a dual-plasmid transformation. | To validate the resistance of <i>ccdA</i> to <i>ccdB</i>, we performed a dual-plasmid transformation. | ||
− | + | <div class="myPage-paragraph-table-div" style="text-align: center"> | |
+ | <table class="myPage-paragraph-table" border = "1"> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <th style="width:20%;text-align: center;">Experiment</th> | ||
+ | <th style="width:25%;text-align: center;">Dual-plasmid system</th> | ||
+ | <th style="width:50%text-align: center;">Strain</th> | ||
+ | <th style="width:30%;text-align: center;">Result</th> | ||
+ | <th style="width:10%;text-align: center;">Colonies</th> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <td rowspan="2">Verfication of <i>ccdA</i> in plasmid</td> | ||
+ | <td><partinfo>BBa_K4907139</partinfo>_pSB4K5<br><partinfo>BBa_K4907138</partinfo>_pSB1C3</td> | ||
+ | <td rowspan="2">in DH10β</td> | ||
+ | <td> | ||
+ | <div class="td-img-container" style="width:100%;text-align: center;"> | ||
+ | <center><html><img src="https://static.igem.wiki/teams/4907/wiki/parts/yxy/139-ban1.jpg" width="100px"></html></center> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | </td> | ||
+ | <td>✔</td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <td><partinfo>BBa_K4907139</partinfo>_pSB4K5<br><partinfo>BBa_I13453</partinfo>_pSB1C3</td> | ||
+ | <td> | ||
+ | <div class="td-img-container" style="width:100%;text-align: center;"> | ||
+ | <center><html><img src="https://static.igem.wiki/teams/4907/wiki/parts/yxy/139-ban2.png" width="100px"></html></center> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | </td> | ||
+ | <td>✖️</td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <td rowspan="2">Verfication of <i>ccdA</i> in genome (<i>ccdB</i> is controlled by pBAD) | ||
+ | </td> | ||
+ | <td rowspan="2"><partinfo>BBa_K4907139</partinfo>_pSB4K5<br><partinfo>BBa_K4907138</partinfo>_pSB1C3</td> | ||
+ | <td>in DB3.1</td> | ||
+ | <td> | ||
+ | <div class="td-img-container" style="width:100%;text-align: center;"> | ||
+ | <center><html><img src="https://static.igem.wiki/teams/4907/wiki/parts/yxy/139-ban3.jpg" width="100px"></html></center> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | </td> | ||
+ | <td>✔</td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <td>in DH10β</td> | ||
+ | <td> | ||
+ | <div class="td-img-container" style="width:100%;text-align: center;"> | ||
+ | <center><html><img src="https://static.igem.wiki/teams/4907/wiki/parts/yxy/139-ban4.png" width="100px"></html></center> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | </td> | ||
+ | <td>✖️</td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | </table> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
<center><b>Table. 1 Performance of different dual-plasmid systems in <i>E. coli</i> DH10β and DB3.1</b></center> | <center><b>Table. 1 Performance of different dual-plasmid systems in <i>E. coli</i> DH10β and DB3.1</b></center> | ||
− | The results showed that <i>E. coli</i> DB3.1 transformed with toxin genes and <i>E. coli</i> DH10β transformed with pBAD(<partinfo>BBa_K206001</partinfo>) promoter grew well. <i>E. coli</i> DH10β transformed with both toxins and antitoxins also exhibited good growth. However, <i>E. coli</i> DH10β with toxins did not grow. This confirmed the killing effect of the toxin <i>ccdB</i> again and the neutralization of antitoxin <i>ccdA</i>. | + | The results showed that <i>E. coli</i> DB3.1 transformed with toxin genes and <i>E. coli</i> DH10β transformed with pBAD (<partinfo>BBa_K206001</partinfo>) promoter grew well. <i>E. coli</i> DH10β transformed with both toxins and antitoxins also exhibited good growth. However, <i>E. coli</i> DH10β with toxins did not grow. This confirmed the killing effect of the toxin <i>ccdB</i> again and the neutralization of antitoxin <i>ccdA</i>. |
Besides, the <i>E. coli</i> DB3.1 transformed with toxin controlled by pBAD promoter without antitoxin both grew better compared with <i>E. coli</i> DH10β From these results, we can draw the conclusion that whether the CcdA is in plasmid or genome can play the role of neutralization to CcdB. | Besides, the <i>E. coli</i> DB3.1 transformed with toxin controlled by pBAD promoter without antitoxin both grew better compared with <i>E. coli</i> DH10β From these results, we can draw the conclusion that whether the CcdA is in plasmid or genome can play the role of neutralization to CcdB. | ||
Latest revision as of 08:47, 12 October 2023
K206001-B0034-ccdB
Biology
ccdB encodes a toxic protein (CcdB) that, as a DNA gyrase poison, locks DNA gyrase together with broken double-stranded DNA, ultimately leading to cell death. BBa_K206001 is a variant pBAD promoter with a modified AraI1 site that has been shown to be less responsive at low concentrations of arabinose.
Usage and design
To validate the interaction between ccdA and ccdB, we constructed a composite part: BBa_K4907139.
Characterization
Colony PCR
In the construction of this circuit, colony PCR and gene sequencing were used to verify the correctness of the transformants. At around 505bp, a target band of approximately 500bp was observed (Fig. 2).
Verification of double plasmid transformation
To validate the resistance of ccdA to ccdB, we performed a dual-plasmid transformation.
Experiment | Dual-plasmid system | Strain | Result | Colonies |
---|---|---|---|---|
Verfication of ccdA in plasmid | BBa_K4907139_pSB4K5 BBa_K4907138_pSB1C3 |
in DH10β |
|
✔ |
BBa_K4907139_pSB4K5 BBa_I13453_pSB1C3 |
|
✖️ | ||
Verfication of ccdA in genome (ccdB is controlled by pBAD) | BBa_K4907139_pSB4K5 BBa_K4907138_pSB1C3 |
in DB3.1 |
|
✔ |
in DH10β |
|
✖️ |
The results showed that E. coli DB3.1 transformed with toxin genes and E. coli DH10β transformed with pBAD (BBa_K206001) promoter grew well. E. coli DH10β transformed with both toxins and antitoxins also exhibited good growth. However, E. coli DH10β with toxins did not grow. This confirmed the killing effect of the toxin ccdB again and the neutralization of antitoxin ccdA. Besides, the E. coli DB3.1 transformed with toxin controlled by pBAD promoter without antitoxin both grew better compared with E. coli DH10β From these results, we can draw the conclusion that whether the CcdA is in plasmid or genome can play the role of neutralization to CcdB.
Sequence and Features
- 10COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[10]
- 12INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[12]Illegal NheI site found at 125
- 21INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[21]Illegal BamHI site found at 65
- 23COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[23]
- 25COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[25]
- 1000INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[1000]Illegal BsaI site found at 372