Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K264001:Design"

 
(References)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
 
__NOTOC__
 
__NOTOC__
 
<partinfo>BBa_K264001 short</partinfo>
 
<partinfo>BBa_K264001 short</partinfo>
Line 16: Line 15:
  
 
===References===
 
===References===
 +
Estrem ST, Gaal T, Ross W, Gourse RL, Identification of an UP element consensus sequence for bacterial promoters, PNAS, (1998), 95, 9761-9766.

Latest revision as of 01:55, 20 October 2009

Modular UP-element Design 2


Assembly Compatibility:
  • 10
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[10]
  • 12
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[12]
  • 21
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[21]
  • 23
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[23]
  • 25
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[25]
  • 1000
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[1000]


Design Notes

The observed UP elements were A-T rich. Therefore, the rational sequence modifications of Design 1 were made to preserve this feature. Nucleotides in Design 1 at positions -59, -58, -54, and -45 were changed from G to T, G to A, A to T, and C to G, respectively. A spacer, CT, is placed between the UP element and subsequent promoters to maintain proper alignment with RNAP.


Source

Rational redesign of BBa_K264000

References

Estrem ST, Gaal T, Ross W, Gourse RL, Identification of an UP element consensus sequence for bacterial promoters, PNAS, (1998), 95, 9761-9766.