Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K4447001"
(→Restriction Enzyme Digestion and Ligation) |
|||
(17 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
In our project, erythromycin C-12 hydroxylase <b>(EC 1.14.13.154)</b> is used as a detector for the presence of erythromycin by catalyzing the oxidation of two stereoisomers of erythromycin, erythromycin B and D to erythromycin C. As shown in <b>Figure 1</b>, this reaction requires NADPH as a reagent and, therefore, gives NADP+ as a reaction product. Consequently, it is possible to evaluate the presence of erythromycin through a coupled reaction employing a NADP+/NADPH colorimetric assay. | In our project, erythromycin C-12 hydroxylase <b>(EC 1.14.13.154)</b> is used as a detector for the presence of erythromycin by catalyzing the oxidation of two stereoisomers of erythromycin, erythromycin B and D to erythromycin C. As shown in <b>Figure 1</b>, this reaction requires NADPH as a reagent and, therefore, gives NADP+ as a reaction product. Consequently, it is possible to evaluate the presence of erythromycin through a coupled reaction employing a NADP+/NADPH colorimetric assay. | ||
− | [[Image:EryK_reaction_TecMonterreyGDL.jpeg| | + | [[Image:EryK_reaction_TecMonterreyGDL.jpeg|610px|center|thumb|<b>Figure 1</b>. <i>Chemical reaction of EryK.</i>]] |
Erythromycin C-12 hydroxylase, as pictured below in <b>Figure 2</b>, is a monomer with 397 amino acids in length and 43.8 kDa in weight. According to Savino <i>et al.</i> (2009), it binds one heme b(iron(II)-protoporphyrin IX) group per subunit as a cofactor. Lambalot <i>et al.</i> (1995) reported a Michaelis constant of 8 μM for erythromycin D, concluding that it shows a 1200-1900-fold preference for erythromycin D over the alternative substrate erythromycin B. This enzyme participates in various molecular and biological processes, ranging from macrolide biosynthetic processes to oxidoreductase reactions. | Erythromycin C-12 hydroxylase, as pictured below in <b>Figure 2</b>, is a monomer with 397 amino acids in length and 43.8 kDa in weight. According to Savino <i>et al.</i> (2009), it binds one heme b(iron(II)-protoporphyrin IX) group per subunit as a cofactor. Lambalot <i>et al.</i> (1995) reported a Michaelis constant of 8 μM for erythromycin D, concluding that it shows a 1200-1900-fold preference for erythromycin D over the alternative substrate erythromycin B. This enzyme participates in various molecular and biological processes, ranging from macrolide biosynthetic processes to oxidoreductase reactions. | ||
Line 84: | Line 84: | ||
|} | |} | ||
− | + | With the DNA fragments purified from an agarose gel, we performed ligation at a molar ratio of 1:5 for vector and insert, as shown in <b>Figure 5</b>. The total vector concentration was 100 nanograms, whereas the reaction volume was 20 µL. Next, <b>Table 2</b> displays the protocol followed for the reaction. | |
+ | |||
+ | [[Image:EryK_Colonies_TecMonterreyGDL.jpeg|200px|left|thumb|<b>Figure 5</b>. <i>Escherichia coli</i> TOP10 colonies transformed with BBa_K4447004 cloned in pBAD/Myc-HisB. Bacteria were grown in LB medium with carbenicillin.]] | ||
+ | |||
+ | {| class="wikitable" style="margin:auto; text-align:center; length: 80%" | ||
+ | |+ Table 2. DNA ligation conditions. | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | !Reactive !! Quantity | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | style="text-align:center;" style="width: 80%;" | T4 DNA Ligase Buffer (10X) || 2 µL | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | style="text-align:center;" style="width: 80%;" | Vector DNA || 100 ng | ||
+ | |-- | ||
+ | | style="text-align:center;" style="width: 80%;" | Insert DNA || 773.5 ng | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | style="text-align:center;" style="width: 80%;" | Nuclease-free water || up to 20 µL | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | style="text-align:center;" style="width: 80%;" | T4 DNA Ligase || 1.5 µL | ||
+ | |} | ||
=References= | =References= |
Latest revision as of 21:19, 10 October 2023
EryK coding sequence
Erythromycin C-12 hydroxylase coding sequence from Saccharopolyspora erythraea. The enzyme is responsible for the stereospecific hydroxylation of the macrolactone ring present in erythromycin D and erythromycin B.
Sequence and Features
- 10COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[10]
- 12COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[12]
- 21INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[21]Illegal XhoI site found at 1197
- 23COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[23]
- 25COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[25]
- 1000COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[1000]
Contents
Usage and Biology
In the last few years, much attention has been drawn to emerging contaminants due to their severe effects on human health and the lack of information about them. Among them, erythromycin has risen as a potential threat in developing antimicrobial resistance. Being capable of detecting this component and its variations in water bodies can lead to the creation of measurement methods capable of degrading them.
In our project, erythromycin C-12 hydroxylase (EC 1.14.13.154) is used as a detector for the presence of erythromycin by catalyzing the oxidation of two stereoisomers of erythromycin, erythromycin B and D to erythromycin C. As shown in Figure 1, this reaction requires NADPH as a reagent and, therefore, gives NADP+ as a reaction product. Consequently, it is possible to evaluate the presence of erythromycin through a coupled reaction employing a NADP+/NADPH colorimetric assay.
Erythromycin C-12 hydroxylase, as pictured below in Figure 2, is a monomer with 397 amino acids in length and 43.8 kDa in weight. According to Savino et al. (2009), it binds one heme b(iron(II)-protoporphyrin IX) group per subunit as a cofactor. Lambalot et al. (1995) reported a Michaelis constant of 8 μM for erythromycin D, concluding that it shows a 1200-1900-fold preference for erythromycin D over the alternative substrate erythromycin B. This enzyme participates in various molecular and biological processes, ranging from macrolide biosynthetic processes to oxidoreductase reactions.
Characterization
PCR amplification from BBa_K4447004
Originally, BBa_K4447001 was located in our FRET expression system (BBa_K4447004). For instance, it had to be amplified through end-point PCR. Primers for amplification are shown below:
- Forward primer: 5' - CGTACCATGGCCGACGAAACCGC - 3'
- Reverse primer: 5' - TAGCGAATTCCTAATGATGATGATGATGATGCGCCGACTGCCTCGGCG - 3'
Forward primer contains a restriction site for the NcoI restriction enzyme, while reverse primer contains a gly-gly-ser spacer, a polyhistidine tag, a stop codon, and a restriction site for the EcoRI restriction enzyme. PCR conditions are shown in Table 1.
Reactive | Quantity |
---|---|
Nuclease-free water | 26 µL |
5X Phusion GC Buffer | 10 µL |
10 mM dNTPs | 1 µL |
0.5 µM forward primer | 5 µL |
0.5 µM reverse primer | 5 µL |
Template DNA (50 ng/µL) | 1 µL |
DMSO | 1.5 µL |
Phusion High-Fidelity DNA polymerase | 0.5 µL |
Finally, results from the PCR are shown in Figure 3. After successfully purifying the fragment from an agarose gel, the concentration obtained was 96.5 ng/µL in 40 µL dilution. With the fragment already purified, we proceeded to perform a restriction digest with the fragment and pBAD/Myc-HisB.
Restriction Enzyme Digestion and Ligation
We performed a restriction enzyme digestion with EryK already purified and the vector defined. Our digestion involved using NcoI and EcoRI restriction enzymes. For both vector and insert, DNA concentration was stated as 4000 nanograms. Table 2 displays the protocol followed for a 50 µL reaction.
Reactive | Quantity |
---|---|
Nuclease-free water | add to 50 µL |
rCutSmart Buffer | 5 µL |
Template DNA (up to 4000 ng) | X µL |
NcoI restriction enzyme | 1 µL |
EcoRI restriction enzyme | 1 µL |
With the DNA fragments purified from an agarose gel, we performed ligation at a molar ratio of 1:5 for vector and insert, as shown in Figure 5. The total vector concentration was 100 nanograms, whereas the reaction volume was 20 µL. Next, Table 2 displays the protocol followed for the reaction.
Reactive | Quantity |
---|---|
T4 DNA Ligase Buffer (10X) | 2 µL |
Vector DNA | 100 ng |
Insert DNA | 773.5 ng |
Nuclease-free water | up to 20 µL |
T4 DNA Ligase | 1.5 µL |
References
[1]. Lambalot, R. H., Cane, D. E., Aparicio, J. J., & Katz, L. (1995). Overproduction and characterization of the erythromycin C-12 hydroxylase, EryK. Biochemistry, 34(6), 1858–1866. https://doi.org/10.1021/bi00006a006
[2]. Mirdita, M., Schütze, K., Moriwaki, Y. et al.(2022). ColabFold: making protein folding accessible to all. Nat Methods 19, 679–682. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-022-01488-1
[3]. Savino, C., Montemiglio, L. C., Sciara, G., Miele, A. E., Kendrew, S. G., Jemth, P., Gianni, S., & Vallone, B. (2009). Investigating the structural plasticity of a cytochrome P450: three-dimensional structures of P450 EryK and binding to its physiological substrate. The Journal of biological chemistry, 284(42), 29170–29179. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M109.003590
[4]. Stassi, D., Donadio, S., Staver, M. J., & Katz, L. (1993). Identification of a Saccharopolyspora erythraea gene required for the final hydroxylation step in erythromycin biosynthesis. Journal of bacteriology, 175(1), 182–189. https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.175.1.182-189.1993