Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K4165038"
(→Dry Lab) |
(→Dry Lab) |
||
Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
<p style=" font-weight: bold; font-size:14px;"> switch 18 vs HtrA1: </p> | <p style=" font-weight: bold; font-size:14px;"> switch 18 vs HtrA1: </p> | ||
− | + | The binding affinity of switch 18 to HtrA1 is calculated as ΔG = -19.516 kcal/mol. | |
<html> | <html> |
Revision as of 14:46, 12 October 2022
HtrA1 Switch number 18
This composite part consists of T7 promoter (BBa_K3633015), lac operator (BBa_K4165062), pGS-21a RBS (BBa_K4165016), 6x His-tag (BBa_K4165020), WAP inhibitor (BBa_K4165008), GSGSGS linker (BBa_J18921), seed peptide (BBa_K4165012), GGSGGGGG linker (BBa_K4165019), seed peptide (BBa_K4165012), GSGSGS linker (BBa_J18921), H1A (BBa_K4165000) and T7 terminator (BBa_K731721).
Usage and Biology
Switch 18 is used to mediate the activity of HTRA1. It is composed of 3 parts connected by different linkers; an HtrA1 PDZ peptide, a clamp of two targeting peptides for tau or amyloid beta, and a catalytic domain inhibitor. Activating HTRA1 requires a conformational change in the linker, eliminating the attached inhibitor from the active site. The conformational rearrangement can be mediated through the binding of affinity clamp to tau or beta-amyloid. This binding will result in a tension that detaches the inhibitor from the active site.
Sequence and Features
- 10COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[10]
- 12COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[12]
- 21COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[21]
- 23COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[23]
- 25INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[25]Illegal NgoMIV site found at 379
Illegal AgeI site found at 115 - 1000COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[1000]
Dry Lab
Modeling
The switch was modeled by (Alphafold - Rosettafold - tRrosetta) and the top model was obtained from tRrosseta with a score of 4 out of 6 according to our quality assessment code.
Figure 1. The 3D structure of switch 18 modeled by TRrosetta. Red: Tau binding peptides, blue: H1A peptide, cyan: inhibitor, and green: linkers
Docking
switch 18 vs HtrA1:
The binding affinity of switch 18 to HtrA1 is calculated as ΔG = -19.516 kcal/mol.
Figure 2. The 3D structure of switch 18 docked to HtrA1 Visualized by Pymol.
Mathematical modeling
Transcription rate and translation rate under T7 promoter
the mathematical modeling was based on our code for the calculation of transcription and translation (you can find it in the code section) beside with the estimated results from the wet lab.
Figure 3. this figure shows the results from the transcription and translation code showing the variation of mRNA and protein concentrations with time.